università degli studi di siena quaderni del dipartimento di economia
Transcript
università degli studi di siena quaderni del dipartimento di economia
UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI SIENA QUADERNI DEL DIPARTIMENTO DI ECONOMIA POLITICA Francesco Sarracino Social Capital and Subjective Well-Being trends: Evidence from 11 European countries n. 558 – Marzo 2009 Abstract - Discovering whether social capital endowments in modern societies have been subjected or not to a process of gradual erosion is one of the most debated topics in recent economic literature. This new stream of research has been inaugurated by Putnam’s pioneering studies about social capital trends in the United States. Recently, a considerable work by Stevenson andWolfers (2008) put a new emphasis on this topic contending Easterlin’s assessment. Present work is aimed at analyzing the relationship between changes in social capital and subjective well-being in Europe considering 11 different countries. In particular, we would like to answer questions such as: 1) is social capital in Europe declining? Is such erosion a general trend of modern societies or is it a characteristic feature of only some of them? 2) social capital trend can help to explain subjective well-being trend? In so doing, our research considers three different set of proxies of social capital controlling for time and socio-demographic aspects in eleven different European countries using WVS data between 1980 and 2000.Our results are encouraging, showing evidence of a probable relationship between social capital and happiness. Furthermore, our results show that during last twenty years European citizens have persistently lost confidence in the judicial system, in the church, in armed forces and the police. Finally, considering single countries, we discover that United Kingdom is the only European country with a clear and negative pattern for social capital: quite every proxy of social capital in UK declined over the considered period Jel Classification: D6 I31 O1 The author is really grateful to Stefano Bartolini and Ennio Bilancini for their precious comments and advices on every step of present work. The usual disclaimers apply Francesco Sarracino, Università di Firenze, e-mail: [email protected] 1 Introduction Discovering whether social capital (SC) endowments in modern societies have been subjected or not to a process of gradual erosion is one of the most debated topics in recent economic literature. This new stream of research has been inaugurated by Putnam’s pioneering studies about SC trends in the United States. Considering numerous proxies of SC, Putnam (2000) argues that during last thirty years USA experienced a decline in social relationships and in its system of shared values and beliefs. From this point, much of the literature on SC tries to find evidence to support or to contend this statement. For a comprehensive review of such literature see Stall and Hooghe (2004). Putnam’s finding has been carefully scrutinised by Paxton (1999), Robinson and Jackson (2001), Costa and Kahn (2003), and Bartolini, Bilancini and Pugno (2008), while Ladd (1996) criticised this evidence. “On balance, social capital has been confirmed as declining in the US, although not so dramatically as Putnam claimed.”1 All these studies are focused on the USA since similar research asks for a generous data-base and the US General Social Survey (GSS) offers a long lasting temporal data-series. Consequently, we don’t have much informations about what happened in other countries in the same period. For that reason the first question I would like to give an answer is: how is doing Europe? is SC declining? is such erosion a general trend of western societies or is it a characteristic feature of the American one? To my knowledge only a few authors payed attention to this aspect since only a few data-sets are useful to establish a clear long-term pattern. In 2001 OECD2 dedicated to this topic a publication in which, beyond others, dealt with the theme of trends in five European countries: United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, France and Germany. The report assesses that in general SC declined, in particular in United Kingdom, while remaining countries show a more mixed pattern. Another general perspective is offered by Andrew Leigh (2003)3 . Contributing to an entry on “Trends in social capital” he identifies three common patterns of declining trust, political participation and organizational activity across industrialized countries in the period between 1980 and 1990. Among the five reviewed European countries (Britain, France, Germany, Spain and Sweden) only the Scandinavian one seems to have a positive trend even if civic engagement is declining. Further studies have been conducted by Norris (2002), Delhey and Newton (2005) but these studies focused on particular 1 S. Bartolini, E. Bilancini, M. Pugno, Did the decline in social capital decrease American happiness? A relational explanation of the happiness paradox, Università degli Studi di Siena - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia Politica, n.540, Agosto 2008, Siena. 2 OECD, The Well-being of Nations. The role if human and social capital, Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, Paris, 2001 3 A. Leigh, Entry on “Trends in Social Capital”, prepared for Karen Christensen and David Levinson (eds) (2003) Encyclopedia of Community: from the village to the virtual world” Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 1 indexes of SC or only on generalised trust and were based on old data from the WVS. A deeper analysis was conducted by Morales (2004) on trends and levels of associational participation in Europe. Looking at trends between 1980 and 2002 from the WVS and the European social survey (ESS) she concludes that it is not possible to state whether a clear increase or decrease in general levels of membership exists. Anyway, her analysis is merely descriptive and, even if she focuses on a broad set of countries, her conclusions may be affected by sample bias. Finally, a more recent article by Frane Adams (2006) observes trends of generalized trust and membership in voluntary organizations using data from WVS in the period 1980 - 2000. The author finds evidence of a non eroding SC in Europe even if he warns about signs of decline as well as improvement. He states that decline in trust in individuals is quite visible, while associational involvement shows a more complex but on average positive trend. Adam’s work is, to my knowledge, the most up-to-date and complete research on European trends of SC. Anyway, it suffers some limitations. First of all it is based on mean variations between the starting and ending period. This is quite comprehensible since the second aim of the author was to test the reliability of the WVS vis-a-vis other data-bases (i.e. ESS), but in general this approach does not allow to check for other factors and sample bias; secondly the author adopts only some of the available proxies of SC, namely generalized trust, membership in voluntary organizations and unpaid voluntary work; finally, Adams focuses on a large number of European countries including transition countries: this is an interesting point, but misses to account for different economic realities (developed and transition countries) preventing a more detailed knowledge of what has happened to SC during last twenty years. In order to overcome these limitations, my research considers three different set of proxies of SC controlling for time and socio-demographic aspects in eleven different European countries. Data are drawn from the WVS, a data-set composed of four waves between 1980 and 2000. In so doing, I am able to investigate European trends on a twenty years period. The second question I would like to answer is whether SC trend can help to explain subjective well-being (SWB) trend. In a pioneering work Easterlin (1974) discovered that, using cross-section data, on average richer people are also happier than poorer ones; but a life-cycle analysis on the same sample shows that during time income grew up while happiness stayed constant. Such a puzzle is actually known as the “Easterlin paradox”. Starting from this point an even more consistent part of the economic literature flourished trying to solve the problem. Many different theories coming from manifold scientific fields have been advanced so far, but until now they failed to fully explain the paradox4 . Recently, Stevenson and Wolfers (2008) revive the 4 for a review of the main theories advanced so far please refer to F. Sarracino, Subjective well-being in low income countries, Studi e Note di Economia, n. 3, 2008 2 debate challenging the existence of the paradox. Considering Europe and Japan they argue that societies get happier as they become richer. That is to say that “money can buy happiness”. Unfortunately, at the same time they state that “the failure of happiness to rise in the United States remains a puzzling outlier.”5 . In this way the Easterlin paradox remains unsolved and also its non existence is not demonstrated. There is a need to further look into the “black box” of the American case. From this point of view, some recent contributions by Helliwell (2003, 2006) propose SC as an important aspect for SWB arguing that money can not explain the whole variation in people well-being. To my knowledge, the paper tackling most succesfully with the challenge settled by Helliwell is Bartolini, Bilancini and Pugno (2008)6 which argues that SC, and in particular relational goods, is important for SWB. They do not deny the importance of income for happiness, but using data from the American GSS between 1975 and 2004 they find out that U.S. SWB is largely explained by four forces acting in different directions: 1) income growth; 2) decreasing relational goods; 3) decreasing confidence in institutions; 4) social comparisons. These four groups of variables allow to explain quite the whole variation in SWB. In other words, the three authors suggests that American happiness did not grow up together with economic growth because the positive effect of income growth was counterbalanced by the declining availability of SC which negatively affects SWB. In this way they provide a convincing and powerful explanation of the Easterlin paradox giving SC a new role: a higher income increases happiness as long as it does not undermine SC. Whenever this hypothesis would be corroborated by further research, policy agendas will have to consider also the effects of economic policy on the preservation and the provision of social capital. Hence, SC can become an important aspect of future development policies. The theory proposed by Bartolini et al. (2008) can help to explain what happened in U.S.A. A few example can probably be convincing. Estimates from the three authors suggest that in presence of a stable endowment of SC, and in particular of relational goods, American SWB would have been higher than the actual one. Similarly, if income growth should compensate for the effect of the reduction of SC on happiness, keeping this variable stable to its 1975 levels, then the growth rate of GDP should have been more than 10%. Finally, they also estimate that the positive effect of income growth on SWB has been counterbalanced by the increase of other’s people income (which offsets 2/3 of the effect of income growth) and by the decrease in relational goods and confidence in institutions (which accounts for 5/6 of 5 B. Stevenson and J. Wolfers, Economic growth and subjective well-being: reassessing the Easterlin paradox, IZA DP n. 3654, August 2008, p. 16 6 S. Bartolini, E. Bilancini, M. Pugno, Did the decline in social capital decrease American happiness? A relational explanation of the happiness paradox, Università degli Studi di Siena - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia Politica, n. 540, Agosto 2008, Siena. 3 the total effect of social comparisons on SWB). Concluding, the contribution from Bartolini et al. (2008) seems to suggest that differences in SC trends can help to explain differences in SWB trends. The aim of this work is to provide further evidence to support this hypothesis looking at European countries. Main results of my research are the following: 1. SC trends in Continental Europe and Great Britain are different. British trends are very similar to the American ones; 2. SWB trends in Europe are generally positive with the only exception of Great Britain; 3. SC and SWB trends for Europe are compatible with a relational explanation of the Easterlin paradox. Present work is structured in four sections: the first section outlined my research questions and motivations behind them; the following section points out data adopted for my research and methodological aspects; the third section reports results from different regressions considering various proxies of SC as dependent variable and adopting time dummies and socio-economic conditions as indipendent variables. Finally, some concluding remarks will follow. 2 Data and Methodology The analysis of SC trends for different European countries asks for a generous data-set. From this point of view, probably, the most comprehensive data-base is represented by the World Values Survey (WVS). It is a wide compilation of surveys collected in more than 80 countries representing more than 80% of the world’s population. It collects informations on sociocultural and political change observed on a randomly selected sample of 300 to 4,000 individuals per country. In particular the database provides informations on “individual beliefs about politics, the economy, religious, social and ethical topics, personal finances, familial and social relationships, happiness and life satisfaction”7 . Data have been collected in four waves (1980 - 82; 1990 - 91; 1995 - 97 and 1999 - 2001) for a total of 267,870 observations covering quite a long period of time - about 20 years. Anyway, the sample available for present study is smaller since I focus on the trend of SC indicators in a small subset of available countries, namely: Italy, France, the Netherlands, Belgium, United Kingdom, Ireland, Germany, Denmark, Sweden, Norway and Finland. 7 Bruni L. and Stanca L., Watching alone: relational goods, television and happiness, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 2006, p. 6 4 Although SC has been longly a much debated topic, actually it still lacks a commonly agreed definition. This topic has been developed and applied in many different social disciplines then different definitions have been advanced so far. Some of the fathers of this concept propose different definitions for it, but given the empirical nature of present work, I opted for the definition proposed by Bartolini et al. (2008) who define SC as “the stock of both non-market relations and beliefs concerning institutions that affect either utility or production functions.”8 . In this way the authors do not focus solely on particular aspects of SC - networks, norms and trust - but comprise all those aspects - material and immaterial - that can contribute to develop mutual trust and co-operation. In particular, they point to two main aspects of SC: 1) every non-market relationships among individuals which allow people to communicate each other and to develop mutual trust. They define this aspect relational SC; 2) the system of values or believes that makes people act coherently. Moreover, the authors propose a further distinction in intrinsically and extrinsically motivated relational SC depending on whether the incentives to act come from within or outside the individual. They define intrinsic SC (alternatively defined as relational goods) those components “that enter into people’s utility function”9 ; by extrinsic SC they mean those components that do not “directly enter into people’s utility functions but are instrumental to something else that may be considered valuable”10 . This distinction allows to go deeper in the analysis of the category of relational SC. In fact, quoting Deci’s work (1971), they focus on the non-instrumental nature of intrinsic motivated activities. This peculiarity allows to focus on a broader point: non-market relations are not always intrinsic; there can be extrinsic relational SC (or purely extrinsic) as well as intrinsic one.11 A further critical aspect about SC is how to measure it. Different proposals have been advanced, but generally there are some agreed proxies of SC. For example, following Putnam (2000) main measures of SC centre around proxies of trust and levels of engagement or interaction in social or group activities. When trying to measure SC we should keep in mind particular aspects (OECD, 2001): • we should pay attention to causal connections since sources, functions and outcomes may be confused; 8 S. Bartolini, E. Bilancini, M. Pugno, Did the decline in social capital decrease American happiness? A relational explanation of the happiness paradox, Università degli Studi di Siena - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia Politica, n. 540, Agosto 2008, Siena, p. 5 9 S. Bartolini, E. Bilancini, M. Pugno, Did the decline in social capital decrease American happiness? A relational explanation of the happiness paradox, Università degli Studi di Siena - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia Politica, n. 540, Agosto 2008, Siena, pp. 5 - 6. 10 S. Bartolini, E. Bilancini, M. Pugno, ibidem, pp. 5 - 6. 11 please refer to tab.1 in the appendix for a summarizing scheme. 5 • SC is mainly characterized by tacit and relational aspects which are naturally difficult to observe, to measure and to codify; • usual variables of SC (trust, membership, voting, etc.) provide proxy measures and should not be confused with the underlying concept. According to the vast majority of the literature on SC (Paxton, 2004; Costa and Kahn (2003)), I observe the beliefs component through several reports of confidence in institutions, namely armed forces, police, parliament, civil services, press, ecclesiastic, judicial system, education system, labour unions and major companies. Answers to these questions range on a 1 to 4 point scale going from none at all to a great deal. To measure non-market relations, I use trust in individuals (represented by a dummy variable) and membership in various voluntary groups and organizations. Given the multiple nature of this third aspect, I adopt the mentioned distinction between intrinsically and extrinsically motivated group membership (Bartolini et al., 2008). Voluntary organizations which enters the first set are labelled Putnam’s groups while those entering the second set are named Olson’s group (Knack, 2003). This distinction is based on the works of the two authors: Olson12 emphasizes the tendency of associations to act as lobbies to get policies that protect the interest of special groups at the expenses of the society as a whole. Consequently, I include in Olson’s groups all those organizations which are extrinsically motivated since it is supposed they are experienced only for instrumental reasons. On the contrary, Putnam13 identifies in associations a source of general trust and of social ties leading to governmental and economic efficiency (Bartolini et al., 2008). In this paper membership in a Putnam’s group is interpreted as intrinsic SC supposing it is experienced only for the pleasure of being a member. Among Putnam’s group I include social welfare service for elderly, church organizations, sport clubs, art and literature clubs, fraternal groups and youth associations, human and animal rights. Among Olson’s groups I include fraternity associations, unions, professional organizations and farm organizations, organization concerned with health and consumer groups. Finally, there are some groups that were left unclassified and labeled as other groups because it is not clear whether they constitute intrinsic or extrinsic RSC, althought they are part of RSC. In this latter group I included veterans associations, political parties and “other groups”. Each option between these three groups of variables is expressed as a dummy variable. Finally, SWB is proxied by the variable happiness that is measured on a scale ranging from 1 to 4 and is based on answers to the following question: 12 Olson M., The rise and decline of nations: economic growth, stagflation and social rigidities, Yale UP: New Haven, 1982 13 Putnam R.D., Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy, Princeton NJ, Princeton University Press, 1993. 6 “All considered you would say that you are: 1. very happy; 2. pretty happy; 3. not too happy; 4. not at all happy?”. In order to study SC and SWB trends during the last 20 years for each of the considered European countries, I follow two approaches14 : I first regress the proxies of SC and SWB on time dummy variables. In this way trends are based on mean values; than I regress the same proxies on different groups of control variables (age, gender, familiar status and education) to consider specific individual and social aspects. In particular, age is considered linearly and with its square; a dummy on male is introduced; familiar status is controlled through three proxies: the number of children, a variable ranging between zero and twenty, and two dummy variables for single and married; finally, education includes a dummy for illiterate. This model is repeated for each considered country. Formally, I estimate the following: j = α + β1 · Di,w2 + β2 · Di,w3 + β3 · Di,w4 + γ1 · Ageit + γ2 · Age2it + P roxyit γ3 · M alei + υ1 · N Childit + υ2 · Singleit + υ3 · M arriedit + δ1 · Illiterateit (1) where index j stands for the different proxies of SC and SWB, index t represents the various waves and index i stands for each individual. In each equation three dummy variables have been introduced to account for the four waves. Where possible I kept the first wave as the reference period. When informations about the first waves where not available, I adopted the second wave as reference period. Since I have different indicators of SC and one proxy of SWB, my regression methodology varies following the specifities of each depending variable: in the case of generalized trust and participation in voluntary organizations, that are expressed in the form of dummies, I adopted a logit model; when studying confidence in institutions or happiness, defined on a 1 to 4 scale, I used an ordered logit model. Tables from 2 to 12 in the appendix report summary statistics for each considered country. When dealing with these data we have to be careful because, although the WVS is the most complete database on our topic, it has some deficiencies. In particular, we have to keep in mind that observations about Italy, Ireland, Denmark, France, The Netherlands and Belgium are missing in the third wave; similarly, data about Finland are not collected in the first wave, while Norway is not observed in the fourth wave. Finally, the third wave does not contain informations about trust in the United Kingdom and about confidence in the educational system in Sweden, Norway, Finland and Germany. Overall, the pooled dataset contains 48340 observations. 14 M. Aguiar and E. Hurst, Measuring trends in leisure: the allocation of time over five decades, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Working Papers n. 2, 2006 7 3 Results 3.1 Social capital trends in Europe I report and discuss results from several regressions relative to equation 1. Results about each regression are reported in the appendix from tab.13 to tab.23. Here I discuss directly my conclusive results which are summerized in charts in the appendix. A first interesting aspect emerging from my regressions is that SC trend in Europe is mainly positive. Hence, the picture about Europe appears fundamentally different from the American one. There is only one European country representing a shocking exception: the Great Britain. In this case every considered proxy of SC is declining meaning that during last twenty years Great Britain experienced a substantial erosion of SC. Charts from fig.1 to fig.7 show clearly this result. On the x-axis I reported the time from 1980 to 2000. Each point on the x-axis corresponds to a wave in the WVS. On the y-axis I report coefficients of the time dummies originating from regressions. The point on the x-axis corresponding to zero represents the reference year, while other points in the charts defining trends corresponds to the coefficients of the time dummies. Finally, each chart reports more than one line. Each line represents results from regressions with different sets of control variables, coherently with the adopted model. Looking at the charts it emerges clearly that Great Britain experienced a general social crisis. Relational SC, represented by trust in others and membership in Putnam’s groups, decreases strongly during all the period. Similarly, also every proxy of beliefs in institutions declines steadily all along the last twenty years. The only proxy reporting a positive trend is membership in other groups, but data are insufficient to draw a trend for all the considered period. The picture is completely different if we consider remaining European countries. In particular, trends about relational goods are generally positive. Here I will discuss only results for some of the major European countries. Considering membership in Putnam’s groups, charts from fig.8(a) to fig.10(a) suggest that Italy, the Netherlands and Sweden from 1980 to 2000 experienced a growing trend. Figure 11(a) and fig.12(a) show that the same trend is positive also in France and in Denmark, even if in these two cases relative growth rate reduces since 1995. Considering Norway, fig.13(a) suggests a positive trend, but in this case available data do not allow to set a clear pattern. I can only conclude that in this case the trend between 1980 and 1990 is positive. Finally, the chart about Germany15 (fig.14(a)) points out that overall from 1980 to 2000 membership in Putnam’s groups is positive, 15 Observations about Germany before 1989 refer to West Germany. 8 but I have to remark that the trend reverted since 1990. Considering the other component of relational goods, that is to say trust in others, the picture emerging from regressions is more homogeneous, since it grows up in every of the mentioned countries. I have only to highlight two cases: 1) Italy, in which the overall trend is positive although the growth rate of trust in other’s slightly reduces starting from 1990; 2) France, which emerges as the only Continental European country with a decreasing trend of trust in others during last twenty years (please, consider (b) charts from fig.8 to fig.14. Let’s turn now to the second component of SC: beliefs in institutions. In this case trends are more mixed among both variables and countries. In any case, some general trends arise quite clearly indicating a worrying trend for confidence in particular institutions: in particular, it seems that during last twenty years European citizens have persistently lost confidence in the judicial system, in religious institutions, in armed forces and in police. Summing up, althought some specificities and a mixed pattern regarding confidence in institutions, results suggest that SC, and in particular relational goods, generally increased during the last twenty years for the considered European countries, while Great Britain comes out as the big European exception showing a very similar pattern to the American one. 3.2 Social capital and subjective well-being in Europe Previous results conveyed a framework in which Europe appears as very different from the USA. For quite every considered country, with the exception of Great Britain, relational SC increased from 1980 to 2000. Regressions about the trend of SWB in the same countries confirm a similar pattern. In fact, SWB increases in every considered country, while Great Britain is once again the only exception with a strongly decreasing trend from 1980 to 1995. Unfortunately, data about the fourth wave are not available in this case (see fig.15 to fig.19 in the appendix). Charts about remaining European countries show an overall positive pattern, even if single trends may differ. For example, France, Norway, Denmark and Netherlands have a steady growing trend (see fig.17(b), fig.18(a) and (b), and fig.16(b)); trends for Germany and Italy are positive too, but the growth rate reduces signifcantly between 1990 and 2000 (see fig.16(a) and fig.19 in the appendix); finally, Sweden’s trend has a U-shaped outline (see fig.17(a)), even if the net result is positive. 4 Conclusions The aim of present study was to point out trends of social capital in Europe and finding evidence to support the thesis that SC trends can help to explain SWB trends. In this way SC gains a new dimension: it can give further meaning to the widely used term well-being. Whenever present thesis would 9 be corroborated by further research, SC would acquire a central role in the definition of our policy agenda. For example, future economic policies should not only focus on ways to promote economic growth, but should pay attention also to their effects on SC. Using different regression techniques, following the nature of dependent variables, I tried to assess the trends of three proxies of SC for each country in the period between 1980 and 2000. Following a broadly accepted approach in the literature, I adopted the following variables: trust in individuals, membership in eighteen different voluntary organizations and confidence in ten institutions. Results are quite innovative for at least two reasons: 1) contemporary literature largely focused on trends in USA rather than in Europe. This is mainly due to the fact that USA have large data-bases allowing such studies for longer periods of time (for example the U.S. GSS); 2) following the debate on the Easterlin paradox, my results suggest that we can not discard the hypothesis that the trend of SC is important for the trend of SWB. From this point of view, it is important to stress that I am not performing a causal analysis, but I am simply assessing SC and SWB trends and notice that in 10 out of 11 countries signs of SC trends are concordant with signs of SWB trends. Whether such evidence would be substantiated by future research, we could say that U.S.A. do not represent a “puzzling outlier” since “income growth is desirable as far as it is not associated with a deterioration of SC.”16 Nonetheless, the question about whether SC trend can help to explain SWB trend is still an open question asking for further and deeper research. Summarizing, my findings are the following: 1. Trends for SC in Europe are mainly positive (in particular for relational goods); 2. Great Britain appears as the only exception with declining trends of SC; 3. Europe seems affected by a general crisis of some particular institutions; 4. Given the concordance between SC and SWB trends in 10 out of 11 cases, we can not reject the hypothesis that SC can help to explain SWB. Concluding, present research allows to remark a few aspects: the first one is that Europe and USA are not exactly following the same pattern. While both regions have experienced an institutional crisis during last twenty years, 16 S. Bartolini, E. Bilancini, M. Pugno, Did the decline in social capital decrease American happiness? A relational explanation of the happiness paradox, Università degli Studi di Siena - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia Politica, n. 540, Siena, Agosto 2008, p. 26. 10 relational social capital in Europe increased. The only European country with negative trends is the Great Britain. Nonetheless, we should take in mind that these figures need further investigation to extend both the number of interested countries and the lenght of the period considered. By now, present results suggesting a quite different pattern between USA and Europe push future research in two main directions: 1) to enlarge present research to discover trends relative to other countries; 2) to investigate why USA and Europe have a different performance. Which forces have pushed toward an increasing erosion of social capital in USA? Is European social capital subjected to the same erosive forces? 3) Do SC trends explain SWB trends in Europe? 11 Appendix: tables 5 - . 0 , , " / - . 2 ) , 3 4 2 ) 3 4 ) 3 ! " # $ Ͳ 0 % " 1 + , " , & & ' * ( ) ! Table 1: Summarizing scheme of the different constituents of social capital. Source: author’s own elaboration 12 M F F J F M 9 K H M M I I B H B F M J K F G N H M K M 9 I B B K I H I F B B B B K M K J K K G 9 F G G N F M H F M L I F M N M I B B F M L M J K K H M L K J H M M M M G M F M I H N K K M K H M J 9 9 F N K K N F I J H M F J B I F M G F M F H F M M L M B B B B B H N H I H G 9 9 9 H J F N F F H N L 9 9 G M M M G M H H J J H G 9 I H G L L H F N 9 K I N K F I F M G N K 9 J K I G L 9 H I J H F B B B B B G K I F L J I I N F L 9 I G L H M M M G M I I I F G J 9 K M N F G I G L 9 F H I F M G N I J F K H G J I N F F H 9 L L K 9 I H 9 F 9 8 7 G 8 7 q6 F F M F M M M G M M M M M I F M G M M M M I H 9 F M M M M M M M G M M M M M I F M G M M M M I H 9 F M M M M M M M G M F F M F I F M G M M M M I H 9 F M M M M M M M G M M M M M I F M G F F M F I H 9 F F B B B B B B U 8 Z< < 6 S Q @ H F G M F I M I M J N K 9 I F G N H K F M H F G F G I M H I L G L F G G F M G H F 9 J K K J I M H M H G J 9 G I H 9 F Y D D A ` R W 6 B B B B B B 8< > _6 U W H F F N M K J J M 9 L I 9 H H G K J I F M H F K N H J M I M F G H F 9 N G L M M G H F I L G M I I M G H H 9 J M G I H 9 F D O ^ = 7 B B B B B B 8< S 7 R 8 d B H F H L 9 I 9 J M K H M N F G G H H B B H F N K K J J M G G G G G G G H H K F F K M H F F L K G M I M J G 9 G G F G M H F I F J M M I M J I K F M M G B F F M 9 F G H F L I J N H I M H H M G H F J M N N G I M 9 F 9 I M G I H 9 F L @ G B B > 8 U 6 R 6 F G M G I H 9 F D ? Y D D O c Y [ D e f B B B B B B g 8 S W H F N J H I H J M I N J N N J G I N K F M H F I M F N H J M G K G F M J G G F M G H F 9 N I I J I M J L H I M J G I H 9 F D Y [ h i e 6 R Q W B B B B B B >< W > H F G L F H M I M J J J K I M G J G K F M H F F F M K M I M K K J L L F G K M M G H F N N 9 I L I M 9 M M G M G I H 9 F \ D ] ; j B B B B B B i < 8< R g H F F G I 9 L J M J G J M J G G H L K F M H F J G 9 I J J M G J F F I G G 9 F M G H F H L N 9 F I M N M 9 F 9 F G I H 9 F [ e B B B B B B U 8 Z< < >6 W S6 Q @ @ H F H G J L F I M N G N L K L G N N K F M H F N J G F I M G L N G L H G J F M G H F N M G G J I M K H G I N L G I H 9 F X Y D A 8 U R B B B B B B 8< S R W H F G K L H G I M J G F H G L G I H K F M H F G K J I L I M N I 9 G L 9 G G F M G H F F K G H L K M 9 H L F H L G I H 9 F V A T B B B B B B Q S R H F H G F F K I M 9 J I K N I G L J K F M H F 9 L L M K K M F J 9 G J G N F M G H F N 9 H L N M F N K L J G N G I H 9 F P P O R 8 @ B B B B B B R b _< Q W F M I L H M F 9 M I M F M M M M G M F M N N I K M 9 M G 9 L J M F M I F M G F M G 9 G J J G M I G I 9 I M M I H 9 F P : < < > W B B B B B B R b _ Q W F M 9 M N N J 9 M F J F M M M M G M F M J K 9 I G 9 M H K I G G F M I F M G F M 9 G G H M 9 M N F F 9 M F M I H 9 F a Y : < U >6 Q @ B B B B B B R b _ Q W F M G 9 M H N H M L 9 F 9 M M M M G M F M N N M 9 H M I I J L H G M I F M G F M H 9 K G 9 9 M L L I N G F M I H 9 F a [ > < R Q @ @ B B B B B B R< 8 W @ F M 9 I K I N H M F 9 N G 9 M N H K F M F M J G M I J H M G M M 9 L 9 M B B B H F 9 L F 9 K N M K K I F L K G L J K F M H F F J 9 G M N M N 9 M K K G F J K G 9 F H F N 9 F G 9 N M H L F K J I G H G 9 F K B B B < 8< > _ D P F F M H F F 9 H H M K H M I N G M G M 9 F P D 6 _ B 86 > < 8 6 R 6 @ A ? = ; : Y ; D k 6 8 7 p n B B 86 > < E 6 > 7 8 @ A ? = ; : = D = C 6 8 7 B B 86 > < < E 6 > 7 8 @ A ? = ; : ; : = D = C 6 8 7 6 8 7 B E 6 > 7 8 = D = C L N H G M L N M B M M M L M M M M M G M M M M G G F F M M M K K J H H H H 9 N H K M B H I N N H M M B B K N G F M M M M M F F I 9 F 9 B 9 I K F M I F M L I I F I G M F F 9 F M F M G F F G M H K J M J K M B J K I H N M 9 G 9 9 K H M G B B I H 9 H J L H L J G G I F F B B N H 9 F H 9 L L 9 M H B B M I B B I K J 9 F M G M M M M N L M I N J H 8 7 q6 B B I I H 9 F A Y D 8 7 q6 H 8 > V P G 8 8 q6 R S W ; 8 Y b 6 b 6 9 R 8 U U6 F Y > Q H A 8 b D 9 8 D < > F @ R R U6 B 8 R6 8 D Y Y D 13 @ 9 5 m H 5 G 5 F 5 o l Table 2: Descriptive statistics about Italy. Source: author’s own elaboration of World Values Survey data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | v w ~v w ± | | | | | | | | ~v w ± | | | | | | | | ~v w ± | | | | | | | | ~v w ± | | | | | | | | | | | | | | v t t w z { t v x w | | | | | | w ~ | | | y | | | t v ~ v u | | | | | | w x v w z ¡ ¢ £ ¤ v ¥ | | | | | | ¦ § £ ¨ w | | | | | | xt x s § ¥ £ | | | | | | t t v v t t z | | | | | | w x w z { v | | | | | | t v { | | | | | | v z | | | | | | | | t r t x | | | | | | | | r t t w x z | | | | | | | | x t z z | | | | | | | | v t z | | | | | | w t t xv | w w v v w x t s | | v w x t w x ~ v | | v w x t w x ~ v | | x w v t w x ~ v | w x ~ v | | | | | | | | | z z z z u u } { y u s r u u } { y u s r u u } { y u s r u u } { y u s r ª ¬ « ¬ ª ° ~v w ¯ ¯ ® © ~v w ~v w ~v w | | v w | | | | | | | | | | | | v | | | | | w | | { | x v s v x | v | t x { v w | | z z | v w 14 v Table 3: Descriptive statistics about Great Britain. Source: author’s own elaboration of World Values Survey data É Ã Ç Ç Ã Ã Ä Ë Ë Ä Ä ¿ ¿ Ã Ç Æ È É Å ¶ É Ç ¿ ¿ ¿ Ç Ë Ç Ã É Ã Æ Ë É Ë Ã Ê É Ê Ç Å Ë Ã Ç Ç Ã Ç Æ Ç Ë É Ë È ¶ Ã Ë ¶ à ¶ ¶ à ¶ Ë Ê Ê Ê ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ Ã Ç Ë Ç Æ È Ê É Ç Æ È É Ê Å É Ç Ë Ã Ç Ã Ç Ã Ç Å È Ê Ê É Ç È É Ç Ç Ç Ç Ã Ã Ç Ë É É Æ Ê É Ç É È Ä È ¶ É Ç ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ Ã Ç Ç Ã È É Ë ¶ Æ Ç Ã É ¶ Ä Ã Ã Ã ¶ Ä Ç Å Ë Æ È Ê Ç Ã Ë Ê Ä É Ë ¶ Æ É Æ ¶ È Æ Ã Ã Ã Ä É Ê Ë Ë Ç Ç Ç Ã Ê É Æ È É Ë ¶ Ã Ê Ë Ä Ê Ä Ã Ä ¶ Ê É Ç Ç Ë É Ã Ë ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ Ç Ê È Ã Å Ë Ë Ë Ã Ä Ã Ã È Ä Å Ç Ä É Æ È Ê Ç Ê È È Ã È Ã Ç É É Ä Ã Ê Ã Æ É É Ç Ç Ç Ã ¶ Ê È Ã Ë É Ë ¶ Ê È Ã Ë Ä Ç È Å Ç É É Ã Ë Ã µ ¶ µ Ë µ Ã Ã Ç Ã Ë Ã Ç Ã Ç Ç Ç Ç Ç Ç Ç Ç Ã Ç Ç Ç Ç Ä Ã Ë Ã Ç Ç Ç Ç Ë Ã Ç Ã Ç Ç Ç Ç Ç Ç Ç Ç Ã Ç Ç Ç Ç Ä Ã Ë Ã Ç Ç Ç Ç Ë Ã Ç Ã Ç Ã Ã Ç Ã Ç Ç Ç Ã Ç Ç Ç Ç Ä Ã Ë Ã Ã Ç Ç Ç Ç Ë Ã Ç Ã Ç Ç Ç Ç Ç Ç Ç Ç Ã Ã Ã Ç Ã Ä Ã Ë Ã ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ Ò µ ×¹ ¹ ³ Ð Î ½ É Ã Å È Ë Ç É È Ç Æ Ê Ê Ã Æ Ë Ë Ê Ê Ç É Ã È ¶ È ¶ ¶ È Ç Æ É Ê Ç Ê É Ë É Ê Ê É Ã Å ¶ ¶ Ê Ë È Ç Ã Ä Ë Å Ä Æ Ë Ã Ç Ë Ã Ö Á Á ¾ Ý ³ Ï Ô ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ µ¹ » ܳ Ò Ô Ç Ç É Ã ¶ Ë ¶ È Ê Ä Ç Ê ¶ Ê Ê ¶ Å Ë Ê È Ê É Ã È Ç Ç Ë É È Ç È Ç Ç Ã Ë Å Ë Ç Ê Ã Ã Á Ì Û º ´ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ µ¹ Ð ´ Ï µ É Ã Ã Æ Å Ã Ê Ä Ç Å Ë Ã Ä Ê Æ Ë É Ä Ê Ç É Ã Å Ë Ê Å Ê Ä Ç Ê ¶ È Ê ¶ Æ Ë É Ê Ê É Ã ¶ Ê Ç Ã È Ç Ê Ç È Å Ç Æ Ë Å Ç Ë Ã Á ¼ Ö Á Á Ì é ³ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ » µ Ò ³ Ï Ø ½ É Ã Å Ë É Å ¶ È Ç È ¶ Ã É Ë Ë Ë Æ È Ê Ç É Ã Ã Æ Ê Å É È Ç Æ Ë Ë È Ë Å Ë Ë Ê Ê É Ã È È Ä Æ Å È Ç ¶ Ë É È Ä Å Ë Å Ç Ë Ã Á Ö ê ë ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ì µ Ð Ô É Ã Ä È Ä ¶ Å Ä Ç Ã ¶ Ë Ë Ê Ã ¶ É Ç Ç Ã Ç É Ã Ë Ç Ä Ç Å Ä Ç Æ Å Æ È Ã ¶ Ä Ê Ê É Ã É Ã Ç Ê É Ä Ç Æ È É Ã Ç Ë ¶ Ã Ã Ë Ã Á Ö Ø í î ê Ï Î Ô ³ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ »¹ Ô » Ù É Ã Ê Ê È É Ë È Ç È ¶ Å Ê Æ É Ë Ë Å Ê Ç É Ã Ä Ç Ê É Ã È Ç Ë Ã ¶ Å È ¶ Ë É Ê Ê É Ã Ã Ä ¶ Ä Ã È Ç Ë Ã È Ë Ã ¶ Ë Ë Ç Ë Ã Á Ú ¸ ï ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ î ¹ µ¹ Ï ì É Ã È È É Ë È Ä Ç Ë Ê ¶ È Ç ¶ Ë Ê È Ê Ç É Ã Æ Ç Æ Ë È Ä Ç Ã ¶ Å Å Æ Ë Ë È Ê Ê É Ã Æ È ¶ Å Ä Ä Ç Å Ê Ã ¶ ¶ É Ë Å Ç Ë Ã Ø ê ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ Ò µ ×¹ ¹ »³ Ô Ð³ Î ½ ½ Õ É Ã Ä Æ Ä È Æ Æ Ç Ã Æ Å Ê Ã Ë ¶ Ë Ç Ç Ã Ç É Ã Ë È Ä ¶ Æ Ä Ç Æ È Æ Ä É Ê Ë É Ê Ê É Ã Ä Å Å Æ È Ä Ç ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ È Ë Æ Ç Ë Ã Ö Á ¾ µ Ò Ï ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ µ¹ Ð Ï Ô É Ã Ä Å Ä Ê Ë È Ç È ¶ Ê Ê ¶ Ä Ë Ê Æ Ê Ç É Ã Ã Ä Å É Æ È Ç Ë Ê Ê Ä É Ä Ë Æ Ê Ê É Ã Ä Ç Ç Æ Ë È Ç È Ä Æ Ê Ë Ç ¶ ¶ Ã Ë Ã Ó ¾ Ñ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ Î Ð Ï É Ã É ¶ Ê Æ Ç Ê Ç Ê ¶ Ä ¶ Å Ä Ë ¶ Ç Ç Ã Ç É Ã Ë Ã É È È Ç ¶ È Ç ¶ È Ç ¶ Ê Ê Ê É Ã Ë Ë Ä Æ È È Ç Ã È Ë Æ É Ë ¶ Ç Ã Ë Ã Í Í Ì Ï µ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ܹ Î Ô Ï ç Í · Ã Ç Ê Ä ¶ Ã Ç É Ç Ã È Å Ã Ç Ë Ç Ë Ã Ç Ã Ç Ã Ç Ê Å È Å Æ ¶ Ç Ê Å Ã Ç Ç Ç Ç Ã Ã Ç É Ê Å Ë ¶ ¶ Ç Ã É Å Æ Ë Ã Ç Ä Ã Ë Ã ¹ ¹ » Ô ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ Ï ç Ü Î Ô æ Ö · Ã Ç Ä ¶ Ê Ê Ç É Ç Ê ¶ É ¶ Ã Ë Ç Ë Ã Ç Ã Ç Ã Ç Ã Ë È Å Ä ¶ Ç Ä Ã Ç Ç Ç Ç Ã Ã Ç Ê È Ê Ê Æ ¶ Ç Ä Ã Å ¶ Æ Ã Ç Ä Ã Ë Ã ¹ Ò »³ Î ½ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ Ï ç Ü Î Ô æ Ø Ã Ç Æ Ê É Ä Ê É Ç Ê Ë Æ Ä É É Ç Ë Ã Ç Ã Ç Ã Ç È ¶ Ê Ê È É Ç Ê Ê ¶ Ç Ç Ç Ç Ã Ã Ç ¶ ¶ È Ä È É Ç Ë È É Ê È ¶ Ç Ä Ã Ë Ã » ¹ Ï Î ½ ½ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ Ϲ µ Ô ½ Í Á Ã Ç Ä Ç Ë Ç È É Ç Ê Ä È Ê Å ¶ Ç Ë Ê Ê Ç Ã Ç Æ Å Ê Ê É Ç É È Æ ¶ Ä É Ç È È Ê Ã Ç Æ É Ë Ë Ê É Ç Ã Ã Ã Ã Ã É Ç Ç Ä Ã Ã ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ³ ¹ µ¹ » Ü Ü Á Í É Ã Ã Ê ¶ Ä Ä Å Ç Ë Å Ê Ç È ¶ ¶ È Ç Ç Ã Ç É Ã É Å É Ç É Æ Ç É È Ã Ê Å ¶ ¶ Ç È Ê É Ã È Ä Å È Ä Å Ç Ã Å È Ç Æ ¶ ¶ Å Ä Ã Ã ¿ µ ³ Ï ³ µ³ » ¹ ½ Ö ¸ Á å ¾ ¼ º ¸ · ã à â ß ³ µ ´ ¿ ¿ » µ³ ¹  ³ » ´ µ ½ ¾ ¼ º ¸ · º Á º À ³ µ ´ ¿ ¿ µ³ ¹ » ¹  ³ » ´ µ ½ ¾ ¼ º ¸ · ¸ · º Á º À ³ µ ´ ¿  ³ » ´ µ º Á º À Ë Ê Ê Ç ¿ ¶ Å ¶ Ê ¶ Å Ë Ç ¶ É Ã ¿ Ë Ã Ç Ã Ê È Ç ¶ Ä Ë Ä È Å Ë Ç Ë Ë ¿ Ã Ã Ë Ç Ç Ç Ã Ç Ã Ã Ç Ç È Ç Æ Ä Å Ç Ê ¶ È Æ È É Ã Ç Ç Ç Ç Ç ¿ É È Ê Ë Ç Å Ã Æ Ç Ç Ç Ç Ã È ¿ ¿ Ä Ã Ë Ã É è ½ ³ µ ´ ä á Þ Ë ² à ² É ² ¿ Ç ¿ Ç Ç Ç Ç Ã Ç Ã ¶ Ã È Ã Ã Æ È Ã Ë Æ Æ Å Æ É ¶ Å Ã Ç ¿ ¿ Ä Ê Å È É Ë Ê É Ç Ê É Ë Ã É Ç Ç ¿ ¿ ¿ Ä Ã Ë Ã Ç Ä Å Ã Ç Ç Å Ç Ç ¿ ¿ Æ Ã Ç ¶ Ê Ã Ç Ç Ç Ç É Ç Ä Ä ¿ à µ ´ ð ´ ³ ð ³ Ë µ ¾ Ö Á Ë ´ ð ´ ³ ð ³ » Ó Í µ µ ç ³ µ ç ³ Ï Ð Ô ¸ Ö Ã Ï µ Ò Ò³ à µ Ö » Î Ë ¾ Á ç Á à µ Ï ¹ » ¿ ½ Ï Ò³ µ ϳ µ Á Ö Ö Á 15 ½ ¶ ² Table 4: Descriptive statistics about Ireland. Source: author’s own elaboration of World Values Survey data þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ õ õ õ õ õ õ õ õ þ þ þ þ þ þ õ õ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ þ ü ò õ þ õ õ þ õ õ õ õ þ þ þ þ þ ôø ó ô õ ó þ þ þ þ þ ôø ú ò ù ý û þ þ þ þ þ þ ú ô ò ò ü õ õ õ þ þ þ þ þ þ # $ ô õ % & " ò þ þ þ þ þ þ úø ú õ õ ÷ ' & þ þ þ þ þ þ $ ø ôø õ " þ þ þ þ þ þ ô ø ø úò ò ü ü ý ô þ þ þ þ þ þ ôø õ ý þ þ þ þ þ þ õ õ õ ô þ þ þ þ þ þ ø õ õ ø ø ú þ þ þ þ þ þ ö õ õ õ õ õ ø úò ü þ þ þ þ þ þ õ õ õ ú ø ü ü þ þ þ þ þ þ ø ô ü õ õ õ þ þ þ þ þ þ ò ø ôø ú õ õ õ þ ô ò ò ôò ú ø ü þ þ ú ôò ø ò ú ó ô ü þ þ ú ôò ø ø ò ú ó ô ü þ ò ú ó ô õ þ ô ø ø ò " ö ÷ . ù ù ÿ ý û ù ÷ ö ÷ ö ù ù ÿ ý û ù ÷ ö ù ù ÿ ý û ù ÷ ö * ò - , + ô ó ) ò ô ó ò ô ó ô ó ò þ þ þ þ þ ! ü þ þ þ þ þ õ þ þ þ þ ô ó ò õ ñ þ þ þ õ ô ó ò þ þ þ ô ó ò ý ô ó ò ú ÷ ô ò ô ò ô ô ô ò ô ú ý ô ø ú ü ò ô ò ô 16 ü ñ ñ ñ ( Table 5: Descriptive statistics about France. Source: author’s own elaboration of World Values Survey data B > B > B C > 9 > B > D B > 9 9 > > B @ ? > F C > E E B ? G B E ? > 9 9 9 9 9 > B B C B E D B F E B ? > B B C B F D B F ? B ? > B B C B A D B 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 D F D G D ? E A G C @ A > A C ? B A ? D E B ? B B > G D ? E ? ? F F C > A G ? F > 9 9 9 ? @ G > A A A > F G G D D E B ? B @ G > A > F > > F E D @ ? > B ? B @ G > A C A > @ 9 9 E B C D A E D > B ? B B > G D ? E @ A E B A > F D F E E ? A E D E E B B B > F > ? D A > D E > D B 9 9 9 B B > F C ? C E @ A C > A @ > > B ? 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 > > B B B B B > F E B ? B B B B B B B B F ? B ? B B B B B B B B A E D E B B B B B B B B 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 B B B B B B B B F E B ? > > B B B B B > F ? B ? B B B B B B B B A E D E B B B B B B B B 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 B B B B B B B B F E B ? B B B B B B B B F ? B ? > > B B B B B > A E D E B B B B B B B B C B E > 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 B B B B B B B B F E B ? B B B B B B B B F ? B ? B B B B B B B B A E D E > > B B B B B > C B E > > 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 N 3 S1 1 4 L 7 9 9 9 9 9 D > D A B G C ? F F @ > D > E A B G E ? > @ 9 9 9 4 K P D > @ A B E E ? D ? D > @ A B @ ? ? > C G > D > @ F B G B ? > E 9 9 9 9 9 D > @ F B G ? ? A D @ > D > G F B @ E ? 9 9 9 D > C A B D ? ? E E @ > D > A F B C B ? B C @ > A > D > F A B @ 9 9 ? D ? > D > > A B G > ? ? D E D > ? A B C C ? E @ ? > E 7 < R T @ 9 9 9 5 N3 4 K 4 ? D D > B A B D ? ? A @ ? > < 6 E 9 9 9 1 L3 ; K 3 R < < H D W 2 ; E D > B G B G > ? ? @ ? > @ < > 3 H @ 1 5 4 X N P > D > @ A B B F ? D E D E D > C A B A A ? C @ ? > R < < 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 L3 P _ d 4 K J P D > F F B A A ? F B B ? D > B A B E F ? ? > B ? D > F A B B F ? A E 9 9 9 9 9 D > C A B G ? ? F F G > D > > A B F ? ? F G G > D > G A B @ > ? G ? D D > A A B B E ? D @ ? > < V E 9 9 9 51 P 5 U 0 D c E D > D A B B G ? A @ ? > < R T b c a _ 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 1 1 K3 D > F A B A ? ? G A @ > D > A F B D @ > C B B ? D > B A B F > ? F E D E D > G F B @ > ? @ @ ? > T N 3 S1 1 7 9 9 9 9 9 9 4 L 4 5 P J 7 D > ? F B B G ? C A @ > B D > ? A B @ D ? B E D E D > B A B > D ? B B E > Q R < 8 K N3 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 1 L3 K P D > E A B G D ? B > @ > D > G A B F E ? B C @ > D > ? G B F B ? E E D E D > B G B B C ? A @ ? > O 8 M 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 J L K D > E @ B D > ? > > @ > D > E G B D B ? @ A @ > D > D @ B F E ? D E D E D > D @ B E D ? B B E > I I H 3 K 7 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 X1 J P K [ > B ? E B > > B F E B ? B B B B B B B B F ? B ? > B E D B D ? B A E D E > B E E B E > B C B E > I / 1 1 5 P 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 K [ X J P > B E E B E > B F E B ? B B B B B B B B F ? B ? > B @ D B B D B A E D E > B ? D B ? ? B C B E > \ R / 1 N 4 5 J 7 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 K [ X J P > B G D B G E B F E B ? B B B B B B B B F ? B ? > B B C B ? C B A E D E > B D D B F ? B C B E > \ T 5 1 K J 7 7 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 3 K1 P 7 > B G D B G E B A E @ > > B A D B E E B F C @ > > B A D B E E B E @ G ? > B A D B ? E B D G B > I < 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 4 1 1 53 X X D > A F B A @ ? C @ @ > D > G F B A @ ? ? B B ? D > F C B > B E > B ? E D > ? C B A @ ? > > ? > < I 9 3 4 5 1 4 K 4 3 9 9 3 4 5 1 = 4 5 ; 3 9 9 4 3 5 1 = 4 5 ; 3 9 9 5 4 3 1 = 4 5 ; 3 9 = 4 ; 3 D B F B 9 9 9 @ E > B ? B ? F B @ ? > 9 A E D E > B B C B A D B C B E > ? ;3 4 Z a 7 7 7 7 2 : 8 6 2 0 / 2 < 2 : 8 6 2 0 / 2 < 2 : 8 6 2 0 / 2 < 2 : 8 6 2 0 / R 0 < m h ;3 4 Z l k j i g ;3 4 ;3 4 ;3 4 9 ? B F E B ? ? F F B E E C B B > B B D B B ? ? 9 > > B B B 9 9 9 A D > 9 9 C B E > E ;3 4 Z ` 9 B A B B ? C 9 9 B D > B E B F ? B ? C F B ? 9 B F B ? ? > > B B @ E B 9 > E D E G > F > > > ? ? D B E > D ;3 4 Z _ 9 9 9 @ B @ D B ? B B 9 G > 9 9 D B E > ;3 4 Z ^ B B B B B A E D B A A C E E B D D B E E E > > B B D D B B 9 9 B C B B 9 9 A B B B F ? C B E > ? [3 4 ] 9 9 9 B B 9 G F A [3 4 B C B E > 8 R < I R C C 5 K3 L 3 4 N B B 9 E R O B > C 3 K P B < 8 < Y E 3 [ 5 J > K K 4 N 0 9 7 < R 3 N 3 4 7 1 K 3 R < 17 J 5 D e E e ? e > f Table 6: Descriptive statistics about Germany. Source: author’s own elaboration of World Values Survey data { { { { { { r { { { { { { r r r r r r { { { { { { r r r r r r o q p o q p { { { { { { r { { { { { { r { { { { { { r { { { { { { r q u u o y { { { { { { } } z r qu w o { { { { } o r v p { { { { { { qu p q r r } x } } { { { { { { w q o o y r r } { { { { { { ¡ q ¢ £ } o w wu { { { { { { } t ¤ r r £ ¡ { { { { { { u qu q u u y { { { { { { o wo y r } z q { { { { { { qu r r r r r z { { { { { { r q y { { { { { { u s u w r { r r { { { { { s r u u wo y { { { { { { r r w u y y { { { { { { u q y } r { { { { { { o u qu w } r r r r r r { q o o qo w u y { { w qo u ~ o w p q y { { qo w u u ~ o w p q y { ~ o w p q r q p t } ¯ v } v | z x v t s t s v } v | z x v t s v } v | z x v t s ® ¬ © ¦ ¦ q p o « o q p o q p o q p { r r r { { { { o § r n { { { { { { { { { { { { { r q p { { o { { { { q o q o w z } q t q o q w } z q q } u w y o q o q } } 18 y n n n ª ¨ ¥ Table 7: Descriptive statistics about Netherlands. Source: author’s own elaboration of World Values Survey data  Á  Á Ä Ç Â ´ ½ Å Ã ½ Á  ´ Å Ç Â ´ ´ Å ½ ½ Å Á Â Ä È È Á ´ Á É Á ´ É Ã Á Â Æ Â Ä Ã Ç Á ½ ½ ½ Á Â Ä Ä Ç Â ´ Æ Ç Â Å Á Ä Á  Á Â Â Â È Â Ã Ã Ç Â Å Ä É Å Á Â Ä Ä Ç Â Ä Æ Ç Â ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ Ç Â Æ Ä È Å Å ´ Å É È É É Á Å Á Á Â Æ Ç Å È Â Ä Á Â Ä Ç Æ Ã Ä Ã Å Ä Á Å ´ Ç Æ Á Å Ã Â Ç Ä Å Å Å Ä É Å Ä Æ È É È Å Å É Æ Ã Ã ´ à Á Â È È Ã Å Å Å È Ç Á ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ Ã Ä È Á ´ È È É Á Å Ä ´ Æ Ç È Â Ä Á  ´ Ä É Á É Æ Å É Á É É Æ Ç Ç Å Ä É Å É Ã È Á Â Å Å Ä Á Á Å Á ´ Ç È Ç Á Á ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ Á Á        Á Å Á Ä Á Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Å Ä É Å Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â È Ç Á Á ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½           ŠÁ Ä Á Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Å Ä É Å Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â È Ç Á Á ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½           ŠÁ Ä Á  Á Á        Á Å Ä É Å Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â È Ç Á Á ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½           ŠÁ Ä Á Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Å Ä É Å Á Á        Á È Ç Á Á » ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ Û Ô ¿ ¿ ¼ Ç Á Á Æ Ã Â Ä Ã Á Å ´ à à Á Â Ç Á È Â Ã Â Ç Ä ´ Å Á Æ É Å Ç Á Æ Ç Ã Â Å Ä È Å Â Æ Â Á ³· ¹ Ú± Ð Ò ½ ½ ½ ½ ¿ Ê Í Ò ± ² Â Â Ç Á ´ Ã É Â É È Ç Å ½ ½ ½ Ç Á Ä Æ É Â Á È ´ Å Ã È Ã Á Â Ç Á Ç É É Â ´ ´ ´ Å È È Æ É Å Ç Á Ã Ä É Â Ã È ´ Å Á Å Â Á ´ ½ ½ ½ ³· Î ² Í ³ É Å Ç Á ´ Ä É Â Ã Á ´ Å Å É Ä Ù ¸ ¿ º Ô ¿ ¿ Ê ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ± Í ¹ ³ Ð ± » Ç Á È Á Ã Â Æ Å Å Å Ç Å Ã Á Â Ç Á È Æ É Â Ã Á ´ Å Å Æ É Å Ç Á Å Ä É Â È Ç Å Å Â Á  Á ¿ Ô Ö è ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ é ê ë ì ³ Î Ò Ç Á Á Ã É Â ´ Á È Å Á Ä Ã Á Â Ç Á È Ä É Â Ä É Ç Å Á É É Å Ç Á Ç Ã É Â Æ Ç Æ Å Ä É Â Á ¿ Ô Ö è ± Í Ì Ò ¹· Ò ¹ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ × ¿ Ø ¶ í Ç Á  ´ Ã Â É Á Å Å È Å Ã Á Â Ç Á Ç Ä É Â Á Ç Å Å Å Æ É Å Ç Á Ä Å Ã Â É Á Á Å Å Å Â Á ì ê è ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ · ³· Í Ç Á Á Ä É Â É ´ Å Å Å Ä Ã Á Â Ç Á Å Æ É Â Ã Ç ´ Å É Æ É Å Ç Á ´ È É Â ´ Å Å Å Ç É Â Á Ö Ð ³ Õ· · » ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ α ¹± Ò Ì » Ç Á ´ Á É Â Ä Á Ä Å È Ã Ã Á Â Ç Á ´ Å É Â Ç Ç Ã Å Æ É É Å Ç Á Â Å É Â Â È Ä Å È É Â Á Ó Ô ¿ ¼ ³ Ð Í ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ³· Î Í Ò Ç Á Ç È Ã Â É ´ Å Å È Ç Ã Á Â Ç Á Ä È Ã Â Ç Ç Á Å Ã Æ É Å Ç Á È É Ã Â Å Á ´ Å É Ç Â Á ¼ Ï Ñ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ Ì Î Í Ç Á Ã É Ä Â Â Á ´ Å Á ½ Á Â Å È Ç Â È Ã Å Â Å ½ Á Â È Ç Ç Â Å É Å Â Å Á Ä Á Á É Ã Ä Â Á Â Ã Å Ç Â Á ½ ½ Á Ç Å Á Á   ´ Ç Â Ç Ç Å Â Å Â Ä É Å Á Â Æ Ä ´ Â È Ä Á Â È Ç Á Á Å Ú Ä ½ ½ ½ Í å Ì Ò ä  ½ ½ · ¹ Â Ç Á Â Ã Ä Â È É Ç Å Æ É É Á Â Ä Æ Å Â Ä É Â Â È Ç Á Á Å Ú· É ½ ½ ½ Í Ì Ò å Å Ç Á Å Ä Ä Â Ä Á É Å Æ Ç Â Á Ë Ë Ê Í ³ Ë Ô µ · Ð ¹± Ì » ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ Ú Ì Í Ò å ä Ö Á Â Â Â È Â ´ Ã Ç Â Å Á Ä Á  Á Â É Ä Ç Â Ç Ç Ç Â Å Ä É Å Á  à Á Ç Â È Å Å Â È Ç Á Á ¹ · Í Ì » » ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ Í· ³ Ò » Ë ¿ Á Â È È Ç Â Å Ä Å Â Ç Å Ã Á  Á Â Å É Ç Â È ´ ´ Â Æ É È Å Á Â È È Ç Â Å Ä Å Â Á   Á ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ± · ³· ¹ Ú Ú ¿ Ë Ç Á Ä É Æ Â Â Á ´ ´ Ç Ä Ã Á Â Ç Á Á Ç Æ Â È Á ´ ´ Á Â É Å Ç Á Ç Ä È Â Ç Æ Å ´ Ä Ã Â Á ½ ³ ± Í ± ³± ¹ · » ½ ½ ¹ ³± · À ± ¹ ² ³ » ½ ½ ³± · ¹ · À ± ¹ ² ³ » ½ À ± ¹ ² ³ È Ç Á  ½ ½ Æ ½ ½ ½ Á Ð ³ Õ· · ± Î Ì ç · Ò Ô ¶ ¿ ã ¸ ¿ ¸ ¾ ¼ º ¸ ¶ µ ¶ µ ¸ ¿ ¸ ¾ ¼ º ¸ ¶ µ ¸ ¿ ¸ ¾ ¼ º ¸ ¶ µ ß â ³ ² ± á Ý ³ ² ± ± ³ ² ³ ² ± ½ Á Å Â Å Â Å Å Á Ä Á È Á Á Â Ä Ä ½ Á Á  Á Á É Ä ´     ½  Á Ä Ç Â Â Â Â ½ Æ Â Æ Á É É É Å Ã Á Ä É Ç Á Æ É ´ Å È Ç Á Á Á æ µ     ´ Ä Ä ½ ½ ½ È Ä Æ Å ³ ² î » ´ ° ½ ½    ½ Å Ä É Å Á Å È Ä Â É Â Å Å Á Á ´ Á Ç Â Ã Á Å Â Â Ä Â ½ ½ Â Å Ã Ç Â É ½ ½ Ç Å Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ´ Æ Â Â Â È Ç Á Á ´ ³ ² î ± ½ ½ ½ Â È Ç ³ ² î ± ½ Ç ¹ ¼ Ô ¿ Ë ³ ² î ± ³ Í Î Ñ Å ³ ³ ± Á Í ¶ ³ Ô å ± å ± Á Ò ³ Рб È ³ Ô Ì¹ Ç ¼ å ¿ Á ³ ¿ · ¹ Á » Í Í Ð± ³ ͱ ³ ¿ Ô Ô ¿ 19 » Ç ° Å ° Á ° à Þ Ü Table 8: Descriptive statistics about Belgium. Source: author’s own elaboration of World Values Survey data ü ü ó ó ó ü ó ó ü ü ü ó ü ü ü ü ó ó ó ó ó ó ü ü ü ü ü ü ó ó ó ó ó ü ü ü ü ü ü ó ó ü ü ü ü ü ü ó ó ü ü ü ü ü ü ó ó ü ü ü ü ü ü ó ó ú ü ü ü ü ü ü þ þ û ó ó òö ø ð ü ü ü ü þ ð ó ó ó ÷ ñ ü ü ü ü ü ü òö ñ ò ó þ ù þ þ ü ü ü ü ü ü & ø ò ð ð ú ó þ ' ( ) * ü ü ü ü ü ü ò ó ó ó ó þ + ' , ð ü ü ü ü ü ü øö ø ó ó ó þ õ + ) ü ü ü ü ü ü ' ö òö ò ö ö ú ü ü ü ü ü ü øð ð ú ó þ û ò ü ü ü ü ü ü òö ó ó û ü ü ü ü ü ü ò ü ü ü ü ü ü ö $ ó ó ó ó ó ö ö ø ü ü ü ü ü ü $ # ô ó ó ö øð ú ü ü ü ü ü ü $ # ó ó ó ø ö ú ú ü ü ü ü ü ü ö ò ú þ ü ü ü ü ü ü ð ö òö ø þ ó ó ó ó ó ó ü ò ð ð òð ø ö ú ü ü ø òð ö ÿ ð ø ñ ò ú ü ü òð ø ö ö ÿ ð ø ñ ò ú ü ÿ ð ø ñ ò ü ó ó ó ü ü ü ü ü ü ò ö ö ð % ô õ þ " ÷ þ ÷ ý û ù ÷ õ ô õ ô ÷ þ ÷ ý û ù ÷ õ ô ÷ þ ÷ ý û ù ÷ õ ô ð ò ñ ò ñ ð ð ò ñ ! ï ï ð ò ñ ï ü ü ó ò ú ü ü ü ü ó ò ñ -ð ü ü ó ó ü ó ü ü ó ü ü ó ü ü ò ñ -ð ü ü ò ñ -ð û þ ñ -ð ø ò õ ò ò $ ð ò $ ð ò ð ø û ò $ þ ò þ ö ø ü ú ð ü ò ð ò þ þ 20 ú ó ï Table 9: Descriptive statistics about Denmark. Source: author’s own elaboration of World Values Survey data ; F F @ ? @ B @ ? @ 2 A ? @ G G @ A ? ; @ G @ ; @ ? @ @ @ C @ D G 2 @ ; ; ; @ ? 2 B E 2 B A G ? ? F B C ? ? E A A A ? B D B ? ? @ @ 2 E ? E A D G A G E C ? E 2 2 @ A B B F A B ? ? 2 B E F G B C C G B G C ? C F G F B B B ; ; ; ; ; ; @ F D G ? B G ? E ? 2 E B A 2 D B ? ? @ G F ? D 2 A E ? ? ? A 2 2 F A B ? F D D ? @ B F E ? F G @ 2 2 ; ; ; ; ; ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ D B ? ? @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ F A B ? @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ; ; ; ; ; ; @ ? ? @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ? D B ? ? @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ F A B ? @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ? C @ ? ; ; ; ; ; ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ D B ? ? ? ? @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ? F A B ? @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ? C @ ? ; ; ; ; ; ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ D B ? ? @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ F A B ? ? ? @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ? ? C @ ? N 1 S5 5 / L J ; ; ; ; ; ; 9 = = Y R : @ 2 ? @ E E @ B E D B ? B ? ? 2 ? A G E @ A G G B G B B ? 2 ? C G E @ C ? ? A C 2 @ ? / K P 15 7 X/ N P ; ; ; ; ; ; = H W 6 @ 2 ? E F C @ B @ E B E F @ ? 2 ? F A E @ A A C B 2 B B ? 2 ? F C E @ E B 2 B C A @ ? 0 ; ; ; ; ; ; 15 L 0 K 1 @ 2 ? F B E @ @ G 2 B E ? ? ? 2 ? G E E @ E @ 2 B B A B ? 2 ? A D E @ B B E B B 2 @ ? = 8 = = H R ; ; ; ; ; ; _ / T ` a b 7 1 N / K @ 2 ? C @ E @ G A D B D ? ? ? 2 ? C @ D @ D ? E B C A B ? 2 ? C G E @ D 2 F B D 2 @ ? 9 = R ; ; ; ; ; ; c 1 L P @ 2 ? F G C @ D F F B 2 B ? ? 2 ? F F C @ B E @ A C A B ? 2 ? E B E @ D G ? A 2 2 @ ? = T R d ` e / K J P ; ; ; ; ; ; 75 P 7 @ 2 ? 2 C E @ @ D E B @ F @ ? 2 ? D ? D @ E F C B ? B B ? 2 ? @ A D @ D D C B @ 2 @ ? = V U 4 d b ; ; ; ; ; ; ` 5 15 K @ 2 ? C ? E @ 2 E B B @ B ? ? 2 ? A C E @ B B 2 B F B B ? 2 ? G C E @ A @ 2 B C 2 @ ? T N 1 S5 5 ; ; ; ; 9 7/ P L/ J @ @ 2 ? ? B E @ @ B F B A A B ? 2 ? E A E @ F C F B 2 2 @ ? = 9 Q R : K 1 N ; ; ; ; ; ; 15 L K P @ 2 ? A E E @ E F D B B B ? ? 2 ? C B D @ 2 ? D B 2 A B ? 2 ? E C D @ C @ G B C 2 @ ? M O : ; ; ; ; ; ; J L K @ 2 ? A D D @ D C C B F ? ? ? 2 ? @ A G @ D A 2 B 2 A ; ; ; 5 5 7 P @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ D B ? ? ? @ G D 2 @ 2 C A @ ; ; ; @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ D B ? ? ? @ F F 2 @ @ 2 C @ F B ? ? @ E F 2 @ A A 2 @ ? C @ ? A ; ; ; X J K ] P 3 F I A B ? @ C @ 2 @ E @ B @ ? C @ ? ? ; ; ; X5 B I I J K ] P ? 2 ? C E G @ ? D C B D 2 @ ? H K 9 3 \ R 5 N 7/ J ; ; ; ; ; ; K ] X J P 9 T @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ D B ? ? ? @ D F 2 @ A C C @ F A B ? ? @ G 2 2 @ G D B @ ? C @ ? \ ; ; ; ; ; ; K5 1 P 7 5 K J 9 = 9 9 @ ? @ E D 2 @ A C E @ G ? ? ? ? @ D D 2 @ ? C E @ E C ? ? ? @ G G 2 @ F @ E @ G C F I ; ; ; ; ; ; / 5 15 7 X X = @ 2 ? E E C @ D A B A C B ? ? 2 ? E D C @ C B B A A A B ? 2 ? A D C @ A @ B A 2 2 @ ? I ; 1 / K / 1/ 7 5 = [ ; ; 7 1/ 5 > / 7 0 1 ; ; 7 1/ 5 > / 7 0 1 ; 5 > / 7 0 1 3 6 = 6 < 9 8 6 3 6 = 6 < 9 8 6 3 6 = 6 < 9 8 6 3 R 4 4 : 4 : 4 : 4 h k j i g / 1 0 f / 1 0 / 1 0 / 1 0 2 . @ ? @ D F A ? ; D B ? ? ? @ @ @ C @ ; ; ; ? C @ ? ? ^ 1 D G A @ A A E ? G ; ; E B ? ? E @ 2 G A ? A A C @ F A B ? ? @ @ @ C @ C B C @ ? ; ; ; ; C E ? G ? ; ; @ A B ? G ? A G B ? C A 2 B ? C @ ? 1 0 ; ; D B ? ? @ D C B @ ? ; ? D ? @ F A @ ? B @ ; E G ? @ @ ? @ ; F A B ? @ C ? @ @ @ G 2 @ @ @ ; 2 B E @ @ @ @ @ F ; A @ B F ; ; ? C @ B Z/ ; ; ; ? A ? ? B @ G E A @ B E ? @ @ ? @ @ C ; ; ? A 1 0 Z/ @ E 2 @ @ @ ; 2 G @ @ @ E ? C @ ? @ D E D @ ? C @ ? 2 1 0 Z/ ; ; ? : R I 1 0 Z/ @ C = O 1 ] B / 1 ] / @ 7 1 K L P 4 1 R ? K 1 N N/ ? R J7 C : 1 ] = @ = 5 7 ? 1 K K N/ ; 9 R R 1 K/ 1 9 = 21 = A . B . ? . Table 10: Descriptive statistics about Norway. Source: author’s own elaboration of World Values Survey data x x w w x w q p x x x x q w w p p x w w x p x x p x q x x w x x x x x x x p w p q x w q w x p x p p x x x q q x q x p p p x w p w p q p w x p q w q p q x w p q w q x p x x q x x q x w w x x x x x w w x p x x w p w q x x x q x w x x x x x x w x x x x x x x w x p x x x x x x w x w ¨m o n x x x x w x x x x w o { { m § w x p w p w x p p w x x p p x x w x q p m o{ } m w x w x p w w x q q p x w x p x p q p q ¦ | n o{ n o ww xx q w w p w w w x q w p p w xx p q p ww w x p p w p w ~ } o m m w x p p w w x x w p w w x x q w p x x w x w q q w p x ¡ ¢ o £ w x q p x x x w x p p q w p w x w p p x w x q p w ¤ ¥ m }{ } w x q q q p w x x q q p p w x q q p x w x w w p z ¤ ¢ { o{ w x p q w p w x w x w x p x x w x p p w p x w x x p p o { { }m m w x p p w x w x p w x x w x q p w x o o{ w x x w p p w x p w x w w p p x x w x x w q p x w x x w p x w x q w p w x p p p w x w p p q o { y x w q x x x x w x q w x x q x w { { } y x w x x x x w w p w x x x w w { }m x x q x x x x w w x x w w q p w } { { o x q w q w x x w x w w x w w x w m { o{ } w x p p q p x x w x w q q w x w q q q x w x p w x w p q q o m m om } { z } om { m } n o om } { m } n o om } { m } n o m } n o q w w x x q p w o n | | ~ | z y | | ~ | z y | | ~ | z y | | ~ | z y s v t t m o n r u m o n m o n m o n w l x x x x x x p x q x x w x w q ¨m w q w w x x q x p w o n x x x x x w q q p p w x p w x w x p w w ¨m x x w q w q x x o n w ¨m p o m o m w o w } o z m o } w o { } o m o m o 22 q l p l x l Table 11: Descriptive statistics about Sweden. Source: author’s own elaboration of World Values Survey data ¶ ¶ ¶ º  º ½ ½ À Á Á ¿ ½ º ½ » ¼ » ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ º º » º ½ À º ½ ¾ º º º » º ¿ À º Á ½ ¿ º º » º  » º ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ À  ¼ ¿ ½  ¾ ¾ ½ ¼ À ½ º Á º  Á º »   Á ¼ »  ¿ ¼ » » ¼ À ¾ » º  ¼ ½ ¿  ¿ Á À  ¾ »  ¾ ¼ º ¿ ½ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¿ Á Á ½ º ¼ ½ »  À Á º » ½ ¼ Á ¼ ¼ À  À ¼ ½ ¿ ¿ ½ ½ ¾ ¿ ¾ ¿ À ½ ½ » ¬  ¬ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ º º º º º ½ ¾ º º º º º º º º º Á ½ ¿ º º º º º º º º ½ ½ » º ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ º º º º º º º º ½ ¾ º º º º º º Á ½ ¿ º º º º º º º º ½ ½ » º ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ º º º º º º º º ½ ¾ º º º º º º º º º Á ½ ¿ º º º º º ½ ½ » º ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ º º º º º º º º ½ ¾ º º º º º º º º º Á ½ ¿ º º º º º º º º ½ ½ » º ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ É ¬ ΰ ° ª Ç Å ´ À ¿ ¼ º À Á  ¾  º À » Á º Á Á  À Á ¿ À º Á º » Á  ¼ Á » º Ô Í ¸ ¸ µ ¬° ² Óª É Ë ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¸ Ã Æ Ë ª « À ¿ ¼ º Á ¾   º º À ½ ¼ º ¼ À  Á » ¿ À ½ ¼ º À ¾  ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ À ½ ¼ º » ¾  Á º º À ¼ ¼ º »   ¾ ¼ ¿ À º Á º À   ¼ » » » º ¾ ¬° Ç « Æ ¬ » º Ò ± ¸ ³ Í ¸ ¸ à ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ Ø ² ¬ É ª Æ ª ´ Ï Ù Ú Û Ü À  Á º ½ ¾  º  º À ¿ ¼ º º   ½ ¼ ¿ À » Á º ¾   º Á » º ¸ Í ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¬ Ç Ë À ¾ ¼ º ¿ ¾  ¾ º À ¼ ¼ º ½ º ¾ ½ Á ¿ À À ¼ º ¾ ½  À Á » º ¸ Í Ï Ý Þ Ú Æ Å Ë ª ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ²° Ë ² À Á º ¾ »  º º À » Á º ¿ À   À ¿ À  Á º À   ¾ À » º ¸ Ñ ¯ Ð ß Þ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ Ü ° ¬° Æ À Á ¼ º º ¾  ½  º À º Á º ¿  ¼ Á ¿ À Á ¼ º  ¾  ¿ ¼ » º Ï Ú É ¬ ΰ ° ´ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ Ǫ ²ª Ë Å ´ À º ¼ º À ¾ ¿  º º À ¾ ¼ º ¿  Á » º Ì Í ¸ µ ¬ É Æ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¬° Ç Æ Ë À ¿ ¼ º Á º ¾  º À  Á º À º ¾ ½ Á ¿ À º ½ º  ¼  » ¼ » º µ È Ê ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ Å Ç Æ À ½ º ¿ »  ¿ º À º ½ º ¿ »  º Á ¿ À ¾ ½ º   ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ º ¾ À º »  º ½ ¾ º º º º º º º º º Á ½ ¿ º À À º ¼  º ½ ½ » º ¼ » Ó° º ¶ Æ Ö Å Ë Ä ® º Ä Ä Ã Æ ¬ ´ ° ° ² Ë ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ Ó Å Æ Ö Ë × Í ® º ¿ À º  À º ½ ¾ º º º º º º º º º Á ½ ¿ º º » º ½ À º ½ ½ » º ° É ²ª Å ´ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ Æ Ö Ó Å Ë × Ï º Á À º ½ ¼ º ½ ¾ º º º º º º º º º Á ½ ¿ º º » º » » º ½ ½ » º ² ° Æ Å ´ ´ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ư ¬ Ë ´ Ä ¸ º ¿ À º Á » º » º º º » º ¿ À º ¿ ¼ ¿ º ½ À º ¾ ¼ º ½ » » º ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ¶ ª ° ¬° ² Ó Ó ¸ Ä À º ¼ º À ¾  ¾ º À Á » º » ¾ » Á ¿ À ¿ » º ¿ º ¾ ½ ¼ » º ¶ ¬ ª Æ ª ¬ª ² ° ° ´ ¶ ¶ ² ¬ª ° ¹ ª ² « ¬ ´ ¶ ¶ ¬ª ² ° ¹ ª ² « ¬ ´ ¶ ¹ ª ² « ¬ º º º À º º ¶ º » º º  º º ¶ ¾ À ½ ¾ º º º º º º º ½ ½ ¶ ¾ º º ¾ ¶ ¶  ½ ¿ ¼ º À » ½ ½ ½ » ¾ « Í ¯ ¸ æ ± ¸ ± · µ ³ ± ¯ ® ± ¸ ± · µ ³ ± ¯ ® ± ¸ ± · µ ³ ± ¯ ® ¯ ® ª ¬ « ä â â ¬ « ª © ª ¬ « ª ¬ « ¶ ¶ º º À º º º ¶  º º ¿ À º ¾ À Á ½ ¶ ¶ ½ ½ » º ¬ « Õª º º º º º º ¶ Á Á º ½ ½ º ¿ ¿ ¿ º º  ¾ º º ¶ ¶ º À º  º ¼ ¶ ¶ ¶ º º º ¿ ¼ º º º º ½ » º À « Õª ¶ ¶ º ½ ½ » º ¬ « Õª ¶ ¶ ¶ ½ º Õª ½ Í ¸ µ  ¬ Ö ª ¬ Ö ª » ² Ê Ä Í ¬ Æ Ç Ë ¯ ¬ ɪ ½ º Æ ¬ É ² Å ½ ¬ Í ¸ » µ ¸ Ö º ¬ ° ² º ´ Æ Æ Éª ¬ ƪ ¬ ¸ Í Í ¸ 23 ´ À © ¾ ©  © å ã á à Table 12: Descriptive statistics about Finland. Source: author’s own elaboration of World Values Survey data õ ð ó ó í î ð õ ô ó ù ó û ù ó ó û ð õ ï ó ó ð ó î î î î ö ð í î ð î ó ï î ý ý þ þ þ ý þ Ͳ þ ÿ þ ý þ ý ý ý þ ý ý Ͳ ý Ͳ ÿ þ ý ý ÿ ý ý þ Ͳ þ þ þ ý ý ÿ ý þ ÿ þ ý ý þ þ ý ý ý þ ý ÿ þ ÿ þ þ þ ý ý ý þ þ Ͳ ý ý ý ÿ ÿ ý ÿ ÿ þ ý ÿ ÿ þ ý þ þ ý ý þ ÿ ý ý ÿ þ ý þ ÿ þ þ ÿ ÿ þ þ ý ÿ ÿ ý ÿ ý ý ù ôû ð Ͳ þ þ Ͳ ý þ ý Ͳ þ þ þ ÿ Ͳ þ Ͳ þ þ ÿ ý ÿ þ ÿ ý ÿ ö ù ú û ð ñ Ͳ ý Ͳ ý ý þ Ͳ Ͳ ý þ ÿ Ͳ ÿ Ͳ þ Ͳ ý þ Ͳ ÿ ý ÿ ÿ ÿ þ ÿ ÿ ý ý ÿ Ͳ ý Ͳ ÿ þ ý Ͳ ÿÿ ý Ͳ þ þ ï õû ï ð ñ ú Ͳ þ ý ý ý ý ý ý ÿ þ þ ö ý ý ý ý ý þ þ ÿ ý ý þ þ þ ý þ þ ý ý þ ÿ ý þ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ý ý þ ÿ þ ÿ ý ý ÿ ý ÿ þ ÿ þ þ ý þ ÿ þ ý ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ý ý ý ÿ ÿ ý þ þ ý ÿ þ þ þ ý ý þ ÿ ý ý þ ý ÿ þ ý ÿ ý ý ý û ð ý þ ÿ ÿ þ ý þ ý ý þ þ þ ôû ð û ð ý ý ý ÿ ÿ ý ý ÿ ý þ þ þ ý ý ý ý ý ÿ þ ý ý þ ÿ þ ý ÿ þ ý ÿ þ ý ÿ þ ý ñ ð ó ï í ëë é î è ö ï ó ÷÷ öí õ ô ó õ ô û õ ÷ öí ó î ó õ í ÷ öí õ ô î Ͳ ÿ ý Ͳ Ͳ ÿ ý Ͳ Ͳ ý Ͳ Ͳ ý ý þ ý Ͳ Ͳ ý ý û ð ú Ͳ þ þ þ ý ÿ ö í Ͳ ÿ ý þ ÿ ÿ ý ù Ͳ þ Ͳ ý ý ý þ ÿ ý Ͳ ý ý ÿ Ͳ ÿ þ þ ô û Ͳ ý ý ý þ ó ï Ͳ Ͳ ý þ þ þ ÿ û õ õ ð ñ Ͳ þ ÿ ý ý þ ù ù Ͳ ý þ Ͳ þ ý þ ý þ ý î î Ͳ ÿ ÿ Ͳ ð Ͳ ð ïô î ó Ͳ þ Ͳ ÿ þ î û ð õ û Ͳ þ ÿ ý ð ï î Ͳ ý þ ú ó ö ï Ͳ î ð Ͳ ð þ ú ù Ͳ ð Ͳ ÿ ÿ ì Ͳ ï î þ ÿ ý þ ú ù ù õ ö ïô ÿ Ͳ ÿ ö ö û ö í û ÷ó Ͳ ý þ þ ô ö Ͳ î ð ÿ ö ì Ͳ ï î û ó í Ͳ ó ö ï ø ïô ð õ û ó õ ö ï î ú ÷ Ͳ î ð ï ð ö ñ ó í ö ý ù û ö ï ñ þ ð î ð û ÿ í 24 ü ò ú ø ò ù ø ò ì ê ç Table 13: Logit regression about the trends of relational goods in Italy. Source: author’s own elaboration of World Values Survey data F F - $ - * % % $ - - $ $ F ( % (. % $ % $ Q 5 < 8 8 A 6 ; < ; ; ; ; < 8 7 A > D D D C < Ͳ A Ͳ < B 8 5 A < > > @ 5 ? 6 @ 5 < B D D D C 6 8 7 < Ͳ ; < D D D C A ; = 7 > ; < < ; ; 6 ? ; C 7 6 B C > ; 5 < C 5 7 B < > ? ; 5 C = ; < ; < > > 5 ; > A 5 < D D D C 8 7 7 B D D D C ? ; < < Ͳ 7 5 A 6 @ 8 5 B 7 < B 5 < B 5 < B B D ? D D D C A ? 7 < @ A 6 ; > ; C 6 = D D D C > @ 8 B D D < B 8 D 6 6 ; < D D ; > A D C = ; 8 B D D C ; 7 8 B D D D C 5 D 6 ; < B 6 8 D < < 5 5 5 ; < D D D C 5 6 D C > 6 8 < @ < < < C A = ; ; 5 @ ; ; 5 5 5 ; < < < < Ͳ ; A 6 ; < < D C = B ; 5 < 5 ; ; ; 5 ; ; ; ; 5 ; ; ; 5 ; ; ; < < < < < C 8 < < < = D D D < 6 A ; ; D D D C > = B C 5 6 > D B 5 A > D D D C ; A ; D D C @ 5 B > 8 B > D D 8 D < C D D D ; C A B D D D C 5 @ A B C ? = ; B C ? = ; B C 7 6 < < < < < B 6 ; ? ; 5 = ; ; 5 = ; ; ? > ; ; < C A 8 ; B D 5 < < < < ? > 5 @ 8 B D D D C A 5 8 B D D D C A 5 8 B D D D C @ = 7 B D D C 8 7 D ; D D C > = B A B @ ? > 5 D D ; D D D D C > < < < < < < < < < < < Ͳ @ ; ; ; ; ; A @ 7 5 8 @ ; ; < C A ; < < B 7 A B = @ 5 6 D < 8 8 A ; A 8 A ; A A ; A 6 A ; > 8 5 ; > 8 5 ; 5 7 ; ; 5 A ; ; 8 A = ; 8 A = ; 7 ; ; 5 = = = ; A = @ ; < < < < B D D D C 8 ; > B D D D C > A A B D D D C A ; @ B D D D C 8 > A < < < < Ͳ ; < 5 < B A < < 5 @ ; ; 5 ; ; ; < < C 6 D 5 D D D ; B 8 = D C ; < < A = @ ; A ? > ; 7 8 @ ; 6 8 A ; = = > ; < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < B C 8 8 ; B C 6 8 ; B C > 8 ; B C = 6 ; B D D D C A 5 8 B D D D C A 5 8 B D D D C > ; 8 B D D D C 8 8 8 B C 8 > ; B C 8 > ; B D C = @ 5 B C = ? ; B C @ > 5 B C @ > 5 B D D C ? 5 6 B D D D C 5 @ 6 < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Ͳ 8 A = = ; A 6 < D D D C Ͳ = Ͳ < = @ A 7 5 @ @ 6 ; C A Ͳ 6 < B 7 A A < @ 6 6 ; B = 5 < < Ͳ ; ; ; ; ; ; < D D D C < < D C = = 8 B D D D C ; 6 ; ; ; B 7 = D D D C ? @ @ B D < Ͳ @ < 6 < @ A ? C 7 8 @ ; ; < B ; 8 < < < < C D 5 > D D D ; ; B 7 > A D C 5 D A @ 7 # : $ 9 Ͳ ; 7 = 7 8 ? < 5 6 = 7 B 7 ; < = ; ; ; < D D D C = ? 6 ; ; ; B A 8 7 < < C 7 D > D D ; ; > D < B D A @ ; Ͳ 8 7 < Ͳ 7 6 ; ; ; ; Ͳ ; ; < B ; A 8 < < C A 7 B 5 < ? 7 = ; B @ < < < D C A 8 8 6 Ͳ A 6 5 ; A = < D D D C = @ 6 6 ; < < < D D D C = 5 ; ; ; < < B 7 < ? A A ; Ͳ > < 6 6 7 > B A 5 < B 5 C ? ; ; B D D D C 7 ? ? 7 = ; < ; ; < < 8 # : $ 9 Ͳ 8 < 7 A Ͳ 5 ; < Ͳ ; ; ; ; ; < C 7 A < < B = < ? @ B D D D C 7 > = B D D D C @ ; 7 B D D D C @ ; ; D D C > ; D D C 5 ; B @ 7 < < D D D C Ͳ ; ? 6 < 5 6 = 7 B ; 6 7 5 ; < D D D C 7 < < B 7 B B 5 A A 5 6 < # : $ 9 Ͳ A ; A ? A A 6 B 7 = < < < 6 7 5 ; ? 8 @ ; > 7 5 ; < < D C 8 < # . $ 8 < 6 < Ͳ 6 ; < D D D C = 7 Ͳ ; 6 6 7 > B 5 Ͳ > < ; < < D D D C A > Ͳ ; 5 A ; ; ; 7 A 5 7 8 6 6 ; B 7 < Ͳ 5 6 ? < B = < A 6 ; 6 < < D D D C A < < > 7 5 ; 7 ; 6 ; Ͳ 7 > Ͳ 6 A A 6 5 < D D D C @ Ͳ < 8 6 5 8 B 7 ? < C > 5 Ͳ ; < < D D D C ; 6 88 A 5 ; 8 6 6 ; Ͳ ; ; ; ; ; ? 7 > 6 < < < Ͳ ; < A 5 < < 7 C = 6 B 5 < B 5 8 A 5 C > B ? = < B @ 5 Ͳ 5 ? 8 5 A 8 5 ; ; ; ; B 6 6 A A ; < D D D C 6 ; ? B D C A A 5 B D C A A 5 B D D D C A < 6 7 8 ; ; 8 ; ; @ 7 ; ; 7 6 ; ; ? = > ; ? = > ; A 8 ; 8 ; > ; ? > ; ; ? > ; ; 7 A 5 ; @ = ; ; ? > 5 ; ? > 5 ; > = 5 ; 8 6 6 ; 6 8 7 6 5 8 7 6 5 8 7 6 5 8 7 6 5 " $ # % $ " + $ ( * - ( % % .." (/ - 0 /* - .." #" 0 /* - % - * " 0 /* .." % 7 7 < Ͳ 5 < < D D Ͳ ; ; ? @ ; ? 8 5 > 5 A 8 < B > 7 B @ 6 Ͳ 5 < < ; ; < < < C = < < < < < # . $ Ͳ A 8 = ; ; ; > 7 ; D C @ 5 7 A A 8 B 5 5 5 8 5 ; 5 8 5 ; G 2 ' 3 2 Ͳ 7 5 > < Ͳ A 6 ; > B ; 5 Ͳ 7 > ; Ͳ < ? 5 < Ͳ = ; > 5 < < B 6 5 < Ͳ 5 < ; ; D D D C @ 5 < D D D C (# " F # $ + Ͳ ? 8 5 > 7 A ? 5 7 ? > 7 ? 7 6 ; B = 7 8 < E $ ( + 3 Ͳ ; ; 6 > < B ; 5 < A = ? ; < < D D D C = 7 9 / Ͳ 7 ; ; ; ; < D D D C ; @ Ͳ = < A ; A = 5 B 5 5 < C 5 ; 5 C ; A < B > 5 ? 7 6 ; B 8 3 Ͳ > < < D D D C < A < < # : $ G Ͳ ? 8 5 ; ; ; ; 7 8 @ A ? ? A 5 @ 5 5 ; ? ; B C A C A 5 > ; B 5 ? < < E / * Ͳ 5 Ͳ < @ < < B 8 5 < < B ; / Ͳ ; ; = 5 5 5 = 5 ; ; ; ; < D D D C A 5 @ 5 < G 2 ' 7 7 > 5 Ͳ < < 7 6 ? 6 5 B ? ; > < Ͳ A 5 @ A 5 ? < < D D D C ? ; @ ; 6 5 # # . Ͳ ; ; < ; ; ; ; 7 6 ? 6 5 B D > < A 7 @ ; % ' - ( Ͳ < < 8 ? 5 ; ; < < < D D C 8 < # " $" + Ͳ A 7 5 > < Ͳ ( A 7 5 6 > @ 8 = ; ; ; ; 8 5 = ; 5 B ? 8 % Ͳ ' 8 < < < = 5 D D D C A $ ( ' 2 2 ' Ͳ P ' ' D D D > 7 ; ; 5 6 > @ 8 = ; ; ; ; B @ 5 5 @ < < = 6 ' 3 % Ͳ F (. % - < Ͳ > < < < F Ͳ ; 8 > 7 ; ; 5 8 5 6 @ 5 ; ; ; ; 6 ' 3 $ #" Ͳ 5 7 < < < F % H Ͳ Q > > ; 5 7 6 @ 6 ; ; 6 @ A 6 5 6 6 G 3 ' 2 M ' 2 G - (/ Ͳ R ' P ' ' D 7 5 < < Ͳ ' 2 ' D Q ; 5 A 7 = ; 6 ; ; / / # / *# G 2 I Ͳ $" + R % 5 < 6 N $ Ͳ ( / ' G % $ ' P ' > A 7 / Ͳ % ($ F . ( ' D ' Ͳ Ͳ $ % % Ͳ Ͳ F - - M J ' ' ' - K J ) * % % $ : ( / " / Ͳ U - % 0- L Ͳ Ͳ W % . / Ͳ S 7 < # F $ " ( F- $ - G ) S O - *# 8 2 #- 2 / " % (/ ' 3 $ : * Ͳ 0 ($ J 1 $ #" - ." J N / - * / + # T S 5 # V S 6 25 4 , 3 1 , 2 1 , ) ' ' & ! Table 14: Logit regression about the trends of relational goods in Great Britain. Source: author’s own elaboration of World Values Survey data w w | y d{ r d | } } | y s y } t d w t q | } t } } d d w t } d h h g j _ h Ͳ g l j k j m h g g g g h h k a l k k i j k h h n p p p o m g k n p p p o a g k n p p p o i i a h h h h Ͳ g g g g g ` l i a h p p p o ` k l _ j a l _ ` ` l g l k a g l i ` h n o a _ _ n o l l g h h Ͳ ` _ h h i a m ` n k g m h h ` l _ g h h p p p o g ` b n p h j l k g j l h p p p o ` a b n p p p o ` a p k g n b p o g ` b _ n o g k g n i g o l h h i ` h b b h n ` b g o g g k g h ` g h h h b l i g _ l i g k i _ g b i _ g l o h h _ j ` g a n o h j h n m _ _ a ` g h o a i _ g g ` g h h n h j _ g h h h h h h h o j _ g n o j ` g n o j g _ n o l l g n o j b g n o g i g n o i b g n o k f t { w h h h h h h h h Ͳ k m b k m j m g g g g h h p p p o j b i i ` l l b g o a j g n o i n _ _ i a j g n ` g u t k g g g i g g g b a g g _ a g g k _ g g ` ` g g _ _ g g m g g g z s y x v h h h h h h h h h h h h g h h h n h o i n h n _ g g l i g g ` i g g h h p o m h h g g h p o k b _ o b m n h b _ p o b i _ a g h h n p o j j _ n o _ a h h h g g l ` g g a g g g g h p p o j ` ` n p p o a a ` h i a g g j a g g _ n i g g ` _ p h h i g _ g j g _ g _ m g g _ ` g g ` ` g g i _ g g a p o a i n o h h h h h h a ` h n g g _ m n o k a _ p o k i _ _ m o j i g n p p p o _ n m h h n j ` b n _ p p p g _ g g g h p p p o b a b n p p p o _ m a n o _ a _ n o l a _ n o i n n o h _ g g g h n b _ a _ j _ h _ g g g h h h h f q d l n h h h h g g g ` _ a o _ i g n o b m g n f q d a _ o h h p p p a g ` _ i g o h h o b m b n p p p ` b _ n p p p o l a m b l m o g l p p p o i b n p k ` m ` _ p p p i g n b b p h h m b ` p o g k i n p p p o j o m ` _ g ` l n h a a o i n p p p o _ ` n b _ g ` n j ` h p o ` ` p p p o k i n h _ g n h s a f d r h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h n p p o b g ` n p p o m k ` n p p p o j k ` n p p o a b ` n p p p o a m b n p p p o b k b n p p p o g _ k n p p p o i i b n p p p o b j a n p p p o k a a n p p p o m j ` n p p p o _ g a n p p o j _ ` n o k b _ n p p o a b ` n p p p o i i ` f e d c h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h Ͳ ` g i ` h Ͳ _ h g g g g l j a Ͳ g g _ i g _ g h h n ` k h i b k _ h h h p h h h Ͳ k h _ ` j l a ` g g g g h p p p o j ` k h ` a l _ p p h n j g k a l p p o a m b k a j g s y Ͳ ` l _ g g g j h h Ͳ ` h h b i i a h n p p p o m Ͳ _ ` m g g _ ` i a i _ h i k ` b n b b h i m a b o h p g p h p o j i ` a h h _ b g n h f q Ͳ a g Ͳ k g h g g g g h h p p p o g b Ͳ _ h k k _ g g h g g g g m j ` ` n ` ` h n j _ ` h n p p j l a p p p p o ` o _ g n b m h h | t Ͳ a ` h Ͳ i _ _ m j i _ _ h h h p p p Ͳ k k h _ ` g g j a g g g g k g ` ` h p p o m b ` Ͳ ` ` _ g g Ͳ i h h h h Ͳ k a a _ g g _ l i j g b g g g g o i _ a b h n j ` z y n h h h g _ g g i b g g l i g g h n b g a m b g a _ a g b b ` g l j ` g k a ` g i _ ` g h h h o g ` _ n o j _ _ n p p o k b ` n p p p o ` l ` h h h a a _ g _ a _ g j _ ` g b k ` g m h h h h m m n p p p o b j ` n p p p o ` j ` n p p o m k ` m ` g i h h h h p p o j _ i i g a a i g l g m g k k k g _ a n _ ` ` g l h o j a _ i k g _ g h h h h h k j g g i _ g g b g g g n o m a _ n o l g g n o _ b g n o g i g n o k i g n o g ` g n o m b g ` h h h h h h h h ` k g ` ` a g j ` a g m k ` g ` m _ g j _ ` g l a ` g b f e d c b a ` _ b a ` _ b a ` _ b a ` _ | r d t ] Z \ Y } q{ | t u | u q{ | f{ u } | { u q{ } ` g h Ͳ g h h n g i i h Ͳ ` _ j g g g _ a l l h p p p o m a k j ` ` a m _ j a b _ n h f { d{ r Ͳ a l ` h Ͳ ` a h _ i k k _ _ n m i h Ͳ a ` g k Ͳ g h h p p p o j h Ͳ i g g g g i m k _ _ n g j h l g b _ Ͳ k a _ _ m h h h h ` j g y s s y Ͳ ` ` ` b ` b _ g g g g k k p p p o m g _ ` n p p p o j i a n p p p o l h l b b g } } Ͳ g j i h Ͳ b h b g _ n m a h Ͳ g g _ ` k _ k b h g g g h h h p p p o i a a n p p p o f d f{ Ͳ h h h h a k m k m m l b b g _ ` h n k m i } ~ Ͳ k i l a g g _ _ i ` ` h h h ` k j h d t } ` g h h Ͳ g b a g g g g g g g g g g g _ g g g h ` y x | t u Ͳ ` a l ` ` a k _ l j b h h h b _ g g ` y x w z s Ͳ _ y v y y Ͳ q } | j m ` i h _ i _ g g j _ i _ k k k k d Ͳ t p p p k _ h Ͳ g g _ k _ g g h h w Ͳ k ` h h k g g g _ ` l g ` j { u Ͳ } ` i k ` g g ` h _ ` z x y s y s z Ͳ d y v y y p p g _ h l l a _ g g g u u f u Ͳ d d w t y v y y h ` ` ` a y f | Ͳ w q | t p | t u z q u Ͳ u d } y y y u z | f } } } f | Ͳ a h w d { t | w | d | } Ͳ Ͳ s d e f{ | Ͳ | f } s b y d e | u { t } u x d q{ d Ͳ f u t _ u ` r f x s ^ [ X 26 Table 15: Logit regression about the trends of relational goods in Ireland. Source: author’s own elaboration of World Values Survey data Ç Ç Ç ³ · µ ¶ Á ¶ · · ³ ³ ± À «µ ¯ ¬ ± ¶ · È Ç Ä ¶ Á ¯ ¶ Á ® ¢ · º à ¶ ¯ Á « ¶ ± Æ Å Ͳ ¤ ¥ Ͳ ¥ ¢ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¢ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¢ ª ¥ ¨ ¡ © ¢ Ͳ ¨ ª § ¨ ¢ ¤ ¤ ¤ £ £ £ £ £ £ ¢ ª ¡ © ¢ Ͳ § ¤ © ¡ £ £ £ ¥ ¡ ¨ ¦ ¡ £ £ £ £ £ ¢ ¢ ¢ © ª ¤ ¡ © ª ¨ ¡ © ª ¤ ¥ ¡ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¤ ¤ ¡ ¡ ¡ £ £ £ £ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ª ¦ ¡ © ª ¦ ¡ © ª ¡ © ª ¡ © ª § ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¡ ¡ ¤ ¡ ¡ ¦ ¤ ¡ ¤ ¡ ¨ ¡ ¡ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ © ª ¥ ¦ ¡ ¡ © ª ¦ ¡ ¡ © ª ¡ ¡ © ª ¡ ¡ © ª ¥ ¡ ¡ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ Ͳ ¢ ¢ ª ¡ § £ £ £ ª § ¢ ¡ © ¡ ¢ ¨ ¦ ¡ ¡ § ¥ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¥ § ¡ ¡ ¨ ¤ § ¡ ¡ £ £ £ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ª ¨ ¨ ¡ ¡ © ª ¨ § ¨ ¡ ¡ © ª ¥ ¤ § ¡ ¡ © ª ¡ © ª ¡ © ª ¡ ¡ © ª ¥ ¡ © ª ¥ ¡ © ª § ¨ ¢ © ¡ ¡ £ ¢ ¢ ª ¦ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¤ ¡ ¡ © ¨ ¡ ¡ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ Ͳ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¥ ¥ ¢ ¡ £ £ £ © ¦ ¡ ª ¤ ¥ ¡ ¢ £ £ ¢ ª ¢ ¢ ¢ ¥ ¡ ¡ ¤ ¦ ¡ ¡ ¥ ¡ ¡ ¤ § ¡ § § ¡ ¤ ¡ § ¡ ¥ § ¡ ¨ § § ¡ § ¡ ¡ § ¡ ¡ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ © ª ¥ § ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ © ª ¨ § ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ © ª ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ © ª ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ © ª ¥ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ © ª ¤ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ © ª § ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ © ª ¤ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ © ª ¦ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ © ª § ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ © ª ¨ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ © ª ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ « ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ Ͳ ¡ ¦ ¨ ¥ ¨ § ¤ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¡ © ª ¥ ¢ ¢ ¢ © ª ¨ ¦ ¡ ¡ ¤ ¨ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ © ª ¦ ¡ ¤ ¡ ¡ ª ¡ ¨ ¡ ¡ © ª ¡ ¢ © ¦ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¦ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ £ £ £ £ £ £ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¡ ¤ ¡ ¡ © ª ¡ ¤ ¡ ¡ © ª § ¡ © ª ¥ ¡ © ª ¡ ¡ © ª ¡ ¡ © ª ¡ ¡ © ª ¨ ¡ © ª ¦ ¡ © ª ¡ © ª ¡ ¥ ¨ ¡ ¡ © ª ¨ ¨ ¡ ¡ © ª § ¨ ¡ ¡ © ª © ª § ¡ ¡ © ª § ¡ ¡ ¢ ¨ ¦ ¡ ¡ ¦ ¡ ¡ ¦ § £ £ £ £ £ ¢ ª ¡ ¦ ¤ ¡ ¡ © ª ¡ ¤ ¡ ¡ © ª £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ ¢ © ¨ ¡ ¡ ¦ ¡ ¡ ¥ ¨ § ¡ ¡ ¤ ¨ § ¡ ¡ ¦ ¥ ¡ ¡ ¥ ¨ ¡ ¥ ¨ ¡ ¤ ¡ ¥ ¦ ¡ ¡ ¨ ¦ ¡ ¡ ¤ ¦ ¡ ¡ ¢ ª ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ « ¦ ¡ © ª ¥ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¢ ¢ ¢ ª § ¡ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ ¡ ¡ © ª ¡ ¡ ¨ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¨ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ £ £ ¥ ¡ ¡ © ª ¥ ¡ ¡ © ª § ¡ ¡ © ª ¤ ¡ ¡ © ª § ¡ ¡ © ª § ¡ ¡ © ª ¥ § ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ © ¡ ¡ ¨ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ ¢ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¦ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¦ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¥ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ Ͳ ¢ ¥ ¥ Ͳ § ¡ ¢ © ¡ ¡ Ͳ ¡ ¢ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¢ ¢ ª ¤ § £ £ ¢ ¢ ¢ © ¡ ¡ ¢ ¢ © ¥ § ¡ ¡ Ͳ ¡ ¢ ¥ ¥ ¨ ¢ £ £ £ ¨ © ¦ ¡ ª § ¡ £ ¢ ª ¡ ¡ Ͳ ¡ ¥ ¤ ¥ ¡ ¼ ¨ ¦ ¤ © ¦ ¡ § § £ £ £ ª ¥ ¢ £ £ £ ¢ © ¥ ¡ © ¡ ¢ ¬ Ͳ ¢ ¦ ¦ Ͳ Ͳ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ Ͳ ¡ ¢ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ª ¦ ¦ ¡ § £ £ £ £ £ £ ¦ ¡ ¤ ¡ ¡ ª ¢ £ ¢ ´ ³ ² ° Ͳ ¡ ¤ ¦ ¢ ¨ ¤ ¦ ¢ © ª ¢ § ¤ ¢ ª ¨ ¦ ¡ ¢ ¦ ¡ ¡ © ¡ § ¦ ¡ ® µ ± Ͳ ¢ Ͳ ¤ ¡ ¼ Ͳ ¦ ¨ ¡ ¢ § ¨ ¡ © ª ¥ ¥ ¢ Ͳ ¢ ¦ Ͳ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¤ § ¢ © ¡ ¡ Ͳ ¡ ¢ ¢ § ¨ ¢ ª ¤ © ¡ Ͳ ¡ § ¨ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¦ ¤ ¨ ¡ ¨ ¢ ¢ © ¢ ¢ ª ¡ ¢ ¯ ® Ͳ ¢ ¨ Ͳ ¡ ¢ ¢ ¨ § ¥ ¥ £ £ £ £ £ ª ¥ ¤ § ¡ ¡ © ¡ ¢ Ͳ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¢ Ͳ ¦ ¡ ¡ ¤ ¨ ¦ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¤ ¤ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ § ¦ ¡ ¦ ¡ ¡ § ¨ ¡ ¡ § ¡ ¦ ¡ ¡ ¦ ¡ ¥ ¤ ¡ ¡ ¡ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ ¶ ¬ ® Á «µ ¶ ® ¯ ¶ À Á ¯ «µ ¶ µ À Á ¯ ¶ Á µ À Á ¯ «µ ¢ ¤ ¡ Ͳ ¡ ¢ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¢ Ͳ ¡ ¨ ¢ © ¦ ¦ ¡ ¥ ¥ ¥ £ £ £ © ¡ ¡ £ ¢ ¡ ¢ ¢ ³ Ͳ ¢ ¥ ¦ ¡ Ͳ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¥ ¢ ª ¡ ¥ Ͳ ¢ Ͳ ¨ ¢ Ͳ ¡ ¦ § ¦ ¡ ¤ ¡ ¥ ¥ £ £ £ £ £ ª ¡ ¢ Ͳ ¥ ¢ ¢ © ª ¢ § ¡ ¥ § ª ¥ ¡ ¡ © Ͳ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ § ¨ © ¡ © ¡ ¢ « Ͳ ¡ § ¢ ¨ § ¢ ª ¨ ¤ ¢ ¢ ¤ £ £ £ £ ¤ ¤ £ £ £ ¶ ® Ͳ ¢ ¨ Ͳ ¢ § ¨ © ¦ ¡ ¡ ¢ Ͳ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¦ ¤ ¢ ¢ ¡ ¦ £ £ £ ´ ³ Ͳ ¦ ¤ ¨ ¢ ¨ ¢ ¨ µ µ ¬ Ͳ ¡ ¢ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¦ ¨ ª ¤ ¡ © ª ¡ ¡ © ª ¥ § ¡ © ª ¢ · · · ³ ³ Ͳ ¡ ¦ ¦ Ͳ ¡ ¢ ¡ ¥ ¡ ¢ ¢ © ¦ ¡ ¡ Ͳ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ § ¡ ¡ ¨ ¢ ¢ ¢ ® µ Ͳ ¢ ¢ ¢ Ͳ · · ³ ° ³ ¤ ¢ § ¨ § ¨ ³ · Ͳ ® ± ® Ͳ ¢ ¶ · ¸ Ͳ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ § ¦ ¡ ¦ ® ¯ ¶ ® ¯ Ͳ « ³ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ³ ² º ¹ Ͳ £ § ¤ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ³ ² µ ¶ Ͳ £ £ ¨ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¢ ¢ ± ´ » Ͳ ¶ Å ¦ ¢ Ͳ · · ± Ͳ ¡ ¾ º ½ Ͳ ® ³ ° ³ ³ ¨ ¡ ¡ ¥ µ ¯ Ͳ £ £ ¢ ¦ § ¦ ¡ ¡ ¡ ´ ² ³  ³ ´ ¿ Ͳ ® Å ¡ · · ¢ Ͳ Æ £ ¯ ¯ ¯ Á ¶ À Ͳ ® ³ ° ³ ³ · à « ¯ Ͳ ± ® « ¶  º ³ ³ · ³ · · ´ ½ Ͳ ¶ ± µ ® ¶ ± ¶ ¶ ¯ µ ® ¯ ³ ² É Ͳ ® Ê ¯ ¬ ± Á ¼ ´ · Ì Ë ² · ¹ Ë ¹ Ë · ½ Table 16: Logit regression about the27 trends of relational goods in France. Source: author’s own elaboration of World Values Survey data wave 2 Putnam's group Olson's group Other's group Trust 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 0.769*** 0.764*** 0.677*** 0.676*** 1.205*** 1.222*** 1.295*** 1.282*** 0.860*** 0.853*** 1.030*** 1.037*** -0.122** -0.130** -0.127** -0.133** [0.0502] [0.0503] [0.0530] [0.0532] [0.0581] [0.0592] [0.0639] [0.0640] [0.0667] [0.0668] [0.0738] [0.0743] [0.0549] [0.0550] [0.0579] [0.0580] -0.105* -0.126** -0.131** -0.123* [0.0612] [0.0616] [0.0642] [0.0644] wave 3 age age2 male 0.0257*** 0.0185* 0.0185* 0.105*** 0.0742*** 0.0741*** 0.00685 0.0305** 0.0308** -0.00121 0.0159 0.0156 [0.00803] [0.00991] [0.00990] [0.0101] [0.0126] [0.0126] [0.0105] [0.0129] [0.0129] [0.00797] [0.00966] [0.00968] -0.0003*** -0.0002** -0.0002** -0.001*** -0.0009*** -0.0009*** -0.0001 -0.0003** -0.003** -0.0001 -0.0002 -0.0002** [8.31e-05] [9.76e-05] [9.76e-05] [0.000108] [0.000126] [0.000126] [0.000107] [0.000129] [0.000128] [8.26e-05] [9.63e-05] [9.65e-05] 0.168*** 0.177*** 0.177*** 0.749*** 0.744*** 0.746*** 0.193*** 0.0832 0.0829 0.0772 0.0455 0.0441 [0.0504] [0.0528] [0.0528] [0.0575] [0.0605] [0.0605] [0.0645] [0.0688] [0.0687] [0.0480] [0.0504] [0.0504] 0.0363 0.0363 0.016 0.017 0.118*** 0.117*** -0.0109 -0.0115 n. of children 28 Table 17: Logit regression about the trends of relational goods in Germany. Source: author’s own elaboration of World Values Survey data Germany single married [0.0246] [0.0246] [0.0280] [0.0280] [0.0295] [0.0294] [0.0215] [0.0215] 0.424*** 0.424*** -0.281** -0.284** 0.420*** 0.422*** 0.351*** 0.347*** [0.100] [0.100] [0.121] [0.121] [0.130] [0.130] [0.0907] [0.0907] 0.131* 0.130* 0.204** 0.199** 0.178* 0.181* 0.0862 0.0823 [0.0691] [0.0692] [0.0805] [0.0807] [0.0923] [0.0924] [0.0648] [0.0648] illiterate Constant -0.0555 -1.906* 0.442 [0.350] [1.028] [0.436] -0.522** [0.245] -0.702*** -1.289*** -1.243*** -1.241*** -1.613*** -4.022*** -3.451*** -3.435*** -2.006*** -2.190*** -3.259*** -3.272*** -0.591*** -0.411** -0.958*** -0.948*** [0.0368] [0.178] [0.238] [0.238] [0.0465] [0.225] [0.299] [0.299] [0.0535] [0.237] [0.313] [0.314] [0.0380] [0.177] [0.231] [0.231] Observations 6778 6775 6230 6230 6778 6775 6230 6230 6778 6775 6230 6230 7870 7861 7408 7408 Wald chi2 235.1 255.3 207.7 207.6 430 724.6 701.5 696.8 166.1 181 217.4 217.2 5.639 37.74 46.37 50.7 Pseudo R2 0.026 0.0285 0.0252 0.0252 0.0573 0.0985 0.105 0.106 0.0274 0.0291 0.0394 0.0396 0.000558 0.00382 0.00499 0.00551 Prob > chi2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 log pseudolikelihoo d -4502 -4489 -4170 -4170 -3814 -3647 -3366 -3363 -3115 -3109 -2826 -2826 -5045 -5022 -4717 -4715 Robust z-statistics in brackets. * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1% 1) Mean values 2) Demographic controls 3) Familiar status 4) Education ï Ü ê Ü ì ú ñ ñ ÷ þ Ü ï é ê ó ë í ø îÜ Þ ì Þ ú Ü Ý ë × ì ú ó ñ ñ ñ ñ à ÷ îÜ ÷ ñ é Ͳ × Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ß ß à Ù Ø ß ß à â Ú â å â è á Ø â è á Ø à æ ç å ä Ù ß æ ç á ä Ù ß à à Ͳ ß ß å á â å à ç Ú å ß á ß Ú × á ß × â á ß ß ß à ç â á å ß æ ç â à à Ͳ Ø à à Ú × ß Ù à ã × â ä ß ß æ ß å ß ä å × ß á Ù á ß à à à à á á × ß æ ç å å × ß æ ç â å × ç ã è × Ø ç á á × ß æ Ù × × ß ß à à æ ß æ ã ß Ø Ø ß ã ã ã â á Ù ß à ç ç à à à ã ã ã á á Ù ß ã ã ã Ø ç Ù × × ß æ ç á Ù × ß æ ç á Ù × à à à à à à ã ã ã á â å ß ã ã ã â â å ß ã ã ã å × å ß ã ã ã Ù × å ß ã ã ã è Ú Ú ß à à à à à ç â Ú Ù ß ß æ ç â Ú Ù ß ß æ ç Ù å Ù ß ß æ ç Ù å Ù ß ß æ ç Ù á Ù ß ß æ ç Ù á Ù ß ß à à à à à à à Ͳ á Ù Ø ß ß å ß ä Ú â Ø ß æ ç ß Ú Ú à à æ ß æ â × ß à æ ç ß å Ù ß ß æ ç ß å à æ à à à à à à à ß ã ã × å × ß è Ù × ß ß Ú Ù × ß ß × ç Ù Ø ä ß ß á × × ß â × à à à à â × ß ß á å × ß ß ã ã ã Ø å á ß ã ã ã Ø å á ß ã ã ã Ú è á ß ã ã ã á á Ø ß ã ã ã á á Ø ß × æ ç Ù Ø ä ß ß æ ç Ù Ú å ß ß æ ç è Ø è ß ß æ ç ä Ø è ß ß æ ç ä á ä ß ß æ ç ä Ø ä ß ß æ ç ä Ø ä ß ß æ ç Ú â å ß ß æ ç ä Ø è ß ß æ ç å Ø è ß ß Ù à à à à à à à à à à à × ß ß Ø Ø × ß ß ß ä Ú á ß ß ß ß ã ã Ù Ú ä ß ß ã ã Ù Ú ä ß ß ã ã â å å ß ß ã ã á å å ß ß Ø × ß à à à à à à à à à à à ç ä á × ß ß ß ß æ ç å á × ß ß ß ß æ ç á Ø × ß ß ß ß æ ç ß å × ß ß ß ß æ ç Ø å × ß ß ß ß æ ç ß Ú × ß ß ß ß æ ç å å × ß ß ß ß æ ç â å × ß ß ß ß æ ç Ù Ú × ß ß ß ß æ ç è â × ß ß ß ß æ ç ß å × ß ß ß ß æ ç Ú Ø × ß à à à à à à à à à à à à ã ã Ú ß ß ß ß ã ã Ú ß ß ß ß ã ã Ù ß ß ß ß Ø ß ß ß ß Ø ß ß ß ß Ù ß ß ß ß ß ã ã ã × ß ß ß ã ã ã × ß ß ß ã ã ã × ß ß ß ã ã ã á ß ß ß ß ã ã ã á ß ß ß ß ã ã ã ä ß ß ß ß Ø à à à à à à à à à à à à æ ç ß â × ß ß æ ç ß â × ß ß æ ç è × × ß ß æ ç Ú å × ß ß æ ç â å × ß ß æ ç è Ù × ß ß æ ç â å × ß ß æ ç á å × ß ß æ ç Ù Ù × ß ß æ ç á å × ß ß æ ç â å × ß ß æ ç ß Ø × ß ß à à à à à à à à à à à à Þ é Ü ã Ø å Ø ß ß ã á å Ø ß ß ä á × ß ß ã ã á â Ù ß ß ã ã Ú á Ù ß ß â Ù × ß ß ã ã ã Ù Ù × ß ã ã ã Ù Ù × ß ã ã ã Ø Ú × ß ã ã ã Ú á á ß ß ã ã ã â á á ß ß ã ã ã Ú å ä ß ß à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à æ ç Ø Ú ä ß ß æ ç × Ú ä ß ß æ ç å ä å ß ß æ ç × ä å ß ß æ ç ß á è ß ß æ ç è Ú è ß ß æ ç Ú ä ä ß ß æ ç × ä ä ß ß æ ç Ú á ä ß ß æ ç Ú á ä ß ß æ ç ß × ä ß ß æ ç Ø ä å ß ß æ ç Ù â è ß ß æ ç Ø â è ß ß æ ç × ß è ß ß æ ç × ä ä ß ß Þ Ý Ü Û à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à Ͳ å à à à æ ß ß ã ã ã ä å ä Ø à ç ß × Ú ß ã ã ã è Ú Ú ß ã à à à æ Ù ß ß à æ ß ß ß Ͳ × ß ß ß ß × Ø × ß ß Ú Ù ß Ù à Ͳ Ø à à â Ú ß Ú ç ä à á å Ù ß ß ß à ç Ø â × ß ã ã ã ä á å ß à Ͳ á ß ß ß ß à ä Ú å Ø æ Ø Ú ß ã ã ã × á à æ Ø × ß à à ã ã ß × Ú ß æ ç è å × ß ã ã ã è á å ß ç Ø è à Þ é Ü Ͳ å à × × ß ß ß ß á á â à ç × Ù ä Ø ç á ß à à à æ ç è à æ å ß ß ë Ͳ × ß â ß ß ß ß à á à Ú Ú Ú å Ø Ú à Ͳ ß à ß ß × ß ß × × â Ú æ ß ã ã ã Ø Ú è × ã ã ã å × Ú × æ ä ß ç ß Ø × ß ã ã ä è Ø ß æ å × ß à Þ Ü ê Ͳ Ø è è ß Ø ä â ß à à à à Ͳ ß Ú á × ß ß å × Ø Ù ç á × Ù ß æ ç á Ù á à à à æ ç à à ë í Ͳ Ú à ß à â á Ù à æ ß ß ã ã ã × â × Ú å × × ß Ù Ø × ß ã ã ä è Ø ß Þ é Ͳ × è ß ß ß à Ú × Ú Ø Ù à Ͳ â à × Ù × ß ß Ø å å Ú ç Ø à à à æ ç Ù à ì î Ͳ Ú ß ß à à Ø è Ú å æ Ø Ú ß ã ã ã Ø â × Ú ç á Ø å ß æ Ø × ß ð í Ͳ á å × ß ß â â × ß ß å â á ß ß Ù á ß ß ã ã ã ä ß Ú ß ã ã ã á ß Ú ß ã ã ã Ø á Ú ß ã ã ã Ú â Ú ß ã ã ã ä â Ø ß ã ã ã ä â Ø ß ã ã ã å ä Ø ß ã ã ã Ù ß Ù ß ã ã Ú Ù Ø ß ã ã á Ù Ø ß ã ã ã Ú Ú á ß ã ã ã â â á ß Ø Ú Ù Ø × Ú Ù Ø × Ú Ù Ø × Ú Ù Ø × Î Ñ ì ê Ü î ú Ö Ô Î Ó Ï ñ é ì ì î ó þ ú óï é ì ï Þ þ ú óï ñ ì ú ï þ ú óï é ñ × Ø ä ß ß á è å ß ß ß è á Ù à ç ß Ͳ â à ß ß ß ß à ß à Ø Ú Ú å Ø à ã ã ã Ø è ß Ú ã ã ã ß ß å ß è ä â ß à æ à Þ ï ï Ü ê Ͳ × è è â à ß ß Ú × â á Ù × Ø Ú ß æ ç Ú à Ͳ × è Ù ß ß à à æ è Ø ß à Ͳ ß è ß Ú ß ß å × à ç ß à á è â ß Ͳ ß à à Ù Ù Ø Ù × Ú Ø Ù à ã ã ã å ß Ú × ñ í ë ë í Ͳ å à ß ß ß ß à ä × á ß á × æ á Ú ß ß à ã ã ã ä è â ß Þ Ü ñ Ͳ × è à Ø å Ú ß ß à à ç á Ø Ú ß æ ç á Ø Ú ß æ ç Ø â Ø ß æ ç ß á à Ͳ Ù ß ß ß ß à á á Ù ß Ú Ú å Ø à æ Ú ß ß ñ ï Þ Ͳ å à ß ß ß ß × è Ú Ú Ú å Ø à à à Ü î ò Ͳ × Ú è è × è à ß ß à Ú è Ú Ú å × Ø Ù × Ú Ø Ù í ñ Ͳ ñ è ß Ø à × å × ß ß à ì î ñ ì î ó Ͳ Ü í í í ã ã Ͳ î ã ß ß ß à × å × ß Ú å ß × â Ù × Ü Ý ó õ ô Ͳ ì â ß á ß ß ß ß ß à à Ú Ø í ø ï Þ ì Ͳ á × à à ß Ø ß Ù ß ß × × ß ß ÷ ð ë ö Ͳ ñ Ͳ Ü í â ß á × à à à Ø û Ü Ͳ îÜ í í ã ß ß ß ß ß ß ß ß Ø í ø ð ù Ͳ ÷ é ñ ì ü Þ ì ó ú Ͳ î Ͳ ã à à ÷ õ ù Ͳ óï n. of children ß × Ú è ä × ß á è × ý Ͳ ñ Ü í Ͳ îÜ í í é ó Ͳ é ñ ì ð ø í ë ÿ í ë ð Ͳ î ã ÿ ó ó Þ ó ú Þ ì þ ì ñ õ í í í õ û Þ ÷ Ü ï î ì ÷ ì Ü ì ì óï î ñ ó÷ Ø ì í ë í Þ Ͳ î í Ü ÷ Ù ó ñ Ü ú ð Ú 29 ø ô ë ô ù Õ Ò Ð Í Table 18: Logit regression about the trends of relational goods in Netherlands. Source: author’s own elaboration of World Values Survey data ) ( ( - - 4 + ) + $ 8 3 ' ( 4 ' - - - ( * 8 * - $ * > Ͳ # # # " # ! " # ! " # ! " ! " Ͳ Ͳ ! Ͳ # ! " ! " ! " ! " ! ! ! " ! " # ! " # " # " # ! " # ! " ! " " ! ! " ! " ! " ! " ! " ! " ! " ! " ! " ! " # # " ! " ! " # ! " ! " ! " ! " ! " ! " ! " ! " ! " Ͳ Ͳ # " Ͳ # ! " ! # Ͳ # " # " # Ͳ Ͳ ! # Ͳ " # ! " ! " " Ͳ # Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ! Ͳ ! ! Ͳ # " ! Ͳ Ͳ ! " Ͳ " ! " " $ Ͳ ! " " ! " ! ! ! ! ' Ͳ Ͳ % # ! ! ! " ! " ! " # ! " ! " ! " ! " ! " ! " ! " ! " ! " ! " # " ! " ! " ! " ! " " # # ! " # ! " # ! " ! " ! " ! " ! " ! " ! " $ ( & * 4 - ( ( * / 3 4 /+ $ $ ( + 3 4 /+ - ( 4 + 3 4 /+ $ - Ͳ Ͳ # " & Ͳ " # ! # ' ) Ͳ # Ͳ ! Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ " Ͳ # ! " " Ͳ " # # $ Ͳ ! ! " # ( * Ͳ Ͳ # " Ͳ # # ! ! ! , ) Ͳ # " + + & Ͳ ! ) ' ' ) Ͳ Ͳ " - - Ͳ # Ͳ - % ! " # ! " # + Ͳ ) Ͳ = ) ! . Ͳ 8 $ - * ) - - Ͳ ( Ͳ > ) * ( * / Ͳ ? ( * / - 1 0 Ͳ - # , 6 ) ' 5 ) ' , + ( Ͳ ) = ) ) Ͳ ( # / / / 4 ( 3 2 Ͳ * ) 6 $ / n. of children ) 6 8 , ' 7 Ͳ > 8 Ͳ ? - : 1 9 Ͳ ) ; , + / Ͳ = ) ) / 9 Ͳ 8 $ * - ( 5 1 ) ) ) ( 4 8 - + * ( 8 ( ( < 1 ; Ͳ ( /+ * - /8 ) 6 * - Ͳ * & / / - ' ) ( 4 / & A @ 8 @ B C @ 4 , % @ 30 E D 6 0 D ' 0 D 9 Table 19: Logit regression about the trends of relational goods in Belgium. Source: author’s own elaboration of World Values Survey data Ͳ R m g c e R ` b q R g g m p a c b T q R S a { z M g g g g V R d dR m g _ dR m Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ V Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ U P Y W \ M \ Ͳ M V [ O \ X W X W N Y X W N V ^ P W O U ] ^ P W V V Ͳ U [ N [ X \ [ W U U N O X U U V V V ] ^ O U M U ] ^ O U M U ] ^ Y M M U V V V Z Z N N N U Z Z O N N U N P Y U U V V V ] ^ X P M U ] ^ X P M U ] ^ [ W M U V V V Z Z U X O U Z Z \ X O U Z P M O U Z [ N O U V V V V ^ W W O U U ] ^ W W O U U ] ^ U U P U U ] ^ Y Y O U U V V V V Ͳ U U V N Y N U Z Z Y N P N ^ [ V ] ^ [ Z Z N P \ U U Z Z P P \ U U [ M W U U P M W U U Z Z Z W M M U V V V V V V V V ^ W U [ U U ] ^ W U [ U U ] ^ W P \ U U ] ^ M O Y U U ] ^ Y N Y U U ] ^ X W [ U U ] ^ N O [ U U ] ^ M O [ U U V V V V V V V V V V Ͳ U V Ͳ N M M U X M M U W Y Y U U Z W W M U Z Y X M U Y M M U Z Z Z O N X U Z Z Z [ N X U Z Z Z \ P X U \ M M U V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V ^ \ P M U U U ] V U ^ \ P M U U U U ] ^ \ M M U U U U ] ^ \ W M U U U U ] ^ \ W M U U U U ] ^ \ O M U U U U ] ^ Y [ M U U U U ] ^ [ [ M U U U U ] ^ [ X M U U U U ] ^ Y P M U U U U ] ^ Y P M Ͳ [ W \ \ M ] O U V Z Z Z Y \ O U ^ [ V \ X Y U U W M U Z Z Z Y N V Z Z Z X M M U ] ^ P W \ U U ] ^ U Y M M U U V Z Z Z P U U U U Z Z Z P U U U U Z Z Z O U U U U Z Z Z P U U U U Z Z Z P U U U U N U U U U Z Z Z N U U U Z Z Z N U U U Z Z Z N U U U Z Z Z X U U U U Z Z Z X U U U U Z Z Z W U V V V V V V V V V V V V ] ^ P X M U U ] ^ O X M U U ] ^ P M M U U ] ^ P \ M U U ] ^ P \ M U U ] ^ W O M U U ] ^ O [ M U U ] ^ N [ M U U ] ^ N P M U U ] ^ N X M U U ] ^ N X M U U ] ^ W M M U U V V V V V V V V V V V V Z Z X M O U U Z Z Y U O U U Z W M N U U Z Z Z X N X U U Z Z Z N M X U U Z Z M \ N U U Z Z Z P [ M U Z Z Z X [ M U Z Z Z N Y M U Z Z Z P W P U U Z Z Z X W P U U Z Z Z W \ X U U V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V ] ^ N P [ U U ] ^ N P [ U U ] ^ N Y \ U U ] ^ X [ \ U U ] ^ O W Y U U ] ^ N W Y U U ] ^ M M Y U U ] ^ O M Y U U ] ^ N \ [ U U ] ^ N \ [ U U ] ^ Y N [ U U ] ^ W W \ U U ] ^ [ U [ U U ] ^ \ U [ U U ] ^ Y W \ U U ] ^ W W \ U U T S R Q V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V Ͳ M N \ Ͳ M V ^ P Ͳ U \ O U O X N U ] ^ U V ] Y M M V V ] O U U V Ͳ U \ \ Y P V ] X P U U V ^ Y M M U V [ O U ^ [ Y O U U V ] [ \ U U Ͳ U V V \ O U V Z Z Z P U U O V ] ^ W V V Z Z V V ] U U U Ͳ [ M O U N Y Y \ O ^ U V Z Z Z W W Y N ] P M U Z Z Z N Y O U ] ^ Z M P M U ^ U [ V ^ N N M U U U U T _ R Ͳ M Y N M U U Ͳ [ V \ X U U ] N P U V ] Y W P U U V ^ W V X M N U U V ] \ U U Ͳ X V V ^ Y M P U Z Z Z N U M N V P \ P U U P M U V ] [ O U U Z Z Z V O W W U U V Ͳ U P Y M N O X N M M X N [ Y N M [ N V ] ^ Y V Z Z Z O X O M V V ] ^ V ^ U M P M U V ] U U U N Ͳ N [ X U U U U Ͳ U V O Y V N N U X N X O N O P M V [ X U M U O U ] ^ \ V ^ U M M U ] ^ U M M U P [ O U U O M N U [ V ^ Y N V T _ R Ͳ N Y W Y U Ͳ U U \ X P M V ] N X U U Ͳ P V W X [ U U U W W W M V V V V ] V ] [ O M U V ] O U U ] \ U U a Ͳ M Y V Ͳ W O X O U U X O N O Z Z Z \ N Y N M X X U ^ V ^ V V T R ` Ͳ P V M M [ M Y U Ͳ \ O \ U U X W \ U U N W W U U N U \ U U Z M W M U P X M U P M M U O N M U Z U W M U Z O W M U Z Z U [ M U Z Z U [ M U Z Z Z Y X P U Z Z Z U W P U Z Z Z U W W U Z Z Z Y X W U N P O N M P O N M P O N M P O N M b ` R d q K J I H G g _ b b d i p q ie _ b e T p q ie g b q e p q ie _ g M M \ Ͳ W M \ W V Y X [ Ͳ U P X U M O U N ^ P V Z Z Z M V ] M U M U N [ O U U [ a c Ͳ M M \ W U Ͳ U U O Y \ ] U P U Ͳ M M M Ͳ M V ^ O Ͳ N N M [ N P Y N ^ V Ͳ Y N U W N V ] [ \ N M V ] O M U T _ Ͳ M X V U P U Z Z Z \ W O O V ^ M V b d Ͳ M O N U \ M V ] ^ Y V Z Z Z X U N U Z Z Z \ N M M ] U M U f c Ͳ U M Ͳ M X O N ] [ N U Ͳ U O [ O V V V V T e e R ` Ͳ N V \ X ^ [ N P U U ] ^ M X O U Z Z Z c a a c Ͳ Y \ \ Y M X N N X M V V ] ^ N O M M g g Ͳ V V [ U M U N X N O O N M [ N N X Y X V [ \ Y [ N M [ N V Z Z Z O W W M Z Z Z Y [ X U T R e T Ͳ M X M N N V Ͳ x M W N M U U U [ V \ Y [ V Ͳ g X M N N V \ [ M V M X O U ] ^ P X N U ] ^ X V h Ͳ R c w c Ͳ _ c Z Z Z Y N N Ͳ d g b Ͳ Y Ͳ U U X \ [ M ] P P U U g g Ͳ x M V [ \ N U U V V V R d b d i Ͳ y X V X N O X O N O c Y W N U M \ Y O b g O V V \ R S d i k j N M N U X M N f N c n e T b Ͳ g Y N Y M c a n m f a l Ͳ R c w c c Ͳ b Ͳ d Z T i i r c a f R Ͳ Z X W [ \ N U U \ M U U T b i q o Ͳ x V V N t _ i p n. of children U M i M N \ [ M N N c n f s Ͳ y Ͳ g u T b q Ͳ R c m k s Ͳ w c c ie Ͳ m _ d g b Z r k c c c k t b T m R g e d b m b R b v b q i Ͳ b ie d g im n R d R e _ i ` T Ͳ b c a c | z N d T i } z O q R f ~ z P 31 n j a j s L F Table 20: Logit regression about the trends of relational goods in Denmark. Source: author’s own elaboration of World Values Survey data ¥ ¡ £ ¤ « ¥ ¡ ¡ ¶ £ ¤ « ¥ ¥ ¥ ¤ ² ¥ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ¢ ¡ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ £ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ¡ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ¤ « ¥ £ ¤ ¤ ¶ « ¤ £ ¶ « £ ¥ ¤ « £ ¶ « £ ¥ Ͳ Ͳ ¤ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ¢ ¡ Ͳ £ £ Ͳ ¡ ¡ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ¥ ¥ Ͳ £ Ͳ ¥ ¦ Ͳ Ͳ ± ¥ Ͳ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¤ Ͳ ¥ ¡ Ͳ ¤ ¥ ¨ § Ͳ ± Ͳ ¥ ¤ £ ¤ Ͳ ¡ © Ͳ ¡ Ͳ ¥ ¡ ¢ ¡ ¬ ¡ Ͳ ¢ ª Ͳ ¤ ± ¡ ¤ « Ͳ ¡ ¢ Ͳ ² ¥ Ͳ ¡ ® ¨ ª Ͳ ¡ ¡ £ Ͳ ¥ ¤ ¯ ¢ ª Ͳ ¬ ¨ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¥ £ ¤ ¤ ¤ ° ¤ « ¤ ¡ ¥ ¨ ¯ Ͳ £ ¥ ¥ ¤ « Ͳ ¤ ´ ³ µ ³ · ³ « ¢ ¸ ³ 32 º ¹ § ¹ § ¹ ª Table 21: Logit regression about the trends of relational goods in Norway. Source: author’s own elaboration of World Values Survey data Ͳ Ä â Ä Ç Á  è Ë Ä É È Ê Å Â â Î Í Ä Ö Ç Ï Á Í ñ ð Ñ ì Ç Á Ê Â Ç Â Â Â Ø Â Ä Ã Ä è ÃÈ Ò Ú Ý Ò × × × Ø Ñ Ó Ô Ý Ò Ý Ô Ó Ò Ý Ô Ø ß Þ Ò Û × à Ü Û à Ú × ß × Ó Ø Ú Ø Ñ Ò Û × × Ó × Ø Ø Ͳ Ñ Ͳ × Û Ò Ô à Û Ó Ü Ó Ô × × Ø Ø ß à Ò Þ Ü × × ß à Ò Þ Ü × × Ø Ø Ù Ù Ù Ü Û Ò × Ù Ù Ù Ü Û Ò × Ø Ø ß à Ó Ò Ñ × ß à Ó Ò Ñ × ß à Ô Ý Ñ × Ø Ø Ø Ͳ × Ø Ø ß Ó × Ú Ý × × Ý Ó Ü × Ø Ó Ý Þ × × Ó Ý Þ × × Û Þ Ñ × Ø Ø Ø ß à Ò Þ Ó × × ß à Ó Þ Ó × × ß à Ò Ñ Ô × × Ø Ø Ø Ø Ͳ Ò × × × Ó Ø Ø à Ú × × à Ò Ñ Ô Û Ô × × Ô Û Ô × × Ñ Ó Ñ × × Ó Ó Ñ × × Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø ß à Ý Ñ Ú × × ß à Ý Ñ Ú × × ß à Ó Ü Þ × × ß à Ú Ó Ü × × ß à Ú Ó Ü × × ß à Ý × Ü × × ß à Ý Ó Ü × × Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ü Ó Ý × × Ú Ó Ý × × Ô × Ý × × Þ × Ñ × Þ × Ñ × Û Ú Ý × × Ù Ù Ù Þ Ò Ò × Ù Ù Ù Ô Ò Ò × Ù Ù Ù Ü Ó Ò × Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø ß à Þ Ý Ñ × × × × ß à Þ Ý Ñ × × × × ß à Ó Ó Ñ × × × × ß à Þ Ü Ñ × × × × ß à Ý Ü Ñ × × × × ß à Ü Ý Ñ × × × × ß à Ó Ñ Ò × × × × ß à Ó Ñ Ò × × × × ß à × Ü Ñ × × × × ß à × Ü Ñ × × × × Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ͳ × Ú Ý Ò Ý × × Ú à Ô Ò × Ô × Û Ø Û Þ Ñ × Ù Ù Ò Ü Ü × × à Ô Ó Ü × × Ø Ø Ù Ù Û Ü Ñ × Ù Ù Ù Ô × × × × Ù Ù Ù Ô × × × × Ù Ù Ù Ý × × × × Ý × á × × Û Ý × á × × Û Ò × × × × Ù Ù Ù Ò × × × Ù Ù Ù Ò × × × Ù Ù Ù Ò × × × Ù Ù Ô × × × × Ù Ù Ô × × × × Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø ß à Ó Ý Ñ × × ß à Ó Ý Ñ × × ß à Ý Ò Ñ × × ß à Ò Ü Ñ × × ß à Ñ Ü Ñ × × ß à Û Ô Ñ × × ß à Ñ × Ò × × ß à Ñ × Ò × × ß à Ñ Þ Ñ × × ß à Þ Ú Ñ × × ß à Þ Ú Ñ × × ß à Ô Ó Ñ × × Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ù Ô Ú Ò × × Ù Ô Ú Ò × × Ù Ù Ù Þ Þ Ó × × Þ Ú Ñ × × Û Ú Ñ × × Ù Ù Ý Ô Ó × × Ù Ù Ù × × Ò × Ù Ù Ù Ñ × Ò × Ù Ù Ù Ô × Ò × Ù Ù Ô Ý Ó × × Ù Ù Ú Ô Ó × × Ù Ú Ó Ò × × Ø Ø Ø Ø ß à Ü Ô Ü × × ß à Ü Ô Ü × × ß à Û Ñ Ü × × ß à Ô Ñ Ü × × Ø Ø Ø Ø Ͳ Ø Ò Ñ Ͳ × Ò Ó Ò Ó ß Ú Ò × Ù Ù Ù Ø ß Û × × Ͳ × Ø Ø Ô Ø à Û Ú × Ü Ô × à Ó Ø Ø Ô × × ß à Ú Ò Ø Ͳ Ò × × × × Ñ Ý Ú Ó Ô Ø ß Ô Ñ Ñ à Ô ß Ô × × Ø ß à Þ Ü Ú × × ß à Û × Ø à × Ü Ñ × × Ø Ͳ × × Ó Ô Ø Ü Ò Ü Ü ß × × Ø Û × Ú × × Ø Ø Ù Ù × Ü Ü × × ß Ü × × ß × × Ø Ͳ Ø Ó Ú Ͳ Ü Ò Ø Ø Ͳ × × × × × × Ù Ù Ù Ü × Ý Ñ à Þ Û Ý Ñ Ù Ù Ù Ü Ó Ô × Ø Ø Ø Ø Ù Ù Ó × × × × ÖÏ Ä Õ Ͳ × Ø Ñ × Ú à Ü Ø × Ø à Ú Ò Ô × × Ù Ù Ù × Ñ Ñ × Ù Ù Ü Ü Ñ × Ͳ × × Ü Ô Ò × Ú Ú Ò ß × Ô × Ù Ù Ù Ô Û × ß × Ø ß à Þ × Ø Ù Ü ß Ô Ñ × Ø ß à Ñ × Ø à Û × Ü Ø Ͳ Ø Û Ú Ñ Ͳ × Ú × Ø Ò Ø à Ü Ø à Ó Ø Ù Ù Ù Ú Ó Ô × ß Ô × × ß × × à Ô Ô Ñ × Ø ÈÏ Ä Ͳ × × Ó Ú × × × × Ú Ò Ñ Ý Ñ Þ Þ Ü × Ü Ñ × Ø Ø Ø ß × × × Ò Ø Þ Ͳ Þ Ø Ó Ý Ú Ò × Ô Ø Ͳ Ü Ñ Ø ß × Ù Ù Ù Ò Þ Û Ñ Ù Ù Ù × Ó Û × Ø Ø à Þ Ô Ñ × Ͳ × × × × × Ø Ø Ͳ × Ø Ò Þ à Ñ Ó Ó × ß à × × Ý × Ø à Ü ß × Ñ × Ø Ù Ù Ù Ñ Ô Ý × Ù Ù Ù × Ñ Ñ × Ø Ͳ × Ú Ú Þ Ñ Ó × Û Ò Ø ß × Ù Ù Ù Ú Ø Ù Ñ Û Ñ × ß à × Ø à × × Ô Ø Ù Ù Ô Ü Ñ × ÈÏ Ä Ͳ Ø Û Ý Ͳ Ü Ø Ú Ó Þ Ñ × Ó Ø à Ñ ß Ú Ó Ñ Ø ß Ý Ñ × Ͳ × × × × × Þ Þ Ô Ñ × × Ú Ò Ͳ × Ø Ø Ü Ò Ý Ñ Ø à Ó × Ñ × Ù Ø ß × × à Ü Ô Ø Í Ͳ × Ò × Ü Ñ × × × × Ø Ý Ñ Ó Ø ß à Û Û Þ Ñ × Ø ß Ú × × Ï Ü Ô Ü × × Û Ô Ü × × Ü Ü Ü × × Ü Ü Ü × × Ó Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø ß Ø Ø Ø ß à Ô Ü Ü × × ß à Ô Ü Ü × × ß à × Þ Ü × × ß à Ü Ó Ü × × ß à Ý Þ Ü × × ß à Ý Þ Ü × × ß à Û Ó Ü × × ß à Û Ñ Ü × × ß à Û Þ Ü × × ß à Û Þ Ü × × ß à Û Ó Ü × × ß à Ú Ü Ú × × Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Ù Ñ Þ Ñ × Ù Ñ Þ Ñ × Ù Ù Ó Ú Ñ × Ù Ù Ú Ü Ñ × Ù Ù Ù Þ Ý Ò × Ù Ù Ù Ú Ý Ò × Ù Ù Ù Û Ò Ó × Ù Ù Ù Ó Ñ Ó × Û × × Ü Ñ Û × × Ô Ò Ñ × Ú Ñ Ñ × Ù Ù Ù × × × Ô à Þ Ó Ü Ø Ø Ù Ù Ù Ñ × Ô × Ô Ò Ñ × Ô Ò Ñ × Ò × × ß à Ý Ó Ü × × ß à Ò Û Ú × × ß à Ó Ú Ú × × ÖÏ Ä Õ Ô Ó Ò Ñ Ô Ó Ò Ñ Ô Ó Ò Ñ Ô Ó Ò Ñ ¼ Å Ä Ç Ã Á ¿ ½ ½ Â É È Ê Ã Ë ÊÁ Ç Ç Ï É Ë ÊÁ É È Ç Â Ç É Á Ë ÁÊ É È Â Ø Ú × Ñ Ͳ × Ø × × × × Ͳ × Ñ Ý Ü Ñ Ñ Ø Ø Þ Ô Ü × Ø Ù Ù Ù × Ô Ý × Ø Ä Å Ͳ Ø Ò Û Ó × Ͳ × × Û Ü ß Ò Ô Ͳ Ø Ͳ × Ù Ù Ù Ñ Ú Ñ Ó Ù Ù Ù Ü Þ Ý Ó Ͳ Þ Ø Ø Ͳ Ñ × × à Ñ Ò Ô × ß à Ñ Ø Ø ß Ý Û × × Ͳ × Ó Ý Ú Ò ß Ó Ó × Ù Ù Ù × × Ô × Ü à Ø à × Ý Ø Ͳ Þ × × Ñ Ø Ø à × Þ Ô Ø ß Ò Ò Ñ Ñ Ù Þ ß Ñ × Í Ͳ × Ñ Ü × × Ò Þ Û Ò Þ Ñ × Ó ß × × Ü Ñ × Ø à Ü Ø â Ͳ × Ú × Ø Ü Ú Ñ Ñ Ñ Ò Ò Ø Ø Ͳ Þ Ø × × à × Ò × Ò × Ͳ Ñ × × × × × × × × Ú Û Ú Ò ß Û Ó × Ø Þ Ñ × Ͳ Þ Ø Ø × Ø Û Ú Ø à Ý Û Ø Ï Ͳ × Ý Ý Ü Ñ Ü Ñ × Ò Ú × × × × × Ú Ò ß × × È Ͳ × Ó Ó Þ × × Ͳ Ø Ø Ø Ͳ î Ñ Û Ô Ý × × × × Ò Ø Ò Ó Û Ú Ͳ Â Ø Þ Ú Ñ Ø Ø ã â Ç Ã Ͳ Ä â í â â Ù Ù Ù Ò Ͳ Â Ç î Ͳ × × × × × × Û Ü Þ × × Ï É É Ä Å Ͳ ï Ý Ø Ø Ø Ù Ù Ù × Þ Ó × Â â Í Í â Ͳ Â Ü Þ Ú Ñ Û Ü Ó × ß à Ò Û Ò × ß à Ü Ý Ø Ä Ï Â Ͳ Ä â Ü Ñ Ò × × Ø ß Ô × × Â É Ï Ͳ Ä è í Ø Ò Þ Û Ò Ø Ø Ä Ã Â ä Ͳ à  â â Ͳ Ù Ý Û Ô Ñ Þ Ñ × Ó â Ç Ê Ã Ͳ Ç × Ü Ø Â å Ì Ͳ ÃÈ × Ú Ü Ý Ç Ê Ã Ä Ö É Ï Ç n. of children Ù Ü × × × Ø Ò Ò â Î ä ã Í æ Ͳ î Ø × × × × Ò â Î × Ò ç Ä Ͳ × Ñ Þ Ó × × × Ø è å À Ͳ ï Â Ø Ò Ý × Ò ã Î â Í ê â Í ã É Ê Ͳ Ä â í Ͳ à  â â Û Ò Þ × × × × Ê Ê Ï Ê Á Ï ËÇ é Ͳ è Ø Ò ë È Ê Ͳ ÃÈ Ù Ê ã À Ç ê å Ï Ç Á Ͳ Ç Ï â â â å ë è Ä É Ã èÇ Ä Ç Ê É Ê Ã Ç è Ä Ã Ï Â â Í â ò ð Ò Ͳ Ç É Ä Å Ï è ó ð Ó Ê Ã Â Ä ã á Á ð 33 Ô Ð Æ Î Ì Æ Í Ì Æ À ¾ » Table 22: Logit regression about the trends of relational goods in Sweden. Source: author’s own elaboration of World Values Survey data Ͳ ÿ ÿ " ÿ ÿ ÿ ) ( ú $ ÿ ' & ú Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ú ú ü ü ú ü ü ú ý û ú ý ü ü ü ü ü ú ü ú ú ú ú ú ú ý ú ü ü ü ý ü ú ü ú ú ü ú ü ú û ú ú ú ú ü ú û û ú ü ú ü ü ú ü ú ý ý ú ü ú ü ú ú ú ú Ͳ û ü ü ú ú ú ú ú ý ú ü ü ü ü û û ý û ý û ü û û ü û ü û ú ú ú ú ý ú ý ü û û ú û ú ý ú ý ú ý ú ú ú ú û û û û û ú û ý ú Ͳ ú û û ü ú ú ú û û ý ý û ý ý û ú ü û û ú ü ú ú û ý ý ý ý ú ü ú ü ú ú ý Ͳ ú ý ü ü ý ü ú û ú Ͳ û û û Ͳ ú ú û ý û ü ý ü ú ý ú ü ú ú Ͳ ú ü ú ú ü û ü ú ú ý ú ú ü Ͳ ú ü ü û û Ͳ ü ú ú ý Ͳ û ý ú û û ú ü ý ú û Ͳ ú ü ý ý ý ý ú ú Ͳ û û û ü ý ú ú ú ú ú ý ú ÿ þ ú ú ü Ͳ ú ú ú û ú Ͳ ü û Ͳ û û ú ü ý ú û Ͳ û ú ú Ͳ ý ý ú Ͳ ý ú û ú ü ý ú ÿ ý ü ý ü ü ý ü ü ü ú ú ü ú ú ú ú ú û ú û ú û ú ú ú ú ú ú ú ú ý ú ý ú ú ý ú ú ú ú ÿ þ ü ý ú ü ý ú ü û ú û û ý ú ú ý ú ú ý ú ü ý û ý ý û ý ü û ú ý ü û ú ý ü û ú ý ü û ú ÿ ø ö ö " " " Ͳ ý û ü ý ú ü ú ü Ͳ û û ú ý Ͳ ú ú û Ͳ ú ú ý û ú Ͳ ý û ú Ͳ ü ý ü ü ý ü ú Ͳ û ü Ͳ ú ý ý Ͳ ý ü ü û ú û Ͳ ü ý ú Ͳ ý ú ú Ͳ û ú ú ü ü û ú Ͳ ý û ú ü Ͳ ü ý û ü ú Ͳ û ü ú ÿ Ͳ ü ú ý ú Ͳ ý Ͳ ú ý û û ü ú ú Ͳ ÿ % ý ü û ü û ú ü ú ÿ Ͳ ÿ û ú ú ú û Ͳ ü û ý Ͳ & ý û ü ú Ͳ ú ý ü Ͳ ÿ Ͳ Ͳ ý Ͳ % ü ú ÿ Ͳ ÿ ý ú Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ü ú ü û ú Ͳ ÿ Ͳ ü û n. of children û ÿ Ͳ û ú û Ͳ & ÿ Ͳ ú ü ú ü ú Ͳ ' ÿ Ͳ û Ͳ % ü ú Ͳ Ͳ # ! # " ÿ ÿ Ͳ * ( û + Ͳ ( ü ÿ ÿ ( ý 34 - , , , ù ÷ õ ô Table 23: Logit regression about the trends of relational goods in Finland. Source: author’s own elaboration of World Values Survey data 6 Appendix: figures 5 6 7 8 9 ] Ͳ . 1 / V W ` a b c d ^ V W f h g Ͳ i j Y 2 2 3 2 4 1 Ͳ . _ ; 0 2 . ^ e : .... / 0 A B C D C F G B V W V W X X Y X Z [ \ H Ͳ V VV E B . / . / Ͳ J K t L 3 M C N O P Q Q K D R M K F H Z X n I C Ͳ J P F P C M H R C R Ͳ G H V W Y n n o p q r s r u v q w n X x q 4 y z { | r } ~ z s | z u w S G . / Q C R P K D Ͳ < Ͳ T V W r y . / > . / ? . / Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ . / < = . / < @ . / > Ͳ = > ͲͲͲ 0 4 . / . / . . / > 0 W V W > u r | w r v w v Ͳ Ͳ 4 > Ͳ k > 4 4 / V > > > / . U Ͳ Y [ V W k V W m V W m k r z s l m k [ k ? 4 3 = Ͳ Ͳ Z (a) (b) Figure 1: Relational social capital trends for Great Britain from 1980 to 2000. a trust in others; b membership in Putnam’s groups. Source: author’s elaboration of World Values Survey data · ¸ ¹ º » ¼ ½ » ¿ À Á Ͳ ¾ Ͳ  à ¯ ° ¶ ¯ ° µ ¯ ° ± ¯ ° ¯ ° ¯ ° ± ³ ´ ± ¯ ² Ͳ Ͳ ² µ È É Ê Ë Ê Í Î É Ï Ì Ͳ ¯ ° ² ¯ ° Æ ¯ ° Å ¯ ° ¡ Ð ¢ Ͳ £ ¤ ¥ ¦ § ¨ © ª ª ¤ « ¦ ¤ Ú ¬ £ © © ¦ ¡ « « É Ñ Ò Ó Ô Ê Õ Ö Ê Ñ × Í × Ê Ô ¡ Ï Ù Ê Ͳ ® ª « © ¤ Û Ü Î Ø Ê Ù × Ò Ë ͲͲ Ä Ͳ ¯ Ͳ ¯¯ Ä Ç × Ø ¡ Å Ç Æ ² Ç Ç Ͳ (a) (b) Figure 2: Trends about membership in Olson’s and other groups for Great Britain from 1980 to 2000. a Membership in Olson’s groups; b Membership in other groups. Source: author’s elaboration of World Values Survey data 35 Ù Î Ï Ø Ò Ë Ù Ô Ò Í Ï æ ç è é ê ë ì è í ì ê è æ î ï ð í î Ý Ͳ ñ ß Þ Ý ã ã ä ã å Þ Ͳ Ͳ â Ý Þ ß à ö ÷ ø ù ø û ü ÷ ÿ Þ ä ø ù û Ý ÿ û ø ý Ͳ ý ü Ͳ ø Ͳ ! ' Ͳ ͲͲ ý Þ å ü Ý Þ á Ý Þ à Ý Þ Ý Þ Ͳ Ý Þ ø Ͳ ù ͲͲ õ ( ) * 0 ) 1 , 3 - ) ( 4 . 5 6 7 7 1 * 8 3 1 , " $ / " ) 0 6 , 6 ) 3 . 9 - Ͳ 2 8 ) 8 - . " % $ & # : 7 ) 8 6 1 * ; á å Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ + ø Ͳ ( þ Ͳ Ͳ ý ú Ͳ á ÷ Ý ß Ͳ Ͳ â ã Ͳ Ý ò ÝÝ Ý Þ à Ý Þ à á Ͳ ô ó ß Ͳ ͲͲ & # # # # & % ó Ͳ (a) (b) Figure 3: Trends about confidence in institutions for Great Britain from 1980 to 2000. a Confidence in religious institutions; b Confidence in judicial system. Source: author’s elaboration of World Values Survey data B C D E F G H D I H F F D < < = = J K L H M K D O Ͳ N > P Q r A s t u v w x t y x v t r v z v { x @ < = > ? } z v y x ~ Ͳ | > j m n m o m p m q jjjj R < = S U T W X S Y b c V < = < @ < = < @ < S < e Ͳ T > > A \ ? \ \ ^ _ Z _ U f ` a a _ W T d e Ͳ j k j l n g > Ͳ T ^ d W d T a Y f T f X = i X e T f d _ o j Ͳ o h U j k l Ͳ k @ Ͳ < l A A < = = A @ Z < = A [ A < = ? > [ ͲͲ ? Ͳ < n n k Ͳ < j k Ͳ o p o = Ͳ @ Ͳ = n j < Y = k > Ͳ < j = \ Ͳ < Y ] ? Ͳ @ j Ͳ j k k Ͳ l (a) (b) Figure 4: Trends about confidence in institutions for Great Britain from 1980 to 2000. a Confidence in parliament; b Confidence in civil services. Source: author’s elaboration of World Values Survey data Ï ¡ ¢ £ ¤ ¥ ¦ ¢ § ¦ ¤ ¢ ¦ ¨ ª Ð Ñ Ò Ó Ô Õ Ñ Ö Õ Ͳ « Ó Ñ Ô ª © ¬ Ç Ë Ë Ì Ë Ø Ö Ù Ú Û × Í Ë Ü Ý Õ Þ Ͳ ß à Î ÇÇÇÇ É Ç È Ç Ê Ͳ Ͳ Ç ² ³ ´ µ ´ Ͳ · ¸ ³ È É â ã ä å ä » ¼ ã Ç ½ ¾ ´ ¿ À Á   ¼ µ à ¾ ¼ · ¹ ± Ͳ è ã é æ ¶ ³ ç Ͳ ¹ È É ë ì í Ê Ͳ î ä ï ð ò ò ê º ´ » Á · Á ´ ¾ ¹ Ä ͲͲ ¯ à Ͳ ° ¸ Å Â ´ à Á ¼ ´ à ¸ ä Ç Ͳ ¹ ë ñ ñ ä î é ô è Ç È ó ä ò ä ó ñ ì å Ê Ͳ µ Æ ç È Í õ Í Ͳ ö ® Ͳ ͲͲ Í ¯ Ç È Ê Ͳ Î Ç È Î Í Ì ® Ç ͲͲ Ͳ Ç È Ç È Ê Ç È É á Ê È Ͳ Ͳ (a) (b) Figure 5: Trends about confidence in institutions for Great Britain from 1980 to 2000. a Confidence in press; b Confidence in educational system. Source: author’s elaboration of World Values Survey data 36 ó è ì é Ì Í Ͳ ñ Ì å ó î ì ç é . , þ ÿ ÿ ÷ ú û ú ú ú . / 0 1 2 . 3 2 4 5 Ͳ ü - 2 6 1 - 3 5 2 8 Ͳ 7 9 : $ $$$$ ý ÷÷÷÷ % ( $ Ͳ ø ÷ ø ( ) ( * ( + ' $ ÷ ø & % = ÷ ø Ͳ Ͳ % I ù ù " û > Ͳ J D K F L B L ? I D ) Ͳ $ & $ & $ & L < * ) C Ͳ $ & ? M M N C G @ N I G B D D $ $ ) N M ? N L G @ ' ) ) P Q ' Ͳ ) û û û ͲͲ û $ Ͳ C ? & # B ? O Ͳ Ͳ ø ÷ ø ÷ & Ͳ ÷ ø * $ & $ & ) ; * ) ; ; ù $ ø H û û G ù ø ø F ' E ! ÷ ? A & $ ÷ @ > $ Ͳ ü ø ? ÷ > Ͳ ý Ͳ $ ù Ͳ Ͳ & Ͳ ù ÷ & ' Ͳ ù Ͳ * (a) (b) Figure 6: Trends about confidence in institutions for Great Britain from 1980 to 2000. a Confidence in police; b Confidence in armed forces. Source: author’s elaboration of World Values Survey data Z [ \ ] ^ _ ` \ a ` ^ \ [ b c e Z [ f g \ d ^ ` h Ͳ c i j R RR T V W Ͳ Ͳ R S W X W W Y T Ͳ Ͳ R S R S R S T V V R S T U V q X m n o p o r s n t u n Ͳ w x y o o Ͳ R S R S R S Ͳ Ͳ v z { | } V R S V v | r | o y U l t ~ o ~ s t } w p ~ y w r t Y s ͲͲ U Ͳ R S R S Y Y l } o ~ | w p Y k l Figure 7: Trends about confidence in major companies for Great Britain from 1980 to 2000. Source: author’s elaboration of World Values Survey data » Ͳ ¼ ½ ¾ ¿ ¿ Ͳ ± ² ± ² · Á  à À º ± ² ± ² · ± ² · ¸ · ¸ ¸ · ± ² ³ ´ ± ² ³ ´ ´ µ ³ º ± ² ± ² ³ ± ² ³³ ± ± ² ¹¹ ´ ± ² ¹ Ä ¸ µ ¶ ³ ´ Æ ¡ ¢ £ Ç È É È ¥ ¦ § ¨ © ª « ¬ ² ¹ ¬ ¦ ¨ ¦ ¡ º ± ² ¥ « ¡ « ¨ £ ¢ £ ± ² ± ² ¸ ± ¯ ° ¢ ¬ « ¦ Ï Ð Ñ Ò È Ç Ó Í Ô È Ï Õ Ë Õ È Ò Í ² × È º ¸ Ù Ú Ì Ö È × Õ Ð É ± º ± ± ¸ Å ¹ Å ³ · Å Å (a) (b) Figure 8: Trends about membership in Putnam’s groups (a) and trust in others (b) for Italy from 1980 to 2000. Source: author’s elaboration of World Values Survey data 37 × Ö Ì Ö Ð Í Õ ¹ Ø Ç £ ® Ì Ê ± Î ¤ Ë É × Ò Ð Ë Í ä Û Ü å æ ç è é ê ë å ì í ï Ͳ î æ ð ò è ñ ñ í ç ô ë ó ã Ͳ Û à Ü Û Ü Ý Þ Þ Û Û Ü Ü Ý Ý Ý Ý ã ß à Ü á Þ â õ ö ÷ ø ÷ ú û ö " ü ù ã ÿ à Ü ß Ý Þ à Ü Û ã á à à Ü Û Û ý ß á Ü ö ÷ ø ú ÷ $ % & ' & ) * % + ( ü à , ú ÷ ü ÷ û % ! ! Ü . / 0 & 1 2 3 4 & - 3 ) 3 & 0 + 5 & 5 4 6 Ý - ü * . + ' 5 0 . ) + ã 7 û ÷ 8 * 4 & 5 3 . ' ø Ý Ý à Û þ ß þ ý þ þ # ! # # # (a) (b) Figure 9: Trends about membership in Putnam’s groups (a) and trust in others (b) for the Netherlands from 1980 to 2000. Source: author’s elaboration of World Values Survey data A 9 : B C D E F G H B I J L K D Ͳ M N O P O @ t 99 :: ;; 99 u v w x Ͳ y z { | { } ?>=< 9 i Q R S T S V W R n s X U > : i i nn i n q q r r ol @ i n q i \ R ] ^ _ ` S a b c n m o p d > i n m i l k j m i n j i n j k l i l n j q d Y : ^ T e ` ^ V X @ i n j f YY :: >> YY <? Y : Y < 9> S ] c V c S ` X e Y S e W X i i nn r r j j n : i n r ; @ g h W d S e c ^ T p ; ; i Y Z > Z i 9 Z Z [ p ~ (a) r ~ j m ~ ~ (b) Figure 10: Trends about membership in Putnam’s groups (a) and trust in others (b) for Sweden from 1980 to 2000. Source: author’s elaboration of World Values Survey data 38 mq i ¡ ¢ £ ¤ ¥ ¦ § © ¢ Ͳ ¨ ª ¡ « ¬ § Ë Ã ® ¯ ° Æ ÃÃÃÃ Ì Í Î È Ï Æ Ì Ͳ Ñ Ò Ó Ô Ð É Æ Ê ¯ ² ³ ® ´ » ¼ ± ® · ¸ ¹ º ¯ ½ Ͳ ¾ Ã Ä Ã Å Ç × ¸ ° ¿ º ¸ ² À ¯ · ½ ² ½ ¯ º Ú Ù Ü Ý Ø Þ ´ ¿ ¯ ¿ ³ Ã Ä Ø à á â ã Ù ä å æ ç ç ß Ç Ù à æ Ü æ Ù ã Þ é Ã Ä Ý Ç Õ Ç Õ è Ù è Ý Ú è ã á Ü Þ Þ Å Ͳ á ´ Ù ´ Ͳ Ø Û ¾ Ç ¶ Æ ç Ù è æ á Ú ê ë È Á  ³ ¾ ¯ ¿ ½ ¸ ° Ͳ à ͲͲ Ä Ã Ä Ã Ä Ã Ä Å È È Ö È µ µ Ͳ µ µ Ͳ Ã Ä Å (a) (b) Figure 11: Trends about membership in Putnam’s groups (a) and trust in others (b) for France from 1980 to 2000. Source: author’s elaboration of World Values Survey data & ö ÷ ø ù ú û ü ý ÷ þ ù Ͳ ÿ û ' ( ) * ' Ͳ ú ÿ + , - . 0 / % ò ì í " " # $ ! õ ìì íí ïï ì í ï ì í ï ïï óò ñ î ð ñ 1 2 3 4 3 6 7 2 8 ? @ 5 ì í ì ô í ìì íí îî ïï ì í î î ñò ì ó ! : 2 ; < = > 3 A B ì í ò B < 4 C > < 6 8 ì ð í # # ! ! ! # õ D ð í ð í ð í ô " $ " # % " $ 3 ; A 6 A 3 > 8 C 3 C 7 8 ó E F 7 B 3 C A < 4 ò ð ðððð $ " 9 ì ò ñ # 9 ! 9 9 ó (a) (b) Figure 12: Trends about membership in Putnam’s groups (a) and trust in others (b) for Denmark from 1980 to 2000. Source: author’s elaboration of World Values Survey data N O P Q R S T U V G H O W Y Ͳ X R X W \ [ Z } ~ ~ Ͳ M t G H u { | K G G H G G I I J K G H H G L J t G u t t ` a b a d e ` u u u u v v x w v v w w J u t u v x t u v x t u { v v y z v x v f c H t { t t _ ] y z t g ] H ` h i j k a l m n o I q ] H a h n d n a k M r s e o a p n i f p a p e f o i b p k i d u v | f t u H b t ] u t | K ] ]]]] t G ^ K ^ L ^ tt M ^ v (a) { z (b) Figure 13: Trends about membership in Putnam’s groups (a) and trust in others (b) for Norway from 1980 to 2000. Source: author’s elaboration of World Values Survey data 39 v Ö ¥ ¦ § ¨ © ª « ¬ ¦ ® ° ª Ͳ ¯ © ¨ Ø Ù Ú Ͳ ² Í × ³ ® ± Î × Û Ý Þ ß à Ü Õ ¤ ¡ Í Î Ñ Ó Ô Í Î Ñ Ò Ð Í Î Ï Ð Ï Ñ ¢ Í Î Ñ Ò ¡ £ ¢ Í ¢ ¶ Í ¸ ¹ º » º ½ ¾ ¹ Î Î Ñ Ï Ò ã ¿ ä å æ ´ µ ´ ´ ¤ ¤ µ µ ¶ ¶ ¡ ¶ ¹ Á Â Ã Ä º Å Æ Ç È È Â » É Ä Â ½ º Á Ç ½ Ç º Ä £ ¿ É º É ¾ Î Ì ¾ È º É Ç Â á ë Î á ä ì í î ï é å ä ê ð ñ ò ó ó í æ ô i w ï í è ê Ò õ ¿ å ì ò è ò å ï Í Ë Î Ï ¿ Í Ê è ç Í Í å ¼ À Î ê ô å ô é ê á ö » ÷ é ó å ô ò í æ ¤ Í Î Í Ò Í ÍÍÍ ¤ · µ · á £ · · Ï â Ñ â Õ â â (a) (b) Figure 14: Trends about membership in Putnam’s groups (a) and trust in others (b) for Germany from 1980 to 2000. Source: author’s elaboration of World Values Survey data Ͳ ø øøøø û ø ù ø ü û ý û þ û ÿ ú Ͳ ø ù Ͳ ü ù ú ü ø ø ø Ͳ ø Ͳ Ͳ Ͳ ù ý ù ú Ͳ ý ü ü ý þ ø ù ø ù ø þ ý ý ý ! ù Ͳ Ͳ ͲͲ ù þ ù ù ù ø ø Ͳ ø ø Ͳ ø ù ø ù ø ù ý ý ý þ ü þ þ ý ú Ͳ þ Figure 15: Subjective well-being trends for Great Britain from 1980 to 2000 Source: author’s elaboration of World Values Survey data T , " " # # - . . / 0 1 2 2 - Ͳ 3 5 V W X Y Z Z Y Ͳ N R P N R S N R Q \ ] Y ^ _ U X ` Z [ " # $ " # $ % " # $ $ " # $ ' ) & % " # N " # $ ( & " # $ " * " # ) + R S R S N N P O Q * $ " # V ( $ " U 6 4 ) # ) % N N RR O O N R a N R a P P S Q ' N R N R O % f 9 : ; < ; > ? : g h i h # R O b P P a b c 7 : B C D E ; F G H I I C < J E C > N R a N R d N R x " # ; o p q r h s B H > H ; E @ J ; J ? @ h o u k u h r m m t w y " M ? I ; J H C < c % N " N """ 7 8 ) 8 $ ( 8 c 8 e (a) d e a O e e (b) Figure 16: Subjective well-being trends for (a) Italy and (b) Netherlands from 1980 to 2000. Source: author’s elaboration of World Values Survey data 40 z l v h w u p h u w v l v p m 7 L # g @ % K " g a n # l j N ) A " k @ = " i r p k m ® { { } { } ~ { ¯ ° ° ± ² ³ ¦ § ¦ § « ¦ § © ´ ´ Ͳ ¯ µ }} {{ | | } } · ³ ¦ § « ª ¦ § « ¦ ¦ § ¨ © ~ ¬ { { ² ¶ ~ {{ { Ͳ {{ || }} © ª | ¦ § ¦ § ¨ ¦ § ¨ ¦ º ¼ ½ ¾ ¿ ¾ { ~ ~ ¡ ~ ¡ ¢ { { ~ } ¢ ¢ ¥ ¡ ¢ ¹ ¦ § ¹ ¦ ¦ § ¹ ¦ ¦ § ¦ § ¦ § ¦ § º º ¬ ¸ ¾ Ï ¹ ¦ ¬ ~ º ¹ ª | » ½ » » » (a) (b) Figure 17: Subjective well-being trends for (a) Sweden and (b) France from 1980 to 2000. Source: author’s elaboration of World Values Survey data 41 É Å Ë Á Ë ¾ È Ã Ã Ê Í ª ¬ ¦ ¾ º { È Ë Ì Ì Æ º { Ç ¸ Æ ¤ Å § Î ½ ¦ £ { {  À ª Ä { Á | Ð Â Ì ¾ Í Ë Æ ¿ ¾ Í Â Ã ¿ Í È Æ Á Ã Ø Ù Ú Ú Û Ü Ý Þ Þ Ý Ͳ Ñ Ô Ñ Ô Ü à Ù á â Ͳ ß ü Ö ý × Ñ Ñ Õ Õ Ô Ô Ö Ö × Ò ü Ñ ü ý ü ý þ þ Ô Ñ Ô Õ Ñ Ô ý Ñ Ñ Ô Ñ Ô Ó Ñ Ô Ô Ó Ò Ò ã ã Ñ Ô Ò Ñ Ô Ò Ó þ ÿ Ò ã Ö ã Ò ç è é ê é ì í è î ë ä ü ý þ ä ã Õ Ó ï è ð ñ ò ó é ô õ ö ÷ ÷ ñ ê ø ó ñ ì î ! ü Ñ Ô ý ! þ ä ù é ð ö ì ö é ó î ø é Ñ Ô Ñ Ô ø í î # " å ú û í ÷ é ø ö ñ $ ê ü ý ü ã Ñ ü Ñ üüüü ã æ å ä æ Ó æ þ æ (a) (b) Figure 18: Subjective well-being trends for (a) Denmark and (b) Norway from 1980 to 2000. Source: author’s elaboration of World Values Survey data 1 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 7 6 Ͳ & ' ( 0 & ' ( , & ' ( ) & ' ( * & ' ( + ( & ' ( , ) & ' ( , - & ' ( ) * 9 : 2 5 ; 8 & ' ( . / & ' ( ) + = > ? @ ? B C > J K D A & ' ( E & ' & 0 & ' & , & ' & ) & ' & * O > P ? F F G Q L C M H B ? L I ? ? N I L D N G ? L N M M C D G @ N I G B D @ & &&&& ( < * < - ) < < Figure 19: Subjective well-being trends for Germany from 1980 to 2000 Source: author’s elaboration of World Values Survey data 42 % ! " " " References [1] F. Adam. Social capital across Europe: findings, trends and methodological shortcomings of cross-national surveys. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin f ür Sozialforschung, (10), 2006. [2] M. Aguiar and E. Hurst. Measuring trends in leisure: the allocation of time over five decades. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Working papers, (2), 2006. [3] S. Bartolini. Why are people so unhappy? Why do they strive so hard for money? Competing explanations of the broken promises of economic growth. In L. Bruni and P.L. Porta, editors, Handbook on the economics of happiness. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, Glensanda House, Montpellier Parade, Cheltenham Glos UK, 2007. [4] S. Bartolini and E. Bilancini. The social context of the labour supply. Siena, 2007. mimeo. [5] S. Bartolini, E. Bilancini, and M. Pugno. Did the decline in social capital decrease American happiness? A relational explanation of the Happiness Paradox. Università degli Studi di Siena - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia Politica, (540), Agosto 2008. [6] S. Bartolini and L. Bonatti. Environmental and social degradation as the engine of economic growth. Ecological economics, 41, 2002a. [7] S. Bartolini and L. Bonatti. Endogenous growth and negative externalities. Journal of economics, 79, 2003. [8] S. Bartolini and R. Palma. Economia e felicità: una proposta di accordo. In L. Bruni and V. Pelligra, editors, Economia come impegno civile. Relazionalità, ben-essere ed economia di comunione. Città Nuova Editrice, Roma, 2002b. [9] M. Bianchi. Se la felicità è cosı̀ importante, come mai ne sappiamo cosı̀ poco? In L. Bruni and P.L. Porta, editors, Felicità ed Economia, quando il benessere è ben vivere. Guerini e Associati, Milano, 2004. [10] D.G. Blanchflower and A.J. Oswald. Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 2004. [11] L. Bruni. Felicità e scienza economica. Storia, problemi aperti e spunti teorici. In P. Sacco and S. Zamagni, editors, Complessità relazionale e comportamento economico, verso un nuovo paradigma di razionalità. Il Mulino, Bologna, 2002. 43 [12] L. Bruni. Sul consumo, sui beni, sulla felicità. In L. Bruni and V. Pelligra, editors, Economia come impegno civile. Relazionalità, ben-essere ed economia di comunione. Città Nuova Editrice, Roma, 2002. [13] L. Bruni and L. Stanca. Watching alone: relational goods, television and happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2006. [14] S.N. Durlauf. On the empirics of social capital. The Economic Journal, 112(483), November 2002. [15] S.N. Durlauf and M. Fafchamps. Social capital. The Centre for the Study of African Economies Working Paper Series, (214), 2004. [16] B. Gui. Beyond transactions: On the interpersonal dimension of economic reality. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 71(2), 2000. [17] J.F. Helliwell. How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper series, (9065), July 2002. [18] J.F. Helliwell. Well-being, social capital and public policy: what’s new? The Economic Journal, 116, March 2006. [19] F. Hirsch. I limiti sociali allo sviluppo. Bompiani, Milano, 1991. [20] R. Inglehart. La società post-moderna. Mutamento, ideologie e valori in 43 paesi. Editori Riuniti, Roma, 1998. [21] R. Inglehart and C. Welzel. Modernization, cultural change and democracy. The human development sequence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005. [22] S. Knack. Groups, growth and trust: cross-country evidence on the olson and putnam hypotheses. Public Choice, (117):341 – 355, 2003. [23] L. Morales. Changing patterns of associational involvement in Europe. Workshop 8 - The changing structure of civil society, directed by Derrick Purdue & Mario Diani, ECPR Joint Sessions, Uppsala, 2004. [24] P Norris. Making democracies work: social capital and civic engagement in 47 societies. British Journal of Political Science, 35:149 – 167, 2004. [25] OECD. Are trust and civic engagement declining in oecd countries? In The well-being of nations: the role of human and social capital, pages 99 – 103. OECD, Paris, 2001. [26] OECD. The evidence on social capital. In The well-being of nations: the role of human and social capital, pages 39 – 63. OECD, Paris, 2001. 44 [27] P. Paxton. Is social capital declining in the United States? a multiple indicator assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 105(1):88 – 127, July 1999. [28] N. Powdthavee. Economics of happiness: a review of literature and applications. Chulalongkorn Journal of Economics (forthcoming), 13th March 2007. [29] R. Putnam. Bowling alone. Simon & Schuster, New York, 2000. [30] R. Putnam. Social capital measurement and consequences. Isuma, 2(1), Spring 2001. [31] R. Putnam. Democracy in flux, the evolution of social capital in contemporary society. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002. [32] T. Schuller, S. Baron, and J. Field. Social capital: a review and critique. In T. Schuller, S. Baron, and J. Field, editors, Social capital: critical perspectives, pages 1 – 39. Oxford University Press, 2000. [33] B. Stevenson and J. Wolfers. Economic growth and subjective wellbeing: reassessing the Easterlin paradox. IZA DP, (3654), August 2008. [34] D. Stolle and M. Hooghe. Inaccurate, exceptional, one-sided or irrelevant? The debate about the alleged decline of social capital and civic engagement in Western societies. British Journal of Political Science, 35:149 – 167, 2004. [35] W. Van OOrschot, W. Arts, and J. Gelissen. Social capital in Europe, measurement and social and regional distribution of a multifaceted phenomenon. Acta Sociologica, 49(2):149 – 167, June 2006. 45