The Detector for the Kaon Rare Decays Experiment NA62 at CERN
Transcript
The Detector for the Kaon Rare Decays Experiment NA62 at CERN
The Detector for the Kaon Rare Decays Experiment NA62 at CERN Massimo Lenti INFN Sezione di Firenze Outline of the presentation • • • • • • Physics motivations for K+→π+νν The beam The main background channels The apparatus The signal acceptance and S/B Time schedule and Conclusions IPRD10, 10.5.2010 M. Lenti 2 Physics motivations • Theoretically very clean • Sensitive to Vtd • Very sensitive to New Physics Present (E787/949): BR(K+→π+νν) = 1.73 with 7 events Predicted: " +1.15 -1.05 ×10-10 Need a 10% measurement (100 events): NA62 IPRD10, 10.5.2010 M. Lenti 3 How many + K decays? • BR(K+→π+νν) ~ 8×10-11 • Look for ~100 signal events • Signal acceptance ~ 10% ] ~1013 K+ decays NA48/NA62 Use the existing CERN accelerators Use the existing NA48 experimental hall IPRD10, 10.5.2010 M. Lenti 4 The Beam Primary Beam: • 400 GeV/c protons • 3×1012 protons/pulse (3×NA48/2) • 4.8/16.8 s duty cycle Secondary Beam: • 75 GeV/c momentum (Δp/ p~1%) • Beam acc.: 12.7 µstr (32×NA48/2) • Total rate: 750 MHz • K+ ~ 6% • 4.5×1012 K+decays/y (45×NA48/2) IPRD10, 10.5.2010 M. Lenti 5 The Beam purity Only 6% K+ but: • protons and positrons don’t decay... • pions and muons decays cannot mimic K+ decays • but beam-gas interactions !! Keep vacuum at 10-6 mbar: use existing NA48 decay tank (already directly measured) Tag the K+ in the beam: use a CEDAR IPRD10, 10.5.2010 M. Lenti 6 The CEDAR The CEDAR is a Cherenkov counter Used at CERN since long time Vary gas pressure and diaphragm aperture to select K+ November 2006: test beam with a CEDAR 100 GeV/c beam Filled with Nitrogen Adapt to NA62 needs: Fill with 4 bar Hydrogen (<7⋅10-3 X0) Change PMT and FE IPRD10, 10.5.2010 M. Lenti 7 Background: K+ decays Decay BR µ+ν (Κµ2) 63.5% π+π0 (Κπ2) 20.7% π+π+π- 5.6% π0e+ν (Κe3) 5.1% π0µ+ν (Κµ3) 3.3% π+π0π0 1.8% µ+νγ (Κµ2γ) π+π0γ 2.7×10-4 π+π-e+ν (Ke4) 4.1×10-5 π0π0e+ν (Ke400) 2.2×10-5 e+ν 1.5×10-5 (Ke2) π+π-µ+ν (Kµ4) IPRD10, 10.5.2010 0.62% 1.4×10-5 M. Lenti 8 Kinematics K+ ν θKπ ν m2miss=(PK-Pπ)2 92% K+ decays 8% K+ decays PK : beam spectrometer Pπ : straw chambers spectrometer IPRD10, 10.5.2010 M. Lenti 9 Beam Spectrometer (I) • 3 Silicon Pixels stations across the 2nd Achromat: 60(X) × 27(Y) mm per station (18000 pixel/station) • Beam rate: 750 MHz (“Gigatracker”), 50 MHz/cm2 IPRD10, 10.5.2010 M. Lenti 10 Beam Spectrometer (II) • 300×300 µm pixels p-in-n (18000 pixel per station) • 200 µm Si sensor + 100 µm chip • 0.13 µm CMOS technology Si sensor Pixel matrix IPRD10, 10.5.2010 R-O chip σ(PK)/PK ~ 0.2% σ(θK) ~ 15 µrad <0.5% X0 /station σ(t) ~ 200 ps/station Sensor prototype M. Lenti 11 Beam Spectrometer (III) Readout See M. Noy’s talk VESSEL’S SIDE CLAMPED DETECTOR’S EDGE CLAMPED The cooling System IPRD10, 10.5.2010 DETECTOR’S EDGE SLIDING M. Lenti VESSEL’S SIDE SLIDING 12 Straw Chambers • 4 chambers with 4 layers/view • Ø 9.6 mm straw tubes in vacuum • 2.1 m long straws • 0.1% X0 per view (4 views) • 130 µm hit resolution per view • NA48 magnet (256 MeV/c pt kick) • holes follow beam path IPRD10, 10.5.2010 M. Lenti 13 Straws Prototype In vacuum 2007 prototype IPRD10, 10.5.2010 M. Lenti 14 Kinematics Reco. Missing mass measurement: dominated by angle between Kaon and pion IPRD10, 10.5.2010 M. Lenti 15 Background 1: K+→µ+ν Kµ2 :largest BR: 63.4% Need ~10-12 rejection factor • Kinematics: 0.5×10-5 • Muon Veto: 10-5 • Particle ID: 10-2 MUV RICH IPRD10, 10.5.2010 M. Lenti 16 Muon Veto: MUV • Re-use of Front Module of NA48 Hadron Calorimeter Build a new module Build a Fast Plane for trigger 10-5 µ detection inefficiency New module: sandwich of iron plates and scintillator strips IPRD10, 10.5.2010 M. Lenti 17 The NA62 RICH 3σ π-µ separation (15-35 GeV/c) • Neon at 1 atm (π thresh.:12 GeV/c) • 2000 PMT • 18 mm pixel • 100 ps Mirrors 17 m Beam Pipe PMT: Hamamatsu R7400 U03 IPRD10, 10.5.2010 M. Lenti 18 RICH prototype: 2009 test beam 15 GeV/c π e µ p×mπ/mµ Ring Radius (mm) 35 GeV/c π e p×mπ/mµ Muon suppression (15.35 GeV/c): 0.7% (see E.Marinova’s talk) IPRD10, 10.5.2010 Ring Radius (mm) M. Lenti 19 Background 2: K+→π+π0 (Kπ2) 2nd Largest BR: 20.9% Need ~10-12 rejection factor • Kinematics: 5×10-5 • Photon Veto: 10-5 per photon (10-8 per π0) " Large angle: 12 ANTIs (8.5 < acceptance < 50 mrad) " Medium angle: NA48 LKr (1 < acceptance < 8.5 mrad) " Small angle: IRC, SAC (acceptance < 1 mrad) IPRD10, 10.5.2010 M. Lenti 20 Large Angle Veto • 12 ring em calorimeters in vacuum • 5 staggered planes per ring • inefficiencies: <10-4 Eγ<1 GeV <10-5 Eγ>1 GeV OPAL Lead Blocks reused IPRD10, 10.5.2010 M. Lenti 21 Large Angle Veto: 1° ring First ring built in Frascati and installed at CERN. Test beam in mid-october 2009 2° ring under test beam august 2010 IPRD10, 10.5.2010 M. Lenti See Poster by P. Valente 22 Small Angle Veto • shaslyk calorimeter on the beam axis • 10-5 ineff. High energy γ Tested in October 2006 In the NA48 tagged photon beam (see later) IPRD10, 10.5.2010 M. Lenti 23 Liquid Kripton Calorimeter Use the existing NA48 LKr calorimeter • 10-5 ineff. Eγ>5 GeV • 10-4 ineff. 1<Eγ<5 GeV Ineff. for Eγ>10 GeV tested on data collected by NA48/2 (K+→π+π0) IPRD10, 10.5.2010 M. Lenti 24 Liquid Kripton Calorimeter (II) vacuum Electron beam (25 GeV/c) Bremsstrahlung Magnet Calorimeter eγ Drift chambers Energy deposition in LKr • 2×108 electrons collected • 10-5 ineff.sensitivity below 10 GeV IPRD10, 10.5.2010 October 2006 test: Tagged photon beam Using the existing NA48 setup M. Lenti Energy GeV Kevlar window 25 X LKr cm Multibody Background Ex. K+→π+π-e+ν Stagger Straws to be hermetic for πup to 60 GeV/c IPRD10, 10.5.2010 M. Lenti 26 CHANTI • Need to veto inelastic scattering in Gigatracker and last collimator • Veto stray muons upstream • Need a CHarged ANTIcounter 1600 mm 33x17x150(max)mm Six stations (x-y views) Extruded scintillator WLS fiber GTK3 See G.Saracino’s talk on MU-RAY IPRD10, 10.5.2010 M. Lenti 27 The NA62 Layout 10 MHz 45 MHz IPRD10, 10.5.2010 750 MHz M. Lenti 28 NA62 Event Display IPRD10, 10.5.2010 M. Lenti 29 Trigger Levels • 10 MHz L0 trigger input • 1track × µ! × γ! → 1 MHz L1 trigger input → PC farm • Software trigger reduction ~ 40 IPRD10, 10.5.2010 M. Lenti 30 Signal Acceptance Region I: 0<mmiss2<0.01 GeV2/c4 Region II: 0.026<mmiss2<0.068 GeV2/c4 Remind: Kµ2 mmiss2 < 0 Kπ2 mmiss2 = 0.0182 GeV2/c4 15 <pπ< 35 GeV/c Fiducial decay region: 60 m Acceptance: 3.5% (Region I), 10.9% (Region II): 14.4% (I+II) IPRD10, 10.5.2010 M. Lenti 31 Signal/Background IPRD10, 10.5.2010 M. Lenti 32 Conclusions • 2006-2009: R&D, test beam • 2010-2011: Construction • july 2012: technical run • november 2012: first physics run • NA62 approved by CERN Research Board: 5.12.2008 • NA62 approved by INFN: 24.7.2009 • Clear Physics case • many other physics channels The NA62 Collaboration: ITP Bern, Birmingham, Bristol, CERN, Dubna, INFN (Ferrara, Firenze, Frascati, Napoli, Perugia, Pisa, Rome I, Rome II, Torino), Fairfax, Glasgow, IHEP, INR, Liverpool, Louvain, Mainz, Merced, San Louis Potosi, SLAC, Sofia, TRIUMF IPRD10, 10.5.2010 M. Lenti 33