æ - H
Transcript
BAHUJAN-SHRAMAN TRADITION SPECIAL ÕãéUÁÙ-Ÿæ×‡æ ÂÚ´UÂÚUæ çßàæðáæ´·¤ ISSN 2348-9286 2014 First Fully English-Hindi Magazine ÂãUÜè âÂê‡æü ¥¢»ýðÁè-çãU‹¼è Âç˜æ·¤æ NEW DELHI Vol. VI No.10 25 ÅêUÕÚU 4 ¥€ R 201 E B O OCT MARY KOM ×ðÚUè ·¤æò× Pg. 61 Mahish-Asura and Ahura-Mazda Pg. 35 ×çãUá-¥âéÚU ß ¥ãéÚ-×’¸Îæ s heroe n a j u Bah æÍæ°´ antic » ü m Ø o õ æ r à iant Âýð× ß è ¤ of val · ´ s ô e ¤ l · a T æØ Ù ¥ôÕèâè ÁØ ßæË×èç·¤, ÁØ ÚUçßÎæâ ÁØ ·¤ÕèÚU, ÁØ Öè× ÖæÚUÌèØ â´S·ë¤çÌ ·ð¤ çÂÌæ×ãU , ÂæßÙ Øæð» çßçàæCU, ×ãUæÚUæ×æØ‡æ ÚU¿çØÌæ, ×æÌæ âèÌæ ·ð¤ ÚUÿæ·¤, ·¤L¤‡ææ âæ»ÚU Ö»ßæÙ ßæË×èç·¤ Áè ·ð¤ ÂæßÙ Âý»ÅU çÎßâ çÌçÍ 8 ¥€ÅêUÕÚU 2014 çÎÙ âéÙèÌßæÚU (ÕéŠæßæÚU) ·¤è âÖè ÖæÚUÌ ßæçâØæð´ ·¤æð Üæ¹-Üæ¹ ÕŠææ§üU §Uâ ¥ßâÚU ÂÚU 25ßè´ çßàææÜ àææðÖæØæ˜ææ (çÌçÍ 7 ¥€ÅêUÕÚU 2014 çÎ٠׊æéßæÚU (×´»ÜßæÚU) ÎæðÂãUÚU 2 ÕÁð ÎÚÔUàæè ×ñÎæÙ, ÜéçŠæØæÙæ) ÖæÚUÌèØ ßæË×èç·¤ Šæ×ü â׿Á (ÚUçÁ.) ֿ߿пâ mUæÚUæ 8 ¥€ÅêUÕÚU ·¤æð Ö»ßæÙ ßæË×èç·¤ ×ãUæÚUæÁ ·¤æ Âý»ÅU çÎßâ ÂêÚUÔ ÖæÚUÌ ×´ð ãUáæð„ü æâ âð ×ÙæØæ Áæ ÚUãUæ ãñU, §Uâ â´ÕŠ´ æè 7 ¥€ÅêUÕÚU 2014 çÎÙ ×´»ÜßæÚU ·¤æð Ö»ßæÙ ßæË×èç·¤ Áè ·¤è 25ßè´ çßàææÜ àææðÖæØæ˜ææ ÎÚÔUâè ×ñÎæÙ ÜéçŠæØæÙæ ´ÁæÕ ×ð´ çÙ·¤æÜè Áæ ÚUãUè ãñU, ãU× ßæË×èç·¤ â׿Á âð çßÙÌè ·¤ÚUÌð ãñÚ ç·¤ Ö»ßæÙ ßæçË×ç·¤ Áè Âý»ÅU çÎßâ ·ð¤ çÎÙ ¥ÂÙð ÕýrææÜØ ×´çÎÚU ¥æñÚU ƒæÚUæ´ð ×ð´ ÚUæàð æÙè ·¤ÚÔÚ °ßÚ °·¤ ÎêâÚÔU ·ð¤ ƒæÚU çׯUæ§UØæ´ Õæ´ÅU·¤ÚU ¹éàæè ×Ùæ°´Ð ¥æÂ âÕ âð çßÙÌè ·¤ÚUÌð ãñU ¥ÂÙð Õ“ææð´ ·¤æð ’ØæÎæ âð ’ØæÎæ ÂÉU̧æ°, ØãUè´ â׿Á ·¤è ÌÚUP¤è ·¤æ ãUÜ ãñÚÐ ßèÚÔUàæ çßÁØ ÎæÙß çßÚUæðžæ× Üÿׇæ ÎýæçßɸU ×éØ â´¿æÜ·¤, ֿ߿пâ âßæðü“æ çÙÎðàæ·¤, ֿ߿пâ ßèÚU ŸæðDU ¿æñŠæÚUè ØàæÂæÜ ßçÚUDU ÙðÌæ, ¥·¤æÜè ÎÜ ÚUæCþUèØ â´¿æÜ·¤, ֿ߿пâ ßèÚU ŸæðDU ÙÚÔUàæ çÉU»æ´Ù ßèÚU ÎðßÚUæÁ ¥âêÚU ßèÚU ÙðÌæ Áè âæðŠæè ÚUæCþUèØ â´¿æÜ·¤, ֿ߿пâ ÚUæCþUèØ Âý¿æÚU ×´˜æè, ֿ߿пâ ÚUæCþUèØ ×´˜æè, ֿ߿пâ ÂýÕŠæ´·¤ Ñ ÖæÚUÌèØ ßæË×èç·¤ Šæ×ü â׿Á (ÚUçÁ.) ֿ߿пâ, ÜéçŠæØæÙæ ×éØ ÎÌÚU Ñ âæ×Ùð Ù»ÚU çÙ»× ·¤æØæüÜØ, ×æÌæ ÚUæÙè ¿æñ·¤, ÜéçŠæØæÙæ, â´Â·ü¤ Ñ 9814000910, 9815602747, 9814514323, 9872905315, 9780016954 ȤæÚUßÇü Âýðâ ·¤æ ÕãéÁÙ âæçãˆØ çßàæðáæ´·¤ 2 ¥Â IL 201 APR ýñÜ ÁÙßÚUè, w®vz ×ð´ Âý·¤æàØ ÂãUÜè âÂê‡æü ¥¢»ýðÁè-çãU‹¼è Âç˜æ·¤æ First Fully English-Hindi Magazine 25 2 201 æçãˆØ Ùâ ÕãéÁßæçáü·¤è First Fully English-Hindi Magazine ÕãéUÁÙ âæçãUˆØ ÂãUÜè âÂê‡æü ¥¢»ýðÁè-çãU‹¼è Âç˜æ·¤æ 25 2013 APRIL 2013 ¥ÂýñÜ ÕãéÁÙ âæçãˆØ ßæçáü·¤è : Pg. 20 æ U ¥æÜô¿Ù ¥õÚ âæçãˆØ No. 5 çß¿æÚU NEW DELH I Vol. VI ÕãéÁÙ Üð¹ ÌéÜâèÚUæ× ¹»ð´Îý Ææ·¤éÚU ×ãUè çâ´ãU ¥ô×Âý·¤æàæ ßæË×èç·¤ ÚU×ç‡æ·¤æ »é#æ Îðßð´Îý ¿õÕð ¿æñÍèÚUæ× ØæÎß âÌèàæ ÂæßǸð ÚUæÁð´Îý ÂýâæÎ çâ´ãU âéÏèàæ Â¿õÚUè ·¤´ßÜ ÖæÚUÌè ×ôãÙÎæâ Ùñç×àæÚUæØ âÂÙæ ¿×çÇ¸Øæ »´»æ âãæØ ×èÙæ ·¤ãæÙè ·¤çßÌæ ¿´Îýç·¤àæôÚU ÁæØâᑚ ÚUæ×ÏæÚUè çâ´ã çÎßæ·¤ÚU ¥ÙèÌæ ÖæÚUÌè àØæ× çÕãUæÚUè àØæ×Ü â´Îè ×èÜ English-Hind First Fully i Magaz ine 2014 MAY 2014 ×§üU ÕãéÁÙ âæçãˆØ ßæçáü·¤è âéÚUð´Îý çSÙ‚Šæ çÎÙðàæ ·¤éàæßæã ×é·Ô¤àæ ׿Ùâ ÚU×ðàæ «¤Ì´ÖÚU àæã´UàææãU ¥æÜ× S߇æüÜÌæ çßàßÈê¤Ü ÕãéÁÙ âæçãˆØ ÎçÜÌ ¥ôÕèâè ¥æçÎßæâè S˜æè ÕãéÁÙ âæ çãˆØ ÎçÜÌ ¥ôÕèâè ¥æçÎßæâè S˜æè ©UÂ‹Øæâ ¥´ ÚUˆÙ ·é¤×æÚU àæ ·¤ãæÙè â´Îè ×èÜ ¥æÜæð¿Ùæ ¥æØßÙ ·¤æð S·¤æ ¥L¤‡æ ÙæÚUæØ‡æ âæ´ÖçÚUØæ ·¤çßÌæ ÜæÜ çâ´ãU çÎÜ Âýð× ¿´Î »æ´Šæè àæ´· ¤ÚU ÂýÜæ×è ÚUæðÁ ·ð¤ÚU·ð¤^Uæ âéá׿ ¥âéÚU ØàææðÎæ ×é ×êü ÂæòÜ ×æËÌæð Üð¹ ¿æñÍèÚUæ× ØæÎß ÚUæÁð ‹Îý ÂýâæÎ çâ´ âéŠ æèàæ Â¿æñÚUè ãU âéÖ æá ¿´Îý ·é¤ àæßæãUæ âéÚ ÔUàæ Â´çÇUÌ Îðßð´Îý ¿õÕð ¥çEÙè ·é ¤×æÚU ´·¤Á ÂãUÜè âÂê‡æü ¥¢»ýðÁè-çãU‹¼è âæÿææˆ·¤æÚU ÚUæÁð‹Îý ØæÎß àæÚU ‡æ ·é¤×æÚU çÜÕæ Âýð× ·é¤×æÚU ×ç‡æ Üð àØæðÚUæ Á çâ´ãU ×ñ˜æðØè Âéc Õð¿ñÙ Âæ ÇUæ. ÜæÜ ÚUˆÙæ·¤ÚU ISSN Âç˜æ·¤æ 25 2348-9286 ÎçÜÌ ¥ôÕèâè ¥æçÎßæâè S˜æè Ut{â}tÇç _|àxÜtÜ fÑxv|tÄ 2015 Ø ÕãéÁÙ âæç㈠çßàæðáæ´·¤ §â ¥´·¤ ×ð´ ¥æÂ Âæ°´»ð çßçÖ‹Ù ÕãéÁÙ Üð¹·¤ô´ ·¤è ·¤ëçÌØô´ ÂÚU ÙØð ÎëçC·¤ô‡æ âð ¥æÜô¿Ùæˆ×·¤ Üð¹, ÕãéÁÙ ¥õÚU ¥çÖÁÙ Üð¹·¤ô´ ·¤è ·¤ëçÌØô´ ·¤æ ÌéÜÙæˆ×·¤ ¥ŠØØÙ ¥õÚU ¥Ùð·¤ ßñ¿æçÚU·¤ SÍæÂÙæ¥ô´ ·¤æ ÕãéÁÙ ÎëçC·¤ô‡æ âð ÂéÙÚUæßÜô·¤ÙÐ §â·Ô¤ ¥çÌçÚU€UÌ ·¤ãæÙè, ·¤çßÌæ°´ ß ¥æˆ×·¤Íæ ¥´àæ ÌÍæ çã´Îè ß ×ÚUæÆè ·Ô¤ Âý×é¹ Üð¹·¤ô´ ·Ô¤ âæÿææˆ·¤æÚUÐ ¥´·¤ ·Ô¤ çܰ çß¿æÚUæÍü ÚU¿æÙæ°´ ¥æ×´ç˜æÌ ãñ´Ð ×ðÜ ·¤ÚUð´ Ñ [email protected] 9 When the Asuras were gods, Devas demons A global perspective ÁÕ ¥âéÚU Íð ÎðßÌæ ¥õÚU Îðß Íð ÚUæÿæâ °·¤ ßñçE·¤ ÂçÚUÂýðÿØ PAGE 6 PAGE 57 Showcase of vaudeville Sßæ´» ·¤æ ¥Ùô¹æ â´âæÚU TRIBALS REJECTING DEMONIC TALES ¥âéÚU ·¤Íæ ·¤æ ¥æçÎßæâè ÂýçÌ·¤æÚU King Mahishasur’s martyrdom ÚUæÁæ ×çãáæâéÚU ·¤è àæãæÎÌ PAGE 16 PAGE 20 Everyone’s is no one’s Áô âÕ·¤æ ãôÌæ ãñ, ßãU ç·¤âè ·¤æ Ùãè´ ãôÌæ PAGE 23 Durga and Mahishasur myth: An objective reading Î黿ü ¥õÚU ×çãáæâéÚU ·¤æ ç×Í·¤ Ñ °·¤ ßSÌéçÙDU 微 PAGE 40 BHOJPURI SONGS OF TOIL ÖôÁÂéÚUè Ÿæ× »èÌ PAGE 53 PAGE 32 PAGE 30 Bhakti - Values of the Shudra tradition Relevance of Aajivak religion ¥æÁèß·¤ Ï×ü ·¤è Âýæâ´ç»·¤Ìæ àæêÎý ÂÚÚÂÚUæ ·Ô¤ ÖçQ¤ ×êËØ PAGE 35 Tales of valiant romantic Bahujan heroes ¥ôÕèâè ÙæØ·¤ô´ ·¤è Âý×ð ß àæõØü »æÍæ°´ IMPLICATIONS OF FESTIVALS ˆØôãæÚUô´ ·Ô¤ çÙçãÌæÍü PAGE 43 Constructing Dalitbahujan Icons ÎçÜÌÕãéÁÙ çßÖêçÌØô´ ·¤æ çÙ׿ü‡æ Cleavage – that is what I want to talk about in the context of Bahujan culture. No, not Deepika Padukone’s much tweeted cleavage but how within Indian society there has been a longstanding cultural divide and yet an uneasy union. ‘Cleave’ (as a verb) is one of the most interesting words in the English language – it has two completely opposite meanings: to cut or split something apart, as with a sharp instrument (cleaver), or to stick to something/someone like glue! The one place it is perfectly used in both T H I N K I N G senses is in God’s command to the new bridegroom: For this cause shall a man (c)leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they two shall be one flesh. In the Indian cultural ‘marriage’ what does cleaving mean? First of all, with rare exceptions like the remote Tribals (adivasis), the majority of India has been wedded by cultural force. It is certainly not a ‘love marriage’ and only in name an ‘arranged marriage’. It is as if the Bahujan bride has been dragged from her father’s house by the brahmanical bridegroom. Hence, the cleavage between very disparate partners. Unlike most other cultures, India’s is replete with dualism: starting with the Vedic Advaita to the later Samkhya (purusha-prakriti), Indian philosophy has explored and developed dualism to the extreme. Religion and even bhakta follows one of two separate streams based on the concept of deity as either saguna (with attributes) or nirguna (without attributes). On the sociological front we have the Dwij-Shudra duality to this day. As Prem Kumar Mani observes, in India there are only two traditions or cultures – the Brahmanic and the Shramanic. Brahmanism has recast all the subcontinent’s narratives under the mythology of devas versus asuras. We do not believe that the majority Bahujans can break out of this mythological trance without coming to grips with their true origins and identity. The discourse begun by FP in October 2011 jumps to a whole new level with this issue’s Cover Story. A regular visitor to India, Dr Paul E. Larsen opened up some interesting new lines of enquiry on the Asurs. I picked up from where he had left off and dug a little deeper and wider to hit upon what is bound to be some thought-provoking truths that should cause Bahujans to better understand their identity, and then their destiny. While I was researching this Cover Story I became more convinced than ever that Bahujan academics and researchers need to devote themselves to these tasks, to this mission – who else will do it for us? It goes without saying that most academic research and analysis today is done in English. The research resources even on Bahujan subjects are richer in English. Therefore, FP exhorts Bahujan academics to master English and investigate, document and analyze India’s rich Dalitbahujan cultural heritage. It is when you push the boundaries from brahmanically approved research topics and lines of enquiry that you face resistance. Hence, the brahmanical conspiracy to keep English education from Dalitbahujans. Like Savitribai wrote, “…Mother English imparts true wisdom / With love revives the oppressed one. / Mother English embraces the downtrodden / Caressing and bringing up those who are fallen. …” Having researched and published in English for a national and international audience, let us not forget to also publish in popular journals in Hindi. That is how our culture can be transformed. FP as a bilingual Bahujan journal plays its role in bringing the fruit of research available in English to Hindistan. Our aim is to bridge the dualism between academic and popular, English and Hindi in a marriage designed to bless, in the Buddha’s words “Bahujan hitay, Bahujan sukhay”. F ORWARD Until next month … Truthfully, Vol. VI No. 10 Bilingual OCTOBER 2014 Dr Silvia Fernandes Chair, Aspire Prakashan Pvt. Ltd. Prabhu Guptara Patron and Chief Advisor Satyaveer Chakrapani Director and Advisor Ivan Kostka Editor-in-Chief Pramod Ranjan Consulting Editor Amrish Herdenia Assistant Editor (English) Amarendra Yadav Principal Correspondent CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Abhay Kumar Dubey (New Delhi) Dilip Mandal (New Delhi) Vishal Mangalwadi (India) Gail Omvedt (Maharashtra) Thom Wolf (New Delhi) Rajan Kumar Designer Office : FORWARD Press 803 Deepali, 92 Nehru Place, New Delhi 110019 Tel. (011) 46538687 Email: [email protected] Printed, published and owned by Ivan Anthony Kostka and printed at M.P. Printers, B-220, Phase-II, Noida, UP - 201301 and published from 803 Deepali, 92 Nehru Place, New Delhi 110019 Disclaimer: The views expressed in the articles are those of the writers. The magazine will not bear any responsibility for them. §â ÕæÚU ×ñ´ ÕãéÁÙ â´S·¤ëçÌ ·Ô¤ â´ÎÖü ×ð´ €UÜèßðÁ ·Ô¤ ÕæÚUð ×ð´ ÕæÌ ·¤ÚUÙæ ¿æãÌæ ãê¡Ð Ùãè´! Îèç·¤æ ÂæÎé·¤ô‡æ ·Ô¤ €UÜèßðÁ ·Ô¤ ÕæÚUð ×ð´ Ùãè´, çÁâÂÚU çÅU÷ßÅUÚU ÂÚU ÕãéÌ ·¤éÀ ·¤ãæ Áæ ¿é·¤æ ãñ ÕçË·¤ ÖæÚUÌèØ â׿Á ·Ô¤ €UÜèßðÁ ·Ô¤ ÕæÚUð ×ð´, Áãæ¡ âçÎØô´ ÂéÚUæÙè âæ´S·¤ëçÌ·¤ ÎÚUæÚU ·Ô¤ ÕæßÁêÎ °·¤ ¥âãÁ °·¤Ìæ ·¤æØ× ãñÐ €UÜèß (çR¤Øæ ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´) ¥´»ýðÁè Öæáæ ·Ô¤ âÕâð çÎÜ¿SÂ àæŽÎô´ ×ð´ âð °·¤ ãñÐ §â·Ô¤ Îô °·¤Î× çßÚUôÏæÖæâè ¥Íü ãñ´ Ñ ÏæÚUÎæÚU Ø‹˜æ âð ç·¤âè ¿èÁ¸ ·¤è Îô Ȥ洷¤ ·¤ÚU ÎðÙæ ¥õÚU ç·¤âè ¿èÁ¸ Øæ ÃØçQ¤ âð »ô´Î ·¤è ÌÚUã ç¿Â·¤ ÁæÙæÐ §Ù ÎôÙô´ ¥Íô´ü çß¿æÚU ×ð´ §â àæŽÎ ·Ô¤ °·¤âæÍ ÂýØô» ·¤æ âÕâð ÕçÉ¸Øæ ©ÎæãÚU‡æ Ù° ÎêËãð ·¤ô §üEÚU ·¤æ ¥æÎðàæ ãñ, Ò§â·Ô¤ çܰ °·¤ ÃØçQ¤ ¥ÂÙð ×æÌæ-çÂÌæ âð ¥Ü» ãô ÁæØð»æ ¥õÚU ¥ÂÙè Â%è âð °ðâð ÁéǸ ÁæØð»æ ç·¤ ÎôÙô´ °·¤ ãô ÁæØð´ ÓÐ ÖæÚUÌ ·Ô¤ Òâæ´S·¤ëçÌ·¤Ó çßßæã ×ð´ €UÜèßðÁ ·¤ãæ¡ ãñ? âÕâð ÂãÜð Ìô, ÎêÚU-ÎÚUæÁ ÿæð˜æ ×ð´ ÚUãÙð ßæÜð ¥æçÎßæçâØô´ ·¤ô ÀôǸ ·¤ÚU, ÖæÚUÌ ·Ô¤ Õãéâ´Ø çÙßæçâØô´ ·¤ô ÕÜÂêßü·¤ âæ´S·¤ëçÌ·¤ ÎëçC âð °·¤ ·¤ÚU çÎØæ »Øæ ãñÐ Øã çÙçpÌ M¤Â âð Âýð× çßßæã Ùãè´ ãñ ¥õÚU ·Ô¤ßÜ Ùæ× ·Ô¤ çܰ ÌØ ç·¤Øæ »Øæ çßßæã ãñÐ °ðâæ Ü»Ìæ ãñ ׿Ùô ÕãéÁÙ ÎéËãÙ ·¤ô Õýæ±×‡æßæÎè ÎêËãæ, ÕÜÂêßü·¤ ©â·Ô¤ çÂÌæ ·Ô¤ ƒæÚU âð ¹è´¿ ·¤ÚU ¥ÂÙð âæÍ Üð ¥æØæ ãôÐ §âçܰ °·¤Î× çÖóæ ÁèßÙâæçÍØô´ ·Ô¤ Õè¿ €UÜèßðÁ ÕÙæ ã饿 ãñÐ ¥‹Ø â´S·¤ëçÌØô´ ·Ô¤ çßÂÚUèÌ, ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ mñÌßæÎ ·¤è ÖÚU׿ÚU ãñ Ñ ßñçη¤ ¥mñÌ âð Üð·¤ÚU âæ´Ø (ÂéL¤á-Âý·¤ëçÌ) Ì·¤, ÖæÚUÌèØ ÎàæüÙ ×ð´ ã×ð´ mñÌßæÎ ·Ô¤ ÖÚUÂêÚU ÎàæüÙ ãôÌð ãñ´Ð Ï×ü ¥õÚU Øãæ¡ Ì·¤ ç·¤ ÖQ¤, Îô çßçÖóæ ÏæÚUæ¥ô´ ×ð´ ¥æSÍæ ÚU¹Ìð ãñ´Ð ·¤éÀ ·Ô¤ çܰ §üEÚU â»é‡æ ãñ Ìô ·¤éÀ ·Ô¤ çܰ çÙ»éü‡æÐ â׿ÁàææS˜æ ·Ô¤ ×ô¿ðü ÂÚU, çmÁ-àæêÎý mñÌßæÎ ã× âÕ·Ô¤ âæ×Ùð ãñÐ Áñâæ ç·¤ Âýð×·¤é׿ÚU ×ç‡æ çܹÌð ãñ´, ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ ·Ô¤ßÜ Îô ÂÚUÂÚUæ°´ Øæ â´S·¤ëçÌØæ¡ ãñ´ - Õýæ±×‡æ ¥õÚU Ÿæ×‡æÐ Õýæ±×‡æßæçÎØô´ Ùð ©Â×ãæmè ·Ô¤ âÖè ¥æØæÙô´ ·¤ô Îðß çßL¤h ¥âéÚU ·¤Íæ¥ô´ ×ð´ ÉæÜ çÎØæ ãñÐ ã׿ÚUè Øã ׿‹ØÌæ ãñ ç·¤ Õãéâ´Ø·¤ ÕãéÁÙ §â ÂõÚUæç‡æ·¤ Ùàæð âð ÌÕ Ì·¤ ÕæãÚU Ùãè´ ¥æ â·¤Ìð ÁÕ Ì·¤ ç·¤ ßð ¥ÂÙè ¥âÜè ÁǸô´ ¥õÚU Âã¿æÙ âð ßæç·¤È¤ Ùæ ãô Á氡РȤæÚUßÇü Âýðâ mæÚUæ ¥Q¤êÕÚU w®vv ×ð´ àæéM¤ ç·¤Øæ »Øæ Øã çß×àæü ¥Õ °·¤ Ù°, ª¤¡¿ð SÌÚU ÂÚU Âãé¡¿ »Øæ ãñÐ Çæ€UÅUÚU ÂæòÜ §ü ÜæâüÙ, Áô ç·¤ çÙØç×Ì ÌõÚU ÂÚU ÖæÚUÌ ¥æÌð ÚUãÌð ãñ´, Ùð ¥âéÚUô´ ·Ô¤ âÕ‹Ï ×ð´ °·¤ ÙØè, çÎÜ¿S ÂÇ¸ÌæÜ àæéM¤ ·¤èÐ ×ñ´Ùð ©âð ¥æ»ð ÕɸæÌð ãé° ¥õÚU »ãÚUæ§ü âð ¹ôÁÕèÙ ·¤è ¥õÚU §â×ð´ ·¤éÀ °ðâð çß¿æÚUôžæðÁ·¤ âˆØ âæ×Ùð ¥æØð çÁÙâð ÕãéÁÙô´ ·¤ô ¥ÂÙè Âã¿æÙ ¥õÚU çȤÚU çÙØçÌ ·¤ô â×ÛæÙð ×ð´ ×ÎÎ ç×Üð»èÐ ÁÕ ×ñ´ ¥æßÚU‡æ ·¤Íæ ·Ô¤ çܰ ¥Ùéâ‹ÏæÙ ·¤ÚU ÚUãæ Íæ ÌÕ ×éÛæð °·¤ ÕæÚU çȤÚU Øã ×ãâêâ ã饿 ç·¤ ÕãéÁÙ àæôÏæçÍüØô´ ¥õÚU çàæÿææçßÎô´ ·¤ô §â ·¤æ×, §â ç×àæÙ ·Ô¤ çܰ Sߨ´ ·¤ô â×çÂüÌ ·¤ÚUÙæ ¿æçã°Ð ¥æç¹ÚU ¥»ÚU Øã ·¤æ× ã× Ùãè´ ·¤ÚUð´»ð´, Ìô ·¤õÙ ·¤ÚUð»æ? ·¤ãÙð ·¤è ¥æßàØ·¤Ìæ Ùãè´ ç·¤ ¥æÁ ¥çÏ·¤æ´àæ àæôÏ ß ¥·¤æÎç×·¤ çßàÜðá‡æ ¥´»ýðÁè Öæáæ ×ð´ ãôÌæ ãñÐ ÕãéÁÙ çßáØô´ ÂÚU Öè ¥´»ýðÁè ×ð´ àæôÏ ·Ô¤ çܰ ·¤ãè´ ¥çÏ·¤ âæ×»ýè ©ÂÜŽÏ ãñÐ ¥ÌÑ È¤æÚUßÇü Âýðâ, ÕãéÁÙ çàæÿææçßÎô´ ·¤æ ¥æuæÙ ·¤ÚUÌæ ãñ ç·¤ ßð ¥´»ýðÁè ÂÚU ¥çÏ·¤æÚU Âýæ# ·¤ÚUð´ ¥õÚU ÖæÚUÌ ·¤è â×ëh ÎçÜÌÕãéÁÙ çßÚUæâÌ ·¤è ¹ôÁ, ©â·¤æ ÎSÌæßðÁè·¤ÚU‡æ ¥õÚU çßàÜðá‡æ ·¤ÚUð´Ð ÁÕ ¥æÂ Õýæ±×‡æßæçÎØô´ mæÚUæ ¥Ùé×ôçÎÌ àæôÏ çßáØô´ âð ¥æ»ð ÕÉð´ð»ð ÌÕ ¥æÂ·¤ô çßÚUôÏ ·¤æ âæ×Ùæ Öè ·¤ÚUÙæ ÂǸð»æÐ Øãè ·¤æÚU‡æ ãñ ç·¤ Õýæ±×‡æßæçÎØô´ Ùð ÎçÜÌÕãéÁÙô´ ·¤ô ¥´»ýðÁè çàæÿææ âð ÎêÚU ÚU¹Ùð ·¤è ÖÚUâ·¤ ·¤ôàæàæ ·¤èÐ Áñâæ ç·¤ âæçߘæèÕæ§ü Ùð çܹæ Íæ ..Ò¥´»ýðÁè ׿´ â‘¿æ çßßð·¤ ÎðÌè ãñ/ Âýð× âð Îç×Ì ·¤ô ÂéÙÁèüçßÌ ·¤ÚUÌè ãñ/ ¥´»ýðÁè ׿´ ÂÎÎçÜÌô´ ·¤ô »Üð Ü»æÌè ãñ/ Áô ç»ÚUð ãé° ãñ´, ©‹ãð´ ©ÆæÌè ¥æòÚU ÎéÜæÚUÌè ãñ..Ó Áãæ¡ ã× ÚUæCþèØ ¥õÚU ¥´ÌÚUæüCþèØ ÂæÆ·¤ô´ ·Ô¤ çܰ ¥´»ýðÁè ×ð´ ¥Ùéâ‹ÏæÙ ·¤ÚUð´ ¥õÚU ©â·¤æ Âý·¤æàæÙ Öè ·¤ÚUð´ ßãè´ ã× Üô·¤çÂýØ çã´Îè Âç˜æ·¤æ¥ô´ ·¤ô Öè Ùæ ÖêÜð´Ð ÌÖè ã׿ÚUè â´S·¤ëçÌ ×ð´ ÕÎÜæß ¥æ â·Ô¤»æÐ çmÖæáè ÕãéÁÙ Âç˜æ·¤æ ÕÌõÚU, ȤæÚUßÇü Âýðâ, ¥´»ýðÁè ×ð´ ©ÂÜŽÏ àæôÏô´ ·¤ô çã´Îè ÂæÆ·¤ô´ ·¤ô ©ÂÜŽÏ ·¤ÚUßæÙð ×ð´ ¥ÂÙè Öêç×·¤æ ¥Îæ ·¤ÚU ÚUãè ãñÐ ã׿ÚUæ ÜÿØ çàæÿææ Á»Ì ¥õÚU ¥æ×ÁÙ ·Ô¤ Õè¿ ·¤è ¹æ§ü ·¤ô ÂæÅUÙæ ãñÐ ¥´»ýðÁè ¥õÚU çã´Îè ·¤æ Øã ç×ÜÙ, Õéh ·Ô¤ àæŽÎô´ ×ð´ âßüÁÙ çãÌæØ, âßüÁÙ âé¹æØ ãô»æÐ Ȥ¤æòÚUßÇü ßáü VI ¥¢·¤ 10 çmÖæáè ¥€ÅêUÕÚUU 2014 ÇUæò çâçËߨæ È¤ÙæZÇUèâ ¿ðØÚU, ¥SÂæØÚU Âý·¤æàæÙ Âýæ. çÜ. ÂýÖé »éŒÌæÚUæ â¢ÚUÿæ·¤ °ß¢ ×éØ âÜæãU·¤æÚ âˆØßèÚU ¿·ý¤Âæç‡æ çÙ¼ðàæ·¤ °ß¢ âÜæãU·¤æÚU ¥æØßÙ ·¤ôS·¤æ ×éØ â¢Âæ¼·¤ Âý×ô¼ Ú¢UÁÙUU âÜæãU·¤æÚU â´ÂæÎ·¤ ¥×ÚUèàæ ãÚUÎðçÙØæUU âãæØ·¤ â´ÂæÎ·¤ (¥´»ýðÁè) ÚÔU‹Îý ØæÎß U Âý×é¹ â´ßæÎÎæÌæ Øô»¼æÙè â¢Âæ¼·¤ ¥ÖØ ·é¤×æÚU ÎéÕð (Ù§ü ç¼ËÜè) ç¼Üè עÇUÜ (Ù§ü ç¼ËÜè) çßàææÜ ×¢»Üßæ¼è (ÖæÚUÌ) »ðÜ ¥æòßðÅU (×ãæÚUæCþ ) Åæò× ßéËȤ (Ù§ü ç¼ËÜè) ÚUæÁÙ ·é¤×æÚU çÇU•ææ§ÙÚ ·¤æØæüÜØ Ñ È¤æòÚUßÇüU Âðýâ }®x ¼èÂæÜè, ~w ÙðãUM¤ ŒÜðâ, Ù§ü ç¼ËÜè vv® ®v~, ȤôÙ - (®vv) y{zx}{}| §ü-×ðÜ Ñ [email protected] ×é¼ý·¤ Âý·¤æàæ·¤ ß Sßæ×è ¥æØßÙ °¢ÍÙè ·¤ôSU·¤æ mæÚUæ °×.Âè.çÂý¢ÅUâü Õè- 22®, Èð¤Á -II, Ùô°ÇUæ, Øê.Âè. - 201301 âð ×éç¼ýÌ ß }®x ¼èÂæÜè, ~w- ÙðãUM¤ ŒÜðâ, Ù§ü ç¼ËÜè vv®®v~ âð Âý·¤æçàæÌ ¥æÜð¹ô´ ×ð´ ÃØÌ çß¿æÚU Üð¹·¤ô´ ·ð¤ ¥ÂÙð ãñ´U ©Uââð Âç˜æ·¤æ · è âãU×çÌ ¥çÙßæØü ÙãUè´Ð ¥»Üð ׿ãU Ì·¤ âˆØ ×ð´ ¥æÂ·¤æ A R T 6 FEATURE OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press King Mahishasur’s martyrdom Well-known painter Dr Lal Ratnakar has created a series of paintings depicting the Bahujan rendition of the Puranic story of Mahishasur and Durga. According to this rendition, the Surs (gods) sent the beautiful Durga, to slay Mahishasur, the king of Asurs (today’s Bahujans). Unaware of the conspiracy, Mahishasur informed his family members of the likely arrival of Durga in advance. The conspirator gods hid around the abode of Mahishasur, waiting with bated breath for the success of their endeavour, for seven days. After Durga killed Mahishasur by stabbing him with a dagger, the gods stormed Mahishasur’s palace and massacred the Asurs mercilessly. The Puranic story says that before slaying Mahishasur, Durga drank liquor to her heart’s content. After the killing of their valiant king, the Asurs gathered on the full-moon night of ‘Ashwin’ (a month of Hindu calendar) to mourn his death. Dr. Ratnakar’s paintings are based on this chain of events. ‘Ashwin Purnima’ (the full-moon day of Ashwin month) falls five days after the ‘Dasveen’ (tenth day) of Durga Puja. This year, Mahishasur ×çãáæâéÚU Martyrdom Day will be observed in various parts of the country on ¥õÚU Î黿ü ·¤è ÂõÚUæç‡æ·¤ 9 October. ·¤Íæ ·Ô¤ ÕãéÁÙ ÂæÆ ·¤ô ØæÌ ç¿˜æ·¤æÚU Çæò. ÜæÜ ÚU%æ·¤ÚU Ùð ç¿˜ææ´ç·¤Ì ç·¤Øæ ãñÐ §â 微 ·Ô¤ ¥ÙéâæÚU, âéÚUô´ (ÎðßÌæ¥ô´) Ùð âé´ÎÚUè Î黿ü ·¤ô ¥âéÚUô´ (¥æÁ ·Ô¤ ÕãéÁÙ) ·Ô¤ ÚUæÁæ ×çãáæâéÚU ·¤è ãˆØæ ·¤ÚUÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ ÖðÁæ ÍæÐ §â ÀÜ âð ¥ÙçÖ™æ ×çãáæâéÚU Ùð Î黿ü ·Ô¤ â´ÖæçßÌ ¥æ»×Ù ·¤è âê¿Ùæ ¥ÂÙð ÂçÚUßæÚUÁÙô´ ·¤ô Öè ¥ç»ý× M¤Â âð Îè ÍèÐ ãˆØæ ·¤æ áǸش˜æ ÚU¿Ùð ßæÜð ÎðßÌæ»‡æ âæÌ çÎÙô´ Ì·¤ âæ´â ÚUô·Ô¤ ×çãáæâéÚU ·Ô¤ ¥æßæâ ·Ô¤ §Îü-ç»Îü çÀÂð ÚUãðÐ Î黿ü mæÚUæ ÚUæÁæ ×çãáæâéÚU ·¤è ÀæÌè ×ð´ ¹´ÁÚU ©ÌæÚUÙð ·Ô¤ ÕæÎ ©‹ãô´Ùð ©Ù·Ô¤ ¥æßæâ ×ð´ Âýßðàæ ·¤ÚU ¥âéÚUô´ ·¤æ ÕÇð Âñ׿Ùð ÂÚU â´ãæÚU ç·¤ØæÐ ÂõÚUæç‡æ·¤ ·¤Íæ¥ô´ ×ð´ ×çãáæâéÚU ·¤è ãˆØæ âð Âêßü Î黿ü ·Ô¤ À·¤ ·¤ÚU àæÚUæÕ ÂèÙð ·¤æ çÁR¤ ãñÐ ¥âéÚUô´ Ùð ¥ÂÙð ÂýÌæÂè ÚUæÁæ ·¤è ãˆØæ ·Ô¤ ÕæÎ, ¥çEÙ Âêç‡æü׿ ·¤è ¿æ´ÎÙè ÚUæÌ ×ð´ §·¤_æ ãô·¤ÚU àæô·¤ âÖæ ·¤èÐ Çæò. ÚU%æ·¤ÚU Ùð §â ç¿˜æ «´¹Üæ ×ð´ §‹ãè´ ƒæÅUÙæR¤×ô´ ·¤ô ¥æÏæÚU ÕÙæØæ ãñÐ ™ææÌÃØ¤ãñ ç·¤ ¥çEÙ Âêç‡æü׿, Î黿ü ÂêÁæ ·¤è ÒÎâßè´Ó ·Ô¤ Æè·¤ Âæ´¿ çÎÙ ÕæÎ ãôÌè ãñÐ §â ßáü Îðàæ ·Ô¤ çßçÖóæ çãSâô´ ×ð´ ×çãáæâéÚU àæãæÎÌ çÎßâ ~ ¥€UÅUêÕÚU ·¤ô ×ÙæØæ Áæ ÚUãæ ãñРȤæòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ | ¥€ÅêUÕÚU 2014 ÚUæÁæ ×çãáæâéÚU ·¤è àæãæÎÌ Prior to Durga’s arrival: King Mahishasur informs his family and servants before Durga’s likely arrival Î黿ü ·ð¤ ¥æ»×Ù ·ð¤ Âêßü Ñ ¥ÂÙð âðß·¤ô´ ß ÂçÚUßæÚUÁÙô´ ·¤ô Î黿ü ·Ô¤ ¥æ»×Ù ·¤è ¥ç»ý× âê¿Ùæ ÎðÌð ÚUæÁæ ×çãUáæâéÚU Durga arrives: King welcomes Durga at doorstep Î黿ü ·¤æ ¥æ»×Ù Ñ ¥ÂÙð mæÚU ÂÚU Î黿ü ·¤æ Sßæ»Ì ·¤ÚUÌð ÚUæÁæ Durga’s Surapaan: According to Puranic stories, Durga drank liquor to her heart’s content before the murder of King Mahishasur Î黿ü ·¤æ âéÚUæÂæÙ Ñ ÂæñÚUæç‡æ·¤ ·¤Íæ¥æð´ ·ð¤ ¥ÙéâæÚU ÚUæÁæ ×çãUáæâéÚU ·¤è ãUˆØæ ·ð¤ Âêßü Î黿ü Ùð ÀU·¤ ·¤ÚU àæÚUæÕ Âè Honey trap: Durga seducing Mahishasur in his bed chamber. According to Puranic stories, Durga did this at the behest of the gods Âýð× ·¤æ ÀUÜ Ñ ×çãáæâéÚU ·ð¤ àæØÙ ·¤ÿæ ×ð´ Âý‡æØ çÙßðÎÙ ·¤ÚUÌè Î黿üÐ ÂæñÚUæç‡æ·¤ ·¤Íæ¥æð´ ·ð¤ ¥ÙéâæÚU Î黿ü Ùð ÎðßÌæ¥æð´ ·ð¤ §UàææÚÔU ÂÚU ÚUæÁæ ·¤æð ¥ÂÙð L¤Â ÁæÜ ×ð´ Õæ´Šææ ç¿˜ææ´·¤Ù 7 A R T 8 FEATURE OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press King Mahishasur’s murder: After living with Mahishasur for seven days, Durga surreptitiously opened the door of his palace so that the gods hiding around could enter. With the help of the gods, on the ninth day, Durga killed Mahishasur. ÚUæÁæ ×çãUáæâéÚU ·¤è ãUˆØæ Ñ âæÌ çÎÙæð´ Ì·¤ ×çãUáæâéÚU ·ð¤ âæÍ ÚUãÙð ·ð¤ ÕæÎ Î黿ü Ùð ©UÙ·ð¤ ×ãUÜ ·¤æ mUæÚ (ÂÅU)U ÀUÜ Âêßü·¤ ¹æðÜ çÎØæ Ìæç·¤ ¥æâ Âæâ ÀéUÂð ÎðßÌæ ×ãUÜ ×ð´ Âýßðàæ ·¤ÚU â·ð´¤Ð Î黿ü Ùð ÎðßÌæ¥æð´ ·ð¤ âãUØæð» âð Ùßð´ çÎÙ ×çãUáæâéÚU ·¤è ãUˆØæ ·¤ÚU ÎèÐ Condolence meeting: The Asurs gather on the full-moon night of Ashwin to mourn the death of their valiant and just king àææð·¤âÖæ Ñ ¥âéÚUô´ Ùð ¥ÂÙð ‹ØæØçÂýØ ¥õÚU ÂýÌæÂè ÚUæÁæ ·¤è ãˆØæ ·Ô¤ ÕæÎ, ¥çEÙ Âêç‡æü׿ ·¤è ¿æ´ÎÙè ÚUæÌ ×ð´ §·¤_æ ãô·¤ÚU àæô·¤ âÖæ ·¤è All Paintings : Dr. Lal Ratnakar âÖè 翘æ Ñ ÇUæò. ÜæÜ ÚUˆÙæ·¤ÚU ȤæòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ | ¥€ÅêUÕÚU 2014 ¥æßÚU‡æ ·¤Íæ 9 When the Asuras were gods, Devas demons A global perspective ÁÕ ¥âéÚU Íð ÎðßÌæ ¥õÚU Îðß Íð ÚUæÿæâ °·¤ ßñçE·¤ ÂçÚUÂýðÿØ PAUL E LARSEN, IVAN KOSTKA T he discourse, indeed debate, initiated by FORWARD Press magazine’s October 2011 Cover Story ‘Who are the Bahujans really worshipping?’ has launched a movement, particularly among India’s majority Dalitbahujans. Each year since then, instead of celebrating Durga Puja, more and more educated, emancipated Dalitbahujans are observing Mahishasur Martyrdom Day. What was the historical defeat of the aboriginal peoples through the Aryans’ deceit and treachery was brahmanically transformed into religious mythology that perpetuates their lies. Ȥæò ÂæòÜ §ü ÜæâüÙ, ¥æØßÙ ·¤ôS·¤æ ÚUßÇü Âýâð ·Ô¤ ¥Q¤êÕÚU w®vv ¥´·¤ ·¤è ¥æßÚU‡æ ·¤Íæ Ò¥æç¹ÚU 緤ⷤè ÂêÁæ ·¤ÚU ÚUãð ãñ´ ÕãéÁÙ?Ó Ùð çÁâ çß×àæü, ÕçË·¤ Õãâ ·¤è àæéL¤¥æÌ ·¤è Íè, ©âÙð ¥Õ °·¤ ¥æ‹ÎôÜÙ ·¤æ SßL¤Â Üð çÜØæ ãñ, çßàæðá·¤ÚU Îðàæ ·Ô¤ ÎçÜÌÕãéÁÙô´ ·Ô¤ Õè¿Ð ãÚU ßáü °ðâð çàæçÿæÌ ß SßÌ´˜æ âô¿ ßæÜð ÎçÜÌÕãéÁÙô´ ·¤è â´Øæ ÕÉÌè Áæ ÚUãè ãñ Áô Î黿ü ÂêÁæ ·Ô¤ SÍæÙ ÂÚU ×çãáæâéÚU àæãæÎÌ çÎßâ ×ÙæÌð ãñд Îðàæ ·Ô¤ ×êÜçÙßæçâØô´ ·¤ô ¥æØô´ü Ùð Ïô¹ð ¥õÚU çßEæâƒææÌ âð ãÚUæØæ ¥õÚU ÕæÎ ×ð´ §â ÁèÌ ·¤ô ÂõÚUæç‡æ·¤ ·¤Íæ ·¤æ ¿ôÜæ ÂãÙæ ·¤ÚU, ¥æØô´ü Ùð ¥ÂÙð 󾐮 ·¤ô ¥×ÚUˆß ÂýÎæÙ ç·¤ØæÐ COVER 10 STORY OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press IT IS TO THE SECOND MILLENNIUM BEFORE CHRIST THAT WE MUST GO IN ORDER TO EXAMINE THE ROOTS OF THE GREAT CONFLICT IMPORTED INTO THE INDIAN SUBCONTINENT WITH THE ARRIVAL OF THE ARYANS ¥»ÚU ã×ð´ ¥æØô´ü ·Ô¤ ¥æ»×Ù ·Ô¤ ÕæÎ ÖæÚUÌèØ ©Â×ãæmè ×ð´ çÀǸð ÖØæßã â´ƒæáü ·¤ô â×ÛæÙæ ãñ Ìô ã×ð´ §üâæ Âêßü ÎêâÚUè àæÌæŽÎè ×ð´ ¿ÜÙæ ãô»æ By deconstructing the myths, more and more of the truth has emerged. FP has been documenting some of these, including establishing the continued existence of a tribe called Asurs [FP Oct. 2012]. In fact, there is a tendency to identify all the aboriginal peoples (Moolnivasis) of the subcontinent as Asurs, with Mahishasur becoming one of their great kings. However, to get at the whole truth, we need to pull back and look at the bigger picture. We need to go back in time – to pre-Vedic times in the history of the Aryan peoples before their entry into the Indian subcontinent – and range more widely in space, at least towards the northwest, from where they arrived. The Aryan Invasion The “Aryan Invasion” speaks of a series of invasions by central Asian peoples during the second millennium BCE. These people gradually came to dominate the peoples of the Indian subcontinent, ultimately through their Varna system. There has been some dispute by Hindutva hobby historians that the Aryans were indigenous, going so far as to preposterously claim they were in fact the people behind the Indus Valley Civilization. However, archaeological, linguistic, and genetic evidence is definitive of the succession of events, not to mention allusions to the invasions in the Aryan Rig Veda itself. No less a scholar than Wendy Doniger affirms the arguments clearly in her now-banned-in-India 2010 book, The Hindus: An Alternative History. This view is also supported by the archaeological evidence of horses, carts, and four-wheeled wagons, which were alien to India before the Aryan presence from a region in today’s Turkmenistan. The late P. Lal of Calcutta, in his introduction to his English translation of The Mahabharata of Vyas (1970), wrote: Accounts of prehistoric struggles between monotheistic oppressed peoples and their polytheistic oppressors are variously portrayed in the sacred texts: the Indian Rig Veda, the Persian Vestas, and the Hebrew Torah. These sacred texts appear to have their origin around the fifteenth century BC. They point to the prehistoric narratives and sagas of the early second millennium before Christ. It is to that period that we must go in order to examine the roots of the great conflict imported into the Indian sub-continent with the arrival of the Aryans. Early Aryan worship The Persian (Iranian) Vestas, more grounded in space and time than the Vedas, offer us more insight into the pre- and early history of the Aryans. From it we learn that before one group moved east towards India §Ù ç×Í·¤ô´ ·¤è ÂÇ¸ÌæÜ âð ·¤§ü âˆØ âæ×Ùð ¥æØðРȤæÚUßÇü Âýðâ, §Ù×ð´ âð ·¤éÀ ·Ô¤ ÕæÚUð ×ð´ çÜ¹Ìæ ÚUãæ ãñÐ §Ù×ð´ àææç×Ü ãñ´ Øã Ì‰Ø ç·¤ ¥âéÚU Ùæ×·¤ ÁÙÁæçÌ ¥æÁ Öè ¥çSÌˆß ×ð´ ãñ (ȤæÚUßÇü Âýðâ, ¥Q¤êÕÚU w®vw)Ð Üðç·¤Ù °·¤ âæ×æ‹Ø ÂýßëçÌ Øã ãñ ç·¤ Îðàæ ·Ô¤ âÖè ×êÜçÙßæçâØô´ ·¤ô ¥âéÚU ×æÙ çÜØæ ÁæÌæ ãñ ¥õÚU ×çãáæâéÚU ·¤ô ©Ù·¤æ ×ãæÙ ÚUæÁæÐ ÂÚU‹Ìé âˆØ Ì·¤ Âãé¡¿Ùð ·Ô¤ çܰ ã×ð´ ¿èÁ¸ô´ ·¤ô ©Ù·¤è â×»ýÌæ ×ð´ Îð¹Ùæ ãô»æÐ ¥õÚU §â·Ô¤ çܰ Á¸M¤ÚUè ãñ ç·¤ ã× ÂèÀð ¿Üð´ - Âêßü-ßñçη¤ ·¤æÜ ×ð´, ©â ·¤æÜ ×ð´ ÁÕ ¥æØô´ü Ùð ÖæÚUÌèØ ©Â×ãæmè ×ð´ ·¤Î× Öè Ùãè´ ÚU¹æ ÍæÐ ã× ¿Üð´, ÖæÚUÌ ·Ô¤ ©žæÚU-Âçp× ×ð´, Áãæ¡ âð ¥æØü ¥æØð ÍðÐ ¥æØü ¥æR¤×‡æ ¥æØü ¥æR¤×‡æ âð ¥æàæØ ãñ w®®® §ü. Âê. âð Üð·¤ÚU v®®® §ü. Âê. ·Ô¤ Õè¿ ×ŠØ °çàæØæ ·Ô¤ çÙßæçâØô´ mæÚUæ ÖæÚUÌèØ ©Â×ãæmè ÂÚU ç·¤Øð »° ã×Üô´ ·¤è Ÿæ´¹ÜæÐ ¥æR¤æ×·¤ô´ Ùð àæÙñÑàæÙñÑ ÖæÚUÌèØ ©Â×ãæmè ·Ô¤ çÙßæçâØô´ ÂÚU ¥ÂÙæ ß¿üSß SÍæçÂÌ ·¤ÚU çÜØæ ¥õÚU ¥´ÌÌÑ ¥ÂÙè ߇æü ÃØßSÍæ ·¤ô ©Ù ÂÚU ÜæÎ çÎØæÐ ·¤éÀ çã‹ÎéˆßæÎè §çÌãæâçßÎô´ ·¤æ ·¤ãÙæ ãñ ç·¤ ¥æØü ÖæÚUÌ ·Ô¤ çÙßæâè ÍðÐ ßð Øã çÙÌæ´Ì ÕðãêÎæ Îæßæ Öè ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´ ç·¤ ¥æØü ãè çâ‹Ïé ƒææÅUè ·¤è âØÌæ ·Ô¤ çÙ׿üÌæ ÍðÐ ÂÚU‹Ìé ÂéÚUæÌˆßèØ, Öæáæ»Ì ¥õÚU ¥æÙéßæ´çàæ·¤èØ Âý׿‡æô´ âð ¥âÜè ƒæÅUÙæR¤× SÂC ãô ÁæÌæ ãñÐ §â·Ô¤ ¥çÌçÚUQ¤, ¥æØô´ü ·Ô¤ «‚ßðÎ Öè ¥æR¤×‡æ ·¤è ¥ôÚU §àææÚUæ ç·¤Øæ »Øæ ãñÐ ÁæÙè׿Ùè ¥ŠØðÌæ ßð´Çè ÇôçÙ»ÚU Ùð âÙ w®v® ×ð´ Âý·¤æçàæÌ ¥õÚU ¥Õ ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ ÂýçÌÕ´çÏÌ ¥ÂÙè ÂéSÌ·¤ ÒÎ çã‹ÎêÁ Ñ °Ù ¥ËÅUÚUÙðçÅUß çãSÅþèÓ ×ð´ ¥æØô´ü ·Ô¤ ¥æR¤×‡æ ·¤è ÕæÌ ·¤ô âãè ÆãÚUæØæ ãñÐ ƒæôǸð ß Îô ß ¿æÚU ÂçãØô´ ·¤è ƒæôÇæ»æÇè âÕ‹Ïè ÂéÚUæÌˆßèØ Âý׿‡æ, Áô ç·¤ ©â §Üæ·Ô¤ ×ð´ ç×Üð ãñ´ Áãæ¡ ¥Õ Ìé·¤ü×ðçÙSÌæÙ ãñ, Öè Øãè Âý×æç‡æÌ ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´Ð ¥æØô´ü ·Ô¤ ¥æ»×Ù âð ÂãÜð, Øð ¿èÁ¸ð´ Øãæ¡ Ùãè´ Âæ§ü ÁæÌè´ Íè´Ð ·¤Ü·¤žææ ·Ô¤ çÎß´»Ì Üð¹·¤ Âè. ÜæÜ Ùð ÒÎ ×ãæÖæÚUÌ ¥æòȸ¤ ÃØæâÓ (v~|®) àæèáü·¤ âð Âý·¤æçàæÌ ¥ÂÙè ÂéSÌ·¤ ·¤è Öêç×·¤æ ×ð´ çܹæ Ñ °·Ô¤EÚUßæÎè Îç×Ì Üô»ô´ ¥õÚU ©Ù·Ô¤ Õãé§üEÚUßæÎè ©ˆÂèǸ·¤ô´ ·Ô¤ Õè¿ â´ƒæáü ·¤æ Âçß˜æ »ý´Íô´ - Áñâð ÖæÚUÌèØ «‚ßðÎ, ȸ¤æÚUâè ßðSÌæ¥ô´ ¥õÚU ØãêÎè ÌôÚUã - ×𴠥ܻ-¥Ü» ߇æüÙ ç·¤Øæ »Øæ ãñÐ Øð âÖè Âçß˜æ »ý´Í ´Îýãßè´ àæÌæŽÎè §üâæ Âêßü ×ð´ çܹ𠻰 ÍðÐ ßð Âýæ»ñçÌãæçâ·¤ ¥æØæÙô´ ¥õÚU §üâæ Âêßü ÎêâÚUè âãdæŽÎè ·Ô¤ §çÌßëžæ ·¤ô ßç‡æüÌ ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´Ð ¥»ÚU ã×ð´ ¥æØô´ü ·Ô¤ ¥æ»×Ù ·Ô¤ ÕæÎ ÖæÚUÌèØ ©Â×ãæmè ×ð´ çÀǸð ÖØæßã â´ƒæáü ·¤ô â×ÛæÙæ ãñ Ìô ã×ð´ §â ·¤æÜæßçÏ ·¤æ ¥ŠØØÙ ·¤ÚUÙæ ãô»æÐ ȤæòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ | ¥€ÅêUÕÚU 2014 ¥æßÚU‡æ ·¤Íæ ¥æØôü´ ·Ô¤ ÂýæÚU´çÖ·¤ ¥æÚUæŠØ and the other west towards Iran, there were some established forms of worship. The names of the deities or spirits can be easily correlated by understanding that what in the Indic (Sanskrit) has an “s”, becomes an “h” in the Iranian (Persian/Farsi). Hence, “asura” and “ahura” were originally one and the same name. “The Avesta’s book of Yashts, as well as portions of other Avestan books, may give us clues about the pre-Zoroastrian Mazdayasni beliefs, thereby serving a function in the Avesta similar to the Christian Bible’s Old Testament,” observes K. E. Eduljee of (Zoroastrian) Heritage Institute. He identifies three primary preZoroastrian Aryan religions mentioned in the source texts: Mazda worship, Daeva or Deva worship and Asura worship. 1. Mazda worship: Mazda – a name associated with the Sanskrit ‘medha’ meaning intelligent or wise – was used to mean God as an intelligent and wise creator. In that sense, the Aryans were supposed to be worshippers of the one creator god they called Mazda. At first they kept “the original ancient law” – whether revealed, intuited or arrived at by social consensus. In the course of time, this worship degenerated into degrees of polytheism, idolatry and nature worship. It is to address these problems that the prophet Zarathushtra (c. 7th to 6th century BC) proclaimed the Ahura-tkaesha, the laws of the Lord (Ahura). It is after this that Ahura-Mazda as the name for God begins to be used. The name incorporates both the creative aspect of the divinity grounded in an ultimate concept of wisdom (‘mazda’), and the aspect of having dominion (‘ahura’) over creation through order and laws. Zarathushtra then set Mazda worship as opposed to the daeva through the laws of the Lord (Ahura). More globally, anthropological studies indicate that there is an archaic monotheism found in virtually all human cultural traditions. Hence, alongside the monotheism of the Jews, the god Ashur was the supreme deity of the polytheistic Assyrians. As we have seen, Ahura Mazda was also the god of the Persians and of the later Zoroastrians. As recorded in the Bible, it was the Persian king Cyrus, who worshipped Ahura, who sent the captured Jews back to rebuild Jerusalem. 2. Daeva or Deva worship:The Rig Veda, the earliest of the Hindu scriptures, provides us with information about pre-Zoroastrian VedicAryan deva worship. Even earlier, the daeva and div in the Avesta and other Persian texts refer to evil qualities, personification of evil qualities and even demons. Over a period of time, reflected in the Persian texts, the word ‘daeva’ and ‘div’ came to include the personification of vices, ȤæÚUâè ßðSÌæ¥ô´ ·¤è çßáØßSÌé, ßðÎô´ ·¤è ÌéÜÙæ ×ð´, ¥Âðÿææ·¤ëÌ ÕǸ𠷤æÜ¹´Ç ¥õÚU Öõ»ôçÜ·¤ ÿæð˜æ ÂÚU ¥æÏæçÚUÌ ãñ §âçܰ ßð ã×ð´ ¥æØô´ü ·Ô¤ Âýæ·¤÷ ß ÂýæÚU´çÖ·¤ §çÌãæâ ·Ô¤ ÕæÚUð ×ð´ ÕðãÌÚU ÁæÙ·¤æÚUè Îð â·¤Ìð ãñ´Ð ©Ùâð ã×ð´ ÂÌæ ¿ÜÌæ ãñ ç·¤ ¥æØô´ü ·Ô¤ °·¤ â×êã ·Ô¤ Âêßü ×ð´ çSÍÌ ÖæÚUÌ ¥õÚU ÎêâÚUð ·Ô¤ Âçp× ×ð´ çSÍÌ §üÚUæÙ ·¤è ¥ôÚU ÂýSÍæÙ ·¤ÚUÙð ·Ô¤ Âêßü Öè ©Ù×ð´ ¥æÚUæÏÙæ ·¤è ·¤éÀ SÍæçÂÌ ÂhçÌØæ´ Íè´Ð ÎðßÌæ¥ô´ ·Ô¤ Ùæ×ô´ ×ð´ ¥´Ìâ´üÕ´Ï SÍæçÂÌ ·¤ÚUÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ Øã ÁæÙÙæ Á¸M¤ÚUè ãñ ç·¤ ÖæÚUÌèØ Öæáæ (â´S·¤ëÌ) ·¤æ ÒâÓ, §üÚUæÙè Öæáæ (ȤæÚUâè) ×ð´ ÒãÓ ÕÙ ÁæÌæ ãñÐ ¥ÍæüÌ Ò¥âéÚUÓ ß Ò¥ãéÚUÓ ×êÜÌÑ °·¤ ãè ãñ´Ð (Á¸ÚUÍéâÅþ) çßÚUæâÌ â´SÍæÙ ·ð¤ ·Ô¤§ü °ÎéËÁè ·¤ãÌð ãñ´ ç·¤ Ò¥ßðSÌæ ·Ô¤ ØàÌ »ý´Í ß ¥‹Ø ¥ßðSÌæ »ý´Í ã×ð´ Âýæ·¤-Á¸ÚUÍéâÅþ ×ÊÎæ ׿‹ØÌæ¥ô´ ·¤è ÕæÚUð ×ð´ ÁæÙ·¤æÚUè Îð â·¤Ìð ãñ´Ð §Ù·¤è ÌéÜÙæ Õæ§çÕÜ ·Ô¤ ¥ôËÇ ÅUðSÅUæ×ð´ÅU âð ·¤è Áæ â·¤Ìè ãñ´ÐÓ ßð ×êÜ »ý´Íô´ ·Ô¤ ¥æÏæÚU ÂÚU ÌèÙ Âýæ·¤-Á¸ÚUÍéâÅþ ¥æØü Ï×ô´ü ·¤è Âã¿æÙ ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´ Ñ ×ÊÎæ ¥æÚUæÏÙæ, Îðß ¥æÚUæÏÙæ ß ¥âéÚU ¥æÚUæÏÙæÐ v. ×’¸Îæ ¥æÚUæÏÙæ Ñ ×ÊÎæ àæŽÎ â´S·¤ëÌ ·Ô¤ Ò×ðÏæÓ àæŽÎ âð ÁéÇæ ã饿 ãñ ¥õÚU §â·¤æ ¥Íü Íæ ç·¤ §üEÚU ×ðÏæßè ß Õéçh×æÙ âÁü·¤ ãñÐ §â ¥Íü ×ð´, ¥æØü °·¤ âÁü·¤ §üEÚU ·Ô¤ ©Âæâ·¤ ·¤ãð Áæ â·¤Ìð ãñ´, çÁâð ßð ×ÊÎæ ·¤ãÌð ÍðÐ àæéL¤¥æÌ ×ð´ ßð Ò×êÜ Âýæ¿èÙ çÙØ×Ó - ¿æãð ßã Âý·¤ÅU ã饿 ãô, ¥´Ì™ææüÙ ÂÚU ¥æÏæçÚUÌ ãô, Øæ âæ×æçÁ·¤ ×Ìñ€UØ ·Ô¤ ¥æÏæÚU ÂÚU ÕÙæØæ »Øæ ãô - ·¤ô Sßè·¤æÚU ·¤ÚUÌð ÍðÐ âר ·Ô¤ âæÍ, §â ¥æÚUæÏÙæ ÂhçÌ ·¤æ SÍæÙ çßçÖóæ Âý·¤æÚU ·Ô¤ ÕãéÎðßßæÎ, ×êçÌü ÂêÁæ ß Âý·¤ëçÌ ÂêÁæ Ùð Üð çÜØæÐ §Ù â×SØæ¥ô´ âð çÙÂÅUÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ Âñ»ÕÚU Á¸ÚUÍéâÅþ (âæÌßè´-ÀÆè àæÌæŽÎè §üâæ Âêßü) Ùð §üEÚUèØ çÙØ×ô´ ·¤æ ÂýçÌÂæÎÙ ç·¤Øæ, çÁâ·Ô¤ ÕæÎ, ¥ãéÚU-×ÊÎæ àæŽÎ §üEÚU ·Ô¤ çܰ ÂýØéQ¤ ç·¤Øæ ÁæÙð Ü»æÐ §â àæŽÎ ×ð´ Îðßˆß ·Ô¤ ÚU¿Ùæˆ×·¤ Âÿæ, çÁâ·¤è ÁÇð´ ™ææÙ (×ÊÎæ) °ß´ §üEÚU mæÚUæ âëçÁÌ â´âæÚU ÂÚU ©â·Ô¤ ÂýÖéˆß (¥ãéÚU) ×ð´ ãñ´ - §Ù ÎôÙô´ ÂçÚU·¤ËÂÙæ¥ô´ ·¤æ âç×Ÿæ‡æ ãñÐ §â Âý·¤æÚU Á¸ÚUÍéâÅþ Ùð, §üEÚUèØ çÙØ×ô´ ·Ô¤ Á¸çÚUØð, Îðßô´ ·Ô¤ SÍæÙ ÂÚU ×ÊÎæ ·¤è ¥æÚUæÏÙæ àæéM¤ ·¤ÚUßæ§üÐ ßñçE·¤ SÌÚU ÂÚU ׿Ùß ßñ™ææçÙ·¤ ¥ŠØØÙô´ âð Øã ÂÌæ ¿ÜÌæ ãñ ç·¤ ֻܻ âÖè âæ´S·¤ëçÌ·¤ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ¥ô´ ×ð´ °·Ô¤EÚUßæÎ ·Ô¤ ¥´àæ ãñ´Ð Áãæ´ ØãêÎè °·Ô EÚUßæÎè Íð ßãè´ Õãé§üEÚUßæÎè ¥çâçÚUØÙô´ ·Ô¤ âßôü‘¿ ÎðßÌæ ¥SæéÚU ÍðÐ Áñâæ ç·¤ ã×Ùð ÂãÜð Îð¹æ, ¥ãéÚU-×’Îæ ȤæÚUçâØô´ ¥õÚU ©žæÚU-ÂæÚUçâØô´ ·Ô¤ ÎðßÌæ ÍðÐ Áñâæ ç·¤ Õæ§üçÕÜ ×ð´ ·¤ãæ »Øæ ãñ, ȤæÚUâè ÚUæÁæ âæØÚUâ, Áô ¥ãéÚU ·Ô¤ ¥ÚUæÏ·¤ Íð, Ùð Õ´Îè ÕÙæ° »° ØãêçÎØô´ ·¤ô ÁðM¤âÜ× ·¤æ ÂéÙçÙü׿ü‡æ ·¤ÚUÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ ÖðÁæ ÍæÐ w. Îðß ¥ÚUæÏÙæ Ñ âÕâð Âýæ¿èÙ çã‹Îê Ï×ü»ý´Í «‚ßðÎ Öè ã×ð´ Âýæ·¤-ÂæÚUâè ßñçη¤-¥æØüÙ Îðß ¥æÚUæÏÙæ ·Ô¤ ÕæÚUð ×ð´ ÁæÙ·¤æÚUè ÎðÌæ ãñÐ §â·Ô¤ ÂãÜð Öè ¥ßðSÌæ ¥õÚU ¥‹Ø ȤæÚUâè »ý´Íô´ ×ð´ Îðß Øæ çÎß ·¤æ ¥Íü ÚUæÿæâ Øæ ÎéC ÂýßëçžæØô´ Øæ ÎéC ÂýßëçžæØô´ ·¤æ ×ÙécØ»é‡ææÚUôÂ ÍæÐ âר ·Ô¤ âæÍ, Áñâæ ç·¤ ȤæÚUâè »ý´Íô´ ×ð´ ÂýçÌçÕ´çÕÌ ãôÌæ ãñ, Îðß Øæ çÎß àæŽÎ ÕéÚUæ§üØô´ ·¤æ ×ÙécØ»é‡ææÚUô ÕÙ »ØæÐ Øã °ðâð ¥æØü ÎðßÌæ¥ô´ ·¤æ lôÌ·¤ Öè ÕÙ »Øæ Áô ç·¤ ßñçη¤ Îðßô´ ×ð´ àææç×Ü Ùãè´ Íð ß »ñÚU-¥æØô´ü ·¤æ ÖèÐ ¥´ÌÌÑ, ×’Îæ-¥ÚUæÏ·¤ Îðß àæŽÎ ·¤æ ÂýØô» àæñÌæÙè Øæ ÎéC ÂýßëçžæØô´ ·Ô¤ çܰ ·¤ÚUÙð Ü»ðÐ 11 COVER 12 STORY OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press “We read into the myth [of Indra versus Vrita], core values of the deva and asura worshippers, as well as the methods the deva-worshippers employed in order to co-exist for generations with the dominant asura-worshippers: bidding their time while plotting to gain power through subterfuge.” – K E Edujee, (Zoroastrian) Heritage Institute Ò§â ç×Í·¤ ×ð´ Îðß ¥õÚU ¥âéÚU ¥ÚUæÏ·¤ô´ ·Ô¤ ×êËØ çÙçãÌ ãñ.´ Øã ã×ð´ Øã Öè ÕÌæÌæ ãñ ç·¤ Îðß-¥ÚUæÏ·¤ô´ Ùð ß¿üSßàææÜè ¥âéÚU-¥ÚUæÏ·¤ô´ ·Ô¤ âæÍ ·¤§ü ÂèçɸØô´ Ì·¤ ÚUãÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ ç·¤â ÌÚUã ·¤è ÚU‡æÙèçÌ ¥ÂÙæ§üÐ ßð Ïô¹æÏǸè âð àæçQ¤àææÜè ãôÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ áǸؘ´ æ ·¤ÚUÌð ÚUãÓð - ·Ô¤§ü °ÎéËÁè, (Á¸ÚUÍâé Åþ) çßÚUæâÌ â´SÍæÙ other Aryan gods who were not part of the Vedic pantheon, as well as the gods of non-Aryan peoples. Eventually, the Mazda worshippers began to use the word daeva generically to mean all forces of evil. It should be noted that not all the daevas in Persian and Zoroastrian texts are the Vedic devas. But the presiding deity of the Rig Vedic, Indra, is demonized in the Avesta. Later, a book of the Zoroastrian scriptures is titled Vi-daevo-data (now Vendidad), which means ‘the law against the daeva’. Lastly, the full name of the religion inaugurated by Zarathushtra means ‘Zarathushtrian Mazda-worship opposed to the daeva through the laws of the Lord (Ahura)’. All these suggest the strongest opposition of the Mazda worshippers to the daeva and their worshippers. While this process could explained away sociologically – as reflective of a serious falling out between two groups of Aryans – for our purposes it is worth lingering on the characterization of the Vedic devas before they show up and impact the Indian subcontinent. In the chapter 32.3 of the Gathas, Zarathushtra speaking about the daeva, says: “At yush deava vispaongha akat manangho sta chithrem.” (But all you daeva are the progeny of wicked thoughts.) Zarathushtra refers to the daeva as a group who collectively chose evil, much in the same way as the Bible describes Satan and the fallen angels. Of the many daeva listed in the Vendidad, only Indra has a direct Vedic equivalent. However, Sauru is thought to be the Vedic Sarva (sometimes used in the Vedas as a name of Shiva). Similarly, Naunghaithya is thought to be the Vedic Nasatya. In the Vendidad, Indra is said to operate under the auspices of Angra Mainyu, the evil spirit, later embodied as Ahriman, the devil incarnate. Øãæ´ Øã ×ãˆßÂê‡æü ãñ ç·¤ ȤæÚUâè ß ÂæÚUâè »ý´Íô´ ×ð´ àææç×Ü âÖè Îðß, ßñçη¤ ÎðßÌæ Ùãè´ ãñ´Ð ÂÚU´Ìé «‚ßðÎ ·Ô¤ ÂýÏæÙ Îðß §´Îý ·¤æ ¥ßðSÌæ ×ð´ ÎæÙßè·¤ÚU‡æ ç·¤Øæ »Øæ ãñÐ ÕæÎ ·Ô¤ °·¤ ÂæÚUâè Ï×ü»ý´Í ·¤æ àæèáü·¤ ãñ ÒçßÎðßô-ÎæÌæÓ (¥Õ Òßð‹ÇèÇæÇÓ) çÁâ·¤æ ¥Íü ãñ ÒÎðßô´ ·Ô¤ ç¹ÜæÈ¤ ·¤æÙêÙÓÐ ÁÚUÍéâÅþ mæÚUæ ©fæçÅUÌ Ï×ü ×ð´ §üEÚUèØ çÙØ×ô´ ·Ô¤ ÌãÌ Îðßô´ ·Ô¤ SÍæÙ ÂÚU ×’Îæ ·¤è ¥æÚUæÏÙæ ·¤è ÕæÌ ·¤ãè »§ü ãñÐ §ââð Øã ÂýÌèÌ ãôÌæ ãñ ç·¤ ×’Îæ-¥ÚUæÏ·¤, Îðßô´ ¥õÚU ©Ù·Ô¤ ¥ÚUæÏ·¤ô´ ·Ô¤ ·¤Ç¸ð çßÚUôÏè ÍðÐ §â ÂýçR¤Øæ ·¤æ â׿ÁàææS˜æèØ çßàÜðá‡æ Öè ç·¤Øæ Áæ â·¤Ìæ ãñ ¥õÚU ßã Øã ç·¤ Øã ¥æØô´ü ·Ô¤ Îô â×êãô´ ·Ô¤ Õè¿ ·Ô¤ »´ÖèÚU ×ÌÖðÎô´ ·¤ô ÂýçÌçÕ´çÕÌ ·¤ÚUÌæ ãñÐ ÂÚU´Ìé ã׿ÚUð çܰ Øã ßñçη¤ Îðßô´ ·Ô¤ ¿çÚU˜æ ·¤ô ÂýçÌÂæçÎÌ ·¤ÚUÙð ߿ܿ ãñ - ©â ¿çÚU˜æ ·¤ô Áô ÖæÚUÌèØ ©Â×ãæmè ÂÚU ©Ù·¤æ ÂýÖæß ÂǸÙð ·Ô¤ ÂãÜð ·¤æ ãñÐ Ò»æÍæÓ ·Ô¤ ¥ŠØæØ xw.x ×ð´ ÁÚUÍéâÅþ Îðßô´ ·Ô¤ ÕæÚUð ×ð´ ·¤ãÌð ãñ´ Ñ Ò¥ÅU Øàæ Îðßæ çßSÂô´»æ ¥·¤Ì ×ÙÙ»ô SÌæ ç¿ÍÚUð×Ó ÂÚU´Ìé Ìé× âÕ Îðß ÎéC çß¿æÚUô´ ·¤è â´ÌæÙ ãô ÁÚUÍéâÅþ Îðßô´ ·¤ô °·¤ °ðâæ â×êã ÕÌæÌæ ãñ çÁ‹ãô´Ùð ÕéÚUæ§ü ·¤ô âæ×êçã·¤ M¤Â âð ¿éÙæ ãñÐ ©âè ÌÚUã Áñâð Õæ§üçÕÜ ×ð´ àæñÌæÙ ¥õÚU ÂçÌÌ §üEÚU-ÎêÌô´ ·¤æ ߇æüÙ ãñÐ Òßð‹ÇèÇæÇÓ ×ð´ çÁÙ Îðßô´ ·¤è ¿¿æü ãñ ©Ù×ð´ âð çâȤü §‹Îý ßñçη¤ ÎðßÌæ ãñ´Ð §â·Ô¤ ¥çÌçÚUQ¤, ÒâôM¤Ó ·¤ô ßñçη¤ ÒâßüÓ (ßðÎô´ ×ð´ çàæß ·¤æ °·¤ Ùæ×) ×æÙæ ÁæÌæ ãñÐ §âè ÌÚUã, ÒÙô´ÙƒæñçÌØæÓ àææØÎ ßñçη¤ ÒÙâæÅU÷ØÓ ãñÐ Òßð‹ÇèÇæÇÓ ×ð´ °ðâæ ·¤ãæ »Øæ ãñ ç·¤ §‹Îý, ¥‹»ý ×ð‹Øê ·Ô¤ çÙÎðüàæ ×ð´ ·¤æ× ·¤ÚUÌæ Íæ, Áô ç·¤ °·¤ ÎéÚUæˆ×æ Íæ ¥õÚU Áô ¥æ»ð ¿Ü·¤ÚU Ò¥ãÚUè׿ÙÓ ¥ÍæüÌ ÎæÙßô´ ·¤æ ¥ßÌæÚU ÕÙæÐ °ÇéËÁè Âýæ·¤ ßñçη¤ ·¤æÜ âð Üð·¤ÚU ßðÎô´ ×ð´ ÎðßÌæ¥ô´ ·Ô¤ §çÌãæâ ·Ô¤ ¥ÂÙð ¥ŠØØÙ ·¤ô §â Üô·¤çÂýØ ¥æØæÙ âð â׿# ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´Ð Ò§‹Îý ·Ô¤ âÕâð ÕǸð àæ˜æé Íð ¥âéÚU ßëÌæ, Áô §‹Îý mæÚUæ ׿ÚUð »° °·¤ Øéß·¤ ·Ô¤ çÂÌæ ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ Âý·¤ÅU ãé°Ð §‹Îý ¥õÚU ßëÌæ ·Ô¤ Õè¿ ãé° Øéhô´ ×ð´ ßëÌæ Øæ Ìô çßÁØè ã饿 ¥Íßæ §‹Îý ·Ô¤ §ÚUæÎô´ ·¤ô Ùæ·¤æ×ØæÕ ·¤ÚUÙð ×ð´ âÈ¤Ü ÚUãæ, ÁÕ Ì·¤ ç·¤ çßc‡æé Ùð ¥ÂÙð ÀÜ-·¤ÂÅU âð §‹Îý ·¤è ×ÎÎ Ùãè´ ·¤èÐ §â ç×Í·¤ ×ð´ Îðß ¥õÚU ¥âéÚU ¥ÚUæÏ·¤ô´ ·Ô¤ ×êËØ çÙçãÌ ãñ´Ð Øã ã×ð´ Øã Öè ÕÌæÌæ ãñ ç·¤ Îðß ¥ÚUæÏ·¤ô´ Ùð ß¿üSßàææÜè ¥âéÚU ¥ÚUæÏ·¤ô´ ·Ô¤ âæÍ ·¤§ü ÂèçɸØô´ Ì·¤ ÚUãÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ ç·¤â ÌÚUã ·¤è ÚU‡æÙèçÌ ¥ÂÙæ§üÐ ßð Ïô¹æÏǸè âð àæçQ¤àææÜè ãôÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ áǸش˜æ ·¤ÚUÌð ÚUãðÐÓ È¤æòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ | ¥€ÅUêUÕÚU Eduljee wraps up his tracing of the devas from the pre-Vedic times to their full flowering in the Vedas, with the following reading of the well-known story: “Indra’s arch foe was the asura Vrita who was manifested by the father of a youth killed by Indra. Thereafter, in encounters between Indra and Vrita, Vrita was either victorious or succeeded in frustrating Indra’s exploits, until that is, Indra was aided by Vishnu as the trickster. We read into the myth, core values of the deva and asura worshippers, as well as the methods the deva-worshippers employed in order to coexist for generations with the dominant asura-worshippers: biding their time while plotting to gain power through subterfuge.” 3. Asura worship: The Rig Veda or other Hindu religious texts mention a set of deities who carry the title ‘asura’. As we have already seen, ‘asura’ is the Vedic equivalent of the Avestan ‘ahura’. Ahura is said to be derived from the word ahu, meaning lord. As with the English word ‘lord’, ahu is a descriptive title for both a human lord (e.g. a feudal lord) and a divine lord. In the Avesta, Mazda is sometimes addressed as just Ahura (Lord) and sometimes as Ahura Mazda (Lord God), much in the same way as in the Bible. The earlier Vedas claim that the devas and asuras are said to have been born of a common parent. However, the asuras as the older (purva-deva) and stronger siblings, claimed greater respect than the devas. Sibling rivalry indeed! The transition, from pre-Vedic through early to late Vedic times, is traceable through the evolution of the meaning ascribed to the title ‘asura’. In the Rig Veda, the term asura or lord is used for individual gods and for people. However, in the later Vedic texts the word asura is used as a title and as the name of a group of gods, who had evolved into demons. This has now been clearly established by the scholarly work of Wash Edward Hale, Asura in Early Vedic Religion (1986). By the time of the later Vedas the asuras are referred to in the plural. It is as a group of deities that the asuras are portrayed as being opposed to the devas. Interestingly, in these internecine conflicts between the two, the asuras were invariably victorious. The only time the devas were victorious is when they used a ruse or received the help of a benefactor trickster such as Vishnu – as was the case between Indra and Vrita. By the time of the Bhagvad-Gita, Puranas and Itihasas the transformation of the asuras from a group of gods into a group of demons is complete. All possible vices are ascribed to them – pride, arrogance, conceit, anger, harshness, and ignorance (Gita 16.4), ironically just as the devas were in the Avestas! Finally, in the Upanishad, the new demonic character of the asuras is sought to be theologized with the introduction of a new word, ‘sura’, meaning god, thereby implying that asura meant ‘asura’ or a not-god. This line of argument can be stood on its head by the Vedic Sanatana Dharmists, who will no doubt give precedence (with little or no historical basis) to the Vedas versus the Avestas. 2014 ¥æßÚU‡æ ·¤Íæ ds reflect the qualities of the go Eduljee speculates, “If ura rshippers, then for as the values of the wo aceful pe a g nin tai ain and m worshippers building ity. For the and order was a prior society based on law been the e priority would have deva worshippers, th r. The asuras rough might and fea exercise of power th tic.” devas are materialis are ethical where the ·Ô¤ ÎðßÌæ¥ô´ ·Ô¤ »é‡æ ¥ÚUæÏ·¤ô´ °ÎéËÁè ·¤æ Ì·¤ü ãñ ç·¤ ¥»ÚU ©Ù Ìô ¥âéÚU-¥ÚUæÏ·¤ô´ ·¤è ´ ·Ô¤ ×êËØô´ ·¤ô ÂýçÌçÕ´çÕÌ ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ ÂÚU ¥æÏæçÚUÌ àææ´çÌÂê‡æü â׿Á Íæ ÂýæÍç×·¤Ìæ ·¤æÙêÙ ¥õÚU ÃØßS ÍæÐ ÁÕç·¤ Îðß-¥ÚUæÏ·¤ô´ Ùæ ·¤æ çÙ׿ü‡æ ¥õÚU ©âð ÕÙæ° ÚU¹ ·Ô¤ ¥æÏæÚU ÂÚU âžææ ·¤æ ÖØ ß Ü Õ é ·¤è ÂýæÍç×·¤Ìæ Íè Õæã Îðß ÖõçÌ·¤ÌæßæÎè ÂýØô»Ð ¥âéÚU ÙñçÌ·¤ Íð ÁÕç·¤ x. ¥âéÚU ¥ÚUæÏÙæ Ñ «‚ßðÎ ß ¥‹Ø çã‹Îê Ï×ü»ý´Í, ©Ù ÎðßÌæ¥ô´ ·¤è ¿¿æü ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´, çÁÙ·Ô¤ Ùæ× ·Ô¤ ¥æ»ð ¥âéÚU àæŽÎ ·¤æ ÂýØô» ç·¤Øæ ÁæÌæ ãñÐ Áñâæ ç·¤ ã× ÂãÜð ãè ·¤ã ¿é·Ô¤ ãñ´, ¥âéÚU, ¥ßðSÌæ ·Ô¤ ¥ãéÚU ·Ô¤ â×·¤ÿæ ãñ´Ð ¥ãéÚU àæŽÎ ×ð´ àææç×Ü ¥ãé ·¤æ ×ÌÜÕ ãôÌæ ãñ ¥çÏÂçÌÐ ßã ¥çÏÂçÌ ×æÙß Öè ãô â·¤Ìæ ãñ (©ÎæãÚU‡ææÍü ·¤ô§ü âæ×´Ì) ¥õÚU ÎñßèØ ÖèÐ ¥ßðSÌæ ×ð´ ׿’Îæ ·¤ô ·¤éÀ SÍæÙô´ ÂÚU ·Ô¤ßÜ ¥ãéÚU (¥çÏÂçÌ) ·¤ãæ »Øæ ãñ ¥õÚU ¥‹Ø SÍæÙô´ ÂÚU ¥ãéÚU-×’Îæ (¥çÏÂçÌ §üEÚU)Ð °ðâæ ãè ·¤éÀ Õæ§üçÕÜ ×ð´ Öè ãñÐ ÂéÚUæÙð ßðÎô´ ×ð´ Øã Îæßæ ç·¤Øæ »Øæ ãñ ç·¤ Îðßô´ ¥õÚU ¥âéÚUô´ ·Ô¤ ÂêßüÁ °·¤ ãè ÍðÐ ÂÚU´Ìé ¿ê´ç·¤ ¥âéÚU ÕǸð (Âêßü-Îðß) ß ¥çÏ·¤ Ìæ·¤ÌßÚU âãôÎÚU Íð ¥ÌÑ ©‹ãð´ Îðßô´ âð ¥çÏ·¤ â×æÙ Âýæ# ÍæÐ Âýæ·¤ ßñçη¤ âð Üð·¤ÚU ÂýæÚU´çÖ·¤ ¥õÚU ©žæÚUßñçη¤ ·¤æÜ Ì·¤ ×ð´ ãé° ÂçÚUßÌüÙô´ ·¤ô ¥âéÚU àæŽÎ ·Ô¤ ¥Íü ×ð´ ãé° ÂçÚUßÌüÙô´ âð â×Ûææ Áæ â·¤Ìæ ãñÐ «‚ßðÎ ×ð´ ¥âéÚU Øæ ¥çÏÂçÌ àæŽÎ ·¤æ ÂýØô» çßçàæC Îðßô´ ß Üô»ô´ ·Ô¤ çܰ ç·¤Øæ »Øæ ãñÐ ÂÚU´Ìé ©žæÚU-ßñçη¤ »ý´Íô´ ×ð´ ¥âéÚU àæŽÎ ·¤æ §SÌð×æÜ Îðßô´ ·Ô¤ °ðâð â×êã ·Ô¤ çܰ ç·¤Øæ »Øæ ãñ Áô ÚUæÿæâ ÕÙ ¿é·Ô¤ ãñ´Ð Øã Ì‰Ø ßæàæ °ÇßÇü ãðÜ ·¤è çßmÌæÂê‡æü ÂéSÌ·¤ Ò¥âéÚU §Ù ¥ÚUÜè ßñçη¤ çÚUÜèÁÙÓ (v~}{) âð çÙ‡ææüØ·¤ M¤Â âð çâh ãô »Øæ ãñÐ ÕæÎ ·Ô¤ ßðÎô´ ·Ô¤ çܹð ÁæÙð ·Ô¤ âר Ì·¤ ¥âéÚU àæŽÎ ·¤æ ÂýØô» Õãé߿٠×ð´ ç·¤Øæ ÁæÙð Ü»æÐ ©‹ãð´ °ðâæ â×êã ÕÌæØæ ÁæÙð Ü»æ, Áô Îðßô´ ·Ô¤ çßÚUôÏè ãñ´Ð çÎÜ¿S Øã ãñ ç·¤ §Ù ÎôÙô´ â×êãô´ ·Ô¤ Õè¿ Øéh ×ð´ ֻܻ ã×ðàææ ¥âéÚU çßÁØè ãôÌð ÍðÐ Îðß ·Ô¤ßÜ ÌÖè ÁèÌÌð Íð ÁÕ ßð ç·¤âè ¿æÜ ·¤æ §SÌð×æÜ ·¤ÚUÌð Íð Øæ çßc‡æé Áñâð ç·¤âè ¿æÜÕæÁ ·¤è ×ÎÎ ÜðÌð Íð, Áñâæ ç·¤ ©‹ãô´Ùð §‹Îý ¥õÚU ßëÌæ ·Ô¤ Õè¿ ãé° Øéh ×ð´ ç·¤ØæÐ Ö»ßÎ÷ »èÌæ, ÂéÚUæ‡æô´ ¥õÚU §çÌãæâ ·Ô¤ Üð¹Ù ·Ô¤ âר Ì·¤ ¥âéÚUô´ ·¤æ Îðßô´ ·Ô¤ â×êã âð ÚUæÿæâô´ ·Ô¤ â×êã ÕÙÙð ·¤è ÂýçR¤Øæ â׿# ãô ¿é·¤è ÍèÐ ©‹ãð´ âæÚUè â´ÖæçßÌ ÕéÚUæ§üØô´ ·¤è ¹æÙ ÕÌæØæ ÁæÙð Ü»æ ÍæÐ §Ù×ð´ àææç×Ü Íð ¥ã´·¤æÚU, R¤ôÏ, ·ýê¤ÚUÌæ ¥õÚU ¥™ææÙÌæ (»èÌæ v{.y)Ð Øã çßÇ´ÕÙæ Íè ç·¤ ¥ßðSÌæ¥ô´ ×ð´ Îðßô´ ·¤ô Æè·¤ §‹ãè´ ¥ß»é‡æô´ âð Üñâ ÕÌæØæ »Øæ ÍæÐ ¥´ÌÌÑ, ©ÂçÙáÎô´ ×ð´ ¥âéÚUô´ ·Ô¤ ÎæÙßè·¤ÚU‡æ ·¤è ÂýçR¤Øæ ¥ÂÙð ¿ÚU× ÂÚU Âãé´¿ »§üÐ §âð Ï×üàææS˜æèØ SßM¤Â ÎðÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ °·¤ ÙØæ àæŽÎ ÒâéÚUÓ §SÌð×æÜ ç·¤Øæ ÁæÙð Ü»æ çÁâ·¤æ ¥Íü Íæ §üEÚUÐ ¥ÍæüÌ ¥âéÚU ·¤æ ¥Íü ãô »Øæ ¥-âéÚU Øæ ¥-§üEÚUÐ §â Ì·¤ü ·¤ô ßñçη¤ âÙæÌÙ Ï×èü ©ÜÅU·¤ÚU ÂýSÌéÌ ·¤ÚU â·¤Ìð ãñ´Ð ßð çÙçpÌ ÌõÚU ÂÚU ¥ßðSÌæ¥ô´ ·¤è ÌéÜÙæ ×ð´ ßðÎô´ ·¤ô ¥çÏ·¤ ×ãˆß Îð´»ðÐ 13 COVER 14 STORY OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press However, as the wisest satguru taught his disciples, a tree is known by its fruit. Dalitbahujans, who have tasted the bitter fruit of the brahmanical banyan tree, can tell that what was born of lies and deceit, and grew through blatant and subtle oppression, is not the advertised apple. In India, the demonized ‘asuras’ are much to be preferred over the deified ‘devas’. Worshippers of Asuras versus those of Devas It is a truism that no people will exceed the morality of their god(s). A people’s worldview and values are dictated by their choice of god(s). In his book, The Hymns of Atharvan Zarathushtra (1967), Jatindra Mohan Chatterji calls the Rig Vedic devas the “seen gods”, and asuras the “unseen gods”. This is true in the sense that the devas like Indra were anthropomorphic (projections of human qualities), with attributes (saguna) and therefore capable of representation as idols, while the asuras like Varuna and Mitra were non-anthropomorphic and formless (nirguna). In the Rig Veda there seems to be a clear division of roles and responsibilities. On the one hand, the devas preside over natural phenomena and the exercise of power and might. On the other hand, the asuras preside over the establishment and maintenance of a moral and social order. For instance, the deva Indra is guardian of the weather, while the asuras Varuna and Mitra are the guardians of the cosmic and moral laws. As a result, it has been observed that “the hymns addressed to Varuna are more ethical and devout in tone than the others, and form the most noble or high-minded portion of the Rig Veda.” Again Eduljee speculates, “If the qualities of the gods reflect the values of the worshippers, then for asura worshippers building and maintaining a peaceful society based on law and order was a priority. For the deva worshippers, the priority would have been the exercise of power through might and fear. The asuras are ethical where the devas are materialistic.” The history of India since Vedic times bears clear testimony to which gods and their followers prevailed and through what means. Demonizing the virtuous Alain Daniélou (1907-1994) spent more than 15 years in the traditional society of India, using only the Sanskrit and Hindi languages and studying music and philosophy with eminent scholars. He was duly initiated into esoteric Shaivism, which gave him unusual access to texts transmitted through the oral tradition alone. He is the author of more than 30 books on the religion, history, and arts of India and the Mediterranean. He wrote: It is significant that it was not for their sins that the anti-gods had to be destroyed but because of their power, their virtue, their knowledge, which threatened that of the gods—that is, the gods of the Aryas. The anti-gods are often depicted as good brahmanas (Bali, Prahlada). here. s, were the real problem “Humans, not anti-god as’ anti-god is the Puran The mythology of good ople out the challenge of pe coded way of talking ab do nce condemned to born into low castes, he more rtheless aspire to a life unclean tasks, who neve forms of dharma” in keeping with higher History Hindus: An Alternative – Wendy Doniger, The §üEÚU-çßÚUôÏè ÍðÐ ÂéÚUæ‡æô´ ×ð´ Øãæ´ ÂÚU â×SØæ ׿Ùß Ùãè´ ÕçË·¤ ÁæçÌØô´ ·Ô¤ Üô»ô´ ·Ô¤ ÕæÚUð è ÖÜð §üEÚU-çßÚUôçÏØô´ ·¤è ¿¿æü, Ùè¿ Øæâ ãñ. §Ù Üô»ô´ ·Ô¤ Âý ·¤æ ð Ù U ·¤Ú ×ð´ ÎÕè-ÀéÂè Öæáæ ×ð´ ÕæÌ Íð ÂÚU´Ìé ßð çȤÚU Öè ° ¥æ çãSâð ×ð´ ·Ô¤ßÜ ¥Sß‘À ·¤æ× Ï×üÂæÜÙ ·¤ÚUÙæ ¿æãÌð Íð ÅUÚUÙðçÅUß çãSÅþè - ßð´Çè ÇôçÙ»ÚU, Î çã‹ÎéÁ: °Ù ¥Ë ÂÚU´Ìé Áñâæ ç·¤ Õéçh×æÙ âλéM¤ Ùð ¥ÂÙð çàæcØô´ ·¤ô çâ¹æØæ Íæ, ç·¤âè ÂðǸ ·¤ô ©â·Ô¤ È¤Ü âð ÁæÙæ ÁæÌæ ãñÐ ÎçÜÌ-ÕãéÁÙô´ Ùð Õýæræ‡æßæÎ ·Ô¤ ßÅUßëÿæ ·Ô¤ ·¤Ç¸ßð È¤Ü ·¤ô ¿¹æ ãñ ¥õÚU ßð Øã ÕÌæ â·¤Ìð ãñ´ ç·¤ ßã 󾐮 ¥õÚU Ïô¹ð âð Á‹×æ ãñ ¥õÚU ¹éÜð ß ÎÕð-ÀéÂð Î×Ù Ùð ©âð âè´¿æ ãñÐ ßã ßô ×èÆæ È¤Ü Ùãè´, Áô ©âð ÕÌæØæ ÁæÌæ ãñÐ ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ ÎæÙßè·¤ëÌ ·¤ÚU çΰ »° Ò¥âéÚUô´UÓ ·¤ô ÎðßÌæ ·¤æ ÎÁæü Îð çΰ »° Îðßô´ ·¤è ÌéÜÙæ ×ð´ ¥çÏ·¤ ×ãˆß çÎØæ ÁæÙæ ¿æçã°Ð ¥âéÚU-ÂêÁ·¤ ÕÙæ× Îðß-ÂêÁ·¤ §â×ð´ ·¤ô§ü â´Îðã Ùãè´ ç·¤ ç·¤âè Öè â׿Á ·¤æ ÙñçÌ·¤ SÌÚU, ©â·Ô¤ ÎðßÌæ¥ô´ ·Ô¤ ÙñçÌ·¤ SÌÚU âð ÕðãÌÚU Ùãè´ ãô â·¤ÌæÐ Üô»ô´ ·Ô¤ ×êËØ ¥õÚU ©Ù·¤è çßEÎëçC ©Ù·Ô¤ §üEÚU ·Ô¤ ¿éÙæß ÂÚU çÙÖüÚU ·¤ÚUÌè ãñÐ ¥ÂÙè ÂéSÌ·¤ ÒÎ çãâ ¥æòȸ¤ ¥ÍÚU×æÙ ÁÚUÍéâÅþÓ (v~{|) ×ð´ çÁÌð‹Îý ×ôãÙ ¿ÅUÁèü, «‚ßñçη¤ Îðßô´ ·¤ô ÒçιÙð ßæÜð ֻ߿ÙÓ ¥õÚU ¥âéÚUô´ ·¤ô Ò¥ÙÎð¹ð ֻ߿ÙÓ ·¤ãÌð ãñ´Ð Øã §â ¥Íü ×ð´ âãè ãñ ç·¤ §‹Îý Áñâð ÎðßÌæ¥ô´ ×ð´ ׿ÙßèØ »é‡æ Íð ¥õÚU ßð â»é‡æ Íð, ¥ÌÑ ©‹ãð´ ×êçÌüØô´ ×ð´ ɿܿ Áæ â·¤Ìæ ÍæÐ §â·Ô¤ çßÂÚUèÌ ßM¤‡æ ¥õÚU çטæ Áñâð ¥âéÚUô´ ×ð´ ׿ÙßèØ »é‡æ Ùãè´ Íð ¥õÚU ßð çÙ»éü‡æ ÍðÐ «‚ßðÎ ×ð´ Îðßô´ ¥õÚU ¥âéÚUô´ ·¤è Öêç×·¤æ¥ô´ ¥õÚU çÁ×ðÎæçÚUØô´ ·¤æ SÂC Õ´ÅUßæÚUæ ãñÐ Áãæ´ Îðß Âýæ·¤ëçÌ·¤ ÂçÚUƒæÅUÙæ¥ô´ ·Ô¤ çÙØ´Ìæ ãñ´ ¥õÚU àæçQ¤ ·Ô¤ ·Ô¤‹Îý ãñ´ ßãè´ ¥âéÚU ÙñçÌ·¤ ¥õÚU âæ×æçÁ·¤ ÃØßSÍæ ·¤ô SÍæçÂÌ ·¤ÚUÙð ¥õÚU ©âð ÕÙæ° ÚU¹Ùð ·¤è çÁ×ðÎæÚUè çÙÖæÌð ãñ´Ð ©ÎæãÚU‡ææÍü, Îðß §‹Îý ×õâ× ·Ô¤ ¥çÏÂçÌ ãñ´ ÁÕç·¤ ¥âéÚU ßM¤‡æ ¥õÚU çטæ ÙñçÌ·¤ ß §üEÚUèØ çÙØ×ô´ ·Ô¤ â´ÚUÿæ·¤ ãñ´Ð ÙÌèÁæ Øã ç·¤ ßM¤‡æ ·¤ô â´ÕôçÏÌ «¿æ°´ ¥çÏ·¤ ÙèçÌÂÚU·¤ ¥õÚU ÖçQ¤Öæß âð ÖÚUè ãé§ü ãñ´ ¥õÚU ßð «‚ßðÎ ·Ô¤ ŸæðDÌ× ß ©‘¿ SÌÚUèØ çãSâô´ ×ð´ âð °·¤ ãñ´Ð °ÎéËÁè ·¤æ Ì·¤ü ãñ ç·¤ ¥»ÚU ©Ù·Ô¤ ÎðßÌæ¥ô´ ·Ô¤ »é‡æ ¥ÚUæÏ·¤ô´ ·Ô¤ ×êËØô´ ·¤ô ÂýçÌçÕ´çÕÌ ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´ Ìô ¥âéÚU-¥ÚUæÏ·¤ô´ ·¤è ÂýæÍç×·¤Ìæ ·¤æÙêÙ ¥õÚU ÃØßSÍæ ÂÚU ¥æÏæçÚUÌ àææ´çÌÂê‡æü â׿Á ·¤æ çÙ׿ü‡æ ¥õÚU ©âð ÕÙæ° ÚU¹Ùæ ÍæÐ ÁÕç·¤ Îðß-¥ÚUæÏ·¤ô´ ·¤è ÂýæÍç×·¤Ìæ Íè ÕæãéÕÜ ß ÖØ ·Ô¤ ¥æÏæÚU ÂÚU âžææ ·¤æ ÂýØô»Ð ¥âéÚU ÙñçÌ·¤ Íð ÁÕç·¤ Îðß ÖõçÌ·¤ÌæßæÎèÐ ßñçη¤ ·¤æÜ âð Üð·¤ÚU ¥æÁ Ì·¤ ÖæÚUÌ ·¤æ §çÌãæâ §â ÕæÌ ·¤æ âæÿæè ãñ ç·¤ ·¤õÙ âð §üEÚU ¥õÚU ©Ù·Ô¤ ¥ÙéØæçØØô´ ·¤æ ÕôÜտܿ ÚUãæ ¥õÚU ©‹ãô´Ùð ç·¤Ù ÌÚUè·¤ô´ ·¤ô ¥ÂÙæØæÐ »é‡æßæÙô´ ·¤æ ÎæÙßè·¤ÚU‡æ °ÜèØÙ ÇðÙèÜæª¤ (v~®|-v~~y) Ùð ÖæÚUÌ ·Ô¤ ÂæÚU´ÂçÚU·¤ â׿Á ×ð´ vz âð ¥çÏ·¤ ßáü çÕÌæ°Ð ©‹ãô´Ùð ·Ô¤ßÜ â´S·¤ëÌ °ß´ çã‹Îè Öæáæ¥ô´ ·¤æ ©ÂØô» ç·¤Øæ ¥õÚU ÂýçÌçDÌ çßmæÙô´ ·¤è â´»çÌ ×ð´ â´»èÌ È¤æòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ | ¥€ÅêUÕÚU In order to explain the demonization of asuras, mythology was created to show that though the asuras were originally just, good, virtuous, their nature had gradually changed. The asuras (anti-gods) were depicted to have become proud, vain, to have stopped performing sacrifices, to violate sacred laws, not visit holy places, not cleanse themselves from sin, to be envious of devas, torturous of living beings, creating confusion in everything and to challenge the devas. Durga Puja and Dalitbahujan identity The celebrations of Durga Puja are an annual reminder to the Dalitbahujans of their struggles for dignity, equity and justice. They speak of historic caste struggles between the Aryans and the aboriginal Asurs, between the Dwij and Dalitbahujans. Wendy Doniger, in The Hindus: An Alternative History (2010, p. 490), states the case clearly: Humans, not anti-gods, were the real problem here. The mythology of good anti-god is the Puranas’ coded way of talking about the challenge of people born into low castes, hence condemned to do unclean tasks, who nevertheless aspire to a life more in keeping with higher forms of dharma. Thus the Durga Puja festival and other such celebrations as the Bali Raja festival in Kerala and other parts of India create stories of identity that renew group and cultural cohesion. No sense of individual or group identity can successfully survive without a story of origin and destiny. The community must believe that it has an ordained place in the order of things. It is from the story of our past that we understand the present and gain hope and direction for the future. Thus the celebration of Mahishasura, the great king of the Asuras, martyred at the hands of the treacherous Aryans, provides for the renewal of both identity and hope for the oppressed Dalitbahujans. Such counter-cultural commemorations reconstruct and empower the identity of today’s oppressed Indian Asuras. The ultimate revenge would be for the majority Dalitbahujans to follow in the footsteps of Mahatma Phule – not just to deconstruct the dominant brahmanical myths in order to find the truth of their original identity, but to reject the oppressive polytheistic meta-narrative and embrace the liberating monotheistic hope of Bali raj, in which they once again are lords (asuras) in their own land. Paul E. Larsen is a scholar with a doctorate in Theology and a life-long learner, with a special interest in the Bahujans. As a founding member of the US Board of Truthseekers International he has been visiting India regularly for over 12 years 2014 ¥æßÚU‡æ ·¤Íæ ¥õÚU ÎàæüÙ ·¤æ ¥ŠØØÙ ç·¤ØæÐ ©‹ãð´ Õæ·¤æØÎæ »é# àæñß Â´Í ×ð´ ÎèçÿæÌ ç·¤Øæ »Øæ çÁââð ©‹ãð´ ©Ù ¥æØæÙô´ ·¤æ ™ææÙ ç×Ü â·¤æ Áô ·Ô¤ßÜ ×õç¹·¤ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ âð °·¤ Âèɸè âð ÎêâÚUè Âèɸè Ì·¤ ãSÌæ´ÌçÚUÌ ç·¤° ÁæÌð ÍðÐ ßð ÖæÚUÌ ¥õÚU Öê×ŠØ âæ»ÚU ÿæð˜æ ·¤è ·¤Üæ¥ô, Ï×ü ß §çÌãæâ ÂÚU x® âð ¥çÏ·¤ ÂéSÌ·¤ô´ ·Ô¤ Üð¹·¤ ãñ´Ð ßð çܹÌð ãñ´ ÒØã ×ãˆßÂê‡æü ãñ ç·¤ §üEÚU-çßÚUôçÏØô´ ·¤ô ©Ù·Ô¤ ÂæÂô´ ·Ô¤ ·¤æÚU‡æ ÙC Ùãè´ ç·¤Øæ ÁæÙæ Íæ ÕçË·¤ ©Ù·¤è àæçQ¤, ©Ù·Ô¤ »é‡æô´ ß ©Ù·Ô¤ ™ææÙ ·Ô¤ ·¤æÚU‡æ, Áô Îðßô´ ·Ô¤ çܰ ¹ÌÚUæ ÕÙ »° Íð - ¥ÍæüÌ ¥æØô´ü ·Ô¤ §üEÚUô´ ·Ô¤ çܰР§üEÚU-çßÚUôçÏØô´ ·¤ô ¥€UâÚU ¥‘Àð Õýæãׇæô´ ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ ÂýSÌéÌ ç·¤Øæ ÁæÌæ Íæ Áñâð ÕæÜè ß ÂýãÜæÎÐ ¥âéÚUô´ ·Ô¤ ÎæÙßè·¤ÚU‡æ ·¤ô ¥õ翈ØÂê‡æü ÆãÚUæÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ Øð ç×Í·¤ ÕÙæ° »° ç·¤ Ølç ¥âéÚU ×êÜÌÑ ‹ØæØçÂýØ ß âÎ÷»é‡æè Íð ÂÚU´Ìé âר ·Ô¤ âæÍ ©Ù·¤æ ¿çÚU˜æ ÕÎÜ »ØæÐ ¥âéÚU (§üEÚU-çßÚUôÏè) δÖè ÕÙ »°, ©‹ãô´Ùð ÕçÜ ÎðÙæ Õ´Î ·¤ÚU çÎØæ, ßð Âçߘæ çÙØ×ô´ ·¤æ ©„´ƒæÙ ·¤ÚUÙð Ü»ð, ©‹ãô´Ùð Âçߘæ SÍæÙô´ ·¤è Øæ˜ææ ·¤ÚUÙæ ÀôǸ çÎØæ ¥õÚU ©‹ãô´Ùð ¥ÂÙð ¥æÂ·¤ô ÂæÂô´ âð ×éQ¤ ·¤ÚUÙð ·¤æ ÂýØæâ ÀôǸ çÎØæÐ ßð Îðßô´ âð §cØæü ·¤ÚUÙð Ü»ð, Áèßô´ ·¤ô âÌæÙð Ü»ð, ¥ÃØßSÍæ Èñ¤ÜæÙð Ü»ð ¥õÚU ÎðßÌæ¥ô´ ·Ô¤ çܰ ¿éÙõÌè ÕÙ »°ÐÓ Î黿ü ÂêÁæ ß ÎçÜÌ-ÕãéÁÙ Âã¿æÙ Î黿ü ÂêÁæ, ÎçÜÌÕãéÁÙô´ ·¤ô »çÚU׿, â׿ÙÌæ ¥õÚU ‹ØæØ ·Ô¤ çܰ ©Ù·Ô¤ â´ƒæáü ·¤è ØæÎ çÎÜæÌè ãñÐ ßã ¥æØô´ü ¥õÚU ×êÜ çÙßæâè ¥âéÚUô´, çmÁô´ ¥õÚU ÎçÜÌ ÕãéÁÙô´ ·Ô¤ Õè¿ â´ƒæáü ·¤æ ÂýÌè·¤ ãñÐ ßð‹Çè ǸôçÙ»ÚU ÒÎ çã‹ÎêÁ Ñ °Ù ¥æËÅUÚUÙðçÅUß çãSÅþèÓ (w®v®, ÂëD y~®) ×ð´ SÂC çܹÌè ãñ´ Ñ ÒØãæ´ ÂÚU â×SØæ ׿Ùß Ùãè´ ÕçË·¤ §üEÚU-çßÚUôÏè ÍðÐ ÂéÚUæ‡æô´ ×ð´ ÖÜð §üEÚU-çßÚUôçÏØô´ ·¤è ¿¿æü, Ùè¿è ÁæçÌØô´ ·Ô¤ Üô»ô´ ·Ô¤ ÕæÚUð ×ð´ ÎÕè-ÀéÂè Öæáæ ×ð´ ÕæÌ ·¤ÚUÙð ·¤æ ÂýØæâ ãñÐ §Ù Üô»ô´ ·Ô¤ çãSâð ×ð´ ·Ô¤ßÜ ¥Sß‘À ·¤æ× ¥æ° Íð ÂÚU´Ìé ßð çȤÚU Öè Ï×üÂæÜÙ ·¤ÚUÙæ ¿æãÌð ÍðÐ §â ÌÚUã, Î黿ü ÂêÁæ ·¤æ ˆØôãæÚU ß ·Ô¤ÚUÜ ß Îðàæ ·Ô¤ ¥‹Ø Öæ»ô´ ×ð´ ×ÙæØæ ÁæÙð ߿ܿ ÕÜèÚUæÁæ ˆØôãæÚU, Âã¿æÙ ·¤è °ðâð Ù§ü ·¤Íæ°´ çÙ׿ü‡æ ·¤ÚUÌè ãñ´ Áô âæ´S·¤ëçÌ·¤ °·¤Ìæ ·¤æ ÙßèÙè·¤ÚU‡æ ·¤ÚU â·Ô¤´Ð ç·¤âè Öè ÃØçQ¤ Øæ â×êã ·¤è Âã¿æÙ ÌÕ Ì·¤ çÁ´Îæ Ùãè´ ÚUã â·¤Ìè ÁÕ Ì·¤ ©âð, ©â·Ô¤ ©ÎØ ß çÙØçÌ ·¤æ ™ææÙ Ù ãôÐ ç·¤âè Öè â×é뾯 ·¤ô Øã çßEæâ ãôÙæ ¿æçã° ç·¤ ©âð â׿Á ×ð´ ©â·¤æ ©ç¿Ì SÍæÙ Âýæ# ãñÐ ã׿ÚUð ¥ÌèÌ âð ã× ¥ÂÙð ßÌü×æÙ ·¤ô â×Ûæ â·¤Ìð ãñ´, ¥ÂÙð ÖçßcØ ·Ô¤ ÂýçÌ ¥æàææßæÙ ãô â·¤Ìð ãñ´ ¥õÚU ©â·¤è çÎàææ ÁæÙ â·¤Ìð ãñ´Ð §â ÌÚUã ¥âéÚUô´ ·Ô¤ ×ãæÙ ÚUæÁæ ×çãáæâéÚU çÁâð ¥æØô´ü Ùð Ïô¹ð âð àæãèÎ ·¤ÚU çÎØæ Íæ ·¤è ·¤Íæ Îç×Ì-ÎçÜÌ ÕãéÁÙô´ ·¤ô Âã¿æÙ ¥õÚU ¥æàææ ÎôÙô´ ÎðÌè ãñÐ §â ÌÚUã ·Ô¤ ÂýçÌ-âæ´S·¤ëçÌ·¤ ¥æØôÁÙ ¥æÁ ·Ô¤ Îç×Ì ÖæÚUÌèØ ¥âéÚUô´ ·¤æ âàæçQ¤·¤ÚU‡æ ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´Ð Õãéâ´Ø·¤ ÎçÜÌ-ÕãéÁÙô´ ·Ô¤ çܰ ÂýçÌàæôÏ ·¤æ âÕâð ÕðãÌÚU ÌÚUè·¤æ ãô»æ ×ãæˆ×æ ȤéÜð ·Ô¤ ÚUæSÌð ÂÚU ¿ÜÙæÐ ©‹ãð´ ·Ô¤ßÜ ¥ÂÙè ×êÜ Âã¿æÙ ·¤ô ÁæÙÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ ß¿üSßßæÎè Õýæã‡æßæÎè ç×Í·¤ô´ ·¤ô ÌôÇ¸Ùæ Ùãè´ ãñ ÕçË·¤ ©‹ãð´ Î×Ù·¤æÚUè Õãé§üEÚUßæÎè ¥æØæÙ ·¤ô ¹æçÚUÁ ·¤ÚU ©‹ãð´ SßÌ´˜æ ·¤ÚUÙð ßæÜð ÕæÜèÚUæÁ ·¤è °·Ô¤EÚUßæÎè ¥æàææ ·¤ô »Üð Ü»æÙæ ãñ çÁâ×ð´ ßð ¥ÂÙè ÏÚUÌè ·Ô¤ ¥çÏÂçÌ (¥âéÚU) ãñ´Ð ÂæòÜ §Uü. ÜæòÚUâÙ çÍØæðÜæòÁè ×ð´ Âè°ÇUè ãñ´U ß ÕãéUÁÙ ×égæð´ ·ð¤ ¥æÁèßÙ ¥ŠØðÌæ ãñ´UÐ ÅUþêUÍ âè·¤âü §´UÅUÚUÙðàæÙÜ ·ð¤ Øê°â ÕæðÇüU ·ð¤ â´SÍæÂ·¤ âÎSØ ·ð¤ L¤Â ×ð´ ßð çÂÀUËæð 12 ßáæðZ âð çÙØç×Ì ÌæñÚU ÂÚU ÖæÚUÌ ·¤è Øæ˜ææ ·¤ÚUÌð ÚUãðU ãñ´UÐ 15 16 DISCOURSE OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press Everyone’s is no one’s Áô âÕ·¤æ ãôÌæ ãñ, ßãU ç·¤âè ·¤æ Ùãè´ ãôÌæ ONE WHO IS OF EVERYONE BELONGS TO NO ONE. THIS CONUNDRUM MUST HAVE TROUBLED BUDDHA ALSO. THAT IS WHY HE TALKED OF ‘BAHUJAN HITAY, BAHUJAN SUKHAY’ Áô âÕ·¤æ ãôÌæ ãñ, ßã ç·¤âè ·¤æ Ùãè´ ãôÌæÐ Õéh â´ÖßÌÑ §â »éˆÍè ×ð´ ©ÜÛæð ãô´»ðÐ §âèçܰ ©‹ãô´Ùð ÕãéÁÙ çãÌæØ, ÕãéÁÙ âé¹æØ ·¤æ ©Î÷ƒææðá ç·¤Øæ PREM KUMAR MANI W hen Pramod Ranjan rang me up to say that FORWARD Press was bringing out an issue centred on Bahujan tradition and that he wanted me to write a piece for it, I was a bit distraught. I could not comprehend what Bahujan tradition could possibly be. India has Shramnic and Brahmanic traditions and there may be thousands of other small and big traditions as well. But Bahujan tradition? I could not think of what to write. I told Pramod about my dilemma but he was insistent that I may write whatever I wish, but write I must. That only compounded my problem. I tried to wriggle out but that is simply impossible in this age of mobile and SMS. In Hindi, Dr Ramvilas Sharma can be credited with launching a discourse on tradition, which he, ultimately converted into an ism. His tradition discourse evoked a lot of criticism and today, hardly anyone needs to be told what his objective was. Humility was not one of the strong points of Ramvilas ji. He did not believe in using a discourse to arrive at a conclusion. Like lawyers, he decided his conclusion first and then his brilliant mind got to Âý Âýð×·¤é׿ÚU ×ç‡æ ×ôÎ ÚU´ÁÙ Ùð ÁÕ ÎêÚUÖæá ÂÚU ÕÌÜæØæ ç·¤ ȤæòÚUßÇü Âýðâ ·¤æ ÕãéÁÙ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ÂÚU °·¤ ¥´·¤ ¥æ ÚUãæ ãñ ¥õÚU ©â ÂÚU ¥æÂ·Ô¤ çß¿æÚU ¥Íßæ çÅUŒÂ‡æè ·¤è ÎÚU·¤æÚU ãô»è, ÌÕ ×ñ´ ãË·¤æ-âæ ÂÚUðàææÙ ãé¥æÐ ×ðÚUè â×Ûæ ×ð´ Ùãè´ ¥æØæ ç·¤ ÕãéÁÙ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ €UØæ ãô»èÐ ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ Ÿæ×‡æ ¥õÚU Õýæ±×‡æ ÂÚU´ÚUæ Ìô ãñ ¥õÚU çȤÚU ÀôÅUè-ÕǸè ãÁæÚUô´ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæØð´ ãô â·¤Ìè ãñ´, Üðç·¤Ù ÕãéÁÙ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ! ×ðÚUè â×Ûæ ×ð´ ©ÜÛæÙ ·¤è »æ´Æð´ ÂǸ »§ü´Ð ×ñ´Ùð ¥ÂÙè ©ÜÛæÙ âð Âý×ôÎ ·¤ô ¥ß»Ì Öè ·¤ÚUæØæÐ ÌÕ Âý×ôÎ ·¤æ Ò¥æÎðàæÓ Íæ, ¥æÂ Áô Öè ¿æãð´ çܹð´, Üðç·¤Ù çܹð´Ð ¥Õ ×ðÚUè ÂÚUðàææÙè ¥õÚU Õɸ »§üÐ ×çÅUØæÙæ ¿æãæÐ Üðç·¤Ù ×ôÕæ§Ü ¥õÚU °â°×°â ·Ô¤ Á׿Ùð ×ð´ °ðâð Ì·¤æÎô´ âð Õ¿Ùæ ×éçà·¤Ü ãôÌæ ãñÐ çã´Îè ×ð´ Çæò. ÚUæ×çßÜæâ àæ×æü Ùð ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ÂÚU çß×àæü ·¤è àæéL¤¥æÌ ·¤è ¥õÚU §âð ¥´ÌÌÑ °·¤ ßæÎ ×ð´ ÂçÚU‡æÌ ·¤ÚU çÎØæÐ ©Ù·Ô¤ §â ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ-çß×àæü ·¤è ÖÚUÂêÚU ¥æÜô¿Ùæ Öè ãé§ü ãñ ¥õÚU ¥æÁ àææØÎ ãè ç·¤âè ·¤ô Øã ÕÌÜæÙð ·¤è ÁL¤ÚUÌ ãñ ç·¤ ©â·¤æ ¥æàæØ €UØæ ÍæÐ ÚUæ×çßÜæâ Áè ¥€U¹Ç¸ ÂéL¤á ÍðÐ ßã çß×àæü âð ÙÌèÁæ Ùãè´ çÙ·¤æÜÌð ÍðÐ ß·¤èÜô´ ·¤è ÌÚUã ÜÿØ ÌØ ·¤ÚU ÜðÌð Íð ¥õÚU çȤÚU ¥ÂÙè ×ðÏæ âð ©âð çâh ·¤ÚU ÎðÌð ÍðÐ Üðç·¤Ù ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ÂÚU ÂãÜè ÎȤæ çß×àæüÙé׿ çã´Îè ×ð´ ·¤éÀ ¥æØæ, Ìô ßã Ùæ×ßÚU çâ´ã ·¤è ÀôÅUè-âè ÂéSÌ·¤ ÒÎêâÚUè ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ·¤è ¹ôÁÓ- Íè, çÁâð ©‹ãô´Ùð ¥ÂÙð »éL¤ ´çÇÌ ãÁæÚUè ÂýâæÎ çmßðÎè ·¤ô â×ÛæÌð-â×ÛææÌð ãé° çܹæ ÍæÐ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ÂÚU °·¤ âæÍü·¤ çß×àæü ·¤è àæéL¤¥æÌ çã´Îè ×ð´ Øãè´ âð ãé§üРȤæòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ | ¥€ÅêUÕÚU 2014 çß×àæü 17 BUT WHAT CAN BAHUJAN TRADITION BE? HOW IS IT RECOGNIZED? IT WILL BE BETTER TO CALL IT BAHUJANSHRAMAN TRADITION ÕãéÁÙ ÂÚÚÂÚUæ €UØæ ãô â·¤Ìè ãñ? Øæ €UØæ ÕÜæ ãñ? §âð ÕãéÁÙ-Ÿæ×‡æ ÂÚÚÂÚUæ ·¤ãÙæ ’ØæÎæ âãè ãô»æ work to prove it correct. In that sense, Namvar Singh’s booklet Doosri Parampara Kee Khoj (The quest for a second tradition) was the first attempt at such a discourse in Hindi. This book was based on the writings of his guru, Pandit Hazari Prasad Dwivedi. From here began a meaningful discourse in Hindi. Customs are not tradition Dr. Namvar Singh begins his book with an anecdote. A widow at Shanti Niketan wanted to marry her daughter according to Hindu rites. Someone said that a widow cannot perform Nandi Shraddha (a ritual). Gururudev (Ravindranath Tagore) summoned jyotishacharya (chief astrologer) Pandit Hazari Prasad Dwivedi, who had just arrived from Kashi, and asked him, “The history of Hindus goes back thousands of years. Is it for the first time that such a thing is being attempted? Such a situation must have risen earlier also?” Panditji pored over Smriti scriptures and found that there were many sentences suggesting that widows enjoyed that right but in totality, the inescapable conclusion was that widows could not perform Nandi Shraddha. He conveyed his opinion to Gurudev, who laughed and asked him ‘Are the older Rishis, whose views have been contradicted by the newer ones, less blessed?”. The question shook Panditji. Is tradition only what was said or done earlier? Does it not include what happened in the subsequent times? The tradition, which, he, till then, believed was something seamless, like Shivdhanush (the bow of Lord Shiva) broke into innumerable pieces. He suddenly realized that there can be more traditions than one. (Doorsri Parampara Kee Khoj, Dr. Namvar Singh, Rajkamal Prakashan, Delhi p. 11). ÂçÚUÂæçÅUØæ´ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ Ùãè´ ãôÌè´ ÂéSÌ·¤ ·¤æ ¥æÚU´Ö ·¤ÚUÌð ãé° ãè Çæò. Ùæ×ßÚU çâ´ã Ùð °·¤ ·¤Íæ ·¤æ çÁR¤ ç·¤Øæ ãñ, ÒÒàææ´çÌ çÙ·Ô¤ÌÙ ×ð´ °·¤ çßÏßæ ¥ÂÙè ·¤‹Øæ ·¤æ çßßæã çã´Îê çßçÏ âð ·¤ÚUÙæ ¿æãÌè ÍèÐ ç·¤âè Ùð ·¤ã çÎØæ ç·¤ Ùæ‹Îè Ÿææh çßÏßæ Ùãè´ ·¤ÚU â·¤ÌèÐ »éL¤Îðß (ÚUßè‹Îý ÙæÍ Ææ·¤éÚU) Ùð Ù°-Ù° ¥æØð ·¤æàæè ·Ô¤ ’ØôçÌáæ¿æØü ´çÇÌ ãÁæÚUè ÂýâæÎ çmßðÎè ·¤ô ÕéÜßæ ÖðÁæÐ ÂêÀæ Òçã´Îé¥ô´ ·¤æ ãÁæÚUô´ ßáü ·¤æ §çÌãæâ ãñ, €UØæ ©â×ð´ ÂãÜè ÕæÚU Øã ƒæÅUÙæ ãô ÚUãè ãñ? ÂãÜð Öè Ìô ·¤Öè °ðâè çSÍçÌ ¥æØè ãô»è?Ó Â´çÇÌ Áè ƒæÚU ¥æ°Ð S×ëçÌ»ý´Íô´ ·¤è ÀæÙÕèÙ ·¤èÐ Îð¹æ ç·¤ ÂêßüÂÿæ ×ð´ °ðâð ÕãéÌ ß¿Ù ãñ´, Áô çßÏßæ ·Ô¤ §â ¥çÏ·¤æÚU ·¤ô Sßè·¤æÚU ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´Ð Üðç·¤Ù ß¿Ùô´ ·¤è â´»çÌ Ü»æÌð âר çÙc·¤áü L¤Â ×ð´ Øãè ·¤ãæ »Øæ ãñ ç·¤ çßÏßæ ·¤ô °ðâæ ¥çÏ·¤æÚU Ùãè´ ãñÐ Áæ·¤ÚU »éL¤Îðß ·¤ô ÕÌæØæ Ìô ã´â·¤ÚU ÕôÜð, Ò€UØæ ÂêßüÂÿæ ·Ô¤ ßð «çá ·¤éÀ ·¤× Âê’Ø ãñ´, çÁÙ·¤æ ¹´ÇÙ ©žæÚUÂÿæ ×ð´ ç·¤Øæ »Øæ ãñ?Ó §â ÂýŸæ Ùð ´çÇUÌ Áè ·¤ô Ûæ·¤ÛæôÚU çÎØæÐ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ €UØæ ©žæÚUÂÿæ ãè ãñ? ÂêßüÂÿæ Ùãè´? çÁâ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ·¤ô ¥Õ Ì·¤ ßð ¥¹‡Ç â×Ûæ ÚUãð Íð, Îð¹Ìð Îð¹Ìð çàæßÏÙéá ·Ô¤ â×æÙ ¹´Ç-¹´Ç ãô »§üÐ Ü»æ ç·¤ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ¥õÚU Öè ãô â·¤Ìè ãñ´ÐÓÓ (ÎêâÚUè ÂÚU´ÚUæ ·¤è ¹ôÁ, Çæò. Ùæ×ßÚU çâ´ã, ÚUæÁ·¤×Ü Âý·¤æàæÙ, ç΄è, ÂëD- vv) ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ°´ Öè ¥Ùð·¤ ãñ´, ¥õÚU ÂçÚUÂçÅUØæ´ ÖèÐ ·¤éÀ Üô» ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ¥õÚU ÂçÚUÂæÅUè ·¤æ ƒææÜ-×ðÜ ·¤ÚU ÎðÌð ãñ´, ÂçÚUÂæÅUè ·¤ô ãè ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ×æÙ ÜðÌð ãñ´Ð Áñâð çã´Îê ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ âð ©Ù·¤æ ¥æàæØ çã‹Îê ÂçÚUÂæçÅUØô´ âð ãôÌæ ãñÐ ©ÆÙðÕñÆÙð, ÂãÙÙð-â´ßÚUÙð ·Ô¤ É´» Øæ §âè ÌÚU㠷𤠥õÚU ·¤éÀÐ Øð ÂçÚUÂæçÅUØæ´ ãñ´, ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ Ùãè´Ð ÁÕ ã× ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ÂÚU çß×àæü ·¤ÚU ÚUãð ãô´, ÌÕ §â·¤æ ¹ØæÜ ÚU¹Ùæ ¿æçã°Ð 18 DISCOURSE OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press NAMVAR SINGH’S BOOKLET DOOSRI PARAMPARA KEE KHOJ (THE QUEST FOR OTHER TRADITIONS) WAS THE FIRST ATTEMPT AT SUCH A DISCOURSE IN HINDI ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ÂÚU ÂãÜè ÎȤæ çß×àæüÙé׿ çã´Îè ×ð´ ·¤éÀ ¥æØæ, ÌÕ ßã Ùæ×ßÚU çâ´ã ·¤è ÀôÅUè-âè ÂéSÌ·¤ ÒÎêâÚUè ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ·¤è ¹ôÁÓ Íè There are many customs and there are many traditions. Some people mix tradition with customs. They confuse customs with tradition. For instance, they say ‘Hindu tradition’ when they mean ‘Hindu customs’. The way you dress, your eating habits – these are not traditions but customs. In any discourse on tradition, this confusion should be avoided. Bahujan Shraman tradition But what can Bahujan tradition be? How is it recognized? I told Pramod Ranjan that it will be better to call it BahujanShraman tradition. Though I said this without much thought and I cannot vouch for the correctness of my formulation either I stand by it. Of course, if someone comes up with a convincing alternative, I won’t take a moment to withdraw from my stand. In our country and society, for centuries, two traditions of thought have existed side-by-side. One is the Shraman tradition and the other, Brahmin tradition. Our dictionaries define ‘Shraman’ as hardworking and diligent while ‘Brahmin’ is defined as chaitanya (consciousness). Janmana jayate shudrah, sanskare dwij uchyate (Everyone is Shudra by birth, it is qualities that make one Dwij or Brahmin). Knowledge (symbolized by the sacred thread) makes someone a Dwij. And at the summit of the Dwijs are Brahmins – those with complete consciousness. But how this group of persons with ‘complete consciouness’ would survive? For that an elaborate state and religious power structure was created. Since survival is difficult without physical labour an exploitative and hypocritical system was put in place. Avoidance of physical labour is the foundation of the Brahmanical value system. Your place in the hierarchy is determined by how little work you do. Brahmins are at the top, followed by Kshatriyas and Vaishyas. Since Kshatriyas and Vaishyas have to do a bit of physical labour, hence they have been placed at a lower level than Brahmins. On the other hand, Shudras have been burdened with so much physical labour that they were barred from acquiring knowledge. ‘Na Shudray Matidyat’ (Don’t give wisdom to Shudras). Don’t allow them to attain consciousness. For, most of the people should remain fools so that some can attain consciousness. This is the root of Brahmanical thinking. And this thinking is alive and kicking even today. ÕãéÁÙ-Ÿæ×‡æ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ Üðç·¤Ù Øã ÕãéÁÙ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ €UØæ ãô â·¤Ìè ãñ? Øæ €UØæ ÕÜæ ãñ? ×ñÙð Âý×ôÎ ÚU´ÁÙ âð ·¤ãæ, §âð ÒÕãéÁÙ-Ÿæ×‡æ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæÓ ·¤ãÙæ ’ØæÎæ âãè ãô»æÐ ç·¤ÌÙæ âãè ãô»æ, Øã Sߨ´ ×ñ´ Öè Ùãè´ ÁæÙÌæÐ °·¤ ÛæÅU·Ô¤ ×ð´ ·¤ã »ØæÐ Üðç·¤Ù ¥Õ Ì·¤ ·¤æØ× ãê´, ·¤ô§ü âæÍü·¤ ÁßæÕ ç×Üð, Ìô ¥ÂÙè ÕæÌ ·¤ô ßæÂâ ÜðÙð ×ð´ ÎðÚU Ùãè´ ·¤L¤´»æÐ ã׿ÚUð Îðàæ-â׿Á ×ð´ âçÎØô´ âð Îô ÌÚUã ·¤è çß¿æÚU-ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ°´ ×éØ L¤Â âð ¿Ü ÚUãè ãñ´Ð °·¤ ãñ Ÿæ×‡æ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ¥õÚU ÎêâÚUè Õýæ±×‡æ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæÐ ã׿ÚUð àæŽÎ·¤ôàæ Ÿæ×‡æ ·¤æ ¥Íü ÕÌÜæÌð ãñ ÒÂçÚUŸæ×è, ×ðãÙÌèÓ ß â‹Øæâè ¥õÚU Õýæ±×‡æ ·¤æ ¥Íü Ò¿ñÌ‹ØÓÐ ÒÁ‹×Ùæ ÁæØÌð àæêÎýÑ â´S·¤æÚUñ çmÁ ©‘ØÌðÓ - Á‹× âð âÖè àæêÎý ãôÌð ãñ´, â´S·¤æÚU âð çmÁ Øæ Õýæ±×‡æ ÕÙÌð ãñ´Ð ™ææÙ ·¤æ (ÂýÌè·¤ ×ð´ Ø™æôÂßèÌ) â´S·¤æÚU ç·¤âè ·¤ô çmÁ ÕÙæÌæ ãñÐ çmÁ ·Ô¤ àæèáü Õýæ±×‡æ ãñ´ - Âê‡æü ¿ñÌ‹ØÐ Üðç·¤Ù §â Âê‡æü ¿ñÌ‹Ø â×êã ·¤è ÖõçÌ·¤ ÂÚUßçÚUàæ ·ñ¤âð ãô»è, §â·Ô¤ çܰ Ï×ü ¥õÚU ÚUæÁ âžææ ·¤è ÚU¿Ùæ ·¤è »§üÐ àæôá‡æ ¥õÚU Âæ¹´Ç ·¤æ ÂêÚUæ ¿R¤ ÚU¿æ »Øæ €UØô´ç·¤ àææÚUèçÚU·¤ Ÿæ× ·Ô¤ çÕÙæ ÁèßÙ ¿ÜÙæ ×éçà·¤Ü ãôÌæ ãñÐ Õýæ±×‡æ ç¿´ÌÙ ·¤æ ×êÜ âê˜æ ãñ àææÚUèçÚU·¤ Ÿæ× âð ÎêÚUèÐ Áô àææÚUèçÚU·¤ Ÿæ× âð çÁÌÙæ ÎêÚU ãñ, ßã ©ÌÙæ ãè ©´¿æ ãñÐ Õýæ±×‡æ âÕâ𠪤ÂÚU ¥õÚU çȤÚU R¤× âð ÿæç˜æØ ¥õÚU ßñàØÐ ÿæç˜æØ ¥õÚU ßñàØ ·¤ô ·¤éÀ àææÚUèçÚU·¤ Ÿæ× ·¤ÚUÙð ÂǸÌð ãñ´, §âçܰ ßð ·¤×ÌÚU ãñ´Ð àæêÎýô´ ÂÚU àææÚUèçÚU·¤ Ÿæ× ·¤è §ÌÙè çÁ×ðÎæÚUè ãñ ç·¤ ©‹ãð´ ™ææÙæÁüÙ ·¤è ÕÜæÌ÷ ×Ùæãè ãñÐ ÒÙ àæêÎýæØ ×çÌlæÌ÷Ó - àæêÎýô´ ·¤ô ×çÌ ×Ì ÎôÐ àæêÎýô´ ·¤ô ¿ñÌ‹Ø ×Ì ÕÙÙð ÎôÐ ·¤éÀ Üô»ô´ ·¤ô ¿ñÌ‹Ø ÕÙð ÚUãÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ ÕãéÌô´ ·¤æ ÁǸ Øæ ×ê¹ü ÕÙð ÚUãÙæ ÁL¤ÚUè ãñÐ Øãè ãñ ×éØ L¤Â âð Õýæ±×‡æ ç¿´ÌÙÐ §â ç¿´ÌÙ ·¤è ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ¥Ùð·¤ L¤Âô´ ×ð´ ¥æÁ Öè ÁæÚUè ãñÐ §â ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ âð ¥Ùð·¤ â‹ØæçâØô´ ¥õÚU ×ÙèçáØô´ Ùð °ÌÚUæÁ ÁÌæØæ ÍæÐ ÂõÚUæç‡æ·¤ ¥æØæÙô´ ·¤è ÕæÌ ÀôÇ Îð´ Ìô °ðçÌãæçâ·¤ ¥æØæÙô´ ×ð´ §Uâ·¤æ âÕâð ÃØßçSÍÌ çßÚUôÏ ÌÍæ»Ì Õéh Ùð ÂýÎçàæüÌ ç·¤ØæÐ ¥ÂÙð ÂýçàæçÿæÌ çÖÿæé¥ô´ ·¤ô âÖè çÎàææ¥ô´ ×ð´ ÁæÙð ·¤æ ¥ÙéÚUæðÏ ·¤ÚUÌð ãé° ©‹ãô´Ùð â´ÕôçÏÌ ç·¤Øæ - Ò¿ÚUÍ çÖ€U¹ßð, ¿æçÚU·¤´, ÕãéÁÙ çãÌæØ ÕãéÁÙ â鹿Ø, Üô·¤æÙé·¤ÂæØ.... ¥ˆÍæØ çãÌæØ, Îðß ×ÙéSâæÙ´ÐÓ (Áæ¥ô çÖÿæé¥ô´, ¿æÚUô´ çÎàææ¥ô´ ×ð´ Áæ¥ô, ÕãéÌô´ ·Ô¤ çãÌ ·Ô¤ çܰ, ÕãéÌô´ ·Ô¤ âé¹ ·Ô¤ çܰ, Üô»ô´ ÂÚU ¥Ùé·¤´Âæ ·¤ÚUÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ, ©Ù·Ô¤ ·¤ËØæ‡æ ·Ô¤ çܰ, ÎðßÌæ¥ô´ ¥õÚU ×ÙécØô´ ·Ô¤ ·¤ËØæ‡æ ·Ô¤ çܰÐ) Õéh ¥ËÂâ´Ø·¤ (׿§ÙçÚUÅUè) ç¿´ÌÙ ·¤ô ÕãéÁÙ (×ðÁæçÚUÅUè) ç¿´ÌÙ ×ð´ ÕÎÜ ÎðÌð ãñ´Ð Øã ©Ù·¤è ÁÙÌæ´ç˜æ·¤ ÂãÜ ÍèÐ ÕãéÌô´ ·Ô¤ çܰ, ·Ô¤ßÜ ·¤éÀ ·Ô¤ çܰ Ùãè´Ð §â ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ·¤ô Ÿæ×‡æ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ·¤ãæ »ØæÐ Õýæ±×‡æ ç¿´ÌÙ Ùð çÁâ ÌÚUã àæêÎýô´ ·¤è ¥ßãðÜÙæ ·¤è Íè, ©Ù·Ô¤ àæôá‡æ ·¤æ °·¤ ·¤é¿R¤ ÚU¿æ Íæ, ßñâæ Ÿæ×‡æ ÂÚU´ÚUæ Ùð Ùãè´ ç·¤ØæÐ ¿ñÌ‹Ø (Õýæ±×‡æ) Üô»ô´ ·¤è ·¤ô§ü ¥ßãðÜÙæ Øãæ´ Ùãè´ ÍèÐ Õéh Ùð çÁÙ ÎðßÌæ¥ô´ ·Ô¤ ·¤ËØæ‡æ ·¤è ÕæÌ ·¤è ãñ, ßð â´ÖßÌÑ Øð ¿ñÌ‹Ø Õýæ±×‡æ ãè ãñ´Ð Ÿæ×‡æ ç¿´ÌÙ â×ˆß ·¤è ÕæÌ ·¤ÚUÌæ ãñÐ ÃØæÂ·¤ çß×éçQ¤ ·¤è ÕæÌ ·¤ÚUÌæ ãñ, âèç×Ì çß×éçQ¤ ·¤è Ùãè´Ð ȤæòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ | ¥€ÅêUÕÚU 2014 Many scholars and saints objected to this tradition. Leaving aside Puranic myths, historically Tathagat Buddha mounted the first and most systematic opposition to this tradition. Directing his trained bhikshuks to proceed in all directions, he said, Charath mikhwe, charikam, bahujan hitay, bahujan sukhay, lokampunay...atthay hitay, aiv manuissanam’ (Go bhikshuks, go in all four directions, for the interest of many, for the happiness of many, for the welfare of the world, for the welfare of the people, for the welfare of gods and humans) Buddha’s thoughts were not for a minority; they were for a majority. This was his democratic initiative. For most, not just for a few. This tradition is called Shraman. This tradition did not ignore the Shudras or build an elaborate structure for their exploitation, as Brahmin ideology had done. The gods Buddha talks about are possibly the Brahmins, equipped with consciousness. Shraman thinking talks of equality. It talks of wider liberation not of limited liberation. çß×àæü s and there are many There are many custom ms. mix tradition with custo traditions. Some people e, th tradition. For instanc wi s m sto cu e us nf co They du n’ when they mean ‘Hin they say ‘Hindu traditio ts – dress, your eating habi customs’. The way you ourse sc di y but customs. In an these are not traditions ion should be avoided on tradition, this confus Ð ·¤éÀ Üô» ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ¥õÚU Öè æ´ Ø çÅU  U ÂçÚ ÚU ¥õ , ´ ãñ ¤ · ð ¥Ù Öè °´ æ ÂÚU´ÂÚU æÅUè ·¤ô ãè ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ×æÙ ÜðÌð  U ÂçÚ , ´ ãñ ð Ì Îð ÚU ·¤ Ü ð -× ƒææÜ æ ·¤ è æÅU ÂçÚU çã‹Îê ÂçÚUÂæçÅUØô´ âð ãôÌæ ãñÐ àæØ ¥æ æ ·¤ ©Ù âð æ ÚU  ´ U ÂÚ ê Î çã´ ð â Áñ ãñ´Ð Øæ §âè ÌÚU㠷𤠥õÚU ·¤éÀÐ Øð » É´ ¤ ·Ô ð Ù ÚU ß â´ ð ÙÙ Âã , Ùð Æ Õñ Ùð ©Æ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ÂÚU çß×àæü ·¤ÚU ÚUãð ãô´, ã× ÁÕ Ð è´ Ùã æ ÚU  U ´ ÂÚ , ´ ãñ æ´ Ø U æçÅ Â U ÂçÚ ÌÕ §â·¤æ ¹ØæÜ ÚU¹Ùæ ¿æçã° Sarvajan versus Bahujan In short, this is the difference between these two traditions. In our country, the Brahmin tradition became so strong that Shraman tradition went out of reckoning. The result was the country was enslaved and remained so for long. Even today, we are slaves in many senses. Socially and culturally, we are still backward. We cannot acquire the expected politico-economic clout if the present trend continues. Sometimes, for the sake of vote politics, attempts are made to convert the Bahujan Shraman cultural tradition into Sarvajan tradition. This was first attempted by Vinoba, then by Mayawati and now Narendra Modi - all singing the same old song. In fact, Sarvajan thinking is a cleverly disguised attempt at preserving Brahmin ideology. But this discourse will be a long one. This short article is not enough for it. In the end, I would like to quote an incident from the Mahabharata. The war is over and all the sons of Draupadi are dead. She is bitterly crying. Trying to console her, Krishna says, “This is bound to happen in wars”. Draupadi replies, “Krishna, do you think I do not understand this simple thing. I understand it very well. The cause of my distress is not only that my sons have been killed. It is also that only I am crying for my sons. When Ghatotkaccha was killed, Bhim cried bitterly and Arjun was all tears when Abhimanyu died. But despite my sons having five fathers, only I am crying for them. Is the one who is everyone’s not anyone’s”. Krishna shakes his head and says, ‘Draupadi, this is true”. One who is of everyone belongs to no one. This conundrum must have troubled Buddha also. That is why he talked of ‘Bahujan hitay, Bahujan sukhay’. Our politicians and social thinkers should ponder over this. Premkumar Mani is a leading Hindi writer and thinker. As a political worker, he is known for his advocacy for social justice âßüÁÙ ÕÙæ× ÕãéÁÙ âæÚU-â´ÿæð ×ð´ Øãè §Ù ÎôÙô´ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ¥ô´ ·¤æ ÖðÎ ãñÐ ã׿ÚUð Îðàæ ×ð´ Õýæ±×‡æ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ §ÌÙè ×ÁÕêÌ ãô »§ü ç·¤ Ÿæ×‡æ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ·¤ô çß×àæü ·Ô¤ ÎæØÚUð âð ãè ÕæãÚU ·¤ÚU çÎØæ »ØæÐ §â·¤æ ÙÌèÁæ Øã ã饿 ç·¤ Îðàæ Ü´Õð ¥ÚUâð Ì·¤ »éÜæ× ÚUãæÐ ·¤§ü ¥Íô´ü ×ð´ ã× ¥æÁ Öè »éÜæ× ãñ´Ð ã׿ÚUæ âæ×æçÁ·¤-âæ´S·¤ëçÌ·¤ çÂÀǸæÂÙ ¥æÁ Öè ÕÙæ ã饿 ãñÐ §â·Ô¤ ÚUãÌð ã× ¥ÂðçÿæÌ ¥æçÍü·¤-ÚUæÁÙèçÌ·¤ Ìæ·¤Ì ãæçâÜ Ùãè´ ·¤ÚU â·¤ÌðÐ ÕãéÁÙ Ÿæ×‡æ âæ´S·¤ëçÌ·¤ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ·¤ô ßôÅU ·¤è ÚUæÁÙèçÌ ·Ô¤ çܰ ·¤Öè-·¤ÖæÚU âßüÁÙ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ×ð´ ÌŽÎèÜ ·¤ÚUÙð ·¤è ·¤ôçàæàæ ãôÌè ãñÐ §âð ÂãÜè ÎȤæ çÕÙôÕæ Ùð ç·¤Øæ Íæ ¥õÚU çȤÚU ×æØæßÌè Ùð ¥õÚU ¥Õ ÙÚUð‹Îý ×ôÎè Øãè ÚUæ» ¥ÜæÂ ÚUãð ãñ´Ð ÎÚU¥âÜ, âßüÁÙ ç¿´ÌÙ, Âý‘Àóæ L¤Â âð Õýæ±×‡æ ç¿´ÌÙ ·¤ô ÕÙæ° ÚU¹Ùð ·¤è °·¤ ãôçàæØæÚU ·¤ôçàæàæ ãñÐ §â ÂÚU çß×àæü ·Ô¤ çܰ ÕãéÌ âר ¿æçã°Ð §â ÀôÅUð ¥æÜð¹ ×ð´ Øã â´Öß Ùãè´ ãô»æÐ ãæ´, §â ¥æÜð¹ ·Ô¤ ¥æç¹ÚU ×ð´ ×ñ´ ÂæÆ·¤ô´ ·¤ô ×ãæÖæÚUÌ ·¤æ °·¤ ¥´àæ ÕÌÜæÙæ ¿æãê´»æÐ ×ãæÖæÚUÌ ·Ô¤ ¥æç¹ÚU ×ð´ ÎýõÂÎè ·Ô¤ âÖè ÕðÅUð ׿ÚUð ÁæÌð ãñ´ ¥õÚU ßã çßÜæÂ ·¤ÚU ÚUãè ãñÐ ·¤ëc‡æ ©âð ¿é ·¤ÚUæÌð ãé° ·¤ãÌð ãñ´- ÒØéh ×ð´ Øã ãôÌæ ãñ, ·¤ëc‡ææÓÐ ·¤ëc‡ææ (ÎýõÂÎè) ·¤ãÌè ãñ - Ò·¤ëc‡æ! €UØæ §â ÀôÅUè ÕæÌ ·¤ô ×ñ´ Ùãè´ â×ÛæÌèÐ ¥‘Àè ÌÚUã â×ÛæÌè ãê´Ð ×ðÚUæ Îé¹ ·Ô¤ßÜ Øã Ùãè´ ãñ ç·¤ ×ðÚUð ÕðÅUð ׿ÚUð »° ãñ´Ð ×ðÚUæ Îé¹ Øã ãñ ç·¤ ¥ÂÙð ÕðÅUô´ ·¤è ×ëˆØé ÂÚU ·ð¤ßÜ ×´ñ çßÜæÂ ·¤ÚU ÚUãè ãê´Ð ƒæÅUôˆ·¤¿ ׿ÚUæ »Øæ Íæ ÌÕ Öè× È¤êÅU-ȤêÅU ·¤ÚU ÚUô ÚUãæ ÍæÐ ¥çÖ׋Øé ·¤è ×ëˆØé ÂÚU ¥ÁéüÙÐ Üðç·¤Ù ×ðÚUð ÕðÅUð ÂÚU ÚUôÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ, Âæ´¿ çÂÌæ¥ô´ ·Ô¤ ÚUãÌð, ·Ô¤ßÜ ×ñ´ ãê´Ð €UØæ Áô âÕ·¤æ ãôÌæ ãñ, ßã ç·¤âè ·¤æ Ùãè´ ãôÌæ?Ó ·¤ëc‡æ Ùð ãæ×è ×ð´ çâÚU çãÜæÌð ãé° ·¤ãæ - Ò·¤ëc‡ææ, Øãè â¿ ãñÐÓ Áô âÕ·¤æ ãôÌæ ãñ, ßã ç·¤âè ·¤æ Ùãè´ ãôÌæÐ Õéh â´ÖßÌÑ §â »éˆÍè ×ð´ ©ÜÛæð ãô´»ðÐ §âèçܰ ©‹ãô´Ùð ÕãéÁÙ çãÌæØ, ÕãéÁÙ âé¹æØ ·¤æ ©U΃ææðá ç·¤ØæÐ ã׿ÚUð ÚUæÁÙðÌæ¥ô´ ¥õÚU âæ×æçÁ·¤ ÎæàæüçÙ·¤ô´ ·¤ô §â ÂÚU çß×àæü ·¤ÚUÙæ ¿æçã°Ð Âýð×·¤é׿ÚU ×ç‡æ çã´Îè ·Ô¤ ÂýçÌçÙçÏ Üð¹·¤, ç¿´Ì·¤ ß âæ×æçÁ·¤ ‹ØæØ ·Ô¤ ÂÿæÏÚU ÚUæÁÙèçÌ·¤×èü ãñ´ 19 20 RE-READING OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press Durga and Mahishasur myth An objective reading Î黿ü ¥õÚU ×çãáæâéÚU ·¤æ ç×Í·¤ °·¤ ßSÌéçÙDU 微 Manglagauri Kamroop Kamakhya ·¤æ×L¤Â ·¤æ×Øæ ×´»Üæ»æñÚUè SANJEEV CHANDAN M ythology is not history. But it does provide a peep into the culture of the people who inhabited a particular area in the hoary past. The myth of devis has a pan-Indian influence, which is centuries old. The myths glorify the motherhood of the devis and worship them as creators. At Kamroop Kamakhya(Assam), the vagina is worshipped and the ritualistic Brahmins have even set aside five days of ‘menstruation’ every month. At Manglagauri in Gaya district of Bihar, the breasts of Devi are worshipped. But are these myths just a celebration of motherhood, of the woman as a creator? Or in them is hidden a long history of social struggle? In fact, despite the advent of the so-called modernistic thinking, writing on the myths of Devis is still fraught with grave risks, especially against the backdrop in which this article has been written. There is no doubt that our inspirational heroes like Mahatma Phule, Dr Ambedkar, Periyar and others have launched bitter assaults on these myths but things have not changed much since their times. ç× â´Áèß ¿´ÎÙ Í·¤ §çÌãæâ Ùãè´ ãôÌð Üðç·¤Ù ßð ¥ÌèÌ ãô ¿é·Ô¤ â׿Á ¥õÚU ©â·¤è â´S·¤ëçÌ ·¤æ §çÌãæâ ÁM¤ÚU ·¤ãÌð ãñ´Ð Îðçߨô´ ·Ô¤ ç×Í·¤ ÂêÚUð Îðàæ ×𴠥ܻ-¥Ü» M¤Âô´ ×ð´ ¥ÂÙæ ÂýÖæß ÚU¹Ìð ãñ´ ¥õÚU ßáô´ü âð ֻܻ âßü׿‹Ø M¤Â âð Sßè·¤æØü ÚUãð ãñ´Ð ×æÙæ ÁæÌæ ãñU ç·¤ Øð ç×Í·¤ Îðçߨô´ ·Ô¤ ׿Ìëˆß ·¤è ÂýçÌDæ ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´ ß ©Ù·¤è âëÁÙ àæçQ¤ ·¤è ¥æÚUæÏÙæ ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´Ð ·¤æ×M¤Â ·¤æ×Øæ (¥â×) ×ð´ S˜æè ·¤è ØôçÙ ·¤è ÂêÁæ ãôÌè ãñ, çÁâ·Ô¤ çܰ Õýæã×‡æ ·¤×ü·¤æ´çÇØô´ Ùð z çÎÙô´ ·¤è ׿çâ·¤ ÒÚUÁSßÜæÓ ¥ßçÏ Öè ÌØ ·¤ÚU ÚU¹è ãñÐ çÕãæÚU ·Ô¤ »Øæ çÁÜð ×ð´ ×´»Üæ»õÚUè ×ð´ Îðßè ·Ô¤ SÌÙ ·¤è ÂêÁæ ãôÌè ãñÐ Üðç·¤Ù €UØæ â¿×é¿ Øð ç×Í·¤ çâȤü âëÁÙ àæçQ¤ ·¤è ¥ÚUæÏÙæ Ì·¤ âèç×Ì ãñ´ Øæ §Ù·Ô¤ ÂèÀð âæ×æçÁ·¤ â´ƒæáü ·¤è °·¤ Ü´Õè »æÍæ Öè ÀéÂè ãñ? ßSÌéÌÑ ·¤çÍÌ ¥æÏéçÙ·¤ âô¿ ·Ô¤ ¥æ»×Ù ·Ô¤ ÕæßÁêÎ, Îðçߨô´ ·Ô¤ ç×Í·¤ ÂÚU çÜ¹Ùæ ¥æÁ Öè ·¤æÈ¤è Áôç¹× ÖÚUæ ãñ, ¹æâ·¤ÚU çÁâ ÂëDÖêç× ×ð´ Øãæ´ çܹÙð ·¤æ Âýâ´» ãñÐ ãæÜæ´ç·¤ ×ãæˆ×æ ȤéÜð, Çæ ¥æÕðÇ·¤ÚU, ÂðçÚUØæÚU ¥æçÎ ã׿ÚUð ÂýðÚU‡ææ ÙæØ·¤ô´ Ùð §Ù ç×Í·¤ô´ ÂÚU ·¤ÚUæÚUæ ÂýãæÚU ç·¤Øæ ãñ, Üðç·¤Ù çSÍçÌØæ¡ ¥æÁ Öè ÕãéÌ ÕÎÜè Ùãè´ ãñ´Ð ȤæòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ | ¥€ÅêUÕÚU 2014 In the Hindu religion, there are innumerable myths surrounding the devis. And Durga is one of them. Durga’s story first appears in Markandey Purana, which was written somewhere between 250 AD and 500 AD. The story is recited by the Brahmins as Durga Saptashati According to Durga Saptashati, Durga has many different forms and names. She is Jagadjanani (the creator of the universe). But, at the same time, she was born from the tej (power) of (male) gods and that was the source of her strength also – the strength which she uses to avenge the defeat of the gods. Durga kills many Asurs, including Mahishasur, Shumbh, Nishumbh, etc. Much has been written about the struggle between the Aryans and the original inhabitants and the names the Aryans gave to the original inhabitants. In many parts of the country, Asurs are worshipped. Thus, the myth of Durga is the story of the original inhabitants versus Aryans battles, which has been glorified by the Brahmin bards. AH Salunkhe and Neeraj Salunkhe, activists of the Maratha Sewa Sangh and scholars of Bahujan tradition, linking the myths of Durga, Urvashi, Amba, etc with Bahujan tradition, describe them as gannayika (literally heroine of a group). Presuming this theory to be correct, the battles which the gannayikas waged must have been either in the nature of wars between tribal clans or they must have been fought on the provocation or under control of the Aryans. Since these gans belonged to the same country hence they must have been aware of the strengths and weaknesses of each other and that knowledge could have been employed to vanquish them. It was because of this that the Aryans must have used the gannayikas to expand their kingdom and in turn, glorified them. Durga Saptashati says that Durga consumed liquor in the battlefield and then she kills Mahishasur. Some between-the-lines interpreters of this story insist that Mahishasur was killed by deceit and that Durga took advantage of her feminine charms. Subsequently, the Asurs Shumbh-Nishumbh invite Durga to come to them. Here also, there is a scope for a subtextual interpretation. And the basis of it is the texts that Durga was unmarried i.e. no god accepted her as his wife. And so, she can be counted amongst the apsaras like Urvashi and Maneka, who were the nymphs of the gods. A linguistic analysis of the words used in the story brings out further facts. Mahishasur's slaying is called Mahishasur mardan. This can be interpreted in two ways. One that Durga was equipped with masculine strength, with the power of the gods (that is what Durga Saptashati says) and that is how she accomplished the mardan (trampling or crushing) of Mahishasur. The word mardan, however, has sexual connotations. Thus, on the basis of the word used and the fact that Durga consumed liquor before killing Mahishasur, there are possibilities of a subtext to the story. One thing, however, is clear: that the only sentiment behind the worship of Durga and other devis is not paying tributes to the power of creation. It has some hidden meanings too, which can only be understood via the Bahujan rendition of the Brahmanical scriptures. Journalist and story-writer Sanjeev Chandan edits Streekaal magazine ÂéÙÂæüÆU ÎÚU¥âÜ, çã´Îê Ï×ü ×ð´ Îðçߨô´ ·Ô¤ ¥Ùð·¤ ç×Í·¤èØ ¥çSÌˆß ãñ´, çÁÙ×ð´ Î黿ü °·¤ ãñ´Ð Î黿ü ·¤è ·¤Íæ wz® §üSßè âð Üð·¤ÚU z®® §üSßè ·Ô¤ Õè¿ çܹ𠻰 ׿·¤´üÇðØ ÂéÚUæ‡æ ×ð´ ãñ, çÁâ·¤æ ÒÎ黿ü â#àæÌèÓ ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ Õýæ±×‡æô´ mæÚUæ ÂæÆ ç·¤Øæ ÁæÌæ ãñÐ ÒÎ黿ü â#àæÌèÓ ·Ô¤ ¥ÙéâæÚU, Î黿ü ·Ô¤ ¥Ü»-¥Ü» Ùæ× ¥õÚU M¤Â ãñ´Ð ßã ÒÁ»Î÷ÁÙÙèÓ ãñ Üðç·¤Ù ©â·¤è ©ˆÂçžæ ÎðßÌæ¥ô´ (ÂéL¤áô´) ·Ô¤ ÌðÁ âð ãé§ü ãñ ¥õÚU ©ââð âð ãè ßã §ÌÙè àæçQ¤àææÜè Öè ÕÙè ç·¤ Îðßô´ ·¤è ÂÚUæÁØ ·¤æ ÕÎÜæ Üð â·Ô¤Ð Î黿ü ¥Ùð·¤ ¥âéÚUô´ ·¤è ãUˆØæ ·¤ÚUÌè ãñ, çÁÙ×ð´ ×çãáæâéÚU, àæéÖ, çÙàæéÖ ¥æçÎ àææç×Ü ãñ´Ð ¥æØô´ü ¥õÚU ×êÜçÙßæçâØô´ ·Ô¤ ¥æÂâè â´ƒæáü ¥õÚU ×êÜçÙßæçâØô´ ·Ô¤ çܰ ¥æØô´ü mæÚUæ ç·¤Øð ÁæÙð ßæÜð â´ÕôÏÙô´ ·Ô¤ §çÌãæâ ÂÚU ·¤æÈ¤è ·¤éÀ çÜ¹æ »Øæ ãñÐ Îðàæ ·Ô¤ ¥Ü»-¥Ü» Öæ»ô´ ×ð´ ¥âéÚUô´ ·¤è ÂêÁæ ãôÌè ãñÐ §â Âý·¤æÚU Î黿ü ·¤æ ç×Í·¤ ¥õÚU ©â·Ô¤ ÂÚUæàæçQ¤ â´Âóæ Øéhô´ ·¤è ·¤Íæ ¥æØô´ü ¥õÚU ×êÜçÙßæçâØô´ ·Ô¤ Õè¿ â´ƒæáü ·¤è ·¤Íæ ãñ, çÁâð Õýæræ‡æ ¿æÚU‡æô´ Ùð ¥çÌßæÎè ÕÙæ çÎØæÐ ×ãæÚUæCþU ·Ô¤ ÕãéÁÙ ÂÚUÂÚUæ ·Ô¤ çßmæÙ ÌÍæ ×ÚUæÆæ âðßæ â´ƒæ ·Ô¤ âçR¤Ø ¥æ´ÎôÜ·¤ ¥æ.ã. âæÜé¹ ´ ð ¥õÚU ÙèÚUÁ âæÜé¹ ´ ð Î黿ü, ©ßüàæè, ¥Õ ¥æçÎ ·¤ô ÕãéÁÙ ÂÚUÂÚUæ âð ÁôǸÌð ãé° ©‹ãð´ Ò»‡æÙæçØ·¤æÓ ÕÌæÌð ãñд ØçÎ Øã çâhæ´Ì âãè ãñ Ìô çȤÚU §Ù »‡æÙæçØ·¤æ¥ô´ ·¤æ Øéh Øæ Ìô ·¤ÕèÜæ§ü Øéh Íæ Øæ çȤÚU ¥æØôǘ ·Ô¤ ©·¤âæßð Øæ çÙØ´˜æ‡æ ×ð´ ã饿 ÍæÐ §âè Îðàæ âð ãôÙð ·Ô¤ ·¤æÚU‡æ Øð Ò»‡æÓ °·¤-ÎêâÚUð ·ð¤ ·¤õàæÜ-·¤çרô´ âð ßæç·¤È¤ ãô´»,ð Áô §‹ãð´ °·¤ ÎêâÚUð ·¤ô ãÚUæÙð ×ð´ âãæØ·¤ ÚUãæ ãô»æ ¥õÚU §âè ·¤æÚU‡æ âð ¥æØôǘ Ùð ¥ÂÙð çßSÌæÚU ·Ô¤ çܰ §Ù·¤æ §SÌð×æÜ ç·¤Øæ ãô»æ ¥õÚU §Ù·¤æ ×çã׿״ÇÙ ã饿 ãô»æÐ Î黿ü â#àæÌè ×ð´ ߇æüÙ ãñ ç·¤ Øéh ·Ô¤ ×ñÎæÙ ×ð´ Î黿ü ÒâéÚUæÂæÙÓ ·¤ÚUÙð Ü»Ìè ãñ ¥õÚU ©â·Ô¤ ÕæÎ ßã ×çãáæâéÚU ·¤æ ßÏ ·¤ÚUÌè ãñÐ §â ·¤Íæ ·¤è ÒçÕÅUßèÙ Î Üæ§´âÓ ÃØæØæ ·¤ÚUÙð ßæÜð Üô» ×çãáæâéÚU ·¤è ãUˆØæ Ïô¹ð âð ·¤è »§ü ׿ÙÌð ãñ´, ØæÙè S˜æè ãôÙð ·¤æ ȸ¤æØÎæ Üð·¤ÚU Î黿ü Ùð ©Ù·¤è ãUˆØæ ·¤ÚU ÎèÐ ÕæÎ ·Ô¤ çÎÙô´ ×ð´ ¥âéÚU àæéÖ-çÙàæéÖ Î黿ü ·¤ô ¥ÂÙð Âæâ ¥æÙð ·¤æ ÂýSÌæß Öè ÎðÌð ãñ´Ð Øãæ¡ Öè ·¤Íæ ·Ô¤ ÖèÌÚU ©Â·¤Íæ ·¤è â´ÖæßÙæ ãñÐ §Ù ©Â·¤Íæ¥ô´ ·¤ô ¥æÏæÚU Îð ÁæÌæ ãñ Î黿ü ·¤æ ¥çßßæçãÌ ãôÙæ ØæÙè ç·¤âè ÎðßÌæ ·Ô¤ mæÚUæ ©âð Â%è ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ Ù Sßè·¤æÚUæ ÁæÙæ, ØæÙè ßã ©ßüàæè, ×ðÙ·¤æ ·¤è ÌÚUã Îðßô´ ·¤è ¥ŒâæÚUæ¥ô´ ×ð´ ç»Ùè Áæ â·¤Ìè ãñÐ ·¤Íæ ×ð´ ÂýØéQ¤ àæŽÎæßÜè ·¤æ Öæáæßñ™ææçÙ·¤ ¥ŠØØÙ Öè ·¤éÀ ¥çÌçÚUQ¤ ̉Øô´´ ·¤ô âæ×Ùð ÜæÌæ ãñÐ ×çãáæâéÚU ·¤è ãUˆØæ ·¤ô Ò×çãáæâéÚU ×ÎüÙÓ ·¤ãæ ÁæÌæ ãñÐ §â Öæáæ ·Ô¤ ÁçÚUØð ÃØæØæ ·¤è Îô â´ÖæßÙæ°´ ÕÙÌè ãñ´, °·¤ Ìô Øã ç·¤ Î黿ü ×ÎæüÙæ Ìæ·¤Ì âð Üñâ Íè, ØæÙè ÎðßÌæ¥ô´ ·Ô¤ ÌðÁ âð, (Î黿ü â#àæÌè ·Ô¤ ¥ÙéâæÚU) §âçܰ ©âÙð ×ÎüÙ ç·¤ØæÐ ÎêâÚUè ÃØæØæ ·Ô¤ çܰ ×ÎüÙ ·Ô¤ Âý¿çÜÌ ¥Íü àææç×Ü ç·¤Øð Áæ â·¤Ìð ãñ´Ð Øã âð€Uâ ·Ô¤ çܰ §SÌð×æÜ ãôÙð ߿ܿ àæŽÎ ãñ, Áô Ò׿Ù-×ÎüÙÓ Ì·¤ çßSÌæÚU ÂæÌæ ãñÐ §â àæŽÎæßÜè ·Ô¤ ¥æÏæÚU ÂÚU Öè Øéh ·Ô¤ ×ñÎæÙ ×ð´ âéÚUæÂæÙ ¥õÚU ©â·Ô¤ ÕæÎ ×çãáæâéÚU ·¤è ãUˆØæ ·Ô¤ ÖèÌÚU ©Â·¤Íæ°´ ÌÜæàæè Áæ â·¤Ìè ãñ´Ð ÁæçãÚU ãñ, Î黿ü ß ¥‹Ø Îðçߨô´ ·¤è ·¤Íæ ·Ô¤ ÂèÀð ·¤è ×êÜ ÖæßÙæ çâȤü âëÁÙ àæçQ¤ ·¤è ¥æÚUæÏÙæ Ùãè´ ãñ, ÕçË·¤ §â·Ô¤ ·¤ãè´ ¥çÏ·¤ »´ÖèÚU çÙçãÌæÍü ãñ´, çÁ‹ãð´ Õýæ±×‡æ»ý´Íô´ ·¤æ âØ·¤ ÂæÆU ·¤ÚU â×Ûææ Áæ â·¤Ìæ ãñÐ Øéßæ ·¤ãæÙè·¤æÚU ß Â˜æ·¤æÚU â´Áèß ¿´ÎÙ ÒS˜æè·¤æÜÓ Âç˜æ·¤æ ·Ô¤ â´ÂæÎ·¤ ãñ´ 21 BAHUJAN 22 FESTIVAL OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press Maharashtra’s Bahujan Dashratra ×ãæÚUæCUþ ·¤æ ÕãéÁÙ ÎàæÚUæ˜æ RAJEEV SUMAN V ery few residents of the Hindi belt know that just like the Navratra festival, a Dashratra festival is celebrated in Maharashtra from 3 to 12 January every year. The decision to celebrate Dashratra fest was taken by Maratha Sewa Sangh in the year 2000. The festival is celebrated at Sindhkhed in the northern hilly Buldhana district of Maharashtra. The festival aims at women’s empowerment by recalling the contribution of the Bahujan women who battled against social dogma and the Brahmanical system. Sudhir Gire, executive member of the Maharashtra state Maratha Sewa Sangh and secretary of its Wardha district unit, says, “We have been celebrating Women’s Day on 3 January [Savitribai Phule jayanti] instead of on 8 March, which is the International Women’s Day. We have been trying to project Bahujan women leaders as ideals. We celebrate the birth anniversaries of Fatima Bi (1 January), Tano Bai Birje (6 January), Mukta Salve, the first Dalit woman student of Savitribai Phule, and Dr Sarojini Babar, a Marathi language and folk culture scholar (7 January) and Shivaji’s mother, Jija Mata (12 January). They all are remembered in the Dashratra festival, held from 3 to 12 January through various programmes.” Evidently, this fest is a revolutionary social and cultural phenomenon. It replaces the imaginary symbols of women’s empowerment with the real ones, besides, of course, putting a stop to ‘celebration of massacres’. Estimates suggest that around 7 to 8 lakh people gather at Sindhkhed to celebrate the festival. Over the last couple of years, the celebration of ‘Dashratra’ festival has spread to many other cities of Maharashtra as well. Rajeev Suman is an editorial research assistant with FORWARD Press çãÚ ÚUæÁèß âé×Ù Îè-Öæáè ÿæð˜æ ·Ô¤ ·¤× ãè Üðæ» ÁæÙÌð ãñ´ ç·¤ çã‹Îê Ï×ü ·Ô¤ ÒÙßÚUæ˜æÓ ©ˆâß ·Ô¤ ÕÚU€Uâ ×ãæÚUæCþ ×ð´ ãÚU âæÜ x âð vw ÁÙßÚUè Ì·¤ ÒÎàæÚUæ˜æÓ ©ˆâß ×ÙæØæ ÁæÌæ ãñÐ ×ÚUæÆæ âðßæ â´ƒæ Ùð ÎàæÚUæ˜æ ©ˆâß ·¤ô ×ÙæÙð ·¤æ çÙ‡æüØ ßáü w®®® ×ð´ çÜØæ ÍæÐ ÚUæ’Ø ·Ô¤ ©žæÚUè ÂãæÇ¸è çÁÜð ÕéËÉæÙæ ·Ô¤ çâ‹Ï¹ðǸ ×ð´ x âð vw ÁÙßÚUè Ì·¤ ×Ùæ° ÁæÙðßæÜð §â ©ˆâß ·¤è çßçàæCÌæ Øã ãñ ç·¤ §â×ð´ §çÌãæâ,¥õÚU ¹æâ·¤ÚU ÕãéÁÙ §çÌãæâ, ·Ô¤ ©Ù S˜æè àæçQ¤ ÂýÌè·¤ô´ ·¤æ S×ÚU‡æ ç·¤Øæ ÁæÌæ ãñ, çÁ‹ãUæÙ´ð ð âæ×æçÁ·¤ M¤çɸØô´ ¥õÚU Õýæ±×‡æßæÎè ÃØßSÍæ ·Ô¤ ç¹ÜæÈ¤ ×ô¿æü çÜØæ ¥õÚU çS˜æØô´ ×ð´ Ù§ü ¿ðÌÙæ ÂñÎæ ·¤èÐ ×ãæÚUæCþ ÂýÎàð æ ×ÚUæÆæ âðßæ â´ƒæ ·¤è ·Ô¤‹ÎýèØ ·¤æØü·¤æçÚU‡æè ·Ô¤ âÎSØ ¥õÚU ßÏæü çÁÜæ âç¿ß âéÏèÚU ç»ÚUð ÕÌæÌð ãñ´ ç·¤ Òã× Üô» ÂãÜð âð ãè } ׿¿ü ·¤ô ×Ùæ° ÁæÙð ßæÜð ¥´ÌÚUæCü èþ Ø ×çãÜæ çÎßâ ·¤è Á»ã x ÁÙßÚUè (âæçߘæèÕæ§ü ȤéÜð ÁØ´Ìè) ·¤ô ãè ×çãÜæ çÎßâ ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ ×ÙæÌð ÚUãð ÍðÐ §âè ·Ô¤ ÌãÌ, ×ÚUæÆæ âðßæ â´ƒæ Ù𠥋ؤ ÕãéÁÙ Ùðç˜æØô´ ·¤ô Öè â׿Á ·Ô¤ âæ×Ùð °·¤ ¥æÎàæü ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ ÂýSÌéÌ ·¤ÚUÙð ·¤æ â´·¤Ë çÜØæ ¥õÚU ȤæçÌ׿ Õè (v ÁÙßÚUè), ÌæÙô Õæ§ü çÕÚUÁð ({ ÁÙßÚUè), âæçßç˜æÕæ§ü ȤéÜð ·¤è ÂãÜè ÎçÜÌ çàæcØæ ×éQ¤æ âæËßð ¥õÚU ×ÚUæÆè âæçãˆØ Öæáæ ß Üô·¤ â´S·¤ëçÌ ·¤è ××ü™æ Çæò âÚUôÁÙè ÕæÕÚU (| ÁÙßÚUè), çàæßæÁè ·¤è ׿´ çÁÁæ ×æÌæ (vw ÁÙßÚUè) ß ¥‹Ø ¥Ùð·¤ ÕãéÁÙ ×çãÜæ Ùðç˜æØô´ ·Ô¤ Øô»ÎæÙ ·¤ô x âð vw ÁÙßÚUè ·Ô¤ Õè¿ ÎàæÚUæ˜æ ©ˆâß ·Ô¤ L¤Â ×ð çßçßÏ ·¤æØüR¤×ô´ ·Ô¤ ×æŠØ× âð ØæÎ ç·¤Øæ ÁæÙð Ü»æÐ ÁæçãÚU ãñ ç·¤ Øã ©ˆâß âæ×æçÁ·¤ ¥õÚU âæ´S·¤ëçÌ·¤ ÎëçC âð °·¤ R¤æ´çÌ·¤æÚUè ÂçÚUƒæÅUÙæ ãñÐ Øã Ù çâȤü ·¤æËÂçÙ·¤ S˜æè àæçQ¤ M¤Âô´ ·¤æ ßæSÌçß·¤ S˜æè ÂýÌè·¤ô´ âð ÂýçÌSÍæÂÙ ãñ ÕçË·¤ ÒãˆØæ¥ô´ ·Ô¤ ÁàÙÓ ·¤æ Öè çÙáðÏ ·¤ÚUÌæ ãñÐ °·¤ ¥Ùé×æÙ ·Ô¤ ¥ÙéâæÚU, çâ‹Ï¹ðÇ ×ð´ §â ¥ßâÚU ÂÚU | âð } Üæ¹ Üô» §·¤næ ãôÌð ãñд çÂÀÜð ·¤éÀ ßáô´ü ×ð´ ×ãæÚUæCþU ·Ô¤ ¥‹Ø àæãÚUô´ ×ð´ Öè Øã ©ˆâß ÕÇð Âñ׿Ùð ÂÚU ×ÙæØæ ÁæÙð Ü»æ ãñÐ ÚUæÁèß âé×٠ȤæÚUßÇü Âýðâ ·Ô¤ â´ÂæÎ·¤èØ àæôÏ âãæØ·¤ ãñ´ ȤæòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ ¥€ÅêUÕÚU 2014 | ÕãéÁÙ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ Tribals rejecting demonic tales (DANAV, RAKSHAS AND ASURS IN INDIAN LITERATURE) ¥âéÚU ·¤Íæ ·¤æ ¥æçÎßæâè ÂýçÌ·¤æÚU (ÖæÚUÌèØ ßæ´Ç׸ Ø ·Ô¤ ÎæÙß, ¥âéÚU ¥õÚU ÚUæÿæâ) VINOD KUMAR A ccording to the history written so far, the Indian subcontinent was never inhabited by the creatures called Asur, Rakshasa or Danav but Indian literature – including Ramayana, Mahabharata and the Puranas – have innumerable references to them. These creatures were huge, looked fearsome, practised black magic and their primary preoccupation was to harass the gods and the gentlemen inhabiting the Earth. Historians insist that the stories about demons actually refer to the struggle between Aryans and the non-Aryans, which continued for several centuries. But even those who see these tales in this context have no qualms accepting that Ram had returned to Ayodhya after slaying the ten-headed Ravana or that the residents of Ayodhya had lit earthen lamps to welcome Ram, Laxman and Sita. We have been celebrating both Dipawali and the slaying of Ravana for centuries if not millennia. Öæ çßÙôÎ ·¤é×æÚ ÚUÌèØ ©Â×ãæmè ·Ô¤ ™ææÌ §çÌãæâ ×ð´ ÎæÙß, ÚUæÿæâ ß ¥âéÚU Áñâè ç·¤âè ÂýÁæçÌ ·¤æ çÁR¤ Ùãè´ ç×ÜÌæ, Üðç·¤Ù ÖæÚUÌèØ ßæ´ÇU̧ר-ÚUæ×æØ‡æ, ×ãæÖæÚUÌ, ÂéÚUæ‡æ ¥æçÎ §â ÂýÁæçÌ ·Ô¤ Áèßô´ ·Ô¤ çßßÚU‡æ âð ÖÚUð ÂǸð ãñд Øð ÎæÙß Öè×·¤æØ, çß·¤ëÌ ¥æ·¤æÚU ·Ô¤, ·¤æÜð ß ×æØæßè àæçQ¤Øô´ âð ÖÚUð ãé° °ðâð Áèß Íð Áô ÎðßÌæ¥ô´ ¥õÚU ×ëˆØéÜô·¤ ×ð´ ÚUãÙð ßæÜð ÖÎý Üô»ô´ ·¤ô ÂÚUàð ææÙ ·¤ÚUÌð ÚUãÌð ÍðÐ §â ÕæÚUð ×ð´ çßmæÙ ¥õÚU §çÌãæâßðžææ ÕãéÌ ·¤éÀ çܹ ¿é·¤Ô ãñ´ ¥õÚU Øã ×æÙ·¤ÚU ¿ÜÌð ãñ´ ç·¤ Øð »æÍæ°´ âçÎØô´ Ì·¤ ¿Üð ¥æØü-¥ÙæØü Øéh ·¤è ÀæØæ°´ ãñÚÐ ÂÚÚÌé §UÙ ·¤Íæ¥ô´ ·¤ô §â M¤Â ×ð´ Îð¹Ùð ßæÜð ¥õÚU ¥‹Ø Üô» Öè âãÁ Öæß âð Øã Sßè·¤æÚU ·¤ÚUÌð ¥æ° ãñ´ ç·¤ Îâ çâÚU ßæÜð ÚUæß‡æ ·¤ô ׿ÚU ·¤ÚU ÚUæ× ¥ØôŠØæ ÜõÅUð ãô´»ð ¥õÚU ©â ¥ßâÚU ÂÚU çÎØð ÁÜæ·¤ÚU ÚUæ×, Üÿ×‡æ ¥õÚU âèÌæ ·¤æ Sßæ»Ì ¥ØôŠØæßæçâØô´ Ùð ç·¤Øæ ãô»æÐ ÌÖè âð ÎèÂæßÜè ×Ù ÚUãè ãñ ¥õÚU ÚUæß‡æ ßÏ ·¤æ ¥æØôÁÙ ãô ÚUãæ ãñÐ ©âè ÌÚUã, ÂêßôüžæÚU ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ ×çãáæâéÚU ·¤æ ßÏ ·¤ÚUÙð ßæÜè Î黿ü ·¤è ¥æÚUæÏÙæ ãôÌè ãñÐ ãæÜ ·Ô¤ ßáæðZ ×ð´ Õ´» â׿Á ·Ô¤ Üô» çÁÙ ÚUæ’Øô´ ×ð´ »°, ßãæ´ Öè ¥Õ Î黿ü ÂêÁæ ãôÙð Ü»è ãñÐ Üðç·¤Ù âæ×æ‹ØÌÑ Î黿ü ÂêÁæ çÕãæÚU, Õ´»æÜ ¥õÚU ¥ôçÇàææ ·¤æ ˆØôãæÚU ãñÐ ·¤Öè-·¤Öè Øã çÁ™ææâæ ãôÌè ãñ ç·¤ Î黿ü 23 BAHUJAN 24 TRADITION OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press ARYANS WERE SO INTOXICATED WITH THEIR SENSE OF SUPERIORITY THAT THEY STARTED CONSIDERING TRIBALS SUB-HUMAN – EVEN LIKENING THEM TO ANIMALS ¥æØæðZ ·¤ô ¥ÂÙè ŸæðDÌæ ·¤æ §ÌÙæ ¥ã´·¤æÚU Íæ ç·¤ ßð ¥æçÎßæçâØô´ ·¤ô ×ÙécØ âð Ùè¿ð ·¤æ, Áèß-Á´Ìé ·¤æ, ÎÁæü ÎðÙð Ü»ð Similarly, in the northeast, Durga, who killed Mahishasur, is worshipped. Though the Bengalis have taken the practice of worshipping Durga to the states where they have migrated, Durga Puja is basically a festival of Bihar, Bengal and Odisha. Sometimes, one wonders why Durga Puja is confined mainly to the northeastern and eastern parts of the country and why the killing of Ravana is celebrated only in north India and not in the south. Similarly, Ramlilas are staged only in north India. Asurs were always cheated The religious scriptures and Puranas invariably depict the Asurs as unscrupulous villains but it is the gods who indulge in all sorts of deceit. The demons and the gods jointly churned the ocean but the invaluable things that emerged from the ocean, including Laxmi, ended up in the kitty of the gods; they also usurped the amrit (elixir of life) that the ocean threw up, and Rahu and Ketu were beheaded when they tried to partake of the elixir by surreptitiously joining the row of the gods. In the Mahabharata, after escaping from the fire in lakshagraha (house of lac), during their sojourn in the forests, Bhim, one of the Pandavas, happened to meet a Danvi. He spent some days with her and then returned to his own world, never looking back on how his son Ghatotkacha was brought up. Even then, Ghatotkacha did his duty towards his father by laying down his life in the battle of Kurukshetra. Innumerable comparisons have been made between the characters of ‘maryada purushottam’ (One who performs his duties ideally) Ram and ‘demon king’ Ravana. Though Ravana did kidnap Sita, he never misbehaved with her. On the other hand, Ram’s behaviour with his wife was entirely condemnable. He humiliated her on more than one occasion. Ram deceitfully killed Bali. Eklavya’s tale is testimony to how a guru sought the thumb of a Tribal youth to secure the future of his upper-caste disciple. All these Puranic tales have become the subject matter of intense and sometimes bitter debate over the last few years. First, the anger and frustration of the Dalits exploded, turning them into haters of the Brahmanical system. And now, the Tribals, too, are increasingly becoming bitter about how they are treated. ÂêÁæ Âêßæðžü æÚUU ¥õÚU Âêßèü ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ ãè €UØô´ ãôÌè ãñÐ §âè ÌÚUã, ÚUæß‡æ ßÏ ·¤æ ©ˆâß ©žæÚU ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ ãè €UØô´ ×ÙæØæ ÁæÌæ ãñ? ÚUæ×ÜèÜæ°´ §âè ÿæð˜æ ×ð´ €UØô´ ¥æØôçÁÌ ãôÌè ãñ?´ Îçÿæ‡æ ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ €UØô´ Ùãè´? ÀÜ ·Ô¤ çàæ·¤æÚU ÚUãð ãñ´ ¥âéÚU ÕãéÏæ Øã Öè Îð¹Ùð ×ð´ ¥æÌæ ãñ ç·¤ Ïæç×ü·¤ »ýÍ´ ô´, ÂéÚUæ‡æô´ ¥æçÎ ×ð´ ÎéC Ìô ÎæÙßô´ ·¤ô ÕÌæØæ ÁæÌæ ãñ, Üðç·¤Ù ÏêÌÌü æ ·¤ÚUÌð ÎðßÌæ çιÌð ãñд ×âÜÙ, â×éÎý ×´ÍÙ Ìô ÎðßÌæ ¥õÚU ÎæÙßô´ Ùð ç×Ü·¤ÚU ç·¤Øæ Üðç·¤Ù â×éÎý âð çÙ·¤Üè Üÿ×è âçãÌ âÖè ×êËØßæÙ ßSÌé°´ ÎðßÌæ¥ô´ Ùð ãǸ Üè´Ð Øãæ´ Ì·¤ ç·¤ ¥×ëÌ Öè âæÚUæ ·¤æ âæÚUæ ÎðßÌæ¥ô´ ·Ô¤ çãSâð »Øæ ¥õÚU ÁÕ ÚUæãê-·Ô¤Ìé Ùð ÎðßÌæ¥ô´ ·¤è ´ç€Ì ×ð´ àææç×Ü ãô·¤ÚU ¥×ëÌ ÂèÙæ ¿æãæ Ìô ©Ù ÎôÙô´ ·¤ô ¥ÂÙð âÚU ·¤ÅUæÙð ÂǸÐð ×ãæÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ Üæÿææ»ëã âð Õ¿·¤ÚU çÙ·¤ÜÙð ¥õÚU Á´»Üô´ ×ð´ ÖÅU·¤Ùð ·Ô¤ ÕæÎ, Âæ´ÇßÂé˜æ Öè× ç·¤âè ÎæÙßè âð ÅU·¤ÚUæ°Ð ©â·Ô¤ âæÍ ·¤éÀ çÎÙô´ Ì·¤ âãßæâ ç·¤Øæ ¥õÚU çȤÚU ßæÂâ ¥ÂÙè ÎéçÙØæ ×ð´ ¿Üð »°Ð ÕðÅUæ ƒæÅUôˆ·¤¿ ·ñ¤âð ÂÜæ-ÕÉæ, §â·¤è ·¤Öè âéÏ Ùãè´ ÜèÐ ãæÜæ´ç·¤ ©â ÕðÅUð Ùð ×ãæÖæÚUÌ Øéh ×ð´ ¥ÂÙè ·¤éÕæüÙè Îð·¤ÚU ¥ÂÙð çÂÌæ ·Ô¤ ·¤Áü ·¤ô ¿é·¤Ìæ ç·¤ØæÐ ×ØæüÎæ ÂéL¤áôžæ× ÚUæ× ¥õÚU ÚUæß‡æ ·Ô¤ ÃØçQ¤ˆß ·¤è Ìô ÕãéÌ âæÚUè â×èÿææ°´ ãéU§UZÐ ÚUæß‡æ âèÌæ ·¤ô ãÚU ·¤ÚU Ìô Üð »Øæ Üðç·¤Ù ©Ù·Ô¤ âæÍ ·¤Öè ¥ÖýÎ ÃØßãæÚU Ùãè´ ç·¤Øæ, ÁÕç·¤ ÚUæ× Ùð ¥ÂÙè ˆÙè ·¤ô Ü»æÌæÚU ¥Â׿çÙÌ ç·¤ØæÐ ÀÜ âð ÕæçÜ ·¤è ãˆØæ ·¤èÐ °·¤ÜÃØ ·¤è ·¤Íæ Ìô §â ÕæÌ ·¤è ç×âæÜ ãè ÕÙ »§ü ãñ ç·¤ °·¤ »éL¤ Ù𠥻Ǹè ÁæçÌ ·Ô¤ ¥ÂÙð çàæcØ ·Ô¤ ÖçßcØ ·Ô¤ çܰ °·¤ ¥æçÎßæâè Øéß·¤ âð ©â·¤æ ¥´»Æê æ ãè ç·¤â ÌÚUã »éL¤Îçÿæ‡ææ ×ð´ ׿´» çÜØæÐ ÂõÚUæç‡æ·¤ »æÍæ¥ô´ ·¤è Øð âÕ ÕæÌð´ çÂÀÜð ·¤éÀ âæÜæð´ âð Ìè¹è Õãâ ·¤æ çãSâæ ÕÙè ãñд ÂãÜð ÎçÜÌô´ ·¤æ »éSâæ ¥õÚU ¥æ·ý¤æðàæ È¤êÅUæ ¥õÚU ßã Õýæ±×‡æßæÎè ÃØßSÍæ âð ƒæë‡ææ ·¤è ãÎ Ì·¤ ¿Üæ »ØæÐ ¥õÚU ¥Õ çÂÀÜð ·¤éÀ âר âð ¥æçÎßæâè â׿Á Öè §â ×éÎÎ÷ ð ÂÚU ¥æ´ÎôçÜÌ ãñÐ ×ŠØ ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ ·Ô¤ç‹ÎýÌ Âýæ¿èÙ ÖæÚUÌèØ §çÌãæâ ·¤è ¥Ü» ¥Ü» ÃØæØæ°´ ãô ÚUãè ãñ,´ ¹æâ·¤ÚU ©â ÿæð˜æ ·Ô¤ §çÌãæâ ·¤è çÁâð ¥Õ Õ´»æÜ, çÕãæÚU ¥æñÚU ¥ôçÇàææ ·¤ãæ ÁæÌæ ãñÐ §çÌãæâ ·¤è çÁÙ ÂéSÌ·¤ô´ ·¤è ×ÎÎ âð Øã Õãâ ¿Ü ÚUãè ãñ, ©Ù×ð´ âÕâð ’ØæÎæ ¿ç¿üÌ ãñ ÇŽËØê ÇŽËØê ã´ÅUÚU ·¤è Ò°ÙËâ ¥æòȤ M¤ÚUÜ Õ´»æÜÐÓ ã´ÅUÚU ·¤æ ׿ÙÙæ ãñ ç·¤ ßñçη¤ Øé» ·Ô¤ Õýæ±×‡æô´ ¥õÚU ×Ùé Ùð çÁâ çã´Îê Ï×ü ·¤è SÍæÂÙæ ·¤è ßã ÎÚU¥âÜ È¤æòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ ¥€ÅêUÕÚU 2014 | ÕãéÁÙ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ FIRST, THE ANGER AND FRUSTRATION OF THE DALITS EXPLODED, TURNING THEM INTO HATERS OF THE BRAHMANICAL SYSTEM. AND NOW, THE TRIBALS, TOO, ARE INCREASINGLY BECOMING BITTER ABOUT HOW THEY ARE TREATED ÂãÜð ÎçÜÌô´ ·¤æ »éSâæ ¥õÚU ¥æ·ý¤æðàæ È¤êÅUæ ¥õÚU ßã Õýæ±×‡æßæÎè ÃØßSÍæ âð ƒæë‡ææ ·¤è ãÎ Ì·¤ ¿Üæ »ØæÐ ¥õÚU ¥Õ çÂÀÜð ·¤éÀ âר âð ¥æçÎßæâè â׿Á Öè §â ×éÎ÷Îð ÂÚU ¥æ´ÎôçÜÌ ãñ Centred in central India India’s ancient history, especially of the region that now covers modern West Bengal, Odisha and Bihar, is being analyzed from different angles. Among the historical works that are being dissected and discussed is W.W. Hunter’s Annals of Rural Bengal. Hunter’s formulation is that Vedic Brahmins and Manu established the religion of central India, ie the region that extends from the Himalayas to the Vindhyas. He contends the Aryans, who migrated from Central Asia to different parts of the world and laid the foundations of many civilizations, were the founders of Hinduism. The branch of the Aryans that migrated to India first settled in the area between two rivers of the northwest – Saraswati and Drishyawati. From there, they moved in the southeasterly direction along the course of the River Ganga, establishing settlements on the banks, eventually reaching Bengal. Manu describes this region as the region of Hinduism. Those who lived in this region, whose diction was clear and who were fair-complexioned were put in one class and whose diction was not clear, who were dark-complexioned and who consumed forbidden foods were put in another class – the class of Asurs. ׊ØÖæÚUÌ ·¤æ Ï×ü ãñ Ñ ×ŠØÖæÚUÌ, ØæÙè çã׿ܨ âð çß´ŠØæ¿Ü ÂßüÌ׿ܿ Ì·¤ ·¤æ Öõ»ôçÜ·¤ ÿæð˜æÐ çã´Îê Ï×ü ·¤è SÍæÂÙæ ×ŠØ °çàæØæ âð çÙ·¤Ü·¤ÚU ÎéçÙØæ ·Ô¤ ¥Ü»-¥Ü» çãSâô´ ×ð´ ·¤§ü âØÌæ¥ô´ ·¤ô Á‹× ÎðÙð ßæÜð ¥æØæðZ Ùð ·¤è çÁ‹ãô´Ùð çã‹ÎéSÌæÙ ×ð´ âÕâð ÂãÜð Âçà¿×ôžæÚU ÿæð˜æ ·¤è Îô ÙçÎØô´-âÚUSßÌè ¥õÚU ÎëàØßÌè-·Ô¤ Õè¿ ÂǸæß ÇæÜæÐ ßãæ´ âð ßð Îçÿæ‡æ-Âêßü çÎàææ ×ð´ Õɸð ¥õÚU »´»æ ÙÎè ·Ô¤ ç·¤ÙæÚU-ð ç·¤ÙæÚUð ÕâÌð ãé° Õ´»æÜ ·Ô¤ ×éãæÙð Ì·¤ Âãé¿ ´ »°Ð §‹ãè´´ §Üæ·¤ô´ ·¤ô ×Ùé ¥ÂÙæ §Üæ·¤æ-çã´Îê Ï×ü ·¤æ §Üæ·¤æ-׿ÙÌð ãñ´ Áô àæéh ÕôÜÌæ ãñ, ©â·Ô¤ ÕæãÚU ÚUæÿæâ ÚUãÌð ãñ´ Áô àæéh ÕôÜ Ùãè´ â·¤Ìð, ¥¹æl ÂÎæÍæðZ ·¤æ Öÿæ‡æ ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´ ¥õÚU Áô ¥æØæðZ ·¤è ÌÚUã »õÚU ߇æü ·Ô¤ Ùãè´ ãñ´ ÕçË·¤ ·¤æÜð ãñд ߇ææðZ ·¤æ ç×Ÿæ‡æ ×Ùé mæÚUæ ÃØæØæçØÌ çã´Îê Ï×ü Øãæ´ ¥ÂÙè ÁǸ´ð Á׿ ÂæÌæ ¥õÚU ©â·¤æ Âý¿æÚU-ÂýâæÚU ãô ÂæÌæ, ©â·Ô¤ ÂãÜð ãè Õõh Ï×ü ©Æ ¹Ç¸æ ã饿 Áô §â §Üæ·Ô¤ ·Ô¤ Üô»ô´ ·¤ô âãÁ Sßè·¤æØü Öè ãé¥æÐ Øãæ´ ·Ô¤ ÚUæÁæ Öè Õýæ±×‡æ, ÿæç˜æØ Ùãè´ ÕçË·¤ Øãæ´ ·Ô¤ ×êÜßæâè Íð Øæ ßð Üô» Íð Áô ×Ùé ·¤è ߇æüßæÎè ÃØßSÍæ ·Ô¤ ÕæãÚU ÍðÐ ¿æãð ßð â×ýæÅU ¥àæô·¤ ãô´ Øæ çȤÚU »õǸ ·¤ô ¥ÂÙè ÚUæÁÏæÙè ÕÙæ·¤ÚU |}z âð v®y® §ü. Ì·¤ Õ´»æÜ ÂÚU àææâÙ ·¤ÚUÙð ßæÜð ÚUæÁæÐ ©Ù×ð´ âð ¥çÏ·¤æ´àæ Õõh Ï×ü ·¤ô ׿ÙÙð ßæÜð ÍðÐ âÙ÷ ~®® §ü. ×ð´ ¹éÎ ·¤ô çã´Îê ׿ÙÙð ßæÜð Õ´»æÜ ·Ô¤ ÚUæÁæ ¥æçÎàßÚUU Ùð ßñçη¤ Ø™æ ß ÂêÁæ-微 ·Ô¤ çܰ ·¤‹ÙæñÁ âð Âæ´¿ 25 BAHUJAN 26 TRADITION OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press The mixing of varnas Before Hinduism, as propounded by Manu, could extend its influence, Buddhism arose and gained wide acceptance among the people outside this region. The kings here were not Brahmins or Kshatriyas. They were the original inhabitants of the country and were out of the pale of the varna system. Whether it be emperor Ashoka or the kings who ruled Bengal from their capital Gaud from AD785 to 1040, they were all Buddhists. In AD 900, Bengal’s ruler, Adhishwar, who considered himself a Hindu, summoned five Brahmins from Kannauj to perform Vedic yagnas and rituals. These Brahmins settled down on the eastern bank of the Ganga and married local women. When they were well settled, their wives from Kannauj joined them, and they moved ahead, leaving their local wives and so-called illegitimate children behind. From these illegitimate children were born Radi Brahmins and other castes such as Kayasthas. Thus the mixed race and castes that emerged were not only the result of intermarriage between members of different varnas but also between those in the varna system and those out of it. So, then who were the inhabitants of the erstwhile Bengal, which included Virbhoom and Maanbhoom? Hunter, quoting pandits, divided them into five broad categories: 1. Non-Aryan Tribals. 2. Vedic and Saraswat Brahmins. 3. Kshatriyas driven away from central India by Parshuram, along with a sprinkling of Vaishya families, who could not proceed beyond Bihar. 4. The descendants of the Brahmins who had come from Kannauj and 5. Kshatriyas, Rajputs, Afghans, and Muslim invaders from north India. None of these communities were part of Manu’s varna system. The Brahmins of central India called the Bengali Brahmins Radis and neither dined with them nor had matrimonial relations with them. No to rituals Thus the people of Bengal were divided into two camps: The invader Aryans, who enjoyed Brahmin-like status and the Tribals, whom the Aryans had encountered there and whom they were pushing deeper and deeper into the jungles. Aryans were so intoxicated etess, says that the Sushma Asur, a Tribal po which is in fact a practice of Durga Puja, der of Asurs, should be celebration of the mur d Ravana are not only stopped. Mahishasur an the Tribal community. Asurs but also heroes of d Brahmans, the Tribals In the Vedas, Puranas an rtrayed as villains have been wrongly po æ ·¤ãÙæ ãñ ç·¤ Î黿ü ÂêÁæ ¥æçÎßæâè ·¤ßçØ˜æè âéá׿ ¥âéÚU ·¤ Õ´Î ãôÙæ ¿æçã°Ð âß ·Ô¤ Ùæ× ÂÚU ¥âéÚUô´ ·¤è ãˆØæ ·¤æ ©ˆ U ãè Ùãè´ ÕçË·¤ ÖæÚUÌ éÚ ×çãáæâéÚU ¥õÚU ÚUæß‡æ Áñâð ÙæØ·¤ ¥â ãñ´Ð ßðÎ-ÂéÚUæ‡æô´ ¥õÚU ÚUß ·Ô¤ â×SÌ ¥æçÎßæâè â×éÎæØô´ ·Ô¤ »õ éÎæØô´ ·¤ô ¹Ü ¿çÚU˜æ è â× ÖæÚUÌ ·Ô¤ Õýæ±×‡æ »ý´Íô´ ×ð´ ¥æçÎßæâ UæâÚU »ÜÌ ãñ âÚ ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ Âðàæ ç·¤Øæ »Øæ ãñ Áô ç·¤ Õýæ±×‡æô´ ·¤ô ÕéÜßæØæÐ ßð Âæ´¿ô´ Õýæræ‡æ »´»æ ·Ô¤ Âêßèü ç·¤ÙæÚUð ÂÚU ÕâðÐ SÍæÙèØ ¥õÚUÌô´ ·Ô¤ âæÍ ƒæÚU ÕâæØæ, Õ‘¿ð ÂñÎæ ç·¤°Ð ÁÕ ßð Øãæ´ ¥‘Àè ÌÚUã Õâ »°, ©â·Ô¤ ÕæÎ ·¤‹ÙæñÁ âð ©Ù·¤è ÂçˆÙØæ´ Øãæ´ ¥æ§ZÚÐ ßð SÍæÙèØ ÂçˆÙØæð´ ¥õÚU ·¤çÍÌ M¤Â âð ¥ßñÏ â´ÌæÙô´ ·¤ô ßãè´ ÀôǸ·¤ÚU ¥æ»ð ÕÉ »°Ð ©Ù·¤è ¥ßñÏ â´ÌæÙô´ âð ÚUæÇ¸è Õýæ±×‡æ ÂñÎæ ãé°, âæÍ ãè ¥Ùð·¤ ¥‹Ø ÁæçÌØæ´ Áñâð ·¤æØSÍ ¥æçÎÐ Üðç·¤Ù çÁÙ ç×çŸæÌ ÙSÜ ¥õÚU ÁæçÌØô´ ·¤æ ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ ¥æçßÖæüß ã饿, ßð çâȤü ×Ùé ·¤è ߇æü ÃØßSÍæ ·Ô¤ Üô»ô´ ·Ô¤ Õè¿ ¥æÂâè çßßæã ·¤æ ÙÌèÁæ Ù ãô·¤ÚU Õýæ±×‡æô´ ¥õÚU çã´Îê ߇æü ÃØßSÍæ ·Ô¤ ÕæãÚU ·¤è ÁæçÌØô´ ·Ô¤ ç×Ÿæ‡æ ·¤æ Öè ÙÌèÁæ ÍæÐ çã´Îê ߇æü ÃØßSÍæ ·¤æ ¥æçÖÁæˆØ ÌÕ·¤æ Õýæ±×‡æ ãè ÍæÐ Ìô, ÌÕ ·Ô¤ Õ´»æÜ ×ð,´ çÁâ×ð´ ßèÚUÖ×ê ¥õÚU ׿ÙÖê× àææç×Ü Íð-·¤è ¥æÕæÎè ·Ô¤ ×êÜ Ìˆß ·¤õÙ ·¤õÙ Íð? ã´ÅUÚU Ùð ´çÇÌô´ ·Ô¤ ãßæÜð âð §â Ì‰Ø ·¤æ ŽØôÚUæ ·¤éÀ §â Âý·¤æÚU çÎØæ ãñ-v.Øãæ´ ·Ô¤ »ñÚU ¥æØü ¥æçÎßæâè w.ßñçη¤ ß âæÚUSßÌ Õýæ±×‡æ x. çÀÅUÂÅé U ßñàØ ÂçÚUßæÚUô´ ·Ô¤ âæÍ ÂÚUàæéÚUæ× mæÚUæ ¹ÎðÇ𸠻° ׊ØÖæÚUÌ ·Ô¤ ÿæç˜æØ Áô çÕãæÚU âð Ùè¿ð Ùãè´ ©ÌÚU Âæ° y. âÙ÷ ~®® §ü. ×ð´ ·¤‹ÙæñÁ âð Üæ° »° Õýæ±×‡æ ¥õÚU ©Ù·Ô¤ ß´àæÁ ¥õÚU z. ©žæÚU ÖæÚUÌ âð çÂÀÜð ·¤éÀ âæÜæð´ ×ð´ ¥æ° ÿæç˜æØ, ÚUæÁÂêÌ, ¥È¤»æÙ ¥õÚU ×éâÜ×æÙ ¥æ·ý¤×‡æ·¤æÚUèÐ ¥õÚU Øð âÖè ×Ùé ·¤è ߇æü ÃØßSÍæ ·Ô¤ çãSâæ Ùãè´ ÍðÐ Õ´»æÜ ·Ô¤ Õýæ±×‡æô´ ·¤ô ©žæÚU ÖæÚUÌ, ØæÙè ×Ùé ·Ô¤ ׊ØÖæÚUÌ ·Ô¤ Õýæ±×‡æô´ Ùð ÚUæÇ¸è Õýæ±×‡æô´ ·¤è â´™ææ Îð ÚU¹è Íè ¥õÚU ©Ùâð ÚUôÅUè-ÕðÅUè ·¤æ â´ÕÏ´ Ùãè´ ÚU¹Ìð ÍðÐ ·¤×ü·¤æ´Çè Ùãè´ Íð ßð ¥SÌé, Õ´»æÜ ·¤è ¥æÕæÎè Îô ÕǸð ¹ð×ô´ ×ð´ çßÖæçÁÌ ÍèÐ ¥æ·ý¤×‡æ·¤æÚUè ¥æØü, çÁ‹ãð´ Õýæ±×‡æô´ Áñâæ ÎÁæü Âýæ# Íæ ¥õÚU Øãæ´ ·Ô¤ ¥æçÎßæâè çÁ‹ãð´ ¥æ·ý¤×‡æ·¤æçÚUØô´ Ùð Øãæ´ ÂæØæ Íæ ¥õÚU çÁ‹ãð´ ßð Á´»Üô´ ×ð´ ¹ÎðÇ̸ ð Áæ ÚUãð ÍðÐ ¥æØæðZ ·¤ô ¥ÂÙè ŸæðDÌæ ·¤æ §ÌÙæ ¥ã´·¤æÚU Íæ ç·¤ ßð ¥æçÎßæçâØô´ ·¤ô ×ÙécØ âð Ùè¿ð ·¤æ, Áèß-Á´Ìé ·¤æ, ÎÁæü ÎðÙð Ü»ðÐ ¥æçÎßæçâØô´ âð ©Ù·¤è ÙȤÚUÌ ·¤è ¥Ùð·¤ ßÁãð´ Íè´Ð °·¤ Ìô ©Ù·¤æ ߇æü ·¤æÜæ Íæ, ÎêâÚUæ, ßð °ðâè Öæáæ ÕôÜÌð Íð çÁâ·¤æ, ©Ù·Ô¤ ¥ÙéâæÚU, ȤæòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ ¥€ÅêUÕÚU 2014 | with their sense of superiority that they started considering Tribals sub-human – even likening them to animals. There were many reasons for their hatred for the Tribals. First, the Tribals were darkcomplexioned; second, they spoke a language, which, according to Aryans, had no grammar; third, the way the Tribals ate and drank; and fourth, they did not perform any rituals, did not worship Indra and had no god of their own. In the Vedic hymns, they were referred to as Dasayan, Dasyu, Daas, Asur, Rakshas, etc. Sushma Asur, a Tribal poetess, says that the practice of Durga Puja, which, in fact, is a celebration of the murder of Asurs, should be stopped. Mahishasur and Ravana are not only Asurs but also heroes of the tribal community. In the Vedas, Puranas and Brahmans, the Tribals have been wrongly portrayed as villains. The Tribals have always resisted discrimination and exploitation. There are many traditions and legends of Asur, Munda and Santhal Tribals, which are records of tribal resistance. Since the non-tribals don’t understand tribal languages, they think the Tribals have nothing against Hindu myths and the racial outlook on which they are based. We often talk of the ‘collective consciousness’ of Indian society. But does our society really have a ‘collective consciousness’? And if it is there, can it survive in the face of the racial discrimination practised here? Do we ever think what must be going through the mind of a Tribal when he sees the grand Durga pandals, huge idols and ten-day celebrations of Durga Puja? Or, are we waiting for a time when he would start celebrating the slaying of his own ancestors? That is somewhat unlikely as a bitter battle is already on between the Tribals and the non-tribals over the cultural model adopted by our policymakers. Vinod Kumar is a journalist, novelist and an activist. His novels Samar Shesh Hai and Mission Jharkhand, based on Jharkhand society, have been well received. He writes regularly on political, tribal and cultural issues ÕãéÁÙ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ rs why Durga Puja is de on w e on , es im et m So n northeastern and easter confined mainly to the d why the killing of parts of the country an t ly in north India and no Ravana is celebrated on ly Ramlilas are staged on in the south. Similarly, in north India Î黿ü ÂêÁæ ·Ô¤ßÜ ·¤Öè-·¤Öè Øã çÁ™ææâæ ãôÌè ãñ ç·¤ Ìè ãñÐ §âè ÌÚUã, ÂêßæðüžæÚUU ¥õÚU Âêßèü ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ ãè €UØô´ ãô €UØô´ ×ÙæØæ ÁæÌæ ãè ÚUæß‡æ ßÏ ·¤æ ©ˆâß ©žæÚU ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ ôçÁÌ ãôÌè ãñ´? Îçÿæ‡æ ãñ? ÚUæ×ÜèÜæ°´ §âè ÿæð˜æ ×ð´ €UØô´ ¥æØ ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ €UØô´ Ùãè´? ·¤ô§ü ÃØæ·¤ÚU‡æ Ùãè´ Íæ, ÌèâÚUæ, ©Ù·Ô¤ ¹æÙ-ÂæÙ ·¤æ ÌÚUè·¤æ ¥õÚU ¿õÍæ, ßð ç·¤âè ÌÚUã ·Ô¤ ·¤×ü·¤æ´Ç ×ð´ çßàßæâ Ùãè´ ·¤ÚUÌð Íð, §´Îý ·¤è ÂêÁæ Ùãè´ ·¤ÚUÌð Íð ¥õÚU ©Ù·¤æ ·¤ô§ü §üUàßÚU Ùãè´ ÍæÐ ßñçη¤ « ¿æ¥ô´ ×ð´ ©‹ãð´ ÎâæÙÙ, ÎSØé, Îæâ, ¥âéÚU, ÚUæÿæâ Áñâè â´™ææ¥ô´ âð â´ÕôçÏÌ ç·¤Øæ ÁæÙð Ü»æÐ ¥æçÎßæâè ·¤ßçØ˜æè âéá׿ ¥âéÚU ·¤æ ·¤ãÙæ ãñ ç·¤ Î黿ü ÂêÁæ ·Ô¤ Ùæ× ÂÚU ¥âéÚUô´ ·¤è ãˆØæ ·¤æ ©ˆâß Õ´Î ãôÙæ ¿æçã°Ð ×çãáæâéÚU ¥õÚU ÚUæß‡æ Áñâð ÙæØ·¤ ¥âéÚU ãè Ùãè´ ÕçË·¤ ÖæÚUÌ ·Ô¤ â×SÌ ¥æçÎßæâè â×éÎæØô´ ·Ô¤ »õÚUß ãñд ßðÎ-ÂéÚUæ‡æô´ ¥õÚU ÖæÚUÌ ·Ô¤ Õýæ±×‡æ »ýÍ´ ô´ ×ð´ ¥æçÎßæâè â×éÎæØô´ ·¤ô ¹Ü ¿çÚU˜æ ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ Âðàæ ç·¤Øæ »Øæ ãñ Áô âÚUæâÚU »ÜÌ ãñÐ ¥æçÎßæâè â׿Á Ùð ã×ðàææ ãÚU ÌÚUã ·Ô¤ ÖðÎÖæß ¥õÚU àæôá‡æ ·¤æ ÂýçÌ·¤æÚU ç·¤Øæ ãñÐ ¥âéÚU, ×é‡Çæ ¥õÚU â´ÍæÜ ¥æçÎßæâè â׿Á ×ð´ ·¤§ü °ðâè ÂÚÚÂÚUæ°´ ¥õÚU ßæç¿·¤ ·¤Íæ°´ ãñ´ çÁÙ×ð´ ©Ù·¤æ çßÚUôÏ ÎÁü ãñÐ ¿êç´ ·¤ »ñÚU-¥æçÎßæâè â׿Á, ¥æçÎßæâè Öæáæ°´ Ùãè´ ÁæÙÌæ ãñ §âçܰ ©âð Ü»Ìæ ãñ ç·¤ ¥æçÎßæâè çã´Îê ç×Í·¤ô´ ¥õÚU ©Ù·¤è ÙSÜèØ ÖðÎÖæß ßæÜè ·¤ãæçÙØô´ ·Ô¤ ç¹ÜæÈ¤ Ùãè´ ãñд ÕãéÏæ ã× ÖæÚUÌèØ â׿Á ·¤è Òâæ×êçã·¤ ¿ðÌÙæÓ ·¤è ÕæÌ ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´ Üðç·¤Ù €UØæ ßæSÌß ×ð´ ã׿ÚUð â׿Á ·¤è ·¤ô§ü âæ×êçã·¤ ¿ðÌÙæ ãñ? Øæ §Ù ÙSÜèØ ÖðÎÖæß ·Ô¤ ÚUãÌð ÕÙ â·¤Ìè ãñ? €UØæ ã×Ùð ·¤Öè çß¿æÚU ç·¤Øæ ãñ ç·¤ ¥æÁ·¤Ü Áô Î黿ü Â´ÇæÜ ÕÙÌð ãñ,´ ÖÃØ ÂýçÌ׿°´ ÕÙÌè ãñ,´ â#æã Îâ çÎÙ Ì·¤ ¿ÜÙð ßæÜð ×ðÜ-ð ÆðÜð ×ð´ Æ»æ-Æ»æ âæ ¹Ç¸æ °·¤ ¥æçÎßæâè çßSȤæçÚUÌ Ùð˜æô´ âð §Ù ¥æØôÁÙô´ ·¤ô Îð¹·¤ÚU €UØæ ×ãâêâ ·¤ÚUÌæ ãñ? Øæ ã× §´ÌÁæÚU ·¤ÚU ÚUãð ãñ´ ç·¤ ßã ¥ÂÙð ãè ÂêßÁ ü ô´ ·¤è ãˆØæ ·Ô¤ §â ©ˆâß ·¤æ ÏèÚU-ð ÏèÚUð ¥æÙ´Î ÜðÙð Ü»ð»æ? °ðâæ Ü»Ìæ Ìô Ùãè´, €UØô´ç·¤ ¥æçÎßæâè ¥õÚU »ñÚU ¥æçÎßæâè â׿Á ·Ô¤ Õè¿ âæ´S·ë¤çÌ·¤ ׿òÇÜ ·¤ô Üð·¤ÚU °·¤ Ìè¹æ Øéh ¥Öè Öè ÁæÚUè ãñИ淤æÚU çßÙôÎ ·¤é׿ÚU Ùð Ü´Õð âר Ì·¤ ˜淤æçÚUÌæ ·¤è ãñ ¥õÚU ¥Õ °ç€UÅUçßÁ× ·Ô¤ âæÍ-âæÍ çã´Îè ·¤Íæ Üð¹Ù ·¤ÚU ÚUãð ãñ´Ð ÛææÚU¹´Ç ·Ô¤ â׿Á ÂÚU Òâ×ÚU àæðá ãñÓ ¥õÚU Òç×àæÙ ÛææÚU¹´ÇÓ Áñâð §Ù·Ô¤ ©UÂ‹Øæâ Õãé¿ç¿üÌ ÚUãð ãñ´Ð ÚUæÁÙèçÌ·¤ çßáØô´, ¥æçÎßæâè â׿Á ¥õÚU â´S·¤ëçÌ ÂÚU çÙØç×Ì M¤Â âð Üð¹Ù Öè ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´ 27 28 INTERVIEW OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press Balivansh is Bahujan tradition: Dr AH Salunkhe ÕÜèß´àæ ÕãéÁÙô´ ·¤è ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ Ñ Çæ ¥æ.ã.âæÜé´¹ð VAMAN’S THREE STEPS COVERED VEDAS, YAGNAS AND VANI. THESE THREE WERE USED TO CRUSH THE BAHUJANS. OUR KING WAS KILLED BY DECEIT. THEREFORE, WE HAVE TO BRUSH ASIDE ALL THE THREE ßæ×Ù ·Ô¤ Ìè٠» ãñ´ - ßðÎ, Ø™æ ¥õÚU ßæ‡æèÐ ÕãéÁÙô´ ·¤ô §‹ãè´ ÌèÙ ·¤æ §SÌð×æÜ ·¤ÚU ·¤é¿Ü çÎØæ »ØæÐ ·¤ÂÅU âð ã׿ÚUð ÚUæÁæ ·¤ô ׿ÚUæ »ØæÐ Ìô ã×ð´ §Ù ÌèÙô´ ·¤ô ÎêÚU ãÅUæÙæ ãô»æ B y providing a credible alternative to Brahmanic tradition, Dr. AH Salunkhe, a scholar of Sanskrit and of Bahujan tradition, brought about a new wave of social consciousness and change in Maharashtra. He is the writer of the much-acclaimed Marathi book Balivansh. We present here excerpts of an interview with Dr. Salunkhe by Prabhakar Dhage, a senior journalist of Goa and Resident Editor of Marathi newspaper Pudhari. The establishment has been using legends and fables to befool the Bahujans. In your book Balivansh, you have exposed the vicious attempt at Brahmanisation and distortion of Bahujan gods. What was your objective behind writing this book? Bali Raja admired even his opponents. This was his strength. According to the pundits, he was an enemy of the Vedas and hence his annihilation was necessary; whereas, even in the Ramayana, Bali Raja has been highly praised. He ensured the × ãæÚUæCþ ×ð´ °·¤ ÃØæÂ·¤ ÂçÚUßÌüÙ ÜæÙð ·¤æ ŸæðØ ÕãéÁÙ ÂÚUÂÚUæ ·Ô¤ çßmæÙ ¥õÚU âæ×æçÁ·¤ ¿ðÌÙæ ·Ô¤ ¥»é¥æ Çæ. ¥æ.ã.âæÜ鴹𠷤ô çÎØæ ÁæÌæ ãñ, çÁ‹ãô´Ùð ÕãéÁÙô´ ·¤ô Õýæ±×‡æßæÎè ÂÚUÂÚUæ ·¤æ °·¤ ×ÁÕêÌ çß·¤Ë çÎØæÐ ×ÚUæÆè ×ð´ ÒÕÜèß´àæÓ ©Ù·¤è Õãé¿ç¿üÌ ÂéSÌ·¤ ãñÐ ÂýSÌéÌ ãñ Çæò. âæÜé´¹ð âð »ôßæ ·Ô¤ ßçÚUD ˜淤æÚU ÌÍæ ×ÚUæÆè â׿¿æÚU˜æ ÒÂéÉæÚUèÓ ·Ô¤ SÍæÙèØ â´ÂæÎ·¤ ÂýÖæ·¤ÚU ɻ𠷤è ÕæÌ¿èÌРδ̷¤Íæ¥ô´ ·¤æ §SÌð×æÜ ·¤ÚU·Ô¤ ÕãéÁÙô´ ·¤ô Õðß·¤êȸ¤ ÕÙæÙð ·¤æ ·¤æ× Øãæ¡ ·¤è ÃØßSÍæ ·¤ÚUÌè ÚUãè ãñÐ Üðç·¤Ù ¥æÂÙð ÒÕÜèß´àæÓ ·Ô¤ ×æŠØ× âð ÕãéÁÙ ÎðßÌæ¥ô´ ·Ô¤ Õýæã‡æè·¤ÚU‡æ ß çß·¤ëÌè·¤ÚU‡æ ·Ô¤ ÂýØæâ ·¤æ ÂÎæüȤæàæ ç·¤Øæ ãñÐ §â ÂéSÌ·¤ ·Ô¤ Üð¹Ù ·¤æ ©gðàØ €UØæ Íæ? çßÚUôçÏØô´ ·Ô¤ Öè ÕÜè ÚUæÁæ Âýàæ´â·¤ ÍðÐ Øã ©Ù·¤æ â׿‰Øü ÍæÐ Â´çÇÌô´ Ùð ¥ÙéâæÚU, ßð ßðÎô´ ·Ô¤ àæ˜æé Íð §âçܰ ©Ù·¤ô ׿ÚUÙæ ¥æßàØ·¤ ÍæÐ ÁÕç·¤ ÚUæ×æØ‡æ ×ð´ ãè ÕÜè ·¤æ »õÚUß»æÙ ȤæòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ | ¥€ÅêUÕÚU 2014 equitable distribution of wealth among his subjects. In his regime, the reward was proportionate to the labour. Bali Raja was killed by Vaman by deceit. It was an assault on Bahujan culture. Brahmins did not want Bali Raja’s culture to prosper and grow. In Maharashtra too, Vaman was thrust upon the Bahujans. It is said that Vaman banished Bali Raja to Pataal (the subterranean world). But he lives on in the hearts of the Bahujans. In Maharashtra, on the day of Diwali, women perform the aarti of their brothers and say Ida Pida Tallo Aani Balicha Rajya Yevo (May you get rid of your problems. May the rule of Bali Raja come).This means that the Bahujans are still attached to Bahujan tradition and to Bali Raja. Bali Raja did not accept the concepts of Ved Pramanya, Chaturyavarna and Yagnayaag – concepts that form the bedrock of the Vedic tradition. If our sisters wish for the return of Bali Raja’s rule, it definitely means that he was one of our great ancestors. Here, two things are important: 1) Bali is an ancestor of the non-Vedic people. 2) If your ancestor was virtuous, it does not mean that you should just keep on flaunting his greatness. It is wrong to hail those who murdered our ancestor – an ancestor who was virtuous and who was a protagonist of justice and equality. Vaman killed him by deceit. Then, why should we accept Vaman, who had no morals? Instead, it is our duty to bring the real facts about Bali before the people. Vaman had sought land which he could cover in three steps from Bali. What did he actually seek? His three steps covered Vedas, Yagnas and Vani (voice). These three were used to crush the Bahujans. Our king was killed by deceit. Therefore, we have to brush aside all the three. In Balivansh, how do you view the old stories? Even animals are not ready to be sacrificed in Yagnas. But our people are ready to sacrifice themselves for the sake of rituals. They need to be made aware of their real history. By looking at our past, we can understand our present better and it will show us the path we should take in the future. This is the objective behind writing the book. For thousands of years, we have been working like animals but still happiness has eluded us, even our basic needs are not fulfilled, and that is because of the Brahmanical system. The coming generations need to understand this. Once they understand this, their confidence levels will rise. Their life will change. The cobwebs in their minds – which has been mortgaged for years – will be removed. The Bahujans will be delivered, emancipated. Balivansh is an attempt to bring to the fore the culture of the Bahujans through Bali. The Bali festival was being celebrated in Maharashtra. But after your book Balivansh came out, the celebrations have taken a bigger form. I am not trying to take credit for anything but I want to tell the reformers that if you put your heart into your work, people will definitely support you. There will be problems, of course, but if you work objectively, change will come. This is my belief. The changes that have come about through Balivansh are an example. The youth must take on the failures. They should not try to retreat in the face of failures. (Translated into Hindi from Marathi original by Shyam Tarke) âæÿææˆ·¤æÚU ç·¤Øæ »Øæ ãñÐ ßð ÂýÁæ ×ð´ ÏÙ ·¤æ â×æÙ çßÌÚU‡æ ·¤ÚUÌð ÍðÐ Ÿæ× ·Ô¤ ×éÌæçÕ·¤ ÂæçÚUŸæç×·¤ ÎðÌð ÍðÐ ÀÜ ¥õÚU ·¤ÂÅU âð ÕÜèÚUæÁæ ·¤ô ßæ×Ù Ùð ׿ÚUæÐ ÕãéÁÙô´ ·¤è â´S·¤ëçÌ ÂÚU ¥æR¤×‡æ ãé¥æÐ Õýæ±×‡æô´ Ùð ©Ù·¤è â´S·¤ëçÌ ·¤ô „çßÌ Ùãè´ ãôÙð çÎØæÐ ×ãæÚUæCþU ×ð´ Öè ßæ×Ù ·¤ô ÕãéÁÙô´ ÂÚU ÜæÎæ »ØæÐ °ðâæ ÕÌæØæ »Øæ ç·¤ ßæ×Ù Ùð ÕÜèÚUæÁæ ·¤ô ÂæÌæÜÜô·¤ ÖðÁ çÎØæÐ Üðç·¤Ù ¥´ÌÚU×Ù âð ÕãéÁÙ, ÕÜèÚUæÁæ ·Ô¤ âæÍ ¥æÁ Öè ãñ´Ð ×ãæÚUæCþ ×ð´ çÎßæÜè ·Ô¤ ˆØôãæÚU ×ð´ ÕãÙ ¥ÂÙð Öæ§ü ·¤è ¥æÚUÌè ©ÌæÚUÌè ãñ, Ìô ·¤ãÌè ãñ Ò§Çæ çÂÇæ ÅUÝô ¥æç‡æ ÕÝè¿´ ÚUæ’Ø ØðßôÐÓ §â·¤æ ×ÌÜÕ ¥æÂ·¤ô â´·¤ÅU âð ×éçQ¤ ç×Üð ¥õÚU ÕÜè ·¤æ ÚUæÁ ¥æ°Ð ¥ÍæüÌ ÕÜè ¥õÚU ÕãéÁÙ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ âð §Ù·¤æ çÚUàÌæ ÕðãÎ ÎëÉ ãñÐ ßðÎ Âýæ×æ‡Ø, ¿æÌéØü߇æü, Ø™æØæ», §Ù ÌèÙ ßõçη¤ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ¥ô´ ·¤ô ÕÜèÚUæÁæ Ùð Sßè·¤æÚU Ùãè´ ç·¤Øæ ÍæÐ ØçÎ ã׿ÚUè ÕãÙ ÕÜè ·¤æ ÚUæÁ ¥æ°, °ðâæ ·¤ãÌè ãñ Ìô çÙçpÌ M¤Â âð ã׿ÚUð ÂêßüÁô´ ×ð´ ÕÜè °·¤ ×ãæÙ ÂêßüÁ ÚUãæ ãñÐ Øãæ¡ Îô ÕæÌð´ ×ãžßÂê‡æü ãñ - ÂãUÜè, ÕÜè ¥ßñçη¤ô´ ·¤æ ÂêßüÁ ãñÐ ÎêâÚUè ÕæÌ ç·¤ ÂêßüÁ ØçÎ »é‡æè ãñ, Ìô ©â·¤æ ·Ô¤ßÜ ¥çÖ×æÙ ·¤ÚUÌð ÚUãÙæ ©ç¿Ì Ùãè´ ãñÐ ã׿ÚUð ÂêßüÁ, Áô âÎ»é‡æè, ‹ØæØ ¥õÚU â×Ìæ ÂýSÍæçÂÌ ·¤ÚUÙð ßæÜð ãñ´, ©Ù·¤è ±ˆØæ ·¤ÚUÙð ßæÜð ·¤è ÁØ-ÁØ·¤æÚU ·¤ÚUÙæ ¥Ùéç¿Ì ãñÐ ©‹ãð´ Ìô ßæ×Ù Ùð ·¤ÂÅU âð ׿ÚUæ ãñÐ Ìô ã× ·¤ÂÅU âð ׿ÚUÙð ßæÜð ßæ×Ù ·¤ô Sßè·¤æÚU €UØô´ ·¤ÚUð´? ßæ×Ù ·Ô¤ Âæâ ÙñçÌ·¤Ìæ Ùãè´ ÍèÐ ã׿ÚUæ ÎæçØˆß ÕÙÌæ ãñ ç·¤ ÕÜè ·¤æ âãè §çÌãæâ Üô»ô´ ·Ô¤ âæ×Ùð ÜæØð´Ð ßæ×Ù Ùð ÕÜèÚUæÁæ âð Ìè٠» Á×èÙ ×æ´»è ÍèÐ Ìô ßã Ìè٠» Á×èÙ €UØæ ãñ? ßæ×Ù ·Ô¤ Ìè٠» ãñ´ Ñ ßðÎ, Ø™æ ¥õÚU ßæ‡æèÐ ÕãéÁÙô´ ·¤ô §‹ãè´ ÌèÙ ·¤æ §SÌð×æÜ ·¤ÚU ·¤é¿Ü çÎØæ »ØæÐ ·¤ÂÅU âð ã׿ÚUð ÚUæÁæ ·¤ô ׿ÚUæ »ØæÐ Ìô ã×ð´ §Ù ÌèÙô´ ·¤ô ÎêÚU ãÅUæÙæ ãô»æÐ ÒÕÜèß´àæÓ ·Ô¤ ×æŠØ× âð ¥æÂÙð ÂéÚUæÙè ·¤Íæ¥ô´ ·¤ô ç·¤â ÎëçC·¤ô‡æ âð Îð¹æ? Ø™æ ×ð´ ¥æãéçÌ ÎðÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ Âàæé Öè ÌñØæÚU Ùãè´ ãôÌð, Üðç·¤Ù ã׿ÚUð ׿Ùß ·¤×ü·¤æ´Ç ·Ô¤ çܰ ÕçÜ ãôÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ ÌñØæÚU ãô ÁæÌð ãñ´Ð ¥ÂÙæ âãèâãè §çÌãæâ ©‹ãð´ â×ÛææÙæ ¥æÁ ·¤è ÁM¤ÚUÌ ãñÐ §çÌãæâ ã×ð´ ã׿ÚUð ßÌü×æÙ ¥õÚU ÖçßcØ ·¤æ ÚUæSÌæ çÎ¹Ìæ ãñÐ Øãè §â ç·¤ÌæÕ ·Ô¤ Üð¹Ù ·¤æ ©gðàØ ãñÐ ãÁæÚUô´ ÕÚUâ âð ã×ð´ ÁæÙßÚUô´ Áñâè ×ðãÙÌ ·¤ÚU·Ô¤ Öè âé¹ Ùãè´ ç×Üæ, çÁÙ âéçßÏæ¥ô´ ·¤è ¥ã× ÁM¤ÚUÌ Íè ßã Ùãè´ ç×Ü ÂæØè, Øãæ¡ ·¤è ÃØßSÍæ ·Ô¤ ·¤æÚU‡æÐ Øã ¥æÙð ßæÜè ÂèÉè ·¤ô â×ÛææÙæ ÁM¤ÚUè ãñÐ ØçÎ ©‹ãð´ Øã â×Ûæ ×ð´ ¥æØæ Ìô ©Ù·¤æ ¥æˆ×çßEæâ ÕÉð»æÐ ÁèßÙ ×ð´ ÕÎÜæß ¥æØð»æÐ ÕÚUâô´ âð ç»ÚUßè ÚU¹ð ©Ù·Ô¤ ×çSÌc·¤ ×ð´ âð ·¤êǸæ çÙ·¤Üð»æ, ÕãéÁÙô´ ·¤æ ©hæÚU ãô»æÐ §â·Ô¤ çܰ ÕÜè ·Ô¤ ×æŠØ× âð ÕãéÁÙ ·¤æ âæ´S·¤ëçÌ·¤ §çÌãæâ ÒÕÜèß´àæÓ ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ âæ×Ùð ¥æØæÐ ×ãæÚUæCþU ×ð´ ÂãÜð âð ãè ÕÜè ×ãôˆâß ×ÙæØæ Áæ ÚUãæ ÍæÐ Üðç·¤Ù ¥æÂ·¤è ç·¤ÌæÕ ÒÕÜèß´àæÓ ¥æÙð ·Ô¤ ÂpæÌ ×ãôˆâß ÕǸð Âñ׿Ùð ÂÚU ×ÙæØæ ÁæÙæ àæéM¤ ãé¥æÐ ×ñ´ ŸæðØ ÜðÙð ·¤æ ÂýØæâ Ùãè´ ·¤ÚUÌæÐ Üðç·¤Ù â´àæôÏ·¤,¥Øæâ·¤ô´ ·¤ô Øã ÁM¤ÚU ÕÌæÙæ ¿æãê´»æ ç·¤ ØçÎ ¥æÂ çÎÜ âð ·¤æ× ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´ Ìô Üô» çÕË·¤éÜ âæÍ Îð´»ðÐ ©â×ð´ ·¤éÀ ·¤çÆÙæ§Øæ¡ ¥æ â·¤Ìè ãñ´ Üðç·¤Ù Âýæ×æç‡æ·¤ M¤Â âð ØçÎ ¥æÂ ·¤æ× ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ Ìô çÙçpÌ M¤Â âð ÂçÚUßÌüÙ ãô»æÐ Øã ×ðÚUæ çßEæâ ãñÐ ÕÜèß´àæ ·Ô¤ ×æŠØ× âð Áô ÂçÚU‡ææ× ¥æØð ãñ´, Øã §â·¤æ ãè ©ÎæãÚU‡æ ãñÐ Øéßæ¥ô´ ·¤ô ¥âȤÜÌæ ·¤ô ÅUP¤ÚU ÎðÙè ãô»èÐ ¥âȤÜÌæ ·Ô¤ ·¤æÚU‡æ ÂèÀð ãÅUÙð ·¤è ·¤ôçàæàæ Ùãè´ ·¤ÚUÙè ¿æçã°Ð (×êÜ ×ÚUæÆè âð çã´Îè ¥ÙéßæÎ Ñ àØæ× ÅUÚU·Ô¤) 29 BAHUJAN 30 TRADITION OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press Bhakti values of the Shudra tradition àæêÎý ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ·Ô¤ ÖçQ¤ ×êËØ WHAT WAS MOST SIGNIFICANT ABOUT THE BHAKTI MOVEMENT WAS THAT IT NOT ONLY CHALLENGED THE BRAHMANICAL SYSTEM OF WORSHIP BUT ALMOST DESTROYED IT ÖçQ¤ ¥æ´ÎôÜÙ ·¤è âÕâð ÕǸè çßàæðáÌæ àææØÎ Øãè Íè ç·¤ §âÙð ©ÂæâÙæ ·¤è Õýæ±×‡æ-ÂhçÌ ·¤ô Ù ·Ô¤ßÜ ¿éÙõÌè Îè ÕçË·¤ ֻܻ ŠßSÌ ·¤ÚU çÎØæ MADAN KASHYAP I could hardly miss the two streams of culture and thought prevalent in Indian society. Neither was I oblivious to the existence of a distinct, third stream – of the Kshatriyas – which ultimately merged with the dominant Brahmanical stream. But being an atheist, my attention was never drawn to the existence of two different systems of worship. What was most significant about the Bhakti movement was that it not only challenged the Brahmanical system of worship but almost destroyed it. It is another matter that, subsequently, Tulsidas made a concerted attempt at re-establishing the Brahmanical values and glorified the Varna system. But he could not even pose a challenge to the values established by Kabir and Raidas, let alone obliterate them. Raidas’s maxim ‘Man changa toh kathoti mein Ganga’ (If your heart is pure, then water in a pitcher is Ganga) is still accepted as a cardinal truth by Indian society while there are not many takers for Tulsidas’ claims such as ‘Dhol, ganwar, Shudra, pashu, nari, yeh sab tadan ke adhikari’ (The drum, the rustic, the Shudra, the animal and the woman need to be beaten) or ‘Pujiye vipra sheel gun heena’ (Worship a Brahmin even if he lacks virtues and character). Öæ ×ÎÙ ·¤àØÂ ÚUÌèØ â׿Á ·¤è â´S·¤ëçÌ ¥õÚU ç¿´ÌÙ ·¤è Îô ÏæÚUæ¥ô´ ÂÚU Ìô ×ðÚUæ ŠØæÙ »Øæ Íæ ¥õÚU ÚUæÁ‹Øô´ ·¤è °·¤ ÌèâÚUè ÏæÚUæ ·Ô¤ âר-âר ÂÚU ¥Ü» çιÙð, Üðç·¤Ù ¥´ÌÌÑ ß¿üSßàææÜè Õýæ±×‡æßæÎè ÏæÚUæ ×ð´ ãè â׿çãÌ ãô ÁæÙð ·¤ô Öè ×ñ´Ùð ·¤§ü ÕæÚU ·¤§ü ÌÚUã âð ×ãâêâ ç·¤Øæ Íæ Üðç·¤Ù ÙæçSÌ·¤ ãôÙð ·Ô¤ ¿ÜÌð ©ÂæâÙæ ·¤è Îô ÂhçÌØô´ ·¤è ¥ôÚU ×ðÚUæ ŠØæÙ ·¤Öè Ùãè´ »ØæÐ ÖçQ¤ ¥æ´ÎôÜÙ ·¤è âÕâð ÕǸè çßàæðáÌæ àææØÎ Øãè Íè ç·¤ §âÙð ©ÂæâÙæ ·¤è Õýæ±×‡æ-ÂhçÌ ·¤ô Ù ·Ô¤ßÜ ¿éÙõÌè Îè ÕçË·¤ ֻܻ ŠßSÌ ·¤ÚU çÎØæÐ ÖÜð ãè ÌéÜâèÎæâ Ùð Õýæ±×‡æßæÎè ×êËØô´ ·¤ô çÈ ÚU âð SÍæçÂÌ ·¤ÚUÙð ·¤è ·¤ôçàæàæ ·¤è ¥õÚU ߇æü ÃØßSÍæ ·¤ô ×çã׿״çÇÌ ·¤ÚUÙð ·¤æ Öè ÂýØ% ç·¤Øæ Üðç·¤Ù ·¤ÕèÚU ¥õÚU ÚUñÎæâ Áñâð â´Ì ·¤çߨô´ mæÚUæ SÍæçÂÌ ÙØð ÁèßÙ×êËØô´ ·¤ô ßð ŠßSÌ Ùãè´ ·¤ÚU â·Ô¤ ÕçË·¤ ¿éÙõÌè Ì·¤ Ùãè´ Îð â·Ô¤Ð Ò×Ù ¿´»æ Ìô ·¤ÆõÌè ×ð´ »´»æÓ - ÚUñÎæâ ·Ô¤ §â ·¤ÍÙ ·¤è ¥æÁ Öè ÂêÚUð ÖæÚUÌèØ â׿Á ×ð´ ׿‹ØÌæ ãñ ÁÕç·¤ ÒÉôÜ, »´ßæÚU, àæêÎý, Âàæé, ÙæÚUè Øð âÕ ÌæÇÙ ·Ô¤ ¥çÏ·¤æÚUèÓ Øæ ÒÂêçÁ° çßÂý àæèÜ »éÙ ãèÙæÓ Áñâè ÌéÜâè ·¤è ©çQ¤Øô´ ÂÚU ãÚU ·¤ô§ü âᑚ ©ÆæÌæ ãñÐ ÖQ¤ ·¤çߨô´, ¹æâ ·¤ÚU ÂãÜð ÎõÚU ·Ô¤ çÙ»éü‡æ â´Ì ·¤çߨô´ Ùð ÂêÁæ-微 ¥õÚU ·¤×ü·¤æ´Ç ·¤è Á»ã ×Ù ·¤è ÂçߘæÌæ ·¤ô ŸæðD ¥õÚU çÙ‡ææüØ·¤ ÕÌæØæÐ ¥õÚU ©â·Ô¤ ÕæÎ ·Ô¤ â׿Á Ùð ¥´çÌ× M¤Â âð §âð Sßè·¤æÚU ·¤ÚU çÜØæÐ §â ÕæÌ ·¤ô ÍôǸæ çßSÌæÚU âð â×ÛæÙð ·¤è ÁM¤ÚUÌ ãñРȤæòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ ¥€ÅêUÕÚU 2014 | Bhakti poets, especially the initial Nirgun (belief in a formless god) ones, laid more emphasis on purity of heart than on rituals and elaborate pujas, and the erstwhile society accepted their views. This needs to be understood in a some detail. Hazari Prasad Dwivedi was the first to present the theory that the progenitors of the Bhakti movement were the Alwar saints of south India. They were devotees of Shiva and laid great emphasis on purity of heart. That was probably because they were Shudras and to a large extent, lacked resources. Neither did they know how to perform the rituals, nor did they have the right to do it. Dwivedi has not tried to explore the reasons behind their stance – and this was not his field either – but it is clear that the Alwar saints represented a social rebellion against the ritualistic religious practices. The saints of north India who joined this movement in the initial phase came from the lower social strata and strongly disapproved of rituals. The movement came to north India from the south but the social circumstances responsible for its rise, and the ideology or thought from which it drew sustenance are unknown. There is a need for more research in these areas. I believe that the movement was born from the ancient stream of the materialistic ideology of the Shudras. Under the pressure of the changing times, materialism metamorphosed into worship of metaphysical entities. In that era, materialism to spiritualism was the natural course of development of knowledge. We will be able to understand what happened in that era only if we put it into perspective. Even in the Ajivaka religion, there are elements of fatalism and belief, such as in the theory that whatever happens in one’s life is pre-decided. These elements cannot be ignored but what is important is that the entire Bhakti movement – from its birth to the emergence of Nirgun Bhakti Marg – is uncompromisingly opposed to Brahmanism and rituals. Of course, more research is needed before the movement can get its due place in the history of the country. As stated earlier, Sagun (belief that God has a form) Bhakti poets and saints, especially Tulsidas, Brahmanized the Bhakti movement. Later, this biggest social movement of Indian history got stalemated due to a variety of factors. But even Tulsidas and other Brahmanical poets had to accept that purity of heart and sincerity were prerequisites for real Bhakti. That was because society had already rejected elaborate religious ceremonies based on complicated rituals and bizarre practices. The Satyanarayan Katha continued to be read – and it is read even today – but even those who perform the puja accept that thoughts and sentiments are more important than rituals. The Shudra principle of purity of intention has won a decisive victory over the Brahmanical principle of rituals and sacraments. This is a major success of the Shudra or, better still, of the anti-Brahmanism stream of thought and this needs to be highlighted A recipient of the Shamsher Samman, Madan Kashyap is counted among the key contemporary Hindi poets. Lekin Udaas Hai Prithvi, Neem Roshni Mein, Kuruj and Door Tak Chuppi are amongst his prominent collections of poems. Matbhed, Lahuluhan Loktantra and Rashtravaad Ka Sankat are collections of his commentaries on political issues ÕãéÁÙ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ âÕâð ÂãÜð ãÁæÚUè ÂýâæÎ çmßðÎè Ùð ¥ÂÙð àæôÏ ·Ô¤ ¥æÏæÚU ÂÚU Øã SÍæÂÙæ Îè Íè ç·¤ ÖçQ¤ ¥æ´ÎôÜÙ ·¤è àæéM¤¥æÌ Îçÿæ‡æ ÖæÚUÌ ·Ô¤ ¥æÜßæÚU â´Ìô´ Ùð ·¤è ÍèÐ ßð çàæß ·Ô¤ ©Âæâ·¤ Íð ¥õÚU ×Ù ·¤è ÂçߘæÌæ ÂÚU ÁôÚU ÎðÌð ÍðÐ àææØÎ §âçܰ Öè ç·¤ ßð àæêÎý Íð ¥õÚU ÕãéÌ ãÎ Ì·¤ âæÏÙãèÙ ÖèÐ ·¤×ü·¤æ´Çô´ âð ßð ¥ÙçÖ™æ Íð ¥õÚU ©‹ãð´ §â·¤æ ¥çÏ·¤æÚU Öè Âýæ# Ùãè´ ÍæÐ ãæÜæ´ç·¤ çmßðÎè Áè Ùð §â ÂÚU ¥õÚU ’ØæÎæ Âý·¤æàæ Ùãè´ ÇæÜæ ¥õÚU ©â·Ô¤ âæ×æçÁ·¤ ·¤æÚU‡æô´ ·¤ô ɸêɸÙð ·¤è Öè ·¤ôçàæàæ Ùãè´ ·¤èÐ Øã ©Ù·¤æ ÿæð˜æ Öè Ùãè´ ÍæÐ Üðç·¤Ù °·¤ ÙÁ¸ÚU Îð¹Ùð âð ãè Øã âæÈ ãô ÁæÌæ ãñ ç·¤ ¥ÂÙð àæéL¤¥æÌè SßM¤Â ×ð´ ãè Øã ·¤×ü·¤æ´ÇßæÎ ·Ô¤ çßL¤h °·¤ âæ×æçÁ·¤ çßÎýôã ·¤æ §ÁãæÚU ÍæÐ ©žæÚU ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ Öè ÂãÜð ¿ÚU‡æ ×ð´ Áô â´Ì ·¤çß §â×ð´ àæææç×Ü ãé° ßð âÕ ·Ô¤ âÕ â׿Á ·Ô¤ çÙ¿Üð ÌÕ·¤ô´ âð Íð ¥õÚU ·¤×ü·¤æ´Çô´ ·Ô¤ ·¤ÆôÚU çßÚUôÏè ÍðÐ ©žæÚU ×ð´ Øã ¥æ´ÎôÜÙ Îçÿæ‡æ âð ¥æØæ Íæ Üðç·¤Ù Îçÿæ‡æ ×ð´ Øã ç·¤Ù âæ×æçÁ·¤ ÂçÚUçSÍçÌØô´ ×ð´ ÂñÎæ ã饿 ¥õÚU ç¿´ÌÙ ·¤è ç·¤â ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ âð §âÙð àæçQ¤ »ýã‡æ ·¤è, ©â ÂÚU ¥Öè àæôÏ ·¤ÚUÙð ·¤è ÁM¤ÚUÌ ãñÐ ×ðÚUè â×Ûæ âð Øã àæêÎýô´ ·¤è Âýæ¿èÙ ÖõçÌ·¤ßæÎè ç¿´ÌÙ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ âð ãè çß·¤çâÌ ã饿 ¥õÚU âר ·Ô¤ ÎÕæß ×ð´ ÖõçÌ·¤ßæÎ, ¥çÏÖõçÌ·¤ àæçQ¤ ·¤è ©ÂæâÙæ ·¤è ¥ôÚU ×éǸ »ØæÐ ÖõçÌ·¤Ìæ âð ¥æŠØæˆ× ·¤è ¥ôÚU Ûæé·¤æß ÌÕ ™ææÙ ·Ô¤ çß·¤æâ ·¤æ SßÖæçß·¤ ׿»ü ÍæÐ ã×ð´ ©âð ̈·¤æÜèÙ ÂçÚUçSÍçÌØô´ ·Ô¤ â´ÎÖü ×ð´ ãè Îð¹Ùæ ãô»æÐ ¥æÁèß·¤ Ï×ü ×ð´ Öè Öæ‚ØßæÎ ¥õÚU çÙØçÌßæÎ ·Ô¤ Ìˆß ç×ÜÌð ãñ´, ©Ù ÂÚU çß¿æÚU ÁM¤ÚUè ãñ Üðç·¤Ù ŠØæÙ ÎðÙð ·¤è ÕæÌ Øã ãñ ç·¤ ¥æÚU´çÖ·¤ ·¤æÜ âð çÙ»éü‡æ ÖçQ¤ ׿»ü Ì·¤ Øã ÂêÚUè ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ¥ÕæÏ M¤Â âð Õýæ±×‡æßæÎ ¥õÚU ·¤×ü·¤æ‡ÇßæÎ ·Ô¤ çßL¤h ãñÐ ßñâð §â ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ·¤ô °ðçÌãæçâ·¤ M¤Â âð SÍæçÂÌ ·¤ÚUÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ ¥Öè ¥õÚU àæôÏ ·¤è ÁM¤ÚUÌ ãñÐ Áñâæ ç·¤ àæéM¤ ×ð´ ·¤ãæ »Øæ ãñ, â»é‡æ ÖQ¤ ·¤çߨô´ ¥õÚU â´Ìô´, çßàæðá M¤Â âð ÌéÜâèÎæâ Ùð ¥ÂÙð SÌÚU âð ÖçQ¤ ¥æ´ÎôÜÙ ·¤æ Õýæ±×‡æè·¤ÚU‡æ ·¤ÚU çÎØæÐ ©â·Ô¤ ÕæÎ Øã ÖæÚUÌ ·Ô¤ §çÌãæâ ·¤æ âÕâð ÕǸæ âæ×æçÁ·¤ ¥æ´ÎôÜÙ ·¤§ü ÌÚUã ·Ô¤ »ˆØæßÚUôÏô´ ×ð´ È´â »ØæÐ Üðç·¤Ù ÖçQ¤ ·Ô¤ çܰ ×Ù ·¤è ÂçߘæÌæ ¥õÚU çÙDæ ·¤è ÁM¤ÚUÌ ·¤ô ÌéÜâè âçãÌ âÖè Õýæ±×‡æßæÎè â´Ìô´ ·¤ô Öè Sßè·¤æÚU ·¤ÚUÙæ ÂǸæ, €UØô´ç·¤ â׿Á, çßçÏçßÏæÙô´ ¥õÚU ·¤×ü·¤æ´Ç¸ô´ âð â´¿æçÜÌ ãôÙð ßæÜð ¥ÙéDæÙô´ ·Ô¤ ß¿üSß ·¤ô ¥Sßè·¤æÚU ·¤ÚU·Ô¤ ¥æ»ð çÙ·¤Ü ¥æØæ ÍæÐ ÖÜð ãè âˆØÙæÚUæØ‡æ ·¤æ ·¤Íæßæ¿Ù ¿ÜÌæ ÚUãæ, ¥æÁ Öè ¿Ü ÚUãæ ãñ, Üðç·¤Ù ©â·Ô¤ ØÁ×æÙ Öè ¥Õ çßÏæÙô´ âð ¥çÏ·¤ ÖæßÙæ¥ô´ ·¤ô ×ãˆß ÎðÌð ãñ´Ð ¥ÍæüÌ÷ ÖæßÙæ ·¤è ÂçߘæÌæ ·¤æ àæêÎý çâhæ´Ì ¥æÁ çßçÏçßÏæÙ ¥õÚU ·¤×ü·¤æ´Ç ·Ô¤ Õýæ±×‡æ çâhæ´Ì ÂÚU çÙ‡ææüØ·¤ M¤Â âð ÂýÖæßè ãô »Øæ ãñÐ Øã àæêÎý Øæ ·¤çã° Õýæ±×‡æßæÎ çßÚUôÏè ç¿´ÌÙÏæÚUæ ·¤è °ðâè ÕǸè âȤÜÌæ ãñ, çÁâð ÚUð¹æ´ç·¤Ì ç·¤Øæ ÁæÙæ ¿æçã°Ð àæ×àæðÚU â×æÙ âð çßÖêçáÌ ×ÎÙ ·¤àØÂ çã´Îè ·Ô¤ Âý×é¹ â×·¤æÜèÙ ·¤çߨô´ ×ð´ ç»Ùð ÁæÌð ãñ´Ð ÒÜðç·¤Ù ©Îæâ ãñ Âë‰ßèÓ, ÒÙè× ÚUôàæÙè ×ð´Ó, Ò·¤éM¤ÁÓ, ÒÎêÚU Ì·¤ ¿éŒÂèÓ ¥æçÎ ©Ù·Ô¤ Âý×é¹ ·¤çßÌæ â´»ýã ãñ´Ð ÚUæÁÙñçÌ·¤ çÅUŒÂç‡æØô´ ·Ô¤ ©Ù·Ô¤ ÌèÙ â´»ýã Ò×ÌÖðÎÓ, ÒÜãêÜéãæÙ Üô·¤Ì´˜æÓ ¥õÚU Ò ÚUæCþßæÎ ·¤æ â´·¤ÅUÓ Öè Âý·¤æçàæÌ ãñ´Ð 31 32 DEBATE OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press Relevance of Aajivak religion ¥æÁèß·¤ Ï×ü ·¤è Âýæâ´ç»·¤Ìæ Kabir ·¤ÕèÚU ×€¹Üè »æðâæÜ THERE WAS A TIME WHEN THE AAJIVAK RELIGION HELD SWAY OVER THE ENTIRE COUNTRY °·¤ âר Íæ ÁÕ ¥æÁèß·¤ Ï×ü ÂêÚUð Îðàæ ÂÚU Àæ »Øæ Íæ KAILASH DAHIYA D alitbahujan and women’s discourse have taken centre-stage these days. The resonance of these discourses can be heard far and wide in Hindi literature. The initiation of Dalitbahujan and women’s discourse has ensured that sooner or later, the slavery of these two classes will come to an end. In my view, the brilliant Aajivak thinker Dr. Dharmaveer is the initiator of these discourses. Dr. Dharmaveer’s ideology is influenced by the thoughts of Makkhali Gosala, Sadguru Raidas and Kabir, all of whom, basically, were Dalitbahujan thinkers. In his various books and articles, Dr. Dharmaveer has explored the religion that was once an integral part of the Dalitbahujan tradition. Marshalling facts and logic, he has sought to prove that Aajivak— propounded by Makkhali Gosala—was that religion. §U ·ñ¤Üæàæ ÎçãØæ â âר ÒÎçÜÌ çß×àæüÓ ¥õÚU ÒS˜æè çß×àæüÓ ¿¿æü ·Ô¤ ·Ô¤‹Îý ×´ð´ ãñ´Ð çã‹Îè âæçãˆØ ×ð´ §Ù çß×àæô´ü ·¤è »ê¡Á ÕãéÌ ÎêÚU ¥õÚU »ãÚUð Ì·¤ âéÙæ§ü Îð ÚUãè ãñÐ ÁÕ âð ÎçÜÌ ¥õÚU S˜æè çß×àæü ¥æ° ãñ´, ÌÖè âð Øã âéçÙçpÌ ãô »Øæ ç·¤ ¥Õ §Ù ÎôÙô´ ·¤è »éÜæ×è ã×ðàææ ·Ô¤ çܰ ¹ˆ× ãôÙð Áæ ÚUãè ãñÐ ×ðÚUæ ׿ÙÙæ ãñ ç·¤ §Ù çß×àæô´ü ·Ô¤ ÂýæÚU´Ö·¤Ìæü ãñ´ Âý¹ÚU ¥æÁèß·¤ ç¿´Ì·¤ Çæ. Ï×üßèÚUÐ Çæ. Ï×üßèÚU ¥ÂÙè ßñ¿æçÚU·¤è ×ãæÙ ×€U¹çÜ »ôâæÜ, âλéL¤ ÚUñÎæâ ¥õÚU ·¤ÕèÚU ·Ô¤ ç¿´ÌÙ âð ÜðÌð ãñ´, Áô ÎçÜÌ-ÕãéÁÙ ç¿´ÌÙ ÚUãð ã´ñÐ ¥ÂÙè Ì‰Øæˆ×·¤ ¥õÚU Ìæç·¤ü·¤ ÎëçC âð ¥ÂÙè çßçÖóæ ÂéSÌ·¤ô´ ß Üð¹ô´ ×ð´ Çæ. Ï×üßèÚU Ùð ©â Ï×ü ·¤ô Öè ¹ôÁæ ãñ, Áô ÎçÜÌÕãéÁÙô´ ·¤è ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ×ð´ â׿çãÌ ÍæÐ ßã Ï×ü Ò¥æÁèß·¤Ó ãñ, çÁâ·Ô¤ ÂýçÌÂæÎ·¤ ×€U¹çÜ »ôâæÜ Íð, çÁ‹ãô´Ùð ÒçÎàææ¿ÚUÓ Ùæ× âð ¥ÂÙæ Ï×ü»ý´Í Öè çܹæ ÍæÐ Øã ÎçÜÌÕãéÁÙô´ ·¤æ ÎéÖæü‚Ø ·¤çã° ç·¤ ßð ¥ÂÙð Ï×ü»ý´Í ·¤è ÚUÿææ Ùãè´ ·¤ÚU Âæ°, çÁâ·Ô¤ ¿ÜÌð ßð çmÁô´ ·Ô¤ »éÜæ× ÕÙ ·¤ÚU ÚUã »°Ð ȤæòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ | ¥€ÅêUÕÚU 2014 Õãâ Ambedkar was also out-manoeuvred by Gandhi vis-avis the Poona Pact. Under this pact, Dalits were placed under the Hindu umbrella, even though they were never a part of the Hindu religion or its Varna system. Thus, their problems got worse ¥æÕðÇ·¤ÚU ÒÂêÙæ Âñ€UÅUÓ ×ð´ Öè »æ¡Ïè âð ×æÌ ¹æ »°Ð §â Âñ€UÅU ×ð´ ÎçÜÌ çã‹Îê ×æÙ çܰ »°, ÁÕç·¤ ßð ·¤Öè Öè Ò߇æü ß çã‹Îê Ï×ü ÃØßSÍæÓ ·¤æ çãSâæ ãè Ùãè´ ÚUãÐð â´·¤ÅU ’Øô´ ·¤æ ˆØô´ ÕÚU·¤ÚUæÚU ÚUãæ Ghoshal had also written a book titled Dishachar, which is the religious scripture and the guiding light of this religion. Unfortunately, the Dalitbahujans could not preserve this scripture and hence became slaves of the Dwij castes. Aajivaks have no belief in the concept of rebirth. Aajivak Kabir (1425-1505) said Bahuri hum kahu ko aavhinge (Why will I come again and again). This creates a basic divide between the Aajivaks and the Dwijs, for the Varna system, caste inequality, rituals and superstitions — all are extensions of the doctrine of rebirth. There was a time when the Aajivak religion held sway over the entire country. Dr Dharmaveer writes, “From the eighth to the fourteenth centuries, all the workers, farmers and artisans who had not embraced Islam, were not Hindu, Buddhists or Jains. They were followers of the Aajivak religion”. Keep in mind that at that time words like Dalitbahujan or Harijan were not in existence. Aajivaks’ embracing Islam also did not make much material difference as Islam also does not believe in rebirth. In that sense, even after becoming Muslims, the Aajivaks preserved their tradition. Then came Kabir with his call of ‘Na Hindu Na Musalman’ (Neither Hindu nor Muslim). Thus, Aajivaks still had hope. Kabir had turned Aajivak and he enjoyed the unstinted support of the great Sadguru Raidas, who was like his elder brother. But since the community lacked the needed strength, the Aajivak religion could not be rejuvenated. Nevertheless, Kabir was a great Aajivak, who named his book Bijak. The Aajivak and Dwij streams ran parallel to each other but as Aajivaks had forgotten their religion, they were bound to slip into misery – and slip they did. Religion is the biggest and the most powerful organization in the world. The castes which do not have any religion are called Dalits, Tribals and Backwards. Ambedkar’s mistake Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar also realized this fact but since his study of history and philosophy was not deep enough, he fell for the Buddhist religion. That only worsened the condition of the Dalitbahujans. ¥æÁèß·¤ô´ Ùð ·¤Öè Ùãè´ ×æÙæ ç·¤ ÂéÙÁü‹× Ùæ× ·¤è ·¤ô§ü ç¿çÇ¸Øæ Öè ãôÌè ãñÐ ¥æÁèß·¤ ·¤ÕèÚU (vywz-vz®z §ü.) Ìô ãé´·¤æÚU Ü»æÌð ãñ´ ÒÕãéçÚU ã× ·¤æãê ·¤ô ¥æßçã´»ðÓÐ §ââð ¥æÁèß·¤ô´ ¥õÚU çmÁô´ ·Ô¤ ç¿‹ÌÙ ×ð´ Á×èÙ-¥æâ×æÙ ·¤æ ¥´ÌÚU ÂñÎæ ãô ÁæÌæ ãñР߇æü-ÃØßSÍæ, ÁæçÌ ¥æŠææçÚUÌ ¥â׿ÙÌæ, ·¤×ü·¤æ´Ç, ¥´ÏçßEæâ ÂéÙÁü‹× ·Ô¤ ãè çßSÌæÚU ãñ´Ð °·¤ âר Íæ ÁÕ ¥æÁèß·¤ Ï×ü ÂêÚUð Îðàæ ÂÚU Àæ »Øæ ÍæÐ Çæ. Ï×üßèÚU çܹÌð ãñ´, Ò¥æÆßè´ àæÌæŽÎè âð Üð ·¤ÚU ¿õÎãßè´ àæÌæŽÎè Ì·¤ Áô ×ÁÎêÚU, ç·¤âæÙ ¥õÚU ·¤æÚUè»ÚU ×éâÜ×æÙ Ùãè´ ÕÙð Íð ßð çã´Îê, Õõh Øæ ÁñÙ Ùãè´ Íð ÕçË·¤ ¥æÁèß·¤ Ï×ü ·Ô¤ ¥Ù騿Øè ÍðÐÓ ŠØæÙ ÚUãð, ©â âר ãçÚUÁÙ Øæ ÎçÜÌÕãéÁÙ Áñâð àæŽÎô´ ·¤æ ¥çSÌˆß Öè Ùãè´ ÍæÐ ¥æÁèß·¤ô´ ·Ô¤ ×éâÜ×æÙ ãô ÁæÙð âð ’ØæÎæ È ·¤ü §âçܰ Ùãè´ ÂǸ ÚUãæ Íæ, €UØô´ç·¤ §SÜæ× ×ð´ Öè ÂéÙÁü‹× ·Ô¤ çܰ ·¤ô§ü SÍæÙ Ùãè´ ÍæÐ °·¤ ÌÚUã âð ¥æÁèß·¤ ¥ÂÙè ÂÚUÂÚUæ ·¤ô âéÚUçÿæÌ Õ¿æ ÚUãð ÍðÐ Üðç·¤Ù àæèƒæý ãè ·¤ÕèÚU »ÚUÁð, ÒÙæ çã‹Îê-Ùæ ×éâÜ׿ÙÐÓ ¥Öè Öè ¥æÁèß·¤ ·¤è ©×èÎ ÕÙè ãé§ü ÍèÐ ·¤ÕèÚU ÂêÚUð ¥æÁèß·¤ ÕÙ »° Íð, çÁâ×ð´ §‹ãð´ ÕǸð Öæ§ü ÌéËØ ×ãæÙ âλéL¤ ÚUñÎæâ ·¤æ â×ÍüÙ ç×Ü ÚUãæ ÍæÐ Üðç·¤Ù ·¤õ× ·¤×ÁôÚU Íè §âçܰ Ï×ü ·¤è ÂéÙSÍæüÂÙæ ãôÌð-ãôÌð ÚUã »§üÐ ÕæßÁêÎ §â ·Ô¤ ·¤ÕèÚU âæãðÕ, Áô Âýæ¿èÙ ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ ã׿ÚUð ¥æÁèß·¤ ×ãæÂéL¤á Íð, Ùð ¥ÂÙð »ý´Í ·¤æ Ùæ× ÒÕèÁ·¤Ó ÚU¹æÐ ¥æÁèß·¤ô´ ¥õÚU çmÁô´ ·¤è ÂÚUÂÚUæ°´ â×æÙæ´ÌÚU âæÍ ¿ÜÌè ÚUãè ãñ´Ð Üðç·¤Ù ¥ÂÙæ Ï×ü ÖêÜæ ÎðÙð ·¤è ßÁã âð ¥æÁèß·¤ô´ ·¤è ãæÜÌ ¹ÚUæÕ ãè ãôÙè Íè ¥õÚU ãé§ü ÖèÐ Ï×ü ÎéçÙØæ ·¤æ âÕ âð ÕÇ¸æ ¥õÚU Ìæ·¤ÌßÚU â´»ÆÙ ãñÐ Ï×üãèÙ ÁæçÌØæ´ ÎçÜÌ, ¥æçÎßæâè ¥õÚU çÂÀǸè Âé·¤æÚUè ÁæÌè ãñ´Ð ¥æÕðÇ·¤ÚU ·¤è ÖêÜ Çæ. Öè×ÚUæß ¥æÕðÇ·¤ÚU §â ÕæÌ ·¤ô ÁæÙÌð Íð Üðç·¤Ù §çÌãæâ ¥õÚU ÎàæüÙ ·¤è »ãÚUæ§ü Ì·¤ Ù ÁæÙð ·Ô¤ ·¤æÚU‡æ ßð Õõh Ï×ü ×ð´ ç»ÚU »°Ð §â âð ÎçÜÌô´ ·¤è ãæÜÌ ÕÎÌÚU ãè ÚUãÙè ÍèÐ ¥æÕðÇ·¤Ú UÒÂêÙæ Âñ€UÅUÓ ×ð´ Öè »æ¡Ïè âð ×æÌ ¹æ »°Ð §â Âñ€UÅU ×ð´ ÎçÜÌ çã‹Îê ×æÙ çܰ »°, ÁÕç·¤ ßð ·¤Öè Öè ߇æü ß çã‹Îê Ï×ü ÃØßSÍæ ·¤æ çãSâæ ãè Ùãè´ ÚUãðÐ â´·¤ÅU ’Øô´ ·¤æ ˆØô´ ÕÚU·¤ÚUæÚU ÚUãæÐ Çæ. Ï×üßèÚU 33 34 DEBATE OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press Ambedkar was also out-manoeuvred by Gandhi vis-a-vis the Poona Pact. Under this pact, Dalits were placed under the Hindu umbrella, even though they were never a part of the Hindu religion or its Varna system. Thus, their problems got worse. Dr. Dharmaveer says that it would have been better had Ambedkar opted for the ‘Aadi’ religion, which was being led by Swami Achootanand at that time. Had he done so, the condition of the Dalitbahujans would have been better today. The Aadi religion had spread all over the country before Independence. Under the leadership of Mangu Ram, the Dalitbahujans had declared themselves ‘Aadyadharmi’ (believers in Aadi religion) in the 1931 census. As has already been said, Dr. Ambedkar falling for the Kshatriya Buddhist religion blocked the rise of Aajivak religion. And this, when Ambedkar’s maternal and paternal grandparents were followers of Kabir. Dr. Ambedkar used to hum the Shabads of Kabir. Aajivaks should also remember that if Dr Ambedkar is addressed affectionately as Baba Saheb, it is in consonance with Kabir being called Kabir Saheb and not because of the legacy of a Kshatriya (Dwij) Buddha. The neoBuddhists, suffering from a deep inferiority complex, are out to prove that Baba Saheb was a Bodhisattva, who is inferior to Buddha. On the other hand, Dr Dharmaveer says that Buddha is nothing before Baba Saheb. Dr Amedbkar towers above Buddha. In fact, Buddha stands with a begging bowl before Ambedkar, who was a great Aajivak. Today, Dr Dharmaveer is making Aajivaks aware of these facts. The Dwijs are dumbstruck and it is time for the Aajivaks to celebrate. Fortunately for the Aajivaks, Ghoshal’s ‘theory of destiny’ has survived. The Brahmins, to prove their rebirth theory, tried to link it with fate. But this theory is not about fate but about the destiny of life. Dr. Dharmaveer has discovered it and he is interpreting it He is telling Aajivaks that Niyati (destiny), Sangati (harmony or compatibility) and Bhav (notions or ideas) are our mantras. Kailash Dahiya is a Dalit poet, critic and art reviewer ÕÌæÌð ãñ´ ç·¤ ¥»ÚU ¥æÕðÇ·¤ÚU ©â âר Sßæ×è ¥ÀêÌæÙ´Î ·Ô¤ ÙðÌëˆß ×ð´ ¿Ü ÚUãð Ò¥æçÎÓ Ï×ü ·¤ô Öè ×æÙ ÜðÌð Ìô çÙçpÌ M¤Â âð ÎçÜÌ ÕðãÌÚU çSÍçÌ ×ð´ ÚUãÌðÐ ¥æçÎ Ï×ü ¥æ´ÎôÜÙ ¥æÁæÎè âð ÂãÜð ÂêÚUð ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ Èñ¤Ü ¿é·¤æ ÍæÐ Â´ÁæÕ ×ð´ Ìô ÕæÕæ ×´»ê ÚUæ× ·Ô¤ ÙðÌëˆß ×ð´ v~xv ·¤è ÁÙâ´Øæ ×ð´ ÎçÜÌÕãéÁÙô´ Ùð ¹éÎ ·¤ô ¥æÎ÷Šæ×èü ƒæôçáÌ ·¤ÚU çÎØæ ÍæÐ Áñâæ ç·¤ ÕÌæØæ »Øæ ãñ, ¥æÕðÇ·¤ÚU ·¤æ ÿæç˜æØ Õõh Ï×ü ×ð´ ç»ÚUÙæ ¥æÁèß·¤ Ï×ü ·Ô¤ ¥ØéÎØ ·¤ô Ùé·¤âæÙ Âãé´¿æ »ØæÐ ßã Öè ÌÕ, ÁÕ Çæ.¥æÕðÇ·¤ÚU ·Ô¤ ÎæÎæ-ÙæÙæ ·¤ÕèÚU ·Ô¤ ¥Ù騿§ü ÍðÐ Sߨ´ ÕæÕæ âæãðÕ ·¤ÕèÚU ·Ô¤ âÕÎ »éÙ»éÙæÌð ÍðÐ ¥æÁèß·¤ô´ ·¤ô Øã Öè ØæÎ ÚU¹Ùæ ¿æçã° ç·¤ Çæ. ¥æÕðÇ·¤ÚU ·¤ô ÕæÕæ âæãðÕ ·¤ÕèÚU âæãðÕ ·¤è ÂÚUÂÚUæ ×ð´ ŒØæÚU âð Âé·¤æÚUÌð ãñ´ Ù ç·¤ ç·¤âè ÿæç˜æØ (çmÁ) Õéh ·¤è ßÁã âðÐ ãèÙÌæ âð ÖÚUð Ùß Õõh ã׿ÚUð ÕæÕæ âæãðÕ ·¤ô ÕôçÏâˆß ÕÙæÙð ÂÚU ÌéÜð ÚUãÌð ãñ´, Áô Õéh âð ÀôÅUæ ãôÌæ ãñÐ ÁÕç·¤ Çæ. Ï×üßèÚU â×Ûææ ÚUãð ãñ´, ÕæÕæ âæãðÕ ·Ô¤ âæ×Ùð Õéh €UØæ Õð¿Ìð ãñ´Ð ÕæÕæ âæãðÕ ¥æÕðÇ·¤ÚU Õéh âð ÕãéÌ ÕǸð ãñ´Ð ßð ×ãæÙ ¥æÁèß·¤ ãñ´, çÁÙ ·Ô¤ âæ×Ùð Õéh Öè¹ ·¤æ ·¤ÅUôÚUæ çܰ ¹Ç¸ð ãñ´Ð ¥æÁ Çæ. Ï×üßèÚU §Ù âÕ Ì‰Øô´ âð ¥æÁèß·¤ô´ ·¤ô ÂçÚUç¿Ì ·¤ÚUßæ ÚUãð ãñ´Ð çmÁ â·¤Ìð ×ð´ ãñ´ ¥õÚU ¥æÁèß·¤ô´ ·Ô¤ ÙëˆØ ·¤æ ¥ßâÚU ¥æ Âãé´¿æ ãñÐ §âð ¥æÁèß·¤ô´ ·¤æ âõÖæ‚Ø ·¤çã° ç·¤ »ôâæÜ ·¤æ ÒçÙØçÌ ·¤æ çâhæ´ÌÓ ¹ÚUæ ·¤æ ¹ÚUæ Õ¿æ ÚUã »ØæÐ Õýæ±×‡æ Ùð §âð ÂéÙÁü‹× ·Ô¤ ¿P¤ÚU ×ð´ Öæ‚Ø âð ÁôǸæÐ Üðç·¤Ù, Øã Öæ‚Ø Ùãè´ Á‹× ·Ô¤ çÙØÌ ãôÙð ·¤æ çâhæ´Ì ãñÐ Çæ. Ï×üßèÚU §âð ¹ôÁ Üæ° ãñ´ ¥õÚU §â·¤è ÃØæØæ ·¤ÚU ÚUãð ãñ´Ð ßð ÕÌæ ÚUãð ãñ´ ç·¤ ¥æÁèß·¤ô´ ×ð´ çÙØçÌ, â´»çÌ ¥õÚU Öæß ã׿ÚUð ÕèÁ ×´˜æ ãñ´Ð ·ñ¤Üæàæ ÎçãØæ ÎçÜÌ ·¤çß, ¥æÜô¿·¤ ¥õÚU ·¤Üæ â×èÿæ·¤ ãñ´ FP Code of Ethics ȤæÚUßÇü Âýðâ ·¤è ¥æ¿æÚU â´çãÌæ FORWARD Press has always been adhering to the highest ethical standards of journalism. We also believe that we are accountable to our readers and advertisers. If you are aware or come to know of any instance of any individual associated with FORWARD Press violating these standards or working against them or if any person or persons demand any monetary or other benefits from you in the name of FORWARD Press, please immediately inform our complaints cell on telephone number 011-4653-8664. Directors, Aspire Prakashan Pvt. Ltd. ȤæÚUßÇüU Âýâ ð ã×ðàææ ÙñçÌ·¤Ìæ ·Ô¤ ©‘¿ ׿ÙδÇô´ ·¤æ ÂæÜÙ ·¤ÚUÌæ ÚUãæ ãñÐ ã× Ù çâÈü ˜淤æçÚUÌæ ·Ô¤ ©‘¿ ©âêÜô´ ×ð´ çßàßæâ ÚU¹Ìð ãñ´ ÕçË·¤ çß™ææÂÙÎæÌæ¥ô´ ß Âç˜æ·¤æ ·Ô âÎSØô´ ·Ô¤ ÂýçÌ Öè ¹éÎ ·¤ô ÁßæÕÎðãU ׿ÙÌð ãñд ¥»ÚU ¥æÂ·¤ô °ðâè ÁæÙ·¤æÚUè ãñ Øæ ¥æÂ·¤ô ç·¤âè âýæÌð âð Øã ™ææÌ ãôÌæ ãñ ç·¤ ȤæÚUßÇü Âýâ ð mæÚUæ ¥çÏ·¤ëÌ ·¤ô§ü ÃØç€Ì §UÙ ©âêÜô´ ·Ô¤ ç¹ÜæÈ ·¤æ× ·¤ÚU ÚUãæ ãñ ¥Íßæ ØçÎ ·¤ô§ü ÃØçQ¤ ȤæÚUßÇüU Âýâ ð ·Ô¤ Ùæ× ÂÚU ¥æÂâð ç·¤âè Öè Âý·¤æÚU ·¤æ ¥ßñÏ Öé»ÌæÙ Øæ ç·¤âè ¥‹Ø ÜæÖ ·¤è ׿´» ·¤ÚU ÚUãæ ãñ Ìô ·¤ëÂØæ ã׿ÚUð çàæ·¤æØÌ âðÜ ·¤ô ̈·¤æÜ §â·¤è âê¿Ùæ Îðд Ù´ÕÚU ãñ-®vv-y{zx}{{y Ð â´¿æÜ·¤»‡æ, °SÂæØÚU Âý·¤æàæÙ Âýæ§ßðÅU çÜç×ÅUÇð Ð MAIL US : [email protected] ȤæòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ | ¥€ÅêUÕÚU 2014 ÕãéÁÙ Üæð·¤»æÍæ°´ Tales of valiant romantic Bahujan heroes ¥ôÕèâè ÙæØ·¤ô´ ·¤è Âýð× ß àæõØü »æÍæ°´ IT’S HARDLY SURPRISING THAT THEY DON’T HAVE A PLACE IN HISTORY OR RELIGION, BUT TRADITION HAS KEPT THEM ALIVE ·¤ô§ü ¥æpØü Ùãè´ ç·¤ §çÌãæâ ¥õÚU Ï×ü ×ð´ ©Ù·Ô¤ çܰ ·¤ô§ü SÍæÙ Ùãè´ ãñ ÂÚU‹Ìé ßð ã׿ÚUè ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ×ð´ ÁèçßÌ ãñ´ RAJENDRA PRASAD SINGH T hose who have been described as Shudras in Brahmanical religious texts are today called OBCs. The tales of valour of the heroes and heroines of this class are not found in history or the Puranas. These tales live on through the oral tradition of folklore. Unlike Dwij heroheroines, the statues of OBC hero-heroines are not installed in temples but in deeh-dihwars (small makeshift mud temples) outside villages and their female warriors in the sati maiya chaura (a place where a woman is supposed to have committed Sati). I live in a small town, Sasaram, in Bihar. Close by is Karpurwa, a village of the Koire caste. There, statues of innumerable historical personalities are installed on small columns of bricks in the fields. They include Sanwara Veer Baba, Nunwa Veer Baba and Banhva Veer Baba. When there have been so many OBC men of mettle in one village alone, their number in the innumerable villages and hamlets of India can only be imagined. While in some place, you will hear about the romance of Shobha Nayka Banjara, elsewhere, you are told about the valour of the two Yadavs, Manas Gop and Bulaki Gop, and yet another place may introduce you to the beauty of Gaango and Lachiya Panerin. Õýæ ÚUæÁð´Îý ÂýâæÎ çâ´ã ±×‡æßæÎè Ï×ü»ý´Íô´ ×ð́ çÁ‹ãð́ àæêÎý ·¤ãæ »Øæ ãñ, ßð ãè ¥æÁ âæÏæÚU‡æÌØæ ¥ôÕèâè ·Ô¤ Ùæ× âð ÁæÙð ÁæÌð ãñ́Ð §â ÌÕ·Ô¤ ·Ô¤ ¥çÏ·¤æ´àæ ÙæØ·¤-ÙæçØ·¤æ¥ô´ ·Ô¤ ØàæSßè ·¤æØü §çÌãæâ-ÂéÚUæ‡æô´ ·Ô¤ Âóææð́ ×ð́ Ùãè´ ÕçË·¤ Üô·¤»æÍæ¥ô´ ·¤è ßæç¿·¤ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ×ð́ çÁ´Îæ ãñÐ çmÁ ÙæØ·¤-ÙæçØ·¤æ¥ô´ ·¤è Öæ´çÌ ¥ôÕèâè ÙæØ·¤-ÙæçØ·¤æ°¡ ×´çÎÚUô´ ×ð́ SÍæçÂÌ Ùãè´ ãñ́ ÕçË·¤ §Ù·¤æ ßæâ »æ¡ß ·Ô¤ ÕæãÚU Çèã-çÇãßæÚUô´ ×ð́ ãñ ¥õÚU §Ù·¤è ßèÚUæ´»Ùæ°¡ âÌè ×ñØæ ·Ô¤ ¿õÚUô´ ×ð́ ÁèçßÌ ãñ́Ð ×ñ´ çÕãæÚU ·Ô¤ ÀôÅUð âð àæãÚU âæâæÚUæ× ×ð´ ÚUãÌæ ãêд §ââð âÅUæ ·¤ô§ÚUè ÁæçÌ ·¤æ °·¤ »æ¡ß ãñ-·¤ÚUÂÚé UßæÐ ßãæ¡ ·Ô¤ ¹ðÌ-¹çÜãæÙô´ ×ð´ Ù ÁæÙð ç·¤ÌÙð °ðçÌãæçâ·¤ ßèÚU ÂéL¤á §ǘÅU-׿ÅUè ·Ô¤ É´ãê ô´ ÂÚU SÍæçÂÌ ãñ-´ âæ¡ßÚUæ ßèÚU ÕæÕæ, ÙéÙßæ ßèÚU ÕæÕæ ¥õÚU Õ‹ãßæ ßèÚU ÕæÕæÐ ÖæÚUÌ ·Ô¤ ÁÕ °·¤ »æ¡ß ·Ô¤ ¹ðÌ-¹çÜãæÙô´ ×ð´ ¥ôÕèâè ·Ô¤ §ÌÙð ßèÚU ãñ´ Ìô §â·Ô¤ ¥â´Ø »æ¡ßô´ ×ð´ ç·¤ÌÙð ßèÚU ÂéL¤á ãô´»,ð §â·¤è ·¤ËÂÙæ ·¤è Áæ â·¤Ìè ãñÐ ·¤ãè´ Õ´ÁæÚUæ ÁæçÌ ·Ô¤ ÒàææðÖæ ÙØ·¤æ ÕÙÁæÚUæÓ ·¤æ Âý‡æØ ¥æØæÙ ãñ, ·¤ãè´ ØæÎß ÁæçÌ ·Ô¤ ×Ùâ »ô ¥õÚU ÕéÜæ·¤è »ô ·¤è àææñØü »æÍæ°¡ ãñ´ Ìô ·¤ãè´ »æ´»ô ÌÍæ Üç¿Øæ ÂÙðçÚUÙ ·¤æ âõ´ÎØôüÂæØæÙ ãñÐ 35 BAHUJAN 36 FOLKLORES OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press Here are some of the key OBC heroes and heroines gleaned from the folktales of the Hindi-speaking states: çã´Îè ÂýÎðàæ ·¤è çßçÖóæ Üô·¤»æÍæ¥ô´ ×ð´ ßç‡æüÌ ·¤éÀ Âý×é¹ ¥ôÕèâè ÙæØ·¤-ÙæçØ·¤æ¥ô´ ·¤æ çßßÚU‡æ çÙÙæ´ç·¤Ì ãñÐ Lorik: He was a Yadav by caste. The story of his life and times has become a part of the folklore not only in north India but also in West Bengal and even south India. Chandayan (1379AD), written by Dawood, Mainasat by Sadhana, Mainasatwanti (Dakkhini) by Gavvasi and Lor Chandrani in Bangla written by Daulat Quazi – all relate his tale. In the Maithil area of Bihar, the story of HarwaHarwa is woven into several folk songs. In Bhojpuri, it is called Loriki. The Mirzapuri version of this folktale has been compiled by W. Crook. The Chhattisgarhi version has been translated into English by Father Verrier Elwin. Thus, Lorik’s character is found in the folk literature of almost all dialects of Hindi. Lorik personifies the great lover and a brave warrior. ÜôçÚU·¤ Ñ ÜôçÚU·¤ ØæÎß ÁæçÌ ·Ô¤ ãñ´Ð §Ù·¤è ·¤ãæÙè â×SÌ ©žæÚU ÖæÚUÌ, Õ´»æÜ ¥õÚU Îçÿæ‡æ ÖæÚUÌ Ì·¤ ×ð´ Âý¿çÜÌ ãñÐ Îæª¤Î ·¤ëÌ Ò¿´ÎæØÙÓ (v|~ §ü.) ¥õÚU âæÏÙ ·¤ëÌ Ò×ñÙæâÌÓ âð Üð·¤ÚU »Ãßæâè ÚUç¿Ì Ò×ñÙæâÌß´ÌèÓ (Îç€U¹Ùè) ÌÍæ Õ´»Üæ ×ð´ ÎõÜÌ ·¤æÁè ÚUç¿Ì ÒÜôÚU ¿´ÎýæÙèÓ Ì·¤ ÜôçÚU·¤ ·¤è »õÚUß»æÍæ ·¤æ çßSÌæÚU ãñÐ ×ñçÍÜè ÂýÎðàæ ×ð´ ÜôçÚU·¤ ¥õÚU ãÚUßæ-ãÚUßæ ·¤è »æÍæ ¥çÏ·¤ »æ§ü ÁæÌè ãñÐ ÖôÁÂéÚUè ×ð´ §âð ÒÜôçÚU·¤èÓ ·¤ãÌð ãñ´Ð §â·Ô¤ ç×ÁæüÂéÚUè M¤Â ·¤ô ÇŽËØê. ·ýꤷ¤ Ùð °·¤˜æ ç·¤Øæ ãññÐ §â Üô·¤»æÍæ ·Ô¤ Àžæèâ»É¸è M¤Â ·¤æ ȤæÎÚU ßñçÚUØÚU °çËßÙ Ùð ¥´»ýðÁè ×ð´ ¥ÙéßæÎ ç·¤Øæ ãñÐ §â Âý·¤æÚU çã´Îè ·¤è ÂýæØÑ âÖè ÕôçÜØô´ ×ð´ ÜôçÚU·¤ ·Ô¤ ¿çÚU˜æ ·¤æ ߇æüÙ ãñÐ ÜôçÚU·¤ ÖæÚUÌèØÌæ âð ¥ôÌÂýôÌ °·¤ Âýð×è ¥õÚU ßèÚU ÂéL¤á ã´ñÐ Vijaymal: He is one of the central characters of the tales of valour related in Bhojpuri folksongs. Vijaymal, who was a Teli by caste, is also referred to as Kunwar Bijai. Like Lorik, he too symbolized medieval bravery and magnanimity. In Vijaymal’s tales, the description of marriage and love takes the backseat while battles occupy centre stage. The folksongs, which are sung only in Bhojpuri, are about a unique combination of romance and valour. Kunwar Vijaymal represents that ideal of Indian bravery which is a combination of maturity, patience and valour. çßÁØ×Ü Ñ ÖôÁÂéÚUè ·¤è ßèÚU»æÍæˆ×·¤ Üô·¤»æÍæ¥ô´ ×ð´ ÒçßÁØ×ÜÓ ¥Íßæ Ò·¤é¡ßÚU-çÕÁ§üÓ ·¤æ Âý×é¹ SÍæÙ ãñÐ çßÁØ×Ü ÌðÜè ÁæçÌ ·Ô¤ ÍðÐ ßèÚU ÜôçÚU·¤ ·Ô¤ â×æÙ çßÁØ×Ü Öè ×ŠØØé»èÙ ßèÚUÌæ ¥õÚU ©ÎæÚUÌæ ·Ô¤ ÂýÌè·¤ ãñ´Ð çßÁØ×Ü ·¤è ·¤ãæÙè ×ð´ çßßæã Âýâ´» »õ‡æ ¥õÚU Øéh ÂýÏæÙ ÕÙ ÁæÌæ ãñÐ ·Ô¤ßÜ ÖôÁÂéÚUè ÂýÎðàæ ×ð´ »æØð ÁæÙð ßæÜð §â »èÌ ×ð´ ßèÚU ÚUâ ¥õÚU oë´»æÚU ÚUâ ·¤æ ÕðÁôÇ â׿»× ãñÐ ·¤é¡ßÚU çßÁØ×Ü ÖæÚUÌèØ ßèÚUÌæ ·Ô¤ ©â ¥æÎàæü ·¤ô ÂýSÌéÌ ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´, çÁâð ÒÏèÚUßèÚUÓ ·¤ãæ ÁæÌæ ãñÐ Bala Lakhandar: He is the key character of the folktale Sati Bihula. The song that tells this tale is sung widely, all the way from the Bhojpur and Mithilanchal regions of Bihar to Bengal, to Basti, Gonda and Gorakhpur districts of Uttar Pradesh. The central character of this folktale is Bihula, who tries everything to revive her dead husband Lakhandar. The tale reminds one of the Puranic story of Savitri and Satyavan. The name of Bala Lakhandar’s father is Chandu Sahu. Obviously, Bala Lakhandar comes from a Sahu family. In the Mithilanchal, this folktale is called Bihula Vishhari and its writer is said to be Kosho Saav. In the Bengali version of this folktale, Chandu Sahu is given more prominence than Bihula. Sati Bihula also includes a description of how Bala Lakhandar gets attracted to the ethereal beauty of Bihula. տܿ ܹ´ÎÚU Ñ ÕæÜæ ܹ´ÎÚU Üô·¤»æÍæ ÒâÌè çÕãéÜæÓ ·Ô¤ Âý×¹ é ¿çÚU˜æ ãñд Õ´»æÜ Ì·¤ çßSÌæçÚUÌ Øã Üô·¤»æÍæ â×SÌ ÖôÁÂéÚUè ÂýÎàð æ, ¥´» ÂýÎàð æ ß ç×çÍÜæ´¿Ü âð Üð·¤ÚU ÕSÌè, »ô´Çæ °ß´ »ôÚU¹ÂéÚU çÁÜô´ Ì·¤ »æ§ü ÁæÌè ãñÐ ÒâÌè ȤæòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ | ¥€ÅêUÕÚU 2014 ÕãéÁÙ Üæð·¤»æÍæ°´ çÕãéÜæÓ ·¤è Üô·¤»æÍæ ×𴠷Ԥδ èý Ø ¿çÚU˜æ çÕãéÜæ ãñ Áô ¥ÂÙð ÂçÌ ÕæÜæ ܹ´ÎÚU ·Ô¤ ÂéÙÁèüßÙ ·Ô¤ çܰ ¥Ùð·¤ ÂýØæâ ·¤ÚUÌè ãñÐ çÕãéÜæ ·¤æ ¿çÚU˜æ âæçߘæè ¥õÚU âˆØßæÙ ·¤è ÂõÚUæç‡æ·¤ ·¤Íæ ·Ô¤ âæçߘæè Âæ˜æ âð ×ðÜ ÚU¹Ìæ ãñÐ ÕæÜæ ܹ´ÎÚU ·Ô¤ çÂÌæ ·¤æ Ùæ× ¿´Îê âæã ãñ, ÁæçãÚU ãñ ç·¤ տܿ ܹ´ÎÚU âæãê ÂçÚUßæÚU âð ¥æÌð ãñд ç×çÍÜæ´¿Ü ×ð´ Øã Üô·¤»æÍæ ÒçÕãéÜæ çßàæãÚUèÓ ·Ô¤ Ùæ× âð ØæÌ ãñ ¥õÚU §â·Ô¤ ÚU¿çØÌæ ·Ô¤àææð âæß ÕÌæ° ÁæÌð ãñд Õ´»æÜ ·¤è §â Üô·¤»æÍæ ×ð´ ¿´Îê âæã ·¤ô çÕãéÜæ âð ¥çÏ·¤ ×ãˆß ç×Üæ ãñÐ ÒâÌè çÕãéÜæÓ ×ð´ çÕãéÜæ ·Ô¤ ¥Üõç·¤·¤ Üæß‡Ø âð ¥æ·¤çáüÌ ãô·¤ÚU տܿ ܹ´ÎÚU ·¤æ ©â·Ô¤ Âý×ð ·¤ô ÂæÙð ·¤æ Âý‡æØæØæÙ ãñÐ Guliya Mai: An OBC, Gulia Mai belonged to what is now Ghazipur district in Uttar Pradesh. Emperor Ashoka had a pillar erected in her name. That Ashoka was moved to do this shows what a great warrior Gulia Mai must have been. »éçÜØæ ׿§ü Ñ ©žæÚU ÂýÎðàæ ·Ô¤ ßÌü×æÙ »æÁèÂéÚU çÁÜð ·¤è »éçÜØæ ׿§ü ¥ôÕèâè ÌÕ·Ô¤ âð Íè´Ð »éçÜØæ ׿§ü ·¤è S×ëçÌ ×ð´ â×ýæÅU ¥àææð·¤ mæÚUæ çßàææÜ·¤æØ SÌ´Ö SÍæçÂÌ ç·¤Øæ »ØæÐ ¥æÂ âô¿ â·¤Ìð ãñ´ ç·¤ »éçÜØæ ׿§ü ç·¤ÌÙè ÂýÌæÂè ßèÚUæ´»Ùæ ãô´»è ç·¤ â×ýæÅU ¥àææð·¤ Ùð ©Ù·¤è S×ëçÌ ×ð´ SÌ´Ö SÍæçÂÌ ·¤ÚUßæØæÐ Sohani: Sohani is the protagonist of Punjab’s famous love story Sohani-Mahiwal. Devendra Satyarthi has written that Sohani is the daughter of a potter and lives in a village on the banks of the Chenab. Mahiwal, a prince, is bowled over by the beauty of Sohani and decides to stay put just opposite her village. Sohani-Mahiwal is a story of platonic love. Everyday, Sohani swims across the river – using an earthen pitcher to keep herself afloat – to meet her sweetheart. She hides the pitcher in the bushes near the river. One day, her sister-in-law replaces the baked pitcher with an unbaked one. With the name of her lover on her lips, Sohani drowns in the river as the unbaked pitcher melts away. Sohani is a symbol of ideal love. âôã‡æè Ñ âôã‡æè ´ÁæÕ ·¤è Âýð× »æÍæ Òâôã‡æè ×ãèßæÜÓ ·¤è ÙæçØ·¤æ ãñÐ Îðßð‹Îý âˆØæÍèü Ùð çܹæ ãñ ç·¤ âôã‡æè °·¤ ·¤éãæÚU ·¤è ·¤‹Øæ ãñ ¥õÚU ç¿Ùæß ·Ô¤ ÌèÚU ÂÚU °·¤ »æ¡ß ×ð´ ÚUãÌè ãñÐ ßãè´ ×ãèᑚ °·¤ ÚUæÁ·¤é׿ÚU ãñ ¥õÚU âôã‡æè ·Ô¤ M¤Â-ÚU´» ÂÚU ×é‚Ï ãô·¤ÚU ©â·Ô¤ »æ¡ß ·Ô¤ Æè·¤ âæ×Ùð ÏêÙè ÚU׿·¤ÚU ÕñÆ ÁæÌæ ãñÐ Òâôã‡æè ×ãèßæÜÓ âæçˆß·¤ Âýð× ·¤è ¥×ÚU »æÍæ ãñÐ âôã‡æè çÙˆØÂýçÌ ƒæÇ¸ð ÂÚU ÌñÚU·¤ÚU ¥ÂÙð çÂýØÌ× ×ãèᑚ ·Ô¤ Âæâ ÁæØæ · ÚUÌè ÍèÐ âôã‡æè ¥ÂÙæ ÂP¤æ ƒæÇ¸æ ç¿Ùæß ·Ô¤ ç·¤ÙæÚUð ÛææÇ¸è ×ð´ çÀÂæÌè ÍèÐ °·¤ çÎÙ ©â·¤è ÙÙÎ Ùð ÂP¤ð ƒæÇ¸ð ·¤è Á»ã ·¤‘¿æ ƒæÇ¸æ ÚU¹ çÎØæÐ ©â ·¤‘¿ð ƒæÇ¸ð ·Ô¤ âãæÚUð ÙÎè ÂæÚU ·¤ÚUÌð âôã‡æè ¥ÂÙð çÂýØÌ× ·¤æ Ùæ× ÜðÌð ãé° ÇêÕ »§üÐ âôã‡æè ¥‹æ‹Ø Âýð× ·¤è ç×âææÜ ãñÐ Dayal Singh: He is the hero of the Maithili folktale Durla Dayal. In the folktale, Dayal Singh introduces himself: “My name is Durla Dayal, village Bharoda. My father’s name is Vishambhar Sahni and my mother’s name is Gajmoti.” Dayal Singh is not only the valiant folk hero of the Nishads but also the deity of Mallahs (boatmen). He is a Mallah by caste but is an accomplished dancer too – that is why he is also known as natua (dancer). In Angika, he is referred to as Natua Dayal and is married to Amrautia, the daughter of Bhaura Godin. All the sisters of Amrautia have already lost their husbands. So, Dayal Singh travels to Kamakhya to seek divine blessings. After coming back from there and crossing a series of hurdles, he brings his wife home. The tale reveals Dayal Singh’s exemplary courage. ÎØæÜ çâ´ã Ñ ×ñçÍÜè Üô·¤»æÍæ ÒÎéÜÚUæ ÎØæÜÓ ·Ô¤ ÙæØ·¤ ÎØæÜ çâ´ã ãñ´Ð §â Üô·¤»æÍæ ×ð´ ÎØæÜ çâ´ã ¥æˆ×ÂçÚU¿Ø ÎðÌð ãé° ·¤ãÌæ ãñ ç·¤ ×ðÚUæ Ùæ× ÎéÜÚUæ ÎØæÜ, ƒæÚU ÖÚUõǸæ, çÂÌæ ·¤æ Ùæ× çßàß´ÖÚU âãÙè ¥õÚU ×æÌæ ·¤æ Ùæ× »Á×ôÌè ãñÐ Øã ÎØæÜ çâ´ã ÎÚU¥âÜ çÙáæÎ ·¤éÜ ·Ô¤ ßèÚU »æÍæÙæØ·¤ °ß´ ׄæãô´ ·Ô¤ Üô·¤ÎðßÌæ Öè ãñ´Ð ßð ÁæçÌ ·Ô¤ ׄæã ãñ´ ÂÚU ÙëˆØ çÙÂé‡æÌæ ·Ô¤ ·¤æÚU‡æ ©‹ãð´ ÒÙÅUé¥æÓ (ÙÌü·¤) Öè ·¤ãæ ÁæÌæ ãñ §âèçܰ ¥´ç»·¤æ ×ð´ ©‹ãð´ ÒÙÅU饿 ÎØæÜÓ ·Ô¤ Ùæ× âð ÁæÙæ ÁæÌæ ãñÐ ©Ù·¤æ çßßæã ¥´ç»·¤æ Üô·¤»æÍæ ×ð´ ÖõÚUæ »ôçɸ٠·¤è ÕðÅUè ¥×ÚUõçÌØæ âð ã饿 ãñÐ ¥×ÚUõçÌØæ ·Ô¤ çßßæã âð Âêßü ©â·¤è çÁÌÙè ÕãÙô´ ·Ô¤ çßßæã ãé° ãñ´, âÖè ·Ô¤ ÎêËãô´ ·¤ô ÕãéÚUæ »ôçɸ٠¹æ ¿é·¤è ãñ §âèçܰ ÎØæÜ çâ´ã Ò»ßÙæÓ ·Ô¤ Âêßü çâçh ·Ô¤ çܰ ·¤æ×M¤Â ·¤æ×æØæ ÁæÌð ãñ´Ð çâçh Âýæ#·¤ÚU ÂéÙÑ çßçßÏ ÕæÏæ¥ô´ ·¤ô ÂæÚU ·¤ÚUÌð ãé° Â%è ·¤ô ƒæÚU Üð ¥æÌð ãñ´Ð §â×ð´ ÎØæÜ çâ´ã ·¤æ ÂÚUæR¤× ©fæçÅUÌ ã饿 ãñÐ 37 BAHUJAN 38 FOLKLORES OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press Bisunath: Bisunath is the central character of the Angika folktale Baba Bisunath. It is believed that Bisunath lived during the reign of Mohammed Shah (1719-48). His father was Baljeet Gop while his mother was Champawati, who lived in Bhitti Chanel Nagar. His younger brother was Avahd Manhaun and his elder sister Bhagomanti. They owned 90 lakh cows. In the month of Magha he reached the village for gauna. After gauna, he started for Bathan, where he lived. On the way, he had to cross the Kosi River. He asked Mohan Mandal to get a boat to take him across the river but Mohan tried to wriggle out of the task by giving some excuse. One day, there was a quarrel between Bisunath and Mohan. On hearing about the quarrel from her son Mohan, an enraged Bhauran sent Lilia, the tigress, to Bisunath. He, however, did not hurt the tigress and allowed himself to be killed, with the name of his mother Gaheli on his lips. Later, when 700 tigers came to the village, people started offering milk to Bisunath, who became a symbol of sacrifice. Though he was very strong and had supernatural powers, he did not harm a female animal. çÕâéÙæÍ Ñ ¥´ç»·¤æ Üô·¤»æÍæ ÒÕæÕæ çÕâéÚUæòÍÓ ·Ô¤ ·Ô¤´ÎýèØ ¿çÚU˜æ çÕâéÙæÍ ãñ´Ð ×æÙæ ÁæÌæ ãñ ç·¤ ÕæÕæ çÕâéÙæÍ ×éã×Î àæææã ·Ô¤ àææâÙ·¤æÜ (v|v~-y} §ü.) ×ð´ ×õÁêÎ ÚUãð ãô´»ðÐ §Ù·Ô¤ çÂÌæ ·¤æ Ùæ× ÕæÜÁèÌ »ô ¥õÚU ׿¡ ·¤æ Ùæ× ¿´ÂæßÌè Íæ, Áô çÖ_è ¿ÙðÜ âÕôÚU Ù»ÚU ·Ô¤ ßæâè ÍðÐ ©Ù·Ô¤ ÀôÅUð Öæ§ü ·¤æ Ùæ× ¥ßÏ ×‹ãõÙ ¥õÚU ÕǸè ÕãÙ ·¤æ Ùæ× Öæ»ô×´Ìè ÍæÐ ©Ù·Ô¤ Âæâ ÙŽÕð Üæ¹ »æØð´ Íè´ ¥õÚU ª¤¡¿è ¿ÚUæâè ×ð´ ©Ù·¤æ ÕÍæÙ ÍæÐ ×æƒæ ×ãèÙð ×ð´ ßð »ßÙæ ·Ô¤ çܰ »æ¡ß ¥æØð, »ßÙæ ·Ô¤ ÕæÎ ßð ÂéÙÑ ÕÍæÙ ·Ô¤ çܰ ¿Ü çÎØð, ÚUæSÌð ×ð´ ·¤ôâè ÙÎè ÂǸÌè ÍèÐ ©‹ãô´Ùð Ùæß ·Ô¤ çܰ ×ôãÙ ×´ÇÜ ·¤ô ÕéÜæØæ ç·¤´Ìé ×ôãÙ ×´ÇÜ Ùð ÕãæÙæ ·¤ÚU çÎØæÐ °·¤ çÎÙ çÕâéÙæÍ ¥õÚU ×ôãÙ ×ð´ Ûæ»Ç¸æ ãé¥æÐ ×ôãÙ Ùð ƒæÚU ÜõÅU·¤ÚU ƒæÅUÙæ ·¤è ÁæÙ·¤æÚUè ׿¡ Öõ´ÚUæ ·¤ô ÎèÐ R¤ôçÏÌ ãô·¤ÚU Öõ´ÚUæ Ùð çÜçÜØæ ÕæçƒæÙ ·¤ô çÕâéÙæÍ ·Ô¤ Âæâ ÖðÁ çÎØæÐ ÕæçƒæÙ ·¤ô ×æÎæ â×Ûæ·¤ÚU çÕâéÙæÍ Ùð ·¤éÀ Ùãè´ ç·¤Øæ ¥õÚU ׿¡ »ãðÜè ·¤æ S×ÚU‡æ ·¤ÚU·Ô¤ Âýæ‡æ ˆØæ» çÎØæÐ °·¤ çÎÙ âæÌ âõ Õæƒæ »æ¡ß ×ð´ ƒæéâ ¥æØð, ©âè çÎÙ âð âÖè çÕâéÙæÍ ·¤è ÕÍæÙè ÂÚU ÎêÏ ¿É¸æÙð Ü»ðÐ ÕæÕæ çÕâéÙæÍ ˆØæ» ·¤è ÂýçÌ×êçÌü ãñ́Ð ¥ˆØ´Ì àæçQ¤àææÜè °ß´ çâh ÂéL¤á ãôÌð ãé° Öè ßð ¥ÂÙð Âýæ‡æ ·¤æ ˆØæ» ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´ ÂÚU ×æÎæ ÕæçƒæÙ ·¤ô Ùé·¤âæÙ Ùãè´ ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´Ð Ranjha: Ranjha is the hero of the Punjabi folktale Heer-Ranjha. He is born into a Muslim Jat family at a place called Takht Hazare on the banks of the Chenab . He falls in love with Heer, a ravishing beauty who lives at a place called Jhang on the other side of the river. Heer is also in love with him and hence asks her father to hire Ranjha for grazing his buffaloes. Heer goes to the forests every day, carrying delicious food for Ranjha. She is married to a young man, Saida, of Khaida caste, who lives at Rangpur but Heer somehow,manages to remain a virgin. Ranjha reaches the place of Heer’s husband and manages to free her through trickery. Heer returns to her father’s place. Promising Ranjha that he would let his daughter marry him, Heer’s father asks him to come with a baraat. However, once Ranjha leaves, Heer’s father murders her. Unable to bear the shock, Ranjha dies. Heer-Ranjha is one of the immortal love stories of our country. ÚUæ¡Ûææ Ñ Â´ÁæÕè Âýð× »æÍæ ÒãèÚU-ÚUæ¡ÛææÓ ·Ô¤ ÙæØ·¤ ÚUæ¡Ûææ ãñÐ ÚUæ¡Ûææ ·¤æ Á‹× ç¿Ùæß ÙÎè ·Ô¤ ç·¤ÙæÚUð ÌÌ ãÁæÚUð Ùæ×·¤ SÍæÙ ÂÚU °·¤ ×éçSÜ× ÁæÅU ·Ô¤ ƒæÚU ã饿 ÍæÐ ç¿Ùæß ·Ô¤ ÎêâÚUð ç·¤ÙæÚUð çSÍÌ Ûæ´» Ùæ×·¤ SÍæÙ ·¤è çâØæÜ ÁæçÌ ·¤è °·¤ ¥ÙéÂ× âé´ÎÚUè ãèÚU âð ©Ù·¤æ Âýð× ÍæÐ ãèÚU Öè ©ââð Âýð× ·¤ÚUÌè Íè, §âèçܰ ãèÚU Ùð çÂÌæ â𠷤㷤ÚU ÚUæ¡Ûææ ·¤ô Öñ´â ¿ÚUæÙð ·¤æ ·¤æ× çÎÜæØæÐ ãèÚU Sߨ´ ©â·Ô¤ çܰ ÙæÙæ ·¤ßæÙ Á´»Ü ×ð´ Üð ÁæÌèÐ ãèÚU ·¤æ çßßæã ÚU´»ÂéÚU çÙßæâè ¹ñÇæ ÁæçÌ ·Ô¤ Øéß·¤ âñÎæ ·Ô¤ âæÍ ãô ÁæÌæ ãñ Üðç·¤Ù ãèÚU ¥ÂÙæ âÌèˆß âéÚUçÿæÌ ÚU¹Ìè ãñÐ ÚUæ¡Ûææ âæÏé ßðàæ ×ð´ Áæ·¤ÚU ÀÜ-ÕÜ âð ãèÚU ·¤ô ×éQ¤ ·¤ÚUæÌæ ãñÐ ãèÚU çÂÌæ ·Ô¤ ƒæÚU ßæÂâ ÜõÅUÌè ãñÐ ãèÚU ·¤æ çÂÌæ ÚUæ´Ûææ âð àæææÎè ·¤æ ÛæêÆæ ßæÎæ ·¤ÚU ©âð ÕæÚUæÌ ÜæÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ ÖðÁ ãèÚU ·¤è ãˆØæ ·¤ÚU ÎðÌæ ãñÐ §â ¹ÕÚU âð Îé¹è ÚUæ¡Ûææ ·¤è ×ëˆØé ãô ÁæÌè ãñÐ ÖæÚUÌèØ ÁÙ׿Ùâ ×ð´ ÚUæ´Ûææ ·¤æ Âýð× ¥×ÚU ãñUÐ Sorthi: Sorthi, a great beauty, is the heroine of a Kaurvi folktale. She belongs to a family of potters. She has a crush on a Banjara called Tapsi and elopes with him. Then the king Oda enters the narrative. He wants to marry Sorthi. He sends his nephew to Tapsi to ‘free’ Sorthi but she then falls in love with the nephew. A battle ensues between the king and his nephew in which the latter is killed but rather than marrying the king, Sorthi prefers to commit sati. Besides Bhojpuri, Sorthi’s folktale is also sung in Maithili and Magahi. Sorthi’s idealism and commitment are central to the story. ȤæòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ | ¥€ÅêUÕÚU 2014 ÕãéÁÙ Üæð·¤»æÍæ°´ RATHER THAN MARRYING THE KING, SORTHI PREFERS TO COMMIT SATI. ... SORTHI’S IDEALISM AND COMMITMENT ARE CENTRAL TO THE STORY âôÚUÆè ÚUUæÁæ âð çßßæã ·¤ÚUÙð ·Ô¤ ÕÁæ° âÌè ãôÙæ Ââ´Î ·¤ÚUÌè ãñÐ §â Üô·¤»æÍæ ×ð´ ¥æÎàæü ¥õÚU SÈê çÌü ·¤æ ·Ô¤´Îý âôÚUÆè ·¤æ ÁèßÙ ¿çÚU˜æ ãñ âôÚUÆè Ñ ·¤õÚUßè Âýð×»æÍæ ·¤è ¥ÙéÂ× âé´ÎÚUè ·¤éãæçÚUÙ ÙæçØ·¤æ âôÚUÆè ãñÐ âôÚUÆè ÂãÜð ÌÂâè Ùæ×·¤ Õ´ÁæÚUð ÂÚU ×é‚Ï ãô·¤ÚU ©â·Ô¤ âæÍ ¿Üè ÁæÌè ãñÐ ÕæÎ ×ð´ §â »æÍæ ×ð´ ÚUæÁæ ¥ôǸ ·¤æ Âýßðàæ ãôÌæ ãñÐ ÚUæÁæ âôÚUÆè âð çßßæã ·¤ÚUÙð ·¤ô §‘Àé·¤ ãñÐ ÚUæÁæ ¥ÂÙð Öæ¡Áð ·¤ô ÌÂâè Õ´ÁæÚUð ·Ô¤ Âæâ ÖðÁ·¤ÚU âôÚUÆè ·¤ô Ò×éQ¤Ó ·¤ÚUæÌæ ãñÐ ÚUæÁæ ¥ôǸ âôÚUÆè ·Ô¤ âæÍ çßßæã ·¤ÚUÙð ·¤æ ÂýØæâ ·¤ÚUÌæ ãñ ÂÚU âôÚUÆè ÚUæÁæ ·Ô¤ Öæ¡Áð ·¤ô Ââ´Î ·¤ÚUÙð Ü»Ìè ãñÐ §â ÕæÌ ·¤ô Üð·¤ÚU ÚUæÁæ ¥ôǸ ß ©â·Ô¤ Öæ´Áð ·Ô¤ Õè¿ ãéØð Øéh ×ð´ Öæ´Áæ ׿ÚUæ ÁæÌæ ãñÐ Üðç·¤Ù âôÚUÆè ÚUæÁæ âð çßßæã ·¤ÚUÙð ·Ô¤ ÕÁæ° âÌè ãô ÁæÙæ Ââ´Î ·¤ÚUÌè ãñÐ ÖôÁÂéÚUè ·Ô¤ ¥çÌçÚUQ¤ ×ñçÍÜè ¥õÚU ×»ãè ×ð´ Öè âôÚUÆè ·¤è Üô·¤»æÍæ »æ§ü ÁæÌè ãñÐ §â Üô·¤»æÍæ ×ð´ ¥æÎàæü ¥õÚU SÈêçÌü ·¤æ ·Ô¤´Îý âôÚUÆè ·¤æ ÁèßÙ ¿çÚU˜æ ãñÐ Kalar Sundari: The tale Kalar Sundari or Bahadur Kalarin is told in the form of a song. The story is about a place called Sorar, now in the Balod tehsil of Durg district in Chhattisgarh. In Sorar, Bahadur Kalarin and her son are worshipped as village deities. Kalar Sundari, belonging to the Kalar caste, was extremely good-looking. Mesmerised by her beauty, a prince forcibly marries her and abandons her after she becomes pregnant. A son is born and is named Chacchan Chora. Once he grows up, he realizes how his mother was cheated. Out of revenge, he starts abducting daughters of feudal families and marrying them. He abducts eight Kori girls but he is still dissatisfied. Kalar Sundari, on the other hand, cannot bear to see the pain and distress of the abducted girls. One day, she pushes her son into a well and then commits suicide by stabbing herself with a katar (dagger). The son performs his duty towards his mother, the mother towards society. ·¤ÜæÚU âé´ÎÚUè Ñ ·¤ÜæÚU âé´ÎÚUè Øæ ÕãæÎéÚU ·¤ÜæçÚUÙ ·¤æ ·¤Íæ-»èÌ Àžæèâ»É¸ ·Ô¤ Îé»ü çÁÜð ·¤è ÕæÜõÎ ÌãâèÜ ×ð´ çSÍÌ âôÚUÚU âð ÁéÇ¸è °·¤ Üô·¤»æÍæ ãñÐ âôÚUÚU ×ð´ ÒÕãæÎéÚU ·¤ÜæçÚUÙÓ ¥õÚU ©â·Ô¤ Âé˜æ ·¤ô »ýæ× Îðßè ¥õÚU »ýæ× ÎðßÌæ ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ ÂêÁæ ÁæÌæ ãñÐ ·¤ÜæÚU âé´ÎÚUè ÁæçÌ ·¤è ·¤ÜæÚU ¥õÚU ¥çmÌèØ âé´ÎÚUè ÍèÐ ©â·Ô¤ ¥ÙéÂ× âõ´ÎØü ÂÚU ×é‚Ï ãô·¤ÚU °·¤ ÚUæÁÂé˜æ Ùð ©ââð »´Ïßü çßßæã ·¤ÚU çÜØæÐ »ÖüßÌè ãôÙð ÂÚU ©âÙð ·¤ÜæÚU âé´ÎÚUè ·¤ô ˆØæ» çÎØæÐ §â çßßæã âð ©âð °·¤ Âé˜æ ã饿 çÁâ·¤æ Ùæ× ÒÀÀæÙ ÀôÚUæÓ ÍæÐ ÕæçÜ» ãôÙð ÂÚU ©âÙð ׿´ ·¤æ ÎÎü â×Ûææ ¥õÚU ÂýçÌçR¤ØæSßM¤Â âæ×´Ìß»ü ·¤è ÕðçÅUØô´ ·¤æ ¥ÂãÚU‡æ ·¤ÚU çßßæã ·¤ÚUÙð Ü»æÐ ÕÌæØæ ÁæÌæ ãñ ç·¤ ©âÙð ¥æÆ ·¤ôÚUè ·¤‹Øæ¥ô´ ·¤æ ¥ÂãÚU‡æ ç·¤ØæÐ ÕæßÁêÎ §â·Ô¤ ßã â´ÌéC Ùãè´ ÍæÐ ·¤ÜæÚU âé´ÎÚUè ¥ÂNÌ çS˜æØô´ ·¤è ßðÎÙæ âð Îé¹è ÍèÐ °·¤ çÎÙ ©âÙð ¥ÂÙð Âé˜æ ·¤ô ·¤é¡° ×ð´ ɷԤܷ¤ÚU ·¤ÅUæÚU âð ¥æˆ×ãˆØæ ·¤ÚU ÜèÐ §Uâ ·¤Íæ ·¤æð Îð¹Ùð ·¤æ °·¤ ÙÁçÚUØæ ØãU ãñU ç·¤, Áãæ´ ׿¡ Ùð â׿Á-Ï×ü çÙÖæØæ ßãè´ Âé˜æ Ùð ׿Ìë-Ï×ü ·¤æ ÂæÜÙ ·¤ÚUÌð ãéØð â׿Á ·Ô¤ â×ÿæ ¥æÎàæü SÍæçÂÌ ç·¤ØæÐ These are but a few of the better known folktales of valiant and/or romantic OBCs heroes and heroines. Since most of these largely remain as part of the oral folklore, the challenge is for Bahujan academics to begin to record and document these before they fade away under the onslaught of the mass media. Instead, the media need to harnessed as tools to capture and propagate this rich treasury of our culture. Rajendra Prasad Singh is a well-known linguist and Hindi critic. He is a Professor of Hindi in the SP Jain College, Sasaram (Bihar). Øð ßèÚU Øæðhæ ¥õÚU M¤×æÙè ¥ôÕèâè ÙæØ·¤-ÙæçØ·¤æ¥ô´ ÂÚU ¥æÏæçÚUÌ ¿éçÙ‹Îæ Üô·¤·¤Íæ°¡ ãñ´Ð §Ù×ð´ âð ¥çÏ·¤æ´àæ ·Ô¤ßÜ ßæç¿·¤ ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ×ð´ ÁèçßÌ ãñ´Ð ÕãéÁÙ çàæÿææçßÎô´ ·Ô¤ âæ×Ùð ¿éÙõÌè Øã ãñ ·¤è ×èçÇØæ ·Ô¤ ¥ÙßÚUÌ ã×Üð ·Ô¤ ¿ÜÌð §Ù ·¤Íæ¥ô´ ·Ô¤ ÁÙ׿Ùâ âð çßS×ëÌ ãôÙð ·Ô¤ ÂãÜð §‹ãð´ çÜç¹Ì SßL¤Â Îð çÎØæ ÁæØðÐ ÕçË·¤ ×èçÇØæ ¥æñÚU àææðŠæ â´SÍæÙæð´ ·¤æ §SÌð×æÜ ã׿ÚUè âæ´S·¤ëçÌ·¤ çßÚUæâÌ ·Ô¤ §â ¹ÁæÙð ·¤ô â´ÚUçÿæÌ ¥õÚU Âý¿æçÚUÌ ·¤ÚUÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ ç·¤Øæ ÁæØðÐ ÚUæÁð´Îý ÂýâæÎ çâ´ã ØæçÌÂýæ# Öæáæ ßñ™ææçÙ·¤ ß çã´Îè ·Ô¤ ¿ç¿üÌ ¥æÜô¿·¤ ãñ´Ð ßð °âÂè ÁñÙ ·¤æòÜðÁ, âæâæÚUæ× (çÕãUæÚU) ·Ô¤ SÙæÌ·¤æðžæÚUU çã´Îè çßÖæ» ×ð´ ÂýæŠØæÂ·¤ ãñ´Ð 39 BAHUJAN 40 SONGS OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press Bhojpuri songs of toil ÖôÁÂéÚUè Ÿæ× »èÌ THESE WOULD REVEAL THAT, AS OPPOSED TO THE PARASITIC EXISTENCE OF THE DWIJ CASTES, WORK AND PRODUCTION HAVE BEEN THE PRIME VALUES OF SHRAMAN CULTURE Øã âæÈ¸ ãñ ç·¤ çmÁ â´S·¤ëçÌ ·¤è ÂÚUÁèçßÌæ ·Ô¤ çßÂÚUèÌ Ÿæ× ¥õÚU ©ˆÂæÎÙ Ÿæ×‡æ â´S·¤ëçÌ ·Ô¤ ÁèßÙ ×êËØ ÚUãð ãñ´ JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV B ahujan culture is also known as Shraman or Arjak culture. The beauty of this Shraman culture manifests itself in almost all parts of the country in the traditional songs of the different castes of the Bahujan community. These labour songs must have been composed to help the working class lessen or forget its fatigue. Here are some casteand profession-specific labour songs of the Bhojpuri area: Key songs of Aheers: Many songs, dances and folk tales are popular among the Aheer or Yadav caste in the Bhojpuri area. Birha, Pharuwahi (Ahirau dance), Lorikayin or Chaneni are the key ones among them, which can still be heard and seen in the Bhojpuri area. Birha : As its name suggests, Birha is a song of virah (separation from one’s beloved). It is mainly sung while grazing cattle. When the shepherd, putting his finger one ear, raises the taan, it seems as if he is pouring out the pain of the entire society. In one of the Birhas, an elderly lady sermonizes young girls, “Pisna ke parikal musaria, tusaria; doodhwa ke parikal bilar; aapam jobanwa sambhariye e bitiywa, rahri mein lagal ba hundar” (Just as the flour stored in the house has to be protected from rats and milk from cats so should you protect your youth, for people with evil designs are eyeing them). Õ çÁÌð´Îý ·¤é׿ÚU ØæÎß ãéÁÙ â´S·¤ëçÌ ·¤ô Ÿæ×‡æ â´S·¤ëçÌ Øæ ¥Áü·¤ â´S·¤ëçÌ ·¤æ Ùæ× çÎØæ ÁæÌæ ãñÐ ÖæÚUÌ ·Ô¤ ֻܻ âÖè çãSâô´ ×ð´ §â Ÿæ×‡æ â´S·¤ëçÌ ·¤æ âõ´ÎØü ©Ù Ÿæ×»èÌô´ ×ð´ çÎ¹Ìæ ãñ, çÁ‹ãð´ ÕãéÁÙ â׿Á ·¤è çßçÖóæ ÁæçÌØæ´ ÂæÚU´ÂçÚU·¤ M¤Â âð »æÌè ¥æ ÚUãè ãñ´Ð §Ù »èÌô´ ·¤ô §‹ãô´Ùð Ÿæ× âð ©ÂÁè Í·¤æÙ ·¤ô ç×ÅUæÙð Øæ çßS×ëÌ ·¤ÚUÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ §ÁæÎ ç·¤Øæ ãô»æÐ ÖôÁÂéÚUè ÿæð˜æ ×ð´ Âý¿çÜÌ ·¤éÀ Âý×é¹ ÁæÌèØ ¥õÚU Ÿæ× »èÌô´ ·¤æ ÂçÚU¿Ø Øãæ´ çÎØæ Áæ ÚUãæ ãñÐ ¥ãèÚUô´ ·Ô¤ Âý×é¹ »è̤ ÖôÁÂéÚUè ÿæð˜æ ×ð´ çÙßæâ ·¤ÚUÙð ßæÜè ¥ãèÚU ¥ÍæüÌ÷ ØæÎß ÁæçÌ ×ð´ ·¤§ü Âý·¤æÚU ·Ô¤ »èÌ, ÙëˆØ ¥õÚU »æÍæ°´ Âý¿çÜÌ ãñ´Ð çÕÚUãæ, È M¤ßæãè (¥çãÚUª¤ Ùæ¿), ÜôçÚU·¤æ§Ù Øæ ¿ÙñÙè ¥æçÎ §Ù·Ô¤ »èÌ-ÙëˆØ ¥õÚU »æÍæ°´ ãñ´, çÁ‹ãð´ ¥æÁ Öè ÖôÁÂéÚUè §Üæ·Ô¤ ×ð´ Îð¹æ-âéÙæ Áæ â·¤Ìæ ãñÐ çÕÚUãæ Ñ ÒçÕÚUãæÓ ·¤æ Ùæ×·¤ÚU‡æ ©â·¤è çßáØßSÌé ÒçÕÚUãUÓ ·Ô¤ ·¤æÚU‡æ ÂǸæ ãô»æÐ ÂæÚU´ÂçÚU·¤ M¤Â âð Øã ¿ÚUßæãè ·Ô¤ âר »æØæ ÁæÌæ ãñÐ ¿ÚUßæãð ÁÕ °·¤ ·¤æÙ ×ð´ ¥ÂÙè ©´»Üè ÇæÜ ·¤ÚU SßÚU ·¤è Ü´Õè ÌæÙ ÜðÌð ãñ´ Ìô Áñâð ÂêÚUð â׿Á ·¤æ ÎÎü Èê ÅU ÂÇ¸Ìæ ãñÐ °·¤ çÕÚUãæ ×ð´ °·¤ Õêɸè S˜æè ÙߨéßçÌØô´ ·¤ô ©ÂÎðàæ ÎðÌð ãé° ·¤ãÌè ãñ-ÒçÂâÙæ ·Ô¤ ÂçÚU·¤Ü ×éâçÚUØæ ÌéâçÚUØæ, ÎêÏßæ ·Ô¤ ÂçÚU·¤Ü çÕÜæÚUÐ ¥æÂÙ ÁôÕÙßæ â´ÖçÚUãð ° çÕçÅUØßæ, ÚUãÚUè ×ð´ Üæ»Ü Õæ ãéò´Ç¸æÚUÐÓ ØæÙè, ÒçÁâ ȤæòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ ¥€ÅêUÕÚU 2014 | Of late, Birhas describing specific incidents are becoming popular. The hinterland of Ghazipur, Azamgarh and Banaras are known for Birha. Faruwahi Geet: Associated with the Yadav caste, this is a khela (sports) song. The singers perform various stunts while singing these songs. The stunts are mainly related to wrestling, and the songs are about valour and courage. They are sung by groups of up to ten. Some play instruments such as nagara, kartar and phar made of iron. The instrumentalists form a circle inside which the singers perform stunts. Lorikayan: This is the traditional storytelling song of the Yadavs. It has three different versions. In the Maithili and Maghahi areas it is called Lorikayan. In Bhojpuri area it is called Loriki and Lorikayan and in the Awadhi region, Chaneni. This story is based on the romance of Lorik and Chanda. Songs of Dhobhis: The songs sung by the Dhobhi caste, whose members have traditionally washed clothes for a living, are known as Dhobhiyau songs. In one such song, a dhobhi is telling his wife, “Tomorrow we have to the ‘ghat’ [The place on the bank of the river where clothes are washed] so prepare moti litti [a thick roti] and don’t forget to carry soap, tobacco and some fire.” The song goes like this: “Moti-moti litiya lagehe dhobiniya ki bihine chale ke ba ghat, teenahi cheezen mat bhulehe dhobhania ki tikiya, tamaku, thoda aag.” During their festivals, members of the Dhobhi caste sing and dance in groups. They play an instrument called hudka in these songs and dances, which are also called hudka dances. Songs of Kahars: The traditional work of this caste is carrying the doli or palki (palanquin). While taking the newlywed bride to her in-laws’ place, the Kahar sings, Budwa kaharwa ke aayee budhaia, to phekein talone mein jaal (The Kahar is old but he is still casting a net in the pond to catch fishes) to lighten the burden on his shoulders and forget his fatigue for a moment. Songs of Telis: The Teli caste is traditionally engaged in extracting oil from oilseeds. Earlier, a bullock-driven contraption called kolhu was used for the purpose. The Teli would start running the kolhu well before sunrise. While walking behind the bullock in the dark, he would sing songs that touched one’s heart. Besides love and romance, the songs are also about their work. One of the songs refers to ghani and extraction of oil using it. Kauni ki junia telin ghania are lagawe. Are kauni junjiya na. Koilari sabad sunaye ki kauni junia na. Adhi kee ratia Teliin ghania lagawe, ki pichli ratia na. Koilari sabad sunawe ki pichli ratia na (Oh Telin, when did you set up the ghani and when did I hear the call of the cuckoo? The Telin set up the ghani at midnight and I heard the call of the cuckoo last night). ÕãéÁÙ »èÌ Âý·¤æÚU ƒæÚU ×ð´ ÚU¹ð ¥æÅUæ ·¤ô ¿êãæ-¿éçãØô´ âð ¥õÚU ÎêÏ ·¤ô çÕ„è âð â´ÖæÜ·¤ÚU ÚU¹æ ÁæÌæ ãñ, ©âè Âý·¤æÚU Ìé× ¥ÂÙð ØõßÙ ·¤ô â´ÖæÜ·¤ÚU ÚU¹ô €UØô´ç·¤ ÎéC Üô» ÖðçǸØð ·¤è Öæ´çÌ ÌéãæÚUð ØõßÙ ·Ô¤ çܰ ƒææÌ Ü»æ° ãñ´ÐÓ ßÌü×æÙ ×ð´ çßçÖóæ ƒæÅUÙæ¥ô´ ÂÚU ¥æÏæçÚUÌ »æÍæˆ×·¤ çÕÚUãæ ·¤æ Âý¿ÜÙ ÕÉ¸Ìæ Áæ ÚUãæ ãñÐ »æÁèÂéÚU, ¥æÁ׻ɸ ¥õÚU ÕÙæÚUâ ·Ô¤ »ýæ×è‡æ §Üæ·Ô¤ çÕÚUãæ ·Ô¤ Âý×é¹ ·Ô¤‹Îý ãñ´Ð È L¤ßæãè »èÌ Ñ ØæÎß ÁæçÌ âð ÁéǸæ ×éØÌÑ ·¤ÚUÌÕ (¹ðÜæ) »æÙ ãñÐ §â·Ô¤ »ßñØæ »æÙð ·Ô¤ âæÍ âæÍ çßçÖóæ Âý·¤æÚU ·Ô¤ ·¤ÚUÌÕ çιæÌð ÚUãÌð ãñ´Ð Øã Ò·¤ÚUÌÕÓ¥ãèÚU ÁæçÌ ·¤è ÂãÜßæÙè âð ÁéǸæ ã饿 ãñÐ Øã ×éØÌÑ ßèÚU ÚUâ ÂýÏæÙ »èÌ ãñÐ §â×ð´ ֻܻ v® Üô»ô´ ·¤æ â×êã ãôÌæ ãñÐ ·¤éÀ Üô» ßæl Ø´˜æ Ùæ»æÚUæ, ·¤ÚUÌæÚU °ß´ Üôãð âð ÕÙæ È æÚU ÕÁæÌð ãñ´Ð Õè¿ ·Ô¤ ÕÇ¸ð ƒæðÚUð ×ð´ ·¤§ü È L¤ßæã »æÙæ »æÌð ß ÙëˆØ ·¤ÚUÌð ãé° Õè¿-Õè¿ ×ð´ ·¤ÚUÌÕ çιæÌð ãñ´Ð ÜôçÚU·¤æØÙ Ñ Øã ØæÎßô´ ·¤æ ÂæÚU´ÂçÚU·¤ ·¤Íæˆ×·¤ »èÌ ãñÐ §â·Ô¤ ÌèÙ Ùæ× Âý¿çÜÌ ãñ´Ð ×ñçÍÜè ¥õÚU ×»ãè ÿæð˜æ ×ð´ ÂýæØÑ §âð ÜôçÚU·¤æØÙ ·¤ãÌð ãñ´Ð ÖôÁÂéÚUè ÿæð˜æ ×ð´ ÜôçÚU·¤è ¥õÚU ÜôçÚU·¤æØÙ ÌÍæ ¥ßÏè ÿæð˜æ ×ð´ §âð ¿ÙñÙè ·¤ãÌð ãñ´Ð Øã »æÍæ ØæÎß ÙæØ·¤ ÜôçÚU·¤ ¥õÚU ¿´Îæ ·Ô¤ Âýð× Âýâ´» ÂÚU ¥æÏæçÚUÌ ãñÐ ÏôçÕØª¤ »èÌ Ñ ·¤ÂǸæ âæÈ ·¤ÚUÙð ßæÜè ÁæçÌ ÏôÕè çÁâ »èÌ ·¤ô »æÌè ãñ ©âð ÏôçÕØª¤ »èÌ ·¤ãÌð ãñ´Ð °·¤ »èÌ ×ð´ ÏôÕè ¥ÂÙè Â%è âð ·¤ã ÚUãæ ãñ ç·¤ ·¤Ü ƒææÅU (ÙÎè ·Ô¤ ç·¤ÙæÚUð ·¤æ ßã SÍæÙ Áãæ´ ÏôÕè ·¤ÂǸæ ÏôÌæ ãñ) ÂÚU ¿ÜÙæ ãñÐ ¥ÌÑ ¹æÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ ×ôÅUè çÜ^è (ÚUôÅUè ·¤æ ãè ×ôÅUæ M¤Â) ÕÙæ ÜðÙæ ¥õÚU âæÍ ×ð´ çÅUç·¤Øæ, Ì´Õæ·¤ê ¥õÚU ÍôǸè âè ¥æ» ÜðÙæ ×Ì ÖêÜÙæÐ Øã »èÌ §â Âý·¤æÚU ãñ - Ò×ôçÅU ×ôÅUè çÜçÅUØæ Ü»ñãð ÏôçÕçÙØæ´ ç· çÕçãÙð ¿Üð ·Ô¤ Õæ ƒææÅUÐ ÌèÙçã´ ¿èÁð´ ×Ì ÖêçÜãñ ÏôçÕçÙØæ´ ç·¤ çÅUç·¤Øæ, Ì׿·¤ê, ÍôÇ¸æ ¥æ»ÐÓ ÏôÕè ÁæçÌ ·Ô¤ Üô» ¥ÂÙ𠩈âßô´ ×ð´ â×êã ×ð´ Ùæ¿Ìð ¥õÚU »æÌð ãñ´Ð §â »æÙð ×ð´ ÒãéÇ·¤æÓ Ùæ×·¤ ÕæÁæ ÕÁæÌð ãñ´ §âçܰ ·¤éÀ Üô» §âð ÒãéÇ·¤æÓ Ùæ¿ Öè ·¤ãÌð ãñ´Ð ·¤ãM¤ßæ Ñ ·¤ãæÚU ÇôÜè Øæ ÂæÜ·¤è ÉôÙð ·Ô¤ Âðàæð âð ÁéǸè ÁæçÌ ãñÐ §Ù·Ô¤ »æÙð ·¤ô Ò·¤ãM¤ßæÓ ·¤ãÌð ãñ´Ð ÂçÌ ·Ô¤ ƒæÚU Áæ ÚUãè ÙßÃØæãÌæ ÎéËãÙ ·¤è »×·¤ âð âÚUæÕôÚU ãôÌæ ã饿 ·¤ãæÚU ÚUæSÌð ×ð´ ÖæÚU ·¤ô ãË·¤æ ·¤ÚUÙð ¥õÚU ¥ÂÙè Í·¤æÙ ·¤ô ç×ÅUæÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ Ÿæë´»æÚU ÚUâ ·¤æ ×ÏéÚU »èÌ ÅUðÚUÌæ ãñ - ÒÕéɏ߿ ·¤´ãÚUßæ ·Ô¤ ¥æ§ü Õéɸ§Øæ Ìõ ÈÔ¤·Ô¤ ÌÜõÙð ×ð´ ÁæÜÐÓ ØæÙè, Õêɸ𠷤ãæÚU ·¤ô ÕéɸæÂæ ¥æ »Øæ ãñ ÂÚU´Ìé ¥Öè Öè ßã Âô¹ÚU ×ð´ ×ÀÜè ·¤Ç¸Ùð ·Ô¤ çܰ ÁæÜ ÇUæÜÌæ ãñÐ ÌðçÜØô´ ·¤æ »èÌ Ñ ÌðÜè ÁæçÌ ÂæÚU´ÂçÚU·¤ M¤Â âð ÌðÜ ÂðÚUÌè ãñÐ ÂãÜð ÕñÜ âð ¿ÜÙð ßæÜð ×àæèÙ âð ÌðÜ çÙ·¤æÜæ ÁæÌæ Íæ, çÁâð Ò·¤ôËãêÓ ·¤ãæ ÁæÌæ ãñÐ ÌðÜè ÕñÜô´ ·Ô¤ ¥æ´¹ô´ ÂÚU Â^è Õæ´Ï·¤ÚU ¥æÏè ÚUæÌ âð ãè ·¤ôËãê àæéM¤ ·¤ÚU ÎðÌæ ÍæÐ ÚUæÌ ×ð´ ¥·Ô¤Üð ÕñÜô´ ·Ô¤ ÂèÀð ƒæê×Ìð ãé° ßð ÕãéÌ ãè ××üÖðÎè »èÌ »æÌð ÍðÐ §Ù »èÌô´ ×ð´ Ÿæë´»æÚU ÚUâ ·Ô¤ âæÍ-âæÍ §Ù·Ô¤ ·¤æØü ·¤æ Öè ©„ð¹ ãñÐ °·¤ »æÙð ×ð´ ÌðçÜÙ ·Ô¤ ÒƒææÙèÓ Ü»æÙð ¥õÚU ÌðÜè ·Ô¤ ÌðÜ ÂðÚUÙð ·¤æ ©„ð¹ ãñ - Ò·¤õÙè ·¤è ÁéçÙØæ ÌðçÜÙ ƒæçÙØæ ¥ÚUð Ü»æßðÐ ¥ÚUð ·¤õÙè ÁéçÙØæ ÙæÐ ·¤ô§ÜçÚU âÕÎ âéÙæßñ ç·¤ ·¤õÙè ÁéçÙØæ ÙæÐ ¥æÏè ·¤è ÚUçÌØæ ÌðçÜçÙ ƒæçÙØæ Ü»æßñ, ç·¤ çÂÀÜè ÚUçÌØæ ÙæÐ ·¤ô§ÜçÚU âÕÎ âéÙæßñ ç·¤ çÂÀËè ÚUçÌØæ ÙæÐ ¥ÍæüÌ÷ - Ò°! ÌðçÜÙ Ìé×Ùð ç·¤â âר ÒƒææÙèÓ Ü»æ§ü ¥õÚU ç·¤â âר ·¤ôØÜ ·¤è ·¤ê·¤ âéÙæ§ü ÂǸèÐ ¥æÏè ÚUæÌ ×ð´ ãè ÌðçÜÙ Ùð ƒææÙè Ü»æ§ü ¥õÚU çÂÀÜè ÚUæÌ ãè ·¤ôØÜ ¥ÂÙæ ·¤ê·¤ âéÙæ§ü ÂǸèÐÓ 41 BAHUJAN 42 SONGS OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press Gond songs: The traditional occupation of the Gond caste is fetching water and cutting wood for fuel. The women of the community cook foodgrains in furnaces. They dance on festive occasions. The Gondau dance is a fine example of folkdance. In one of the Gond songs, a woman says that a thief came disguised as her sweetheart and stole her bracelet (Khur khur khur khur tati bole, hum jaani piyawa mor, piywa ke bhese ayele, kangna le gayele chor). Jantsar: Until some years ago, wheat was ground in a handoperated stone mill called jaanta. The songs that were sung by women while working on the jaanta were called Jantsar. In one of the songs, a woman says, “Aey Ram Hari more gayle videswa, sakal dukhwa deye gayele ho ram. Aer sasu nanadiya birahi boleli, kekar kamiya khadbu ho ram” (My husband has gone to some other city. That is why my mother-in-law and my sisterin-law ask whose income will feed me). It may be mentioned here that folk artiste Bhikhari Thakur has extensively used Jantsar songs in his play Videsiya. Ropni-Sohni: These are the songs women agricultural labourers sing during planting and harvesting. These songs beautifully depict the bittersweet exchanges in a family. See the pain of being away from one’s beloved in these lines: Nandi jhargava kayli, piya pardes gayle. Kiya ho rama, bhauji roveli chatia phate ho ram (My sister-in-law quarrels with me. My beloved has gone to another place and her bhauji [ie the singer] is crying). Thus, these songs, besides depicting the various occupations of the working class, also underline the close proximity of the Bahujan castes with nature. The pain of the large-scale migration from the region in search of employment is also reflected in these songs, particularly in those sung by women. A detailed and comprehensive study of these songs would reveal that, as opposed to the parasitic existence of the Dwij castes, work and production have been the prime values of Shraman culture. Jitendra Kumar Yadav is president of All India Backward Students’ Forum and has researched on plays of Bhikhari Thakur and Bhojpuri society »ô´Ç¸ô´ ·Ô¤ »èÌ Ñ »ô´Ç ÁæçÌ ·¤æ ·¤æØü ×éØÌÑ ÂæÙè ÖÚUÙæ, Ü·¤Ç¸è ¿èÚUÙæ ãñÐ §Ù·¤è çS˜æØæ´ ÖæÇ¸ Ûæô·¤·¤ÚU ¥óæ ÖêÁÙð ·¤æ ·¤æØü ·¤ÚUÌè ãñ´Ð Øð Üô» çßçÖóæ ¥ßâÚUô´ ÂÚU ÙëˆØ Öè ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´ çÁ‹ãð´ Ò»ôǸª¤ Ùæ¿Ó ·¤ãæ ÁæÌæ ãñÐ Øã Üô·¤ ÙëˆØ ·¤æ ©ˆ·¤ëC Ù×êÙæ ãñÐ °·¤ »èÌ ×ð´ »ôçǸ٠·¤ãÌè ãñ ç·¤ çÂØæ ·Ô¤ M¤Â ÏÚU ·¤ÚU·Ô¤ ¿ôÚU ¥æØæ ¥õÚU ×ðÚUæ ·¤´»Ù ¿ôÚUè ·¤ÚU ·Ô¤ Üð »Øæ Ñ Ò¹éÚU ¹éÚU ¹éÚU ¹éÚU ÅUæÅUè ÕôÜð, ã× ÁæçÙ çÂØßæ ×ôÚUÐ çÂØßæ ·Ô¤ Öðâð ¥§Üð, ·¤´»Ùæ Üð »§Üð ¿ôÚUÐÓ ÁÌâæÚU Ñ ·¤éÀ Îàæ·¤ ÂãÜð Ì·¤ »æ´ßô´ ×ð´ »ðãê´ ÒãæÍ ¿P¤èÓ âð ãè Âèâæ ÁæÌæ Íæ çÁâð ÒÁ´æÌæÓ ·¤ãÌð ãñ´Ð Áæ´Ìæ ÂèâÌð ßQ¤ ×çãÜæ°´ §Ù »æÙô´ ·¤ô »æÌè ãñ´ §âè ·¤æÚU‡æ §Ù »èÌô´ ·¤ô Á´ÌâæÚU ·¤ãæ ÁæÌæ ãñÐ °·¤ ÒÁ´ÌâæÚU »èÌÓ ×ð´ ÒÁæ´ÌæÓ ¿Üæ ÚUãè °·¤ ×çãÜæ ·¤ãÌè ãñ Ñ Ò° ÚUæ× ãçÚU ×ôÚUð »§Üð çÕÎðâßæ, â·¤Ü ÎéÑ¹ßæ Îð§ »§Üð ãô ÚUæ×Ð ° âæâé, ÙÙçÎØæ çÕÚUãè ÕôÜðÜè, ·Ô¤·¤ÚU ·¤×§Øæ ¹§Õê ãô ÚUæ×ÐÓ ¥ÍæüÌ ×ðÚUæ ÂçÌ ç·¤âè ÎêâÚUð àæãÚU ×ð´ ¿Üæ »Øæ ãñÐ §â·Ô¤ ·¤æÚU‡æ ×ðÚUè âæâ ¥õÚU ÙÙÎ ·¤ãÌè ãñ ç·¤ ×ñ´ ç·¤â·¤è ·¤×æ§ü ¹æª¤´»èÐ ™ææÌÃØ ãñ ç·¤ Üô·¤ ·¤Üæ·¤æÚU çÖ¹æÚUè Ææ·¤éÚU Ùð ¥ÂÙð ÙæÅU·¤ ÒçÕÎðçâØæÓ ×ð´ ÒÁ´ÌâæÚUÓ ·Ô¤ »èÌô´ ·¤æ ÃØæÂ·¤ ÂýØô» ç·¤Øæ ãñÐ ÚUôÂÙè-âôãÙè ·Ô¤ »èÌ Ñ Øã ×éØÌÑ ¹ðÌ-×ÁÎêÚU çS˜æØô´ ·¤æ »èÌ ãñÐ §âð ×çãÜæ°´ ¹ðÌ ×ð´ ÚUôÂÙè-âôãÙè ·¤ÚUÌð âר âæ×êçã·¤ M¤Â ×ð´ »æÌè ãñÐ §Ù »æÙô´ ×ð´ ÂæçÚUßæçÚU·¤ Ùô´·¤-Ûæô´·¤ ·¤æ ÕǸæ âéM¤ç¿Âê‡æü ç¿˜æ‡æ ãôÌæ ãñÐ §Ù »èÌô´ ×ð´ ¥ÂÙð çÂýØ âð çÕÀéǸÙð ·¤è ÂèǸæ Îðç¹° - ÒÙÙÎè Ûæ»ÚUßæ ·¤§Üè, çÂØæ ÂÚUÎðàæ »§ÜðÐ ç·¤Øæ ãô ÚUæ×æ, Ö©Áè ÚUôßðÜè ÀçÌØæ È æÅUð ãô ÚUæ×ÐÓ ØæÙè, ÙÙÎ Ûæ»Ç¸æ ·¤ÚU ÚUãè ãñÐ ÂçÌ ÂÚUÎðàæ ¿Üæ »Øæ ãñ ¥õÚU °ðâè çSÍçÌ ×ð´ ©â·¤è ÖõÁè ÚUô ÚUãè ãñÐ ÙæçØ·¤æ °ðâè ÂýçÌ·¤êÜ çSÍçÌØô´ ×ð´ Õð¿ñÙ ãñÐ §Ù »èÌô´ âð »éÁÚUÌð ãé° ã× Îð¹Ìð ãñ´ ç·¤ §Ù×ð´ Ÿæ× ·Ô¤ çßçÖóæ M¤Âô´ ·Ô¤ ç¿˜æ‡æ ·Ô¤ âæÍ-âæÍ ÕãéÁÙ ÁæçÌØô´ ·Ô¤ Âý·¤ëçÌ âð âã¿Øü ·¤ô Öè ÚUð¹æ´ç·¤Ì ç·¤Øæ »Øæ ãñÐ ÖôÁÂéÚUè ÿæð˜æ âð ÕǸð Âñ׿Ùð ÂÚU ãé° Ÿæ×-ÂýßâÙ ·¤è ÂèǸæ Öè §Ù »èÌô´, çßàæðá·¤ÚU ×çãÜæ¥ô´ mæÚUæ »Øð ÁæÙð ßæÜð »èÌô´ ×ð´, ÕǸð ׿ç×ü·¤ ɸ´» âð ¥çÖÃØQ¤ ãé§ü ãñÐ ÎÚU¥âÜ, §Ù »èÌô´ ·¤æ ¥»ÚU âéçÙØôçÁÌ ¥ŠØØÙ ãô Ìô Øã âæÈ ãôÌð ÎðÚU Ù Ü»ð»è ç·¤ çmÁ â´S·¤ëçÌ ·¤è ÂÚUÁèçßÌæ ·Ô¤ çßÂÚUèÌ Ÿæ× ¥õÚU ©ˆÂæÎÙ Ÿæ×‡æ â´S·¤ëçÌ ·Ô¤ ÁèßÙ ×êËØ ÚUãð ãñ´Ð ¥æòÜ §´çÇØæ Õñ·¤ßÇü SÅUêÇð´ÅU È ôÚU× ·Ô¤ ÚUæCþèØ ¥ŠØÿæ çÁÌð´Îý ·¤é׿ÚU ØæÎß Ùð ÁßæãÚUÜæÜ ÙðãM¤ ØêçÙßçâüÅUè âð ÒçÖ¹æÚUè Ææ·¤éÚU ·Ô¤ ÙæÅU·¤ ¥õÚU ÖôÁÂéÚUè â׿ÁÓ çßáØ ÂÚU àæôÏ ç·¤Øæ ãñ ȤæòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ | ¥€ÅêUÕÚU 2014 â´S·¤ëçÌ ÂçÚUßÌüÙ 43 Smashing Brahminical Gods Constructing Dalitbahujan Icons September 5 as Teachers’ Day : A Critique Õýæã‡æßæÎè ÂýÖé¥ô´ ÂÚU ¿ôÅU ÎçÜÌÕãéÁÙ çßÖêçÌØô´ ·¤æ çÙ׿ü‡æ z çâÌÕÚU ·¤ô çàæÿæ·¤ çÎßâ Ñ °·¤ ¥æÜô¿Ùæ ABHAY KUMAR S ince 1962 India’s schools and educational institutions have been observing 5 September as Teachers’ Day. It is the birth anniversary of the first vice-president and second president of independent India, Dr Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan (1888-1975). More recently, a section of Dalits – mostly students, activists and intellectuals at public universities – has been increasingly denouncing this practice. They contend that the birthday of Radhakrishnan, a Brahmin, should no longer be held as Teachers’ Day because he had made no contribution to the educational upliftment of the majority lowered castes and classes. Instead they exhort people to observe National Teachers’ Day on 3 January, the birth anniversary of the 19th-century backward caste social reformer and teacher, Savitribai Phule (1831-1897). Savitribai Phule as educationist icon According to her biographer, M. G. Mali (Krantijyoti Savitribai Phule, 2005), Savitribai Phule was taught by her young husband, Jotiba in a school run under the shade of a mango tree. Access to education enabled her to become aware about egalitarian movements around the world – she managed to read the biography of Thomas Clarkson (1760-1846), who fought for the liberation of African Americans. Later, when she became a teacher, there was opposition from reactionary Brahmins, who pelted her with â ¥ÖØ ·¤é×æÚ Ù÷ v~{w âð, ÖæÚUÌ ·Ô¤ S·¤êÜ ß ¥‹Ø àæñÿæç‡æ·¤ â´SÍæØð´, z çâÌ´ÕÚU ·¤ô çàæÿæ·¤ çÎßâ ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ ×ÙæÌè ¿Üè ¥æ ÚUãè ãñ´Ð z çâÌ´ÕÚU, SßÌ´˜æ ÖæÚUÌ ·Ô¤ ÂãÜð ©ÂÚUæCþÂçÌ ß ÎêâÚUð ÚUæCþÂçÌ Çæ€UÅUÚU âßü„è ÚUæÏæ·¤ëc‡æÙ (v}}}-v~|z) ·¤æ Á‹×çÎÙ ãñÐ çÂÀÜð ·¤éÀ ßáô´ü âð, ÎçÜÌô´ ·Ô¤ °·¤ ÌÕ·Ô¤ - çÁâ×ð´ ×éØÌÑ ·¤éÀ çßEçßlæÜØô´ ·Ô¤ Àæ˜æ, âæ×æçÁ·¤ ·¤æØü·¤Ìæü ß ÕéçhÁèßè àææç×Ü ãñ´ - Ùð z çâÌ´ÕÚU ·¤ô çàæÿæ·¤ çÎßâ ×ÙæØð ÁæÙð ·¤æ çßÚUôÏ ÂýæÚU´Ö ·¤ÚU çÎØæ ãñÐ ©Ù·¤æ ·¤ãÙæ ãñ ç·¤ ÚUæÏæ·¤ëc‡æÙ, Áô ç·¤ °·¤ Õýæ±×‡æ Íð, ·Ô¤ Á‹×çÎßâ ·¤ô çàæÿæ·¤ çÎßâ ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ Ùãè´ ×ÙæØæ ÁæÙæ ¿æçã° €UØô´ç·¤ ©‹ãô´Ùð Ùè¿è ÁæçÌØô´ ¥õÚU ß»ô´ü ·Ô¤ ÖæÚUÌ ·Ô¤ Õãéâ´Ø·¤ Üô»ô´ ·Ô¤ àæñÿæç‡æ·¤ ©óæØÙ ·Ô¤ çܰ ·¤éÀ Ùãè´ ç·¤ØæÐ ßð ¿æãÌð ãñ´ ç·¤ ÚUæCþèØ çàæÿæ·¤ çÎßâ, x ÁÙßÚUè ·¤ô ×ÙæØæ Áæ° Áô ç·¤ v~ßè´ âÎè ·¤è â׿Á âéÏæÚU·¤ ß çàæçÿæ·¤æ âæçߘæèÕæ§ü Èé Üð (v}xv-~|) ·¤æ Á‹×çÎÙ ãñÐ çàæÿææçßÎ ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ âæçߘæèÕæ§ü Èé Üð âæçߘæèÕæ§ü ·Ô¤ ÁèßÙè Üð¹·¤ °×.Áè. ׿Üè (R¤æ´çÌ’ØôçÌ âæçߘæèÕæ§ü ÈéÜð, w®®z) ·Ô¤ ¥ÙéâæÚU, âæçߘæèÕæ§ü Èé Üð ·¤ô ©Ù·Ô¤ Øéßæ ÂçÌ ÁôçÌÕæ Ùð ¥æ× ·Ô¤ ÂðǸ ·¤è Àæ´ß ×ð´ ¿ÜÙð ßæÜð °·¤ S·¤êÜ ×ð´ çàæÿææ ÎèÐ çàæçÿæÌ ãô ÁæÙð ·Ô¤ ·¤æÚU‡æ ©‹ãð´ ÎéçÙØæ ×ð´ ¿Ü ÚUãð â×ÌæßæÎè ¥æ´ÎôÜÙô´ ·¤è ÁæÙ·¤æÚUè ç×Ü â·¤èÐ ©‹ãô´Ùð CULTURE 44 CHANGE OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press THE BIRTHDAY OF RADHAKRISHNAN, A BRAHMIN, SHOULD NO LONGER BE HELD AS TEACHERS’ DAY BECAUSE HE HAD MADE NO CONTRIBUTION TO THE EDUCATIONAL UPLIFTMENT OF THE MAJORITY LOWERED CASTES AND CLASSES ÚUæÏæ·¤ëc‡æÙ, Áô ç·¤ °·¤ Õýæ±×‡æ Íð, ·Ô¤ Á‹×çÎßâ ·¤ô çàæÿæ·¤ çÎßâ ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ Ùãè´ ×ÙæØæ ÁæÙæ ¿æçã° €UØô´ç·¤ ©‹ãô´Ùð Ùè¿è ÁæçÌØô´ ¥õÚU ß»ô´ü ·Ô¤ ÖæÚUÌ ·Ô¤ Õãéâ´Ø·¤ Üô»ô´ ·Ô¤ àæñÿæç‡æ·¤ ©óæØÙ ·Ô¤ çܰ ¤·é¤À Ùãè´ ç·¤Øæ stones and flung dung on her in order to “save” their orthodox Hindu religion. While frustrated Brahmins were unable to deter the zeal of the young Phule couple for imparting education, they succeeded in reasoning with her father-in-law, Govinda Rao, to force them to leave his family home. She preferred eviction, along with her husband, from home to giving up her mission of education for all. Despite the opposition, the Phules continued to persuade parents to send their daughters to their schools. As a result of their hard work, 18 schools were opened from 1848 to 1852. Her dedication to spread education, particularly among Dalitbahujans, is self-evident from a few lines of her poem. “All gets lost without knowledge … We become animal without wisdom … So learn and break the chains of caste … Throw away the Brahman’s scriptures fast.” Dalitbahujan assertion at HCU, JNU Though it has been claimed that Savitribai Phule’s birth anniversary has been celebrated as Teachers’ Day by the radical Dalit Panther since the 1970s, the intensified campaigns, particularly at public universities, have been observed in the last few years. This article focuses on such activism at India’s two prestigious universities, Hyderabad Central University (HCU) and Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), where Dalitbahujan politics are particularly strong. Bahujan Student Front (BSF), a Dalit organisation active at HCU since its formation in 2007, has been celebrating the birth anniversary of Savitribai Phule as Teachers’ Day for the past few years. In its 2013 pamphlet, the BSF offered its justification for this: “Education was denied to the Bahujan Samaj under the barbaric Brahmanical reign; despite this, Savitribai Phule made radical efforts to enlighten the mulnivasis [aboriginals] of India by taking up education as the weapon for emancipation.” Dalit ideology views Brahminism as a primary contradiction and education as one of the most important means for liberation. It therefore opposes the observance of Teachers’ Day on the birth anniversary of a Brahmin who is alleged to have been an apologist of Hinduism/Brahminism as a scholar of comparative religion. Íæò×â €UÜæ·¤üâÙ (v|{®-v}y{) ·¤è ÁèßÙè Âɸè, çÁ‹ãô´Ùð ¥EðÌ ¥×ÚUèç·¤Øô´ ·¤ô ×éçQ¤ çÎÜæÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ â´ƒæáü ç·¤Øæ ÍæÐ ¥æ»ð ¿Ü·¤ÚU, ÁÕ ©‹ãô´Ùð ÂɸæÙæ àæéM¤ ç·¤Øæ Ìô §â·¤æ ÂýçÌçR¤ØæßæÎè Õýæ±×‡æô´ Ùð ÁÕÚUÎSÌ çßÚUôÏ ç·¤ØæÐ ©Ù ÂÚU ˆÍÚU ¥õÚU »ôÕÚU ÈÔ¤´·Ô¤ »Øð ¥õÚU Øã âÕ ç·¤Øæ »Øæ ÒÏ×üÚUÿææ ·Ô¤ Ùæ× ÂÚUÓÐ ÁÕ Õýæ±×‡æ ¥ÂÙè Ì×æ× ·¤ôçàæàæô´ ·Ô¤ ÕæÎ Öè Øéßæ Èé Üð δÂçžæ ·¤ô ©Ù·¤è ÚUæã âð çß¿çÜÌ Ùãè´ ·¤ÚU â·Ô¤ Ìô ©‹ãô´Ùð âæçߘæèÕæ§ü ·Ô¤ ââéÚU »ôçß´Î ÚUæß ·¤ô §ÌÙæ ÖǸ·¤æØæ ç·¤ ©‹ãô´Ùð Èé Üð δÂçžæ ·¤ô ¥ÂÙð ƒæÚU âð çÙ·¤æÜ çÎØæÐ ÂÚU´Ìé âæçߘæèÕæ§ü ¥õÚU ©Ù·Ô¤ ÂçÌ Ùð âÖè ·¤ô çàæÿææ ©ÂÜŽÏ ·¤ÚUßæÙð ·Ô¤ ¥ÂÙð ç×àæÙ ·¤ô ˆØæ»Ùð ·¤è ÕÁæØ, ßã ƒæÚU ˆØæ»Ùæ ÕðãÌÚU â×ÛææÐ çßÚUôÏ ·Ô¤ ÕæßÁêÎ ßð ¥çÖÖæß·¤ô´ ·¤ô §â ÕæÕÌ ÂýðçÚUÌ ·¤ÚUÙð ·Ô¤ ¥ÂÙð ¥çÖØæÙ ×ð´ ÁéÅUð ÚUãð ç·¤ ©‹ãð´ ÜǸ緤Øô´ ·¤ô Èé Üð δÂçžæ mæÚUæ â´¿æçÜÌ S·¤êÜô´ ×ð´ ÂɸÙð ÖðÁÙæ ¿æçãØðÐ ©Ù·¤è ·¤çÆÙ ×ðãÙÌ ·Ô¤ ¿ÜÌð, âÙ÷ v}y} âð v}zw ·Ô¤ Õè¿ v} S·¤êÜô´ ·¤è SÍæÂÙæ ãé§üÐ çàæÿææ ·Ô¤ ÂýâæÚU ¥õÚU çßàæðá·¤ÚU ÎçÜÌ-ÕãéÁÙô´ ·¤ô çàæçÿæÌ ·¤ÚUÙð ·Ô¤ ¥çÖØæÙ ·Ô¤ ÂýçÌ âæçߘæèÕæ§ü ·¤è ÂýçÌÕhÌæ ·¤æ ÖæÙ ©Ù·¤è ·¤çßÌæ ·¤è §Ù ¿´Î ´çQ¤Øô´ âð ãôÌæ ãñ, Ò™ææÙ ·Ô¤ çÕÙæ âÕ ¹ô ÁæÌæ ãñ...çßßð·¤ ·Ô¤ çÕÙæ ã× Âàæé ÕÙ ÁæÌð ãñ´...§âçÜØð âè¹ô ¥õÚU ÁæçÌ ·¤è Á´ÁèÚUð´ ÌôǸ Îô...Õýæ±×‡æô´ ·Ô¤ »ý´Í ÁËÎè âð ÁËÎè ÈÔ¤´·¤ ÎôÓÐ Áð°ÙØê, °¿âèØê ×ð´ ÎçÜÌ ÕãéÁÙô´ Ùð ©Ææ§ü ¥æßæÁ Ølç Øã Îæßæ ç·¤Øæ ÁæÌæ ãñ ç·¤ ©»ý ÎçÜÌ Âñ´Íâü, âÙ÷ v~|® ·Ô¤ Îàæ·¤ âð ãè âæçߘæèÕæ§ü Èé Üð ·Ô¤ Á‹×çÎÙ ·¤ô çàæÿæ·¤ çÎßâ ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ ×ÙæÌð ÚUãð ãñ´ ÂÚU´Ìé §â ¥çÖØæÙ Ùð çÂÀÜð ·¤éÀ ßáô´ü ×ð´ ãè »çÌ Â·¤Ç¸è ãñÐ çßEçßlæÜØô´ ×ð´ §â ¥çÖØæÙ ·¤æ ÁôÚU ’ØæÎæ ãñÐ §â Üð¹ ×ð´ ã× ÖæÚUÌ ·Ô¤ Îô ÂýçÌçDÌ çßEçßlæÜØô´, ÁßæãÚUÜæÜ ÙðãM¤ çßEçßlæÜØ (Áð°ÙØê) ß ãñÎÚUæÕæÎ âð‹ÅþÜ ØêçÙßçâüÅUè (°¿âèØê) ×ð´ ÎçÜÌ-ÕãéÁÙ ÚUæÁÙèçÌ ·Ô¤ ª¤¡¿ð ãôÌð SßÚUô´ ·¤è ¿¿æü ·¤ÚUð´»ðÐ °¿âèØê ×ð´ ÒÕãéÁÙ SÅUêÇð´ÅU Èý ´ÅUÒ (Õè°â°È) Ùæ×·¤ °·¤ ÎçÜÌ â´»ÆÙ, âÙ÷ w®®| ×ð´ çßEçßlæÜØ ·¤è SÍæÂÙæ ·Ô¤ âר âð ãè âçR¤Ø ãñÐ Øã â´»ÆÙ çÂÀÜð ·¤éÀ ßáô´ü âð âæçߘæèÕæ§ü Èé Üð ·Ô¤ Á‹×çÎßâ ·¤ô çàæÿæ·¤ çÎßâ ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ ×ÙæÌæ ¥æØæ ãñÐ âÙ÷ w®vx ×ð´ ÁæÚUè ¥ÂÙð °·¤ ¿ðü ×ð´ Õè°â°È Ùð §â·¤æ ¥õç¿ˆØ ÕÌæÌð ãéØð çܹæ ç·¤ ÒÕÕüÚU Õýæ±×‡æßæÎè àææâÙ ×ð´ ÕãéÁÙ â׿Á ·¤ô çàæçÿæÌ Ùãè´ ãôÙð çÎØæ ÁæÌæ ÍæÐ §â·Ô¤ ÕæÎ Öè âæçߘæèÕæ§ü Èé Üð Ùð ×êÜ çÙßæçâØô´ ·Ô¤ Õè¿ ™ææÙ ·¤æ Âý·¤æàæ Èñ¤ÜæÙð ·Ô¤ çÜØð ¥Í·¤ ÂýØæâ ç·¤ØðÐ ©‹ãô´Ùð çàæÿææ ·¤æ §SÌð׿Ü, ×éçQ¤ ·Ô¤ ãçÍØæÚU ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ ç·¤ØæÐÓ ÎçÜÌ çß¿æÚUÏæÚUæ, Õýæ±×‡æßæÎ ·¤ô ÎçÜÌô´ ·¤è ×éçQ¤ ·¤è ÚUæã ×ð´ âÕâð ÕǸè ÕæÏæ ¥õÚU çàæÿææ ·¤ô ©Ù·¤è ×éçQ¤ ·¤æ âÕâð ÂýÖæß·¤æÚUè ÌÚUè·¤æ ׿ÙÌè ãñÐ ßã °·¤ Õýæ±×‡æ ·Ô¤ Á‹×çÎÙ ·¤ô çàæÿæ·¤ çÎßâ ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ ȤæòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ | ¥€ÅêUÕÚU 2014 â´S·¤ëçÌ ÂçÚUßÌüÙ parted education to “As Brahmins never im e Dalitbahujans, Savitri others, especially to th and Jotiba Phule were sb hu r he d an e ul Ph i Ba a revolutionary step to instrumental in taking jans sections.” - a 2012 educate the Dalitbahu e blog of S. Swaroop pamphlet posted on th HCU Sirapangi, a student of ÚU ÎçÜÌ ÕãéÁÙô´, ¿ê´ç·¤ Õýæ±×‡æ ·¤Öè ÎêâÚUô´ ß çßàæðá·¤ ©Ù·Ô¤ ÂçÌ ¥õÚU ·¤ô çàæÿææ Ùãè´ ÎðÌð Íð §âçܰ Èé Üð çàæçÿæÌ ·¤ÚUÙð ô´ü ·¤ô ÁôçÌÕæ Èé Üð ·¤ô ÎçÜÌ-ÕãéÁÙ ß» âèØê ·Ô¤ Àæ˜æ ¸ð - °¿ ·Ô¤ çܰ R¤æ´çÌ·¤æÚUè ·¤Î× ©ÆæÙð ÂÇ ×ð´ ÂôSÅU ç·¤Øæ v® °â SßL¤Â çâÚUæÂ´»è ·Ô¤ ŽÜæò» ÂÚU w® »Øæ °·¤ ÂÚU¿æ Similarly, S. Swaroop Sirapangi, a student of HCU with Dalitbahujan ideological persuasion, posted a pamphlet in 2012 on his blog that said Savitribai Phule, unlike Radhakrishnan, deserved to be recognised as a true educator, for she, along with her husband Jotiba Phule, was in the forefront of spreading education, particularly among women and lower castes as early as the middle of the 19th century. “As Brahmins never imparted education to others, especially to the Dalitbahujans, Savitri Bai Phule and her husband Jotiba Phule were instrumental in taking a revolutionary step to educate the Dalitbahujans sections.” A web portal Dalit Muslims Voice also supports the Dalits’ demand. It praises Savitribai Phule as “a radical exponent of mass and female education”, “a champion of women’s liberation”, “a pioneer in engaged poetry”, “a courageous mass leader” fighting against “upper caste atrocities”. The Pasmanda Muslims and Dalit and backward-caste Muslims allege that they face exploitation and humiliation at the hands of upper caste Ashraf Muslims. As a result they have forged an alliance with lower castes of Hindus and other religious communities. In JNU, too, the United Dalits Students Forum (UDSF) has been organizing seminars, holding public meetings and taking out political processions on this issue. JNU’s traditionally strong left students’ organisations, which have ignored Dalitbahujan icons in the past, have now no hesitation in wearing Phule’s badge on their sleeves. In short, while smashing Brahmin gods, the Dalitbahujans are simultaneously discovering their own icons. ×ÙæØð ÁæÙð ·¤è çßÚUôÏè ãñ €UØô´ç·¤ °ðâæ ¥æÚUôçÂÌ ãñ ç·¤ ÌéÜÙæˆ×·¤ Ï×üàææS˜æ ·Ô¤ ¥ŠØðÌæ ·Ô¤ ÌõÚU ÂÚU Çæ€UÅUÚU ÚUæÏæ·¤ëc‡æÙ, çã´Îê Ï×ü/Õýæ±×‡æßæÎ ·Ô¤ ÌÚUÈ ÎæÚU ÍðÐ §âè ÌÚUã, °¿âèØê ·Ô¤ °·¤ Àæ˜æ °â. SßM¤Â çâÚUæÂ´»è, Áô ¥ÂÙè ÎçÜÌ-ÕãéÁÙ çß¿æÚUÏæÚUæ ·Ô¤ çÜØð ÁæÙð ÁæÌð ãñ´, Ùð âÙ÷ w®vw ×ð´ ¥ÂÙð ŽÜæò» ÂÚU çܹæ ç·¤ çàæÿææ ·Ô¤ ÿæð˜æ ×ð´ ÚUæÏæ·¤ëc‡æÙ ·¤è ÌéÜÙæ ×ð´ âæçߘæèÕæ§ü Èé Üð ·¤æ Øô»ÎæÙ ·¤ãè´ ¥çÏ·¤ ×ãˆßÂê‡æü ãñ €UØô´ç·¤ ßð v~ßè´ âÎè ·Ô¤ ×ŠØ ×ð´ ×çãÜæ¥ô´ ¥õÚU Ùè¿è ÁæçÌØô´ ×ð´ çàæÿææ ·Ô¤ ÂýâæÚU ·Ô¤ ¥çÖØæÙ ·¤è ¥»é¥æ Íè´Ð ¿ê´ç·¤ Õýæ±×‡æ ·¤Öè ÎêâÚUô´, ß çßàæðá·¤ÚU ÎçÜÌ ÕãéÁÙô´, ·¤ô çàæÿææ Ùãè´ ÎðÌð Íð §âçܰ Èé Üð ¥õÚU ©Ù·Ô¤ ÂçÌ ÁôçÌÕæ Èé Üð ·¤ô ÎçÜÌÕãéÁÙ ß»ô´ü ·¤ô çàæçÿæÌ ·¤ÚUÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ R¤æ´çÌ·¤æÚUè ·¤Î× ©ÆæÙð ÂǸðÐ °·¤ ßðÕ ÂôÅUüÜ ÒÎçÜÌ ×éçSÜ× ßæòØâÓ Öè ÎçÜÌô´ ·¤è §â ׿´» ·¤æ â×ÍüÙ ·¤ÚUÌæ ãñ ¥õÚU âæçߘæèÕæ§ü Èé Üð ·¤ô Ò¥æ× Üô»ô´ ß ×çãÜæ¥ô´ ·¤è çàæÿææ ·¤è R¤æ´çÌ·¤æÚUè ÂýçÌÂæÎ·¤Ó, Ò×çãÜæ¥ô´ ·¤è SßÌ´˜æÌæ ·¤è çã׿ØÌèÓ, Ò©gðàØÂê‡æü ·¤çßÌæ Üð¹Ù ·¤è ¥»ýÎêÌÓ, Òâæãâè ÙðÌæÓ ß Ò©‘¿ ÁæçÌØô´ ·Ô¤ ¥ˆØæ¿æÚUô´Ó ·Ô¤ çßM¤h â´ƒæáü ·¤ÚUÙð ßæÜè ×ãæÙ ×çãÜæ ÕÌæÌæ ãñÐ Øãæ´ Øã ×ãˆßÂê‡æü ãñ ç·¤ Ââ׿´Îæ ×éâÜ׿Ù-¥ÍæüÌ ÎçÜÌ ß çÂÀǸè ÁæçÌØô´ ·Ô¤ ×éâÜ׿Ù-Øã ¥æÚUô ܻæÌð ãñ´ ç·¤ ©‹ãð´ ¥àæÚUÈ ×éâÜ׿Ùô´ ·Ô¤ ãæÍô´ àæôá‡æ ¥õÚU ¥Â×æÙ ·¤æ çàæ·¤æÚU ãôÙæ ÂÇ¸Ìæ ãñÐ Øãè ·¤æÚU‡æ ãñ ç·¤ Ââ׿´Îæ ×éâÜ׿Ùô´ Ùð çã‹Îê Ùè¿è ÁæçÌØô´ ·Ô¤ âæÍ â´ØéQ¤ ×ô¿æü ÕÙæ çÜØæ ãñÐ Áð°ÙØê ×ð´ §âè ÌÚUã ·¤æ ¥çÖØæÙ ÒØêÙæ§üÅUðÇ ÎçÜÌ SÅUêÇð´ÅU÷â È ôÚU×Ó (ØêÇè°â°È) mæÚUæ ¿ÜæØæ Áæ ÚUãæ ãñÐ §â ¥çÖØæÙ ·Ô¤ ¥´Ì»üÌ »ôçDØæ´, ¥æ× âÖæØð´ ¥õÚU ÁéÜêâô´ ¥æçÎ ·¤æ ¥æØôÁÙ ç·¤Øæ ÁæÌæ ãñÐ àæÙñÑ àæÙñÑ çßEçßlæÜØ ·¤æ ׿ãõÜ §ÌÙæ ÕÎÜ »Øæ ãñ ç·¤ ßãæ´ ã×ðàææ âð àæçQ¤àææÜè ÚUãð ßæ×´Íè Àæ˜æ â´»ÆÙô´ ·Ô¤ ÙðÌæ-çÁÙ ÂÚU Øã ¥æÚUôÂ Ü»æØæ ÁæÌæ ÚUãæ ãñ ç·¤ ßð ÎçÜÌ-ÕãéÁÙ çßÖêçÌØô´ ·¤ô ÙÁÚU¥´ÎæÁ ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´-Öè ¥Õ ¥ÂÙè Õæ´ã ÂÚU Èé Üð ·¤æ ÕðÁ Ü»æÙð ×ð´ àæ×æüÌð Ùãè´ ãñ´Ð ÜŽÕôÜé¥æÕ Øã ç·¤ Õýæ±×‡æßæÎè ÂýÖé¥ô´ ÂÚU ¿ôÅU ·¤ÚUÙð ·Ô¤ ¥çÌçÚUQ¤, ÎçÜÌ-ÕãéÁÙ ¥ÂÙè çßÖêçÌØô´ ·¤è SÍæÂÙæ Öè ·¤ÚU ÚUãð ãñ´Ð 45 CULTURE 46 CHANGE OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press To understand this phenomenon, let me draw on the work of social historian Badri Narayan (Women Heroes and Dalit Assertion in North India: Culture, Identity and Politics, 2006). According to Narayan, Dalits’ identity history attempts to iconize Dalit heroes and heroines. The purpose of this exercise is to challenge the hegemony of the upper castes in the sphere of culture and civil society. New icons such as Phule, Udadevi, Jhalkaribai, Avantibai, Pannadhai, Mahaviridevi are meant to enthuse Dalits to fight against the oppression and exploitation by the upper castes. As he puts it, ‘In contemporary times, Dalit narratives are being rewritten and recreated to awaken the oppressed Dalit communities.’ (p158) Dalits’ bitter experience with teachers Dalits were denied access to education until a few centuries ago in Indian society. During the British raj, a number of social reform movements led by Dalitbahujan radicals propagated the idea of equality in a highly stratified society. As the colonial government gradually introduced education for the masses, some Dalitbahujans were able to enter schools. But unlike the experience of upper-caste students, who often glorified teachers and placed them higher than gods, Dalits, on the other hand, had an experience of mistreatment, discrimination and humiliation at schools. There is a significant amount of work on the colonial period which shows such inhuman treatment of Dalit students. Most Dalit autobiographies, written in the post-colonial period, also reflect on this continuing grim reality. For example, Arvind Malagatti’s Government Brahmana (2007) recalls with pain how he was abused as “bastard” and was forced to undergo severe punishment. But most shockingly, the teacher inflicted pain on him without touching his body. “But we untouchable lot never had the good fortune of receiving slaps from his hands,” says the young Malagatti (p14). The experience of Namdeo Nimgade (In the Tiger’s Shadow: The Autobiography of An Ambedkarite, 2010) is not less painful. “The headmaster admitted me under the strict condition that I, being an untouchable, must never enter the classroom but sit with a handful of other untouchables on the hot veranda and listen to lessons through a window”, rues Nimgade (p27). These examples show the bitter experience of Dalit students with their upper-caste teachers. As a result, Dalits nourish a negative image of most of their upper-caste and Brahminical teachers. The denunciation of Radhakrishnan as an educator is informed by these very sociological and historical experiences of Dalits while the adoption of a backward-caste woman, Savitribai Phule, as an icon, may be viewed as a sign of the intensification of Dalitisation of public culture. Abhay Kumar ([email protected]) is pursuing a PhD at the Centre for Historical Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi §â ÂçÚUƒæÅUÙæ ·¤ô â×ÛæÙð ×ð´ âæ×æçÁ·¤ §çÌãæâçßÎ÷ ÕÎýè ÙæÚUæØ‡æ (ßê×ðÙ ãèÚUôÁ °‡Ç ÎçÜÌ °âÚUàæÙ §Ù ÙæÍü §´çÇØæÑ ·¤Ë¿ÚU, ¥æ§üÇð´çÅUÅUè °‡Ç ÂôçÜçÅU€Uâ, w®®{) ·¤æ Øã ©hÚU‡æ ã׿ÚUè ×ÎÎ ·¤ÚU â·¤Ìæ ãñÐ ßð çܹÌð ãñ´, ÒÎçÜÌ ¥ÂÙè Âã¿æÙ SÍæçÂÌ ·¤ÚUÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ ÎçÜÌ ÙæØ·¤-ÙæçØ·¤æ¥ô´ ·¤è SÍæÂÙæ ·¤ÚUÌð ¥æ ÚUãð ãñ´Ð §â·¤æ ©gðàØ â´S·¤ëçÌ ß Ùæ»çÚU·¤ â׿Á ·Ô¤ ÿæð˜æô´ ×ð´ ª¤¡¿è ÁæçÌØô´ ·Ô¤ ß¿üSß ·¤ô ¿éÙõÌè ÎðÙæ ãñÐ Èé Üð, ©ÎæÎðßè, ÛæÜ·¤æÚUèÕæ§ü, ¥ß´ÌèÕæ§ü, ÂóææÏæØè, ×ãæßèÚUèÎðßè ¥æçÎ Áñâè Ù§ü çßÖêçÌØô´ ·Ô¤ ¥æçßc·¤æÚU ·¤æ ©gðàØ ãñ ÎçÜÌô´ ·¤ô ©»ý ÕÙÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ ÂýðçÚUÌ ·¤ÚUÙæ Ìæç·¤ ß𠪤¡¿è ÁæçÌØô´ ·Ô¤ Î×Ù ß àæôá‡æ ·Ô¤ ç¹ÜæÈ ÜǸ â·Ô¤´Ð §Ù çÎÙô´ ÎçÜÌ ·¤Íæ¥ô´ ·¤æ ÂéÙÜðü¹Ù ¥õÚU ÂéÙü¥çßc·¤æÚU ¿Ü ÚUãæ ãñ Ìæç·¤ Îç×Ì ÎçÜÌ â×éÎæØô´ ·¤ô Áæ»ýÌ ç·¤Øæ Áæ â·Ô¤ (ÂëD vz})ÓÐ ÎçÜÌô´ ·¤æ çàæÿæ·¤ô´ ·Ô¤ âæÍ ·¤ÅUé ¥ÙéÖß ÖæÚUÌèØ â׿Á ×ð´ ·¤éÀ âçÎØô´ ÂãÜð Ì·¤, ÎçÜÌô´ ·¤è çàæÿææ Ì·¤ Âãé´¿ Ùãè´ ÍèÐ ¥´»ýðÁô´ ·Ô¤ ÚUæÁ ·Ô¤ ÎõÚUæÙ ÎçÜÌ-ÕãéÁÙ R¤æ´çÌ·¤æçÚUØô´ ·Ô¤ ÙðÌëˆß ×ð´ ·¤§ü â׿ÁâéÏæÚU ¥æ´ÎôÜÙ ¿Üð, çÁ‹ãô´Ù𠪤¡¿-Ùè¿ ·Ô¤ Ö´ßÚUÁæÜ ×ð´ È´ âð ÖæÚUÌèØ â׿Á ×ð´ â׿ÙÌæ ÜæÙð ·¤è ׿´» ©Ææ§üÐ ¥õÂçÙßðçàæ·¤ àææâÙ Ùð çàæÿææ ·Ô¤ mæÚU ¥æ× Üô»ô´ ·Ô¤ çܰ ¹ôÜ çΰР§â·Ô¤ ÙÌèÁð ×ð´ ·¤éÀ ÎçÜÌ-ÕãéÁÙ Öè S·¤êÜô´ ×ð´ Âýßðàæ Âæ â·Ô¤Ð ÂÚU´Ìé Áãæ´ ª¤¡¿è ÁæçÌØô´ ·Ô¤ çßlæçÍüØô´ ·¤æ çàæÿæ·¤ô´ ·Ô¤ â´Õ´Ï ×ð´ ¥ÙéÖß ¥‘Àæ Íæ ¥õÚU ßð Ù ·Ô¤ßÜ ©Ù·¤æ ×çã׿״ÇÙ ·¤ÚUÌð Íð ßÚUÙ÷ ©‹ãð´ §üEÚU âð Öè ª¤¡¿æ ÎÁæü ÎðÌð Íð ßãè´ ÎçÜÌô´ ·¤ô S·¤êÜô´ ×ð´ ÎéÃØüßãæÚU, ÖðÎÖæß ¥õÚU ¥Â×æÙ ·¤æ âæ×Ùæ ·¤ÚUÙæ ÂǸæÐ ¥õÂçÙßðçàæ·¤ ·¤æÜ ×ð´ ãéØð Üð¹Ù âð ã×ð´ ÂÌæ ¿ÜÌæ ãñ ç·¤ ÎçÜÌ çßlæçÍüØô´ ·Ô¤ âæÍ ¥×æÙßèØ ÃØßãæÚU ¥æ× ÍæÐ ¥õÂçÙßðçàæ·¤ àææâÙ ·Ô¤ ¥´Ì ·Ô¤ ÕæÎ çÜ¹è »§ü ÎçÜÌô´ ·¤è ¥æˆ×·¤Íæ¥ô´ ×ð´ §â ·¤ÅUé â‘¿æ§ü ·¤æ ߇æüÙ ãñÐ ©ÎæãÚU‡ææÍü, ¥ÚUçß´Î ×æÜæ»^è ¥ÂÙè ÂéSÌ·¤ һߴü×ð´ÅU Õýæ±×‡ææÓ (w®®|) ×ð´ ¥ÂÙæ ÎÎü ÕØæ´ ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´Ð ßð çܹÌð ãñ´ ç·¤ ©‹ãð´ S·¤êÜ ×ð´ ÒãÚUæ×èÓ ·¤ãæ ÁæÌæ Íæ ¥õÚU ÎêâÚUð Õ‘¿ô´ ·¤è ÌéÜÙæ ×ð´ ·¤ãè´ ¥çÏ·¤ ·¤Ç¸è âÁæØð´ Îè ÁæÌè Íè´Ð ÂÚU´Ìé âÕâð Îé¹Î Øã Íæ ç·¤ ¥ŠØæÂ·¤ çÕÙæ ©Ù·Ô¤ àæÚUèÚU ·¤ô ãæÍ Ü»æØð ©‹ãð´ ÖØæßã ßðÎÙæ ÎðÌð ÍðÐ Òã× ¥ÀêÌô´ ·¤ô ·¤Öè ©Ù·Ô¤ ãæÍô´ ÍŒÂǸ ¹æÙð ·¤æ âõÖæ‚Ø Ùãè´ ç×ÜæÓ, ׿ܿ»^è çܹÌð ãñ´ (ÂëD vy)Ð Ùæ×Îðß çÙ׻ɸð (§Ù Î ÅUæØ»âü àæñÇôÑ Î ¥æòÅUôÕæØô»ýæÈè ¥æòÈ °Ù ¥´ÕðÇ·¤ÚUæ§ÅU, w®v®) ·¤æ ¥ÙéÖß ·¤× ÎÎüÙæ·¤ Ùãè´ ÍæÐ ÒãñÇ׿SÅUÚU Ùð ×éÛæð §âè àæÌü ÂÚU ÖÌèü ç·¤Øæ Íæ ç·¤ ¿ê´ç·¤ ×ñ´ ¥ÀêÌ ãê´ §âçÜØð ×éÛæð ·¤Öè Öè €UÜæâM¤× ×ð´ Ùãè´ ƒæéâÙæ ãñ ¥õÚU ×ééÛæð ¥‹Ø ¥ÀêÌ Õ‘¿ô´ ·Ô¤ âæÍ, »×ü ßæÚUæ‡Çð ×ð´ ÕñÆ·¤ÚU, ç¹Ç¸·¤è âð 微 âéÙÙæ ÂǸð»æ,Ó çÙ׻ɸð çܹÌð ãñ´ (ÂëD w|)Ð §Ù ©ÎæãÚU‡æô´ âð âæÈ ãñ ç·¤ ÎçÜÌ çßlæçÍüØô´ ·¤ô ¥ÂÙð ©‘¿ ÁæçÌØô´ ·Ô¤ çàæÿæ·¤ô´ ·Ô¤ ãæÍô´ ¥Â×æÙ ¥õÚU çÌÚUS·¤æÚU ÛæðÜÙæ ÂǸæÐ ÁæçãÚU ãñ ç·¤ ÎçÜÌô´ ·Ô¤ ×Ù ×ð´ ©Ù·Ô¤ ©‘¿ ÁæçÌ ß Õýæ±×‡æßæÎè çàæÿæ·¤ô´ ·¤è Ù·¤æÚUæˆ×·¤ Àçß ãñÐ ¥ÂÙð §âè âæ×æçÁ·¤ ß ÚUæÁÙñçÌ·¤ ¥ÙéÖß ·Ô¤ ·¤æÚU‡æ ßð ÚUæÏæ·¤ëc‡æÙ ·¤ô Îðàæ ·¤æ âÕâð ÕǸæ çàæÿæ·¤ ÕÌæØð ÁæÙð ·¤æ çßÚUôÏ ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´Ð §â·¤è Á»ã ©‹ãô´Ùð âæçߘæèÕæ§ü Èé Üð ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ °·¤ çÂÀǸè ÁæçÌ ·¤è ×çãÜæ ·¤ô ¥ÂÙð ÂýÌè·¤ ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ ¹ôÁ çÙ·¤æÜæ ãñÐ Øã âæßüÁçÙ·¤ â´S·¤ëçÌ ·Ô¤ ÎçÜÌè·¤ÚU‡æ ×ð´ ÌðÁè ¥æÙð ·¤æ â´·Ô¤Ì ãñÐ ¥ÖØ ·¤é׿ÚU ÁßæãÚUÜæÜ ÙðãM¤ çßEçßlæÜØ Ù§ü çÎ„è ·Ô¤ â´ðÅUÚU È æòÚU çãSÅUôçÚU·¤Ü SÅUÇèÁ ×ð´ Âè°¿Çè ·¤ÚU ÚUãð ãñ´ ȤæòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ | ¥€ÅêUÕÚU 2014 ¥ŠØØÙ ·¤ÿæ Burnt pages of Indian history ÖæÚUÌèØ §çÌãæâ ·Ô¤ ÁÜæ çΰ »° ÂëD A BOOK THAT DIGS UP A PRE-VEDIC CIVILIZATION INFORMED BY BUDDHISM Øã ÂéSÌ·¤ ÖæÚUÌ ·Ô¤ Õõh Šæ×ü ·Ô¤ ÂýæÏæ‹Ø ßæÜè Âêßü ßñçη¤ âØÌæ ·¤è ÂÇ¸ÌæÜ ·¤ÚUÌè ãñ ARUN KUMAR M ost historians believe that Aryans were aliens who destroyed the pre-Vedic civilization and culture of India. The Vedic Aryans had obliterated every remnant of Buddhism and that is why Al Baruni wrote in his book Indology (AD1030) that he could not meet a single Buddhist monk nor could he lay his hands upon any Buddhist text. For want of historical or archaeological evidence, Francois Bernier, in his book Travels in the Mughal Empire 1656-1668, could write only one sentence on Buddhism while Abul Fazal did not even mention it in his Akbarnama. But in the modern age, Dr Ambedkar and many other scholars have written important books on Buddhism. ¥ ¥L¤‡æ ·é¤×æÚU çÏ·¤æ´àæ §çÌãæâ·¤æÚUô´ ·¤è ׿‹ØÌæ ãñ ç·¤ ¥æØü çßÎðàæè Íð ¥õÚU ©U‹ãUæÙ´ð ð ÖæÚUÌ ·¤è Âêßü ßñçη¤ âØÌæ °ß´ â´S·¤ëçÌ ·¤ô ÙC ç·¤Øæ ÍæÐ ßñçη¤ ¥æØæðZ Ùð Õõh Ï×ü ·Ô¤ âæÿØ Ì·¤ ç×ÅUæ çΰРÌÖè Ìô ¥ÜÕM¤Ùè Ùð ¥ÂÙè ÂéSÌ·¤ Ò§´ÇôÜæòÁèÓ (v®x® §ü®) ×ð´ ÚUôÙæ ÚUôØæ ç·¤ ©âð ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ °·¤ Öè Õõh »ýÍ´ Øæ çÖÿæé Ùãè´ ç×ÜæÐ âæÿØ ·Ô¤ ¥Öæß ×ð´ Èý¤‹·¤æð§Uâ ÕçÙüØÚU Ùð ¥ÂÙè ÂéSÌ·¤ Ò×é»Ü âæ×ýæ’Ø ×ð´ Øæ˜ææ°´ v{z{-v{{}Ó ×ð´ Õõh Ï×ü ÂÚU ׿˜æ °·¤ ßæ€UØ çܹæ Ìô ¥ÕéÜ È ÁÜ Ùð Ò¥·¤ÕÚUÙæ×æÓ ×ð´ Õéh ·¤æ çÁ·ý¤ Ì·¤ Ùãè´ ç·¤ØæÐ çÂÀÜð âõ âæÜô´ ×ð´ Çæò ¥æÕðÇ·¤ÚU âçãÌ ·¤§ü çßmæÙô´ Ùð Õõh Ï×ü ÂÚU ¥Ùð·¤ ×ãˆßÂê‡æü ÂéS̷𤴠çܹè ãñд ãæÜ ×ð´ SßÂÙ ·¤é׿ÚU çßàßæâ ·¤è ×êÜ ¥´»Á ðý è ×ð´ çÜç¹Ì ÂéSÌ·¤ ·¤æ çã‹Îè ¥ÙéßæÎ ÒÕõh Šæ×ü Ñ ×ôãÙÁôÎǸô ãÇŒÂæ Ù»ÚUô´ ·¤æ Šæ×üÓ Âý·¤æçàæÌ ã饿 ãñ, çÁâ·¤æ ¥ÙéßæÎ ÁæÙð-׿Ùð ÎçÜÌ âæçãˆØ·¤æÚU âˆØÂý·¤æàæ Ùð ç·¤Øæ ãñÐ XX 47 READING 48 ROOM OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press e and religious, archaeological evidenc s, ict ed ts, en m cu do al m was the Quoting historic has proved that Buddhis as hw Vis , es tic ac pr l ra y of India’, traditional and cultu e first chapter ‘Discover th In ia. Ind ic ed e-V pr rappa – predominant religion in of Mohenjodaro and Ha ion lig re e th s wa m his Budd e of their Vishwas contends that y destroyed all evidenc he “T . ns ya Ar e th by stroyed the cities which were de lture”, he writes cu a crime of obliterating ÂæÚU´ÂçÚU·¤ Sߌ٠·¤é׿ÚU çßàßæâ Ùð çßçÖ‹Ù ÎSÌæßðÁô´, çàæÜæÜð¹ô´, ÂéÚUæÌæçˆß·¤ âæÿØô´, Ïæç×ü·¤, ÂæÚÚÂçÚU·¤ °ß´ âæ´S·¤ëçÌ·¤ Âý׿‡æô´ ·Ô¤ ¥æÏæÚU ÂÚU Øã âæçÕÌ ç·¤Øæ ãñ ç·¤ Âêßü ßñçη¤ ·¤æÜ ¤, · ü ç× ×ð´ ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ Õõh Ï×ü ·¤æ ÂýæÏæ‹Ø ÍæÐ Ïæ , ô´, ÂéÚUæÌæçˆß·¤ âæÿØô´ ¹ Üð Üæ çàæ , ô´ Á ßð Ìæ ü ÎS Ï× Ù Õõh Ö‹ ´ ·¤éÜ vw ¥ŠØæØô´ ×ð´ çßÖæçÁÌ §â ×ð çßç Ì Sߌ٠·¤é׿ÚU çßàßæâ Ùð Âêßü ßñçη¤ ·¤æÜ ×ð´ ÖæÚU ç·¤ ãñ Øæ ç·¤ çÕÌ âæ Øã U ÂéSÌ·¤ ×ð´ Õõh Ï×ü ·Ô¤ ÎàæüÙ, Õõh æ ÂÚ ·¤ ÚU ´ °ß´ âæ´S·¤ëçÌ·¤ Âý׿‡æô´ ·Ô¤ ¥æÏæ è ¹ôÁÓ ×ð´ çßàßæâ ÂæÌð ãñ´ ç·¤ ×ôãÙÁôÎǸô ¥õÚU ãǸŒÂæ Ù»ÚUôÙC ¥õÚU Õýæãׇæ Ï×ü ·¤æ â´ƒæáü ÌÍæ ãè ÍæÐ ÂýÍ× ¥ŠØæØ ÒÖæÚUÌ ·¤ ÙC ·¤ÚU çÎØæÐ Üð¹·¤ çܹÌð ãñ´, ©‹ãô´Ùð °·¤ â´S·¤ëçÌ ·¤ô Õõh Ï×ü ·Ô¤ ©ˆÍæÙ-ÂÌÙ ·¤æ Ï×ü Õõh Ï×ü Íæ, çÁâð ¥æØæðZ Ùð ç×ÅUæ çΰ Íð §çÌãæâ çÜ¹æ »Øæ ãñÐ ÂýÍ× ÿØ âæ è âÖ ¤ ·Ô Ï æ ÚU ¥Â ¤ ¥ŠØæØ ÒÖæÚUÌ ·¤è ¹ôÁÓ ×ð´ ·Ô ð ·¤ÚUÙ çßàßæâ ÂæÌð ãñ´ ç·¤ ×ôãÙÁôÎǸô ¥õÚU ãǸŒÂæ Ù»ÚUô´ ·¤æ Ï×ü Õõh Ï×ü Íæ, çÁâð ¥æØæðZ Ùð ÙC ·¤ÚU çÎØæÐ Üð¹·¤ çܹÌð ãñ Ñ Ò©‹ãô´Ùð °·¤ â´S·¤ëçÌ ·¤ô ÙC Now the Hindi translation of Swapna Kumar Das’s book, Buddhism: The ·¤ÚUÙð ·Ô¤ ¥ÂÚUæÏ ·Ô¤ âÖè âæÿØ ç×ÅUæ çΰÐÓ (ÂëD Religion of Mohenjodaro and Harappa Cities, has been published under the title z) Üð¹·¤ Ùð çßSÌæÚUÂßê ·ü ¤ Øã â×ÛææØæ ãñ ç·¤ Bauddha Dharma: Mohenjodaro, Harappa Nagaron Ka Dharma. Well-known Âý»çÌàæèÜ Õõh Ï×ü Ùð §ÌÙè ¥æâæÙè âð Õýæãׇæ Dalit litterateur Satya Prakash has translated the book. Ï×ü ·Ô¤ ¥æ»ð ƒæéÅUÙð Ùãè´ ÅU·ð ¤Ô ÕçË·¤ ¥ˆØ´Ì ·ý¤ê ÚUUÌæÂê‡æü Quoting historical documents, edicts, archaeological evidence and religious, ɸ»´ âð Õýæãׇæ Ï×ü Ùð Õõh Ï×ü ·¤ô ¹ˆ× ç·¤ØæÐ ßð traditional and cultural practices, Vishwas has proved that Buddhism was the çܹÌð ãñ´ , Òçã‹Îê Ï×ü ·Ô¤ ×õçÜ·¤ çâhæ´Ì ÕéçÙØæÎè predominant religion in pre-Vedic India. The book is divided into 12 chapters, M¤Â âð ÁÙçßÚUôÏè, ©ˆÂèǸٷ¤æÚUè ¥õÚU ÖðÎÖæß×êÜ·¤ dealing with Buddhism, its philosophy, the struggle between Brahmanism and ãñÓ´ñ (ÂëD-vx) ÁÕç·¤ ÒÕõh Ï× âæßüÖõç×·¤ Buddhism and the history of the rise and fall of Buddhism. In the first chapter ÖýæÌëˆß ·¤æ ÕãéÌ ãè ©ÎæÚU翞æ Ï×ü ãñÓ (ÂëD-x|)Ð ‘Discovery of India’, Vishwas contends that Buddhism was the religion of Mohen§âè ·¤æÚU‡æ ¥æØæðZ Ùð ¥ÂÙð È æØÎð ·Ô¤ çܰ ×êÜ jodaro and Harappa – the cities which the Aryans overran. “They destroyed all çÙßæçâØô´ ·Ô¤ Õõh Ï× ·¤ô ÙC ç·¤Øæ ¥õÚU ©Ù ÂÚU evidence of their crime of obliterating a culture” (Page 5). The writer says that a çã‹Îê Ï×ü ·¤ô ÍôÂæ Ìæç·¤ àæôá‡æ ¥õÚU Î×Ù ·¤è comparatively progressive Buddhism did not surrender before Brahmanism ÒSÍæØè Õ´ÎôÕSÌèÓ ·¤è Áæ â·Ô¤Ð easily but was crushed in the most cruel manner. He writes, “The basic tenets of ÂéSÌ·¤ ·Ô¤ Âý怷¤ÍÙ ×ð´ w} Õéhô´ ¥õÚU ©Ù·Ô¤ Hinduism are anti-people, discriminatory and oppressive” (Page 13) whereas ¥çSÌˆß ·Ô¤ Âý׿‡æô´ ·¤è ¿¿æü ãñÐ çâhæÍü »õÌ× ·Ô¤ “Buddhist Dhamma is a liberal religion, propounding universal brotherhood” ÂãÜð ·Ô¤ w| ¥‹Ø Õéhô´ ·¤æ §çÌãæâ ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ Ìô ÙC (Page 37). That is why, the invading Aryans destroyed the Buddhist Dhamma of ·¤ÚU çÎØæ »Øæ, Üðç·¤Ù ŸæèÜ´·¤æ ×´ð âéÚUçÿæÌ Õ¿ »ØæÐ the original inhabitants and thrust Hinduism upon them so that they could build Õõh çÖÿæé Çæò »é‡æÚˆÙ ŸæèÜ´·¤æ âð w} Õéhô´ ·Ô¤ ÕæÚUð ×ð´ a “permanent machinery” of exploitation and oppression. ÁæÙ·¤æÚUè ÖæÚUÌ Üæ°Ð çßàßæâ, Õýæãׇæô´ ·Ô¤ Òâ×éÎý The book’s preface talks about the 28 Buddhas and the evidence for them. The ÂæÚU çÙáðÏÓ ·¤ô Õõh Ï×ü · ÒçßSÌæÚU ·Ô¤ ÖØÓ ·Ô¤ history of the 27 Buddhas who pre-dated Siddhartha Gautam has been destroyed M¤Â ×´ð Îð¹Ìð ãñ´ €UØô´ç·¤ Õýæãׇæô´ ·¤ô ÂÌæ Íæ ç·¤ in India but it is safe in Sri Lanka. Dr Gunratna, a Buddhist monk, brought the inforÕõh Ï×ü ·¤æ §çÌãæâ çßÎðàææð´ ×ð´ âéÚUçÿæÌ ãñд §â mation about 28 Buddhas from Sri Lanka to India. Vishwas links the Brahmanical ÂéSÌ·¤ ×ð´ ¥æÏéçÙ·¤ Øé» ×ð´ Õõh Ï×ü ·Ô¤ ÂéÙM¤ˆÍæÙ ban on “crossing the seas” with the fear of “expansion of Buddhism” because the ·Ô¤ çßáØ ×ð´ °·¤ ÂêÚUæ ¥ŠØæØ ãñ, çÁâ×ð´ ¥Ùæ»çÚU·¤ Brahmins knew that history of Buddhism was safe and available abroad. An entire Ï×üÂæÜ, Çæò ¥æÕðÇ·¤ÚU, ÚUæãéÜ âæ´·¤ëˆØæØÙ ¥æçÎ chapter of the book is devoted to the revival of Buddhism in modern India and mæÚUæ ¥æÏéçÙ·¤ Øé» ×ð´ ç·¤° »° ÂýØæâô´ ·¤æ ߇æüÙ ãñÐ elaborates on the efforts made by Anagrik Dharmapal, Dr Ambedkar, Rahul Øã ÂéSÌ·¤ §çÌãæâ ×ð´ L¤ç¿ ÚU¹Ùð ßæÜô´ ¥õÚU Sankrityayan, etc in this direction. ÕãéÁÙ â׿Á ·Ô¤ ·¤æØü·¤Ìæü¥ô´ ·Ô¤ çܰ ·¤æÈ è All in all, this book is quite useful for those interested in ©ÂØô»è âæçÕÌ ãô»èÐ history and for Bahujan activists. Title : Baudhha Dharma: Mohenjodaro, Harappa Nagaron Ka Dharma Author: Swapan Kumar Vishwas Hindi Translation : Satyaprakash Published : Gautam Book Centre, New Delhi Phone : 9810173661 `250 ÂéSÌ·¤ Ñ Õõh Šæ×ü Ñ ×ôãÙÁôÎǸô ãÇŒÂæ Ù»ÚUô´ ·¤æ Ï×ü Üð¹·¤ Ñ SßÂÙ ·¤é׿ÚU çßàßæâ çã´Îè ¥ÙéßæÎ Ñ âˆØÂý·¤æàæ Âý·¤æàæ·¤Ñ »õÌ× Õé·¤ âðÅ´ UÚU, Ù§ü çÎËÜè ȤæðÙÑ 9810173667 ȤæòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ | ¥€ÅêUÕÚU 2014 ÁÙ ×èçÇØæ Blinded by communalism âæ´ÂýÎæçØ·¤Ìæ ×ð´ ¥´Ïð ANIL CHAMADIA A rshad Zubair was observing the Ramzan roza (fast). He was in charge of catering at Maharashtra Sadan in New Delhi. Some MPs from Maharashtra were staying at the government guesthouse, including 11 from the BJP and Shivsena who were very unhappy with the food being served there. They wanted to go public with their complaints; so on 17 July they invited journalists of Maharashtra-based media organizations to the Sadan. When camera crews and correspondents of as many as 11 media organizations reached the Sadan, Shivsena MP Rajan Vichare began thrusting a roti into Zubair’s mouth. Despite having recorded the incident, the media organizations, which shift into the ‘Breaking News’ mode at the drop of a hat, kept this news under wraps for almost a week. For inexplicable reasons, the sensational news that a Shivsena MP force-fed a Muslim observing Roza in front of media persons was canned. Those who were present at the spot spoke about it to their colleagues in other media organizations. But the news still did not come out. Those privy to the information took the stand that they were not ¥ ¥çÙÜ ¿×çÇ¸Øæ ÚUâÎ ÁéÕñÚ¸, ÚU×ÁæÙ ·Ô¤ ×ãèÙð ×ð´ ÚUôÁ¸ð ÂÚU ÍðÐ çÎ„è ·Ô¤ ×ãæÚUæCþ âÎÙ ×ð´ ¹æÙÂæÙ ·¤è ÃØßSÍæ ©Ù·¤è Îð¹-ÚUð¹ ×ð´ ¿Ü ÚUãè ÍèÐ ×ãæÚUæCþþ ·Ô¤ ·¤éÀ â´âÎ âÎSØ ©â âÚU·¤æÚUè ¥çÌçÍ»ëã ×ð´ ÆãÚUð ãé° Íð ¥õÚU ©Ù×ð´ ÖæÁÂæ ¥õÚU çàæßâðÙæ ·Ô¤ vv âÎSØ àææç×Ü ÍðÐ Øð âÖè ¹æÙÂæÙ ·¤è ÃØßSÍæ ·¤ô Üð·¤ÚU ÕðãÎ ÙæÚUæÁ ÍðÐ ¥ÂÙè ÙæÚUæÁ»è ·¤ô âæßüÁçÙ·¤ ·¤ÚUÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ ©‹ãô´Ùð v| ÁéÜæ§ü ·¤ô ×ãæÚUæCþ-çSÍÌ ×èçÇØæ â´SÍæÙô´ ·Ô¤ â´ßæÎÎæÌæ¥ô´ ·¤ô ÕéÜæØæÐ ‚ØæÚUã ×èçÇØæ â´SÍæÙô´ ·Ô¤ â´ßæÎÎæÌæ ¥õÚU ·ñ¤×ÚUæ ÂâüÙ çÙ×´˜æ‡æ ·¤ô Sßè·¤æÚU ·¤ÚU âÎÙ Âãé´¿ðÐ ©Ù âÖè ·Ô¤ âæ×Ùð, çàæßâðÙæ ·Ô¤ °·¤ âæ´âÎ ÚUæÁÙ çß¿æÚUð Ùð ÁéÕñÚU ·Ô¤ ×é´ã ×ð´ ÁÕÚUÙ °·¤ ÚUôÅUè Æê´â ÎèÐ §â ÎëàØ ·¤ô ·ñ¤×ÚUð ×ð´ Öè ·ñ¤Î ç·¤Øæ »ØæÐ Üðç·¤Ù ãñÚUæÙè ·¤è ÕæÌ Øã ãñ ç·¤ ÂÜ-ÂÜ ·¤è ¹ÕÚUð´ ÎðÙð ßæÜð ×èçÇØæ ¿ñÙÜæð´ ×ð´ °·¤ ãUÌð Ì·¤ Øã ¹ÕÚU Ùãè´ ¥æ â·¤è ç·¤ °·¤ çàæßâðÙæ âæ´âÎ Ùð ×èçÇØæ ·¤ç×üØæð´ ·¤è ×õÁêλè ×ð´ °·¤ ÚUôÁðÎæÚU ×éâÜ×æÙ ·Ô¤ ×é´ã ×ð´ ÁÕÚUÙ ÚUôÅUè Æê´â ÎèÐ ãæÜæ´ç·¤, ×èçÇØæ â´SÍæÙô´ ·Ô¤ çÁÙ ×éÜæçÁ×ô´ ·Ô¤ âæ×Ùð Øã ƒæÅUÙæ ãé§ü, ©‹ãô´Ùð ©â·Ô¤ ÕæÚUð ×ð´ ÎêâÚUð ×èçÇØæ â´SÍæÙô´ ·Ô¤ ¥ÂÙð âæçÍØô´ ·¤ô Öè ÕÌæØæ Üðç·¤Ù ç·¤âè Ùð Öè ©â ¹ÕÚU ·¤ô ÁæçãÚU Ùãè´ ãôÙð çÎØæÐ ©Ù Üô»ô´ ·Ô¤ Âæâ °·¤ Ì·¤ü Øã Íæ ç·¤ ƒæÅUÙæ Ù Ìô ©Ù·Ô¤ âæ×Ùð 49 50 JAN MEDIA OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press ONE OF THE FOUR PILLARS OF DEMOCRACY IS NOW CLEARLY PART OF THE ESTABLISHMENT Üô·¤Ì´˜æ ·Ô¤ ¿æÚU SÌ´Öô´ ×ð´ âð °·¤ ×èçÇUØæ Öè çÙçpÌ ÌõÚU ÂÚU ÃØßSÍæ ·¤æ çãSâæ ÕÙ »Øæ ãñ personally present at the spot and had no evidence that such an incident had taken place and hence they could not report it. It was only after the Indian Express carried the news on 23 July that the the channels began running the footage, apparently to save their skin. At that time, Parliament was in session and the news created some commotion there. Two questions arise here. The first is whether the correspondents of Maharashtra-based publications are comparatively more communal and casteist. And, second, is it possible to suppress the news of any event –howsoever important it may be – if there is an unholy alliance between the four pillars of democracy? While looking for an answer to the first question, we came across a research paper. Dinesh Murar, a researcher in mass communications, has put in a lot of effort into bringing out the paper. He collected and collated facts relating to the socio-economic, political and religious backgrounds and gender of the journalists working in media organizations of the Vidharbha region of Maharashtra. He has tried to analyse how these factors affect the selection and coverage of news: what is suppressed and/or exaggerated and how. His research covered Hindi newspapers Lokmat Samachar, Dainik Bhaskar, Nav Bharat, Rashtra Prakash and Pratidin; Marathi dailies Lokmat, Sakal, Loksatta, Deshonnati, Punyanagari and Lokshahi Varta; and English newspapers The Indian Express, The Times of India and The Hitavada. The survey revealed that, of the 186 journalists working in these newspapers, 79 per cent were Hindus, 6 per cent Muslims, 12 per cent Buddhists and 3 per cent Jains. There was not a single Christian, Sikh or Parsee journalist. But merely these figures do not explain the religious bias that is reflected in the content of these newspapers. For that, we will have to dig a bit deeper. ãé§ü Íè ¥õÚU Ùæ ãè ©Ù·Ô¤ Âæâ ©â ƒæÅUÙæ ·¤æ ·¤ô§ü âÕêÌ ãñUÐ wx ÁéÜæ§ü w®vy ·¤ô ÁÕ ¥´»ýðÁè ¥¹ÕæÚU §´çÇØÙ °€UâÂýðâ Ùð ƒæÅUÙæ ·¤æ çßßÚU‡æ ÂãÜè ÕæÚU ÀæÂæ ÌÕ ƒæÅUÙæ ·Ô¤ âר ×õÁêÎ ¿ñÙÜßæÜô´ Ùð Öè ¥ÂÙè ¿×Çè Õ¿æÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ ©â·Ô¤ ȤéÅUðÁ çιæÙð àæéM¤ ·¤ÚU çΰРâ´âÎ ·¤æ â˜æ ¿Ü ÚUãæ Íæ ¥õÚU ©â âר §â ¹ÕÚU ·Ô¤ âæßüçÁÙ·¤ ãôÌð ãè â´âÎ ×ð´ Öè àæôÚU àæÚUæÕæ ãé¥æÐ §â ƒæÅUÙæ ·¤ô Üð·¤ÚU Îô ÂýàÙ çß¿æÚU‡æèØ ãñ´Ð ÂãÜæ, €UØæ ×ãæÚUæCþ ·Ô¤ â´ßæÎÎæÌæ¥ô´ ×ð´ Ïæç×ü·¤ ß ÁæÌèØ Âêßæü»ýã ¥Âðÿææ·¤ëÌ ’ØæÎæ ãñ´? ÎêâÚUæ, ç·¤ €UØæ ØçÎ â´âÎèØ Üô·¤Ì´˜æ ·Ô¤ ¿æÚUô´ SÌ´Öô´ ·Ô¤ Õè¿ âæ´Æ»æ´Æ ãô Áæ° Ìô ÕǸè âð ÕÇ¸è ƒæÅUÙæ°´ ÎÕæ§ü Áæ â·¤Ìè ãñ? ÂãÜð ÂýàÙ ·Ô¤ ©žæÚU ·¤è ¹ôÁ ·¤ÚUÌð ãé° ×éÛæð °·¤ àæôϘæ ç×ÜæÐ ©âð ÁÙâ´¿æÚU ·Ô¤ àæôÏæÍèü çÎÙðàæ ×éÚUæÚU Ù𠷤Ǹè ×ðãÙÌ âð ÌñØæÚU ç·¤Øæ ãñÐ ©‹ãô´Ùð ×ãæÚUæCþ ·Ô¤ çßÎÖü ×ð´ ×èçÇØæ â´SÍæÙô´ ·Ô¤ ˜淤æÚUô´ ·Ô¤ âæ×æçÁ·¤,¥æçÍü·¤, ÚUæÁÙèçÌ·¤, Ïæç×ü·¤, Üñ´ç»» ¥æçÎ ÂëDÖêç× ·Ô¤ Ì‰Ø Á׿ ç·¤° ¥õÚU Øã çßàÜðá‡æ ç·¤Øæ ç·¤ ˜淤æÚUô´ ·¤è âæ×æçÁ·¤ ÂëDÖêç× ·¤æ ¥âÚU ç·¤â M¤Â ×ð´ ¹ÕÚUô´ ÂÚU ãôÌæ ãñ - ç·¤ÌÙæ, €UØæ ¥õÚU ·ñ¤âð çÀÂæØæ ÁæÌæ ãñ ¥õÚU €UØæ ¥õÚU ·ñ¤âð ÕÉ¸æ ¿É¸æ·¤ÚU Âðàæ ç·¤Øæ ÁæÌæ ãñÐ §â ¥ŠØØÙ ×ð´ çã´Îè Öæáæ ·Ô¤ Üô·¤×Ì â׿¿æÚU, ÎñçÙ·¤ ÖæS·¤ÚU,ÙßÖæÚUÌ, ÚUæCþÂý·¤æàæ, ÂýçÌçÎÙ, ×ÚUæÆè Öæáæ ·Ô¤ Üô·¤×Ì, â·¤æÜ, Üô·¤âžææ, ÎðàæôóæÌè,Âé‹ØÙ»ÚUè, Üô·¤àææãè ßæÌæü ÌÍæ ¥´»ýðÁ¸è Öæáæ ·Ô¤ Î §´çÇØÙ °€UâÂýðâ, Î ÅUæ§â ¥æòȸ¤ §´çÇØæ ¥õÚU Î çãÌßæÎ ·¤æð çÜØæ »Øæ ãñUÐ âßðü ·Ô¤ ¥ÙéâæÚU §Ù â´SÍæÙô´ ·Ô¤ ·¤éÜ v}{ ˜淤æÚUô´ ×ð´ |~ ÂýçÌàæÌ ˜淤æÚU çã´Îê , { ÂýçÌàæÌ ×éçSÜ×, vw ÂýçÌàæÌ Õõh ¥õÚU x ÂýçÌàæÌ ÁñÙ ãñ´, ÁÕç·¤ çâ¹, §üâæ§ü Øæ ¥‹Ø Ï×ô´ü âð °·¤ Öè ˜淤æÚU Ùãè´ ãñ´Ð Üðç·¤Ù ·Ô¤ßÜ Øã ¥æ´·¤Ç¸æ çßçÖóæ Öæáæ¥ô´ ·Ô¤ ˜æô´ ×ð´ Ïæç×ü·¤ ·¤^ÚUÌæ ·¤ô Ùãè´ ÎàææüÌæ ãñÐ ©â·Ô¤ çܰ ¥æ´·¤Ç¸ô´ ·Ô¤ ÖèÌÚU ÁæÙæ ãô»æÐ ȤæòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ | ¥€ÅêUÕÚU 2014 ÁÙ ×èçÇØæ ia organizations, ed m e th t, en d ci in e th of a hat, kept Despite having recorded p ro d e th at e d o m s’ aking New le reasons, ab which shift into the ‘Bre lic p ex in r Fo k. ee w a for almost this news under wraps e-fed a Muslim rc fo P M a n se iv Sh a at the sensational news th ersons was canned p ia ed m f o t n o fr in za observing Ro Ì Øã ãñ ç·¤ ÂÜ Õæ è ·¤ è Ù æ U Ú ãñ Ù ·¤ ç ð Ü æÐ Ø » æ ¤Ø ç· §â ÎëàØ ·¤ô ·ñ¤×ÚUð ×ð´ Öè ·ñ¤Î ÍæÙô´ ×ð´ °·¤ ãUÌð Ì·¤ Øã ¹ÕÚU Ùãè´ ¥æ â·¤è ÂÜ ·¤è ¹ÕÚUð´ ÎðÙð ßæÜð ×èçÇØæ â´S ·¤ç×üØæð´ ·¤è ×õÁêλè ×ð´ °·¤ ÚUôÁðÎæÚU ç·¤ °·¤ çàæßâðÙæ âæ´âÎ Ùð ×èçÇØæ ´â ÎèÐ ×éâÜ×æÙ ·Ô¤ ×é´ã ×ð´ ÁÕÚUÙ ÚUôÅUè Æê The newspaper-wise break-up of the figures is as under: In the Marathi daily Lokmat of the Lokmat group, of the 47 journalists 79 per cent are Hindus, 15 per cent Buddhists and 6 per cent Jains. Thus, there is not a single Muslim, Sikh or Christian journalist in the newspaper. In the Marathi daily Deshonnati, 84 per cent journalists are Hindus, 3 per cent are Muslims and 13 per cent are Buddhists. All journalists of the Marathi daily Loksatta are Hindus. Needless to say, the religious backgrounds of journalists of Marathi newspapers are of immense consequence. In Lokmat Samachar, the Hindi newspaper of the Lokmat group, 68 per cent of the journalists are Hindus, 20 per cent are Muslims and 12 per cent are Buddhists. In the Hindi daily Dainik Bhaskar, 94 per cent of the journalists are Hindus, 3 per cent Muslims and another 3 per cent Buddhists. The editorial heads of the Vidharbha editions of Lokmat, Deshonnati, Loksatta,t, Lokmat Samachar, Dainik Bhaskar, Nav Bharat and The Hitavada are all Hindus. Seventy-seven per cent of the journalists surveyed conceded that their religion did impact the way they looked at things. These figures clearly show that the media organizations are dominated by journalists of a particular religion. There is not a single non-Hindu in the editorial team of Loksatta, which describes itself as a ‘powerful representative of the mainstream’ in Maharashtra. Now, we again come back to the question of why the incident of Zubair being forcibly fed a roti did not become public despite the presence of representatives of five newspapers and six TV channels. Was it not an instance of religious prejudices at play? Religion apart, what stopped the scribes from carrying the story? Didn’t the human angle play in their minds? On the surface, they are all representatives of rival media groups but when it comes to hiding a truth, their unity ×éØ â׿¿æÚU˜æô´ ·¤è çSÍçÌ §ââð ÁæÙè Áæ â·¤Ìè ãñÐ Üô·¤×Ì â×êã ·Ô¤ ×ÚUæÆè ÎñçÙ·¤ Üô·¤×Ì ·Ô¤ ·¤éÜ y| ˜淤æÚUô´ ×ð´ âð |~ ÂýçÌàæÌ ˜淤æÚU çã´Îê ãñ´, vz ÂýçÌàæÌ Õõh ¥õÚU { ÂýçÌàæÌ ÁñÙ Ï׿üßÜÕè ãñ´Ð Üô·¤×Ì ×ð´ ×éçSÜ×, çâ¹ ¥õÚU §üâæ§ü â×é뾯 âð °·¤ Öè ˜淤æÚU Ùãè´ ãñ´Ð ×ÚUæÆè ÎñçÙ·¤ ÎðàæôóæÌè ×ð´ }y ÂýçÌàæÌ ˜淤æÚU çã´Îê, x ÂýçÌàæÌ ×éçSÜ× ¥õÚU vx ÂýçÌàæÌ Õõh ãñ´Ð ×ÚUæÆè ÎñçÙ·¤ Üô·¤âžææ ×ð´ âÖè ˜淤æÚU çã´Îê ãñ´Ð »õÚU ·¤ÚUð´, ×ÚUæÆè ˜æô´ ×ð´ ÎêâÚUð Ï×ô´ü ·Ô¤ âÎSØô´ ·¤è â´Øæ ÂÚUÐ Üô·¤×Ì â×êã ·Ô¤ çã´Îè ÎñçÙ·¤ Üô·¤×Ì â׿¿æÚU ×ð´ {} ÂýçÌàæÌ ˜淤æÚU çã´Îê, w® ÂýçÌàæÌ ˜淤æÚU ×éâÜ×æÙ ¥õÚU vw ÂýçÌàæÌ ˜淤æÚU Õõh ãñ´Ð çã´Îè â׿¿æÚU˜æ ÎñçÙ·¤ ÖæS·¤ÚU ×ð´ ~y ÂýçÌàæÌ ˜淤æÚU çã´Îê, x ÂýçÌàæÌ ˜淤æÚU ×éçSÜ× ¥õÚU x ÂýçÌàæÌ ˜淤æÚU Õõh ãñ´Ð Üô·¤×Ì, ÎðàæôóæÌè, Üô·¤âžææ, Üô·¤×Ì â׿¿æÚU, ÎñçÙ·¤ ÖæS·¤ÚU, ÙßÖæÚUÌ ¥õÚU Î çãÌßæÎ ·Ô¤ çßÎÖü ×ð´ âÖè â´ÂæÎ·¤èØ Âý×é¹ çã´Îê Ï׿üßÜÕè ãñ´Ð çßÎÖü ·Ô || ÂýçÌàæÌ ˜淤æÚUô´ Ùð ×æÙæ ç·¤ Ïæç×ü·¤ ÂëDÖêç× ·¤æ ÂýÖæß âÕ´çÏÌ Â˜æ·¤æÚU ·Ô¤ ÎëçC·¤ô‡æ ß ·¤æØü ÂÚU ÂÇ¸Ìæ ãñ Ð Øð ¥æ´·¤Ç¸ð ÕÌæÌð ãñ´ ç·¤ ×èçÇØæ â´SÍæÙô´ ×ð´ ¹æâ ÁæçÌØô´ ß Ï×ü ·¤æ ß¿üSß ãñÐ Üô·¤âžææ ×ð´ Ìô °·¤ Öè »ñÚU-çã‹Îê ×éÜæçÁ× Ùãè´ ãñ´Ð ßã ×ãæÚUæCþ ×ð´ Ò×éØ ÏæÚUæ ·¤æ âàæQ¤ ÂýçÌçÙçÏÓ ãñÐ ¥æç¹ÚU·¤æÚU ×ãæÚUæCþ âÎÙ ×ð´ Âæ´¿ â׿¿æÚU˜æô´ ¥õÚU Àã ¿ñÙÜô´ ·¤è ¥æ´¹ô´ ·¤è ×õÁêÎ»è ·Ô¤ ÕæßÁêÎ ÁéÕñÚU ·Ô¤ ×é´ã ×ð´ ÁÕÚUÙ ÚUôÅUè Æê´âÙð ·¤è ƒæÅUÙæ ̈·¤æÜ €UØô´ ÕæãÚU Ùãè´ ¥æ Âæ§ü? €UØæ ©Ù·Ô¤ Ïæç×ü·¤ Âêßæü»ýã âçR¤Ø Ùãè´ Íð? Ï×ü ·¤è ÕæÌ ÀôǸ Öè Îè Áæ° Ìô ¹ÕÚU ·Ô¤ ׿ÙßèØ ÂýàÙ ·¤ô ©ÆæÙð âð â´ßæÎÎæÌæ¥ô´ ·¤ô ·¤æñÙ âè ¿èÁ ÚUô·¤ ÚUãè Íè? ·¤ãÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ ßð âÖè °·¤ ÎêâÚUð âð ÂýçÌSÂÏæü ·¤ÚUÙð ßæÜð ×èçÇØæ â´SÍæÙô´ ·Ô¤ â´ßæÎÎæÌæ Íð Üðç·¤Ù Øã ·ñ¤âè ÂýçÌSÂÏæü ãñ ç·¤ 51 52 JAN MEDIA OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press has to be seen to be believed. And this is just one example. In fact, the term competition also has a different connotation here. There is complete unanimity on a set of political, social and economic beliefs, and these beliefs are above professional rivalry. As for the second issue, one feels like questioning the very concept that the four pillars of democracy keep a watch over one another and maintain a balance. What if all the four pillars are not sensitive to the democratic ethos and are in cahoots with each other? Since 1990, we have been increasingly witnessing how the four pillars, instead of preserving and strengthening democracy, seem to have started considering democracy as a threat to the new economic order. The Maharashtra Sadan incident demonstrates how the news of any incident can be suppressed if there is an alliance between the legislature and the media. One can only guess how many incidents and truths were suppressed post liberalization. That is why, after the advent of liberalization, the freedom of the press has become an issue of grave concern. The establishment has successfully managed to incorporate the media into its fold. And mind you, the Maharashtra Sadan episode is not only an instance of suppressing a piece of news due to religious bias; it points at a wider conspiracy of silence. On 24 July, The Indian Express even wrote that the media persons provoked the MP to thrust the roti into Zubair’s mouth. Thus, the media is not always a silent spectator; at times, it can also be the agent provocateur. This can also been seen as an example of how the media is under pressure to ‘create’ news. Thus, the media no longer only reports news. It also creates and suppresses news. This is a bitter truth we all have to face. Anil Chamadia is a senior Hindi journalist, associated with media research. Currently, he edits Jan Media and Mass Media, Hindi and English journals on media issues e all On the surface, they ar media groups but representatives of rival a truth, their unity when it comes to hiding lieved. There is has to be seen to be be a set of political, complete unanimity on liefs, and these social and economic be sional rivalry beliefs are above profes çÌSÂÏæü ·¤ÚUÙð ·¤ãÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ ßð âÖè °·¤ ÎêâÚUð âð Âý Üðç·¤Ù Øã ßæÜð ×èçÇØæ â´SÍæÙô´ ·Ô¤ â´ßæÎÎæÌæ Íð â¿ ·¤ô ·ñ¤âè ÂýçÌSÂÏæü ãñ ç·¤ ©Ù·Ô¤ Õè¿ ç·¤âèÌô ×ãÁ °·¤ çÀÂæÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ °·¤æ ãô ÁæÌæ ãñ? ØãØãæ¡ ¥ÂÙð ©ÎæãÚU‡æ ãñÐ ÎÚU¥âÜ, ÂýçÌSÂÏæü ·Ô¤ ÁÙèçÌ·¤, ¥Ü» ¥Íü ãñд °·¤ ¹æâ ÌÚUã ·Ô¤ ÚUæ Ì ·Ô¤ âæÍ Öè âæ×æçÁ·¤, ¥æçÍ·ü ¤ çß¿æÚUô´ ÂÚU âã×çÁæ â·¤Ìæ ãñÐ ÂýçÌSÂÏæü ·¤æ °·¤ ·¤ôÙæ ÌñØæÚU ç·¤Øæ ©Ù·Ô¤ Õè¿ ç·¤âè â¿ ·¤ô çÀÂæÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ °·¤æ ãô ÁæÌæ ãñ? Øã Ìô ×ãÁ °·¤ ©ÎæãÚU‡æ ãñÐ ÎÚU¥âÜ, ÂýçÌSÂÏæü ·Ô¤ Øãæ¡ ¥ÂÙð ¥Ü» ¥Íü ãñ´Ð °·¤ ¹æâ ÌÚUã ·Ô¤ ÚUæÁÙèçÌ·¤, âæ×æçÁ·¤, ¥æçÍü·¤ çß¿æÚUô´ ÂÚU âã×çÌ ·Ô¤ âæÍ Öè ÂýçÌSÂÏæü ·¤æ °·¤ ·¤ôÙæ ÌñØæÚU ç·¤Øæ Áæ â·¤Ìæ ãñÐ ÎêâÚUð ÂýàÙ ·Ô¤ ©žæÚU ·¤è ¹ôÁ ·¤ÚUÌð ãé° â´âÎèØ Üô·¤Ì´˜æ ·¤è ©Uâ ¥ßÏæÚU‡ææ ÂÚU âᑚ ·¤ÚUÙð ·¤æ ×Ù ·¤ÚUÌæ ãñ çÁâ×ð´ ·¤ãæ ÁæÌæ ãñ ç·¤ §â·Ô¤ ¿æÚUô´ SÌ´Ö °·¤ ÎêâÚUð ÂÚU çÙ»ÚUæÙè ÚU¹Ùð ¥õÚU â´ÌéÜÙ ÕÙæÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ ÁM¤ÚUè ãôÌð ãñ´Ð ØçÎ Øð ¿æÚUô´ SÌ´Ö Üô·¤Ì´˜æ ·Ô¤ ÂýçÌ â´ßðÎÙàæèÜ Ùãè´ ãô´ ¥õÚU ©Ù·Ô¤ Õè¿ °·¤æ ãô Áæ° Ìô ©â çSÍçÌ ×ð´ €UØæ ç·¤Øæ Áæ â·¤Ìæ ãñ? v~~® ·Ô¤ ÕæÎ ¹æâÌõÚU âð â´âÎèØ Üô·¤Ì´˜æ ·Ô¤ ¿æÚUô´ SÌ´Öô´ ·Ô¤ Õè¿ Üæð·¤Ì´˜æ ·¤ô Õ¿æÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ ÂýçÌSÂÏæü ·¤è ÕÁæØ Üô·¤Ì´˜æ ·¤ô Ù§ü ¥æçÍü·¤ ÃØßSÍæ ·Ô¤ çܰ ¹ÌÚUæ â×ÛæÙð ×ð´ °·¤æ ·¤è çSÍçÌ çιæ§ü ÎðÌè ãñÐ ×ãæÚUæCþ âÎÙ ·¤è ƒæÅUÙæ ÕÌæÌè ãñ ç·¤ çßÏæçØ·¤æ ¥õÚU ×èçÇØæ ×ð´ °·¤æ ãô Ìô ƒæÅUÙæ°´ ÎÕæ§ü Áæ â·¤Ìè ãñ´Ð Öê×´ÇÜè·¤ÚU‡æ ·¤è ÂýçR¤Øæ ·Ô¤ ÕæÎ Ù ÁæÙð ç·¤ÌÙè ƒæÅUÙæ°´ ß â¿ ¥æÂâè âã×çÌ âð ÎÕæ° »° ãñ´Ð ØçÎ ÂéçÜâ ·Ô¤ âæÍ ×èçÇØæ ·¤è âã×çÌ ÕÙ Áæ° Ìô Öè °ðâè ãè çSÍçÌ Îð¹Ùð ·¤ô ç×ÜÌè ãñÐ Öê×´ÇÜè·¤ÚU‡æ ·Ô¤ ÕæÎ ×èçÇØæ ·¤è SßÌ´˜æÌæ ·¤ô Üð·¤ÚU ’ØæÎæ ç¿´Ìæ §âèçܰ ÁæçãÚU ·¤è ÁæÌè ãñÐ SÍæçÂÌ â´SÍæÙô´ Ùð §âð Ù§ü ¥æçÍü·¤ ÃØßSÍæ ×ð´ °·¤ ÕǸæ çãSâðÎæÚU ÕÙæ çÜØæ ãñÐ ×ãæÚUæCþ âÎÙ ·¤è ƒæÅUÙæ ·Ô¤ßÜ Ïæç×ü·¤ Âêßæü»ýã ·¤è ßÁã âð ç·¤âè â׿¿æÚU ·¤ô ÎÕæÙð ·¤æ ©ÎæãÚU‡æ Ùãè´ ãñ´ ÕçË·¤ ßã °·¤ ÕǸð SÌÚU ÂÚU âæ´Æ»æ´Æ ·¤è °·¤ ÛæÜ·¤ Âðàæ ·¤ÚUÌæ ãñÐ §´çÇØÙ °€UâÂýðâ Ùð Ìô wy ÁéÜæ§ü ·¤ô Øã Ì·¤ çܹæ ç·¤ âæâ´Î ·¤ô ÁÕÚUÙ ×é´ã ×ð´ ÚUôÅUè Æê´âÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ ×èçÇØæ ßæÜô´ Ùð Öè ©·¤âæØæÐ §â ÌÚUã ×èçÇØæ·¤×èü ·Ô¤ßÜ ×ê·¤Îàæü·¤ ãè Ùãè´ ÚUãð, ÕçË·¤ ƒæÅUÙæ ·Ô¤ ßã âç·ý¤Ø Âæ˜æ Öè ÕÙðÐ ©‹ãô´Ùð ƒæÅUÙæ ×ð´ çãSâðÎæÚUè ·¤èÐ §â ÂýßëçÌ ·¤ô Öè §â M¤Â ×ð´ â×ÛæÙæ ¿æçã° ç·¤ Ù§ü ÃØßSÍæ ×ð´ ×èçÇØæ·¤×èü ÂÚU ƒæÅUÙæ¥ô´ ·¤ô ÚU¿Ùð ×ð´ çãSâðÎæÚUè ·¤ÚUÙð ·¤æ Öè ÎÕæß ãñÐ ÁæçãÚU ÌõÚU ÂÚU ßã ·Ô¤ßÜ ç·¤âè ¹ÕÚU ·¤ô âæßüÁçÙ·¤ ·¤ÚUÙð ·¤æ Âæ˜æ ãè Ùãè´ ÚUã »Øæ ãñ ÕçË·¤ ßã ƒæÅUÙæ ·¤ô ÀéÂæÙð ¥õÚU ƒæÅUÙæ ·¤ô ÚU¿Ùð ßæÜð Âæ˜æ ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ Öè ÌñØæÚU ã饿 ãñ´Ð Øã Ù§ü ÃØßSÍæ âð ÁéÇ¸æ °·¤ ·¤ÅUé Ì‰Ø ãñUÐ ¥çÙÜ ¿×çÇ¸Øæ çã´Îè ·Ô¤ ßçÚUD ˜淤æÚU ãñ´ ¥õÚU ¥ÂÙð ×èçÇØæ çÚUâ¿ü ·Ô¤ çܰ Âýçâh ÚUãð ãñ´Ð §Ù çÎÙô´ ßð çã´Îè ¥õÚU ¥´»ýðÁè ×ð´ ×èçÇØæ ׿çâ·¤ ÒÁÙ ×èçÇØæÓ ß Ò׿â ×èçÇØæÓ ·¤æ â´ÂæÎÙ ·¤ÚU ÚUãð ãñ´ ȤæòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ | ¥€ÅêUÕÚU 2014 ÕãéÁÙ çßàÜðá‡æ Implications of Indian festivals 53 ÖæÚUÌèØ ˆØôãæÚUô´ ·Ô¤ çÙçãÌæÍü ASHOK ANAND I n these times of Dalit discourse and women’s discourse, one key issue that is largely ignored is the implications of Hindu festivals and their relationship with the Bahujans. Over the past couple of years, FORWARD Press has taken many meaningful and promising initiatives in this regard Prem Kumar Mani’s article ‘On Dussehra’ published in October 2011 FP brought many questions that were pestering me for long to the fore. The article turned the spotlight on the myth of Durga and Mahishasur. According to Mani, Dussehra is the festival of Mahishasur mardan (the slaying of Mahishasur). I came away from my reading of the article with one particularly thought-provoking lesson: the dominant and the deprived classes will not interpret history and mythology in the same way. This puts a great responsibility on our shoulders. There cannot be any doubt that our place in the history-in-the-making will be decided by how Î ¥àæô·¤ ¥æÙ´Î çÜÌ çß×àæü ¥õÚU S˜æè çß×àæü ·Ô¤ §â ÎõÚU ×ð´ Áô ¥ˆØ´Ì ×ãˆßÂê‡æü ×égæ çß×àæü ·Ô¤ ÎæØÚUð âð ֻܻ »¸æØÕ ãñ, ßã ãñ— çã´Îê ˆØôãæÚUô´ ·Ô¤ çÙçãÌæÍô´ü ¥õÚU ÕãéÁÙ â׿Á ·¤æ ¥´Ìâ´üÕ´ÏÐ §â â´Õ´Ï ·¤ô ÌÜæàæÙð ·¤è çÎàææ ×ð´ ÒȤæÚUßÇü ÂýðâÓ Ùð çÂÀÜð ·¤éÀ ßáô´ü ×ð´ ÕãéÌ âæÍü·¤ ¥õÚU ¥æàææÁÙ·¤ ÂãÜ ·¤è ãñÐ §âè ·¤Çè ×ð´, Âç˜æ·¤æ ·Ô¤ ¥€UÅUêÕÚU w®vv ¥´·¤ ×ð´ Ò緤ⷤè ÂêÁæ ·¤ÚU ÚUãð ãñ´ ÕãéÁÙ?Ó àæèáü·¤ âð Âý·¤æçàæÌ Âýð× ·¤é׿ÚU ×ç‡æ ·¤æ Üð¹ Âɸ·¤ÚU ×ðÚU𠥋ÎÚU ßáô´ü âð ÎÕð ·¤§ü ÂýàÙô´ Ùð âÚU ©Ææ çÜØæÐ Âýð× ·¤é׿ÚU ·¤æ Øã Üð¹ ×çãáæâéÚU ¥õÚU Î黿ü ·Ô¤ ç×Í·¤ ·¤ô ·Ô¤´Îý ×ð´ ÚU¹·¤ÚU çÜ¹æ »Øæ ãñÐ ©Ù·Ô¤ ¥ÙéâæÚU, ×çãáæâéÚU ×ÎüÙ ·¤æ ©ˆâß ãè ÎàæãÚUæ ãñÐ §Uâè ¥´·¤ ×ð´ Âý·¤æçàæÌ Âýð×·¤é׿ÚU ×ç‡æ ·Ô¤ °·¤ ¥æñÚU Üð¹ ÒÎàæãUÚÔU ·ð¤ ˆØæðãUæÚU ÂÚUÓ ·¤æ Øã ßæ€UØ çß¿æÚU‡æèØ ãñ- Òã×ð´ Øã Sßè·¤æÚU ·¤ÚUÙæ ãô»æ ç·¤ §çÌãæâ ¥õÚU ÂõÚUæç‡æ·¤Ìæ ÂÚU ß¿üSß BAHUJAN 54 ANALYSIS OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press BAHUJANS SHOULD RESOLVE TO OPPOSE AND BOYCOTT ALL SUCH TRADITIONS THAT SYMBOLIZE THE MURDER BY DECEIT OR THE DEFEAT OF THEIR HEROES ÕãéÁÙ ©Ù âÖè ÂÚUÂÚUæ¥ô´ ·¤æ çßÚUôÏ ¥õÚU Õçãc·¤æÚU ·¤ÚUÙð ·¤æ â´·¤Ë Üð´ Áô ©Ù·Ô¤ ÙæØ·¤ô´ ·¤è ÀÜÂêßü·¤ ãˆØæ ¥Íßæ ¥‹ØU Âý·¤æÚU âð ÂÚUæÁØ ·Ô¤ ÂýÌè·¤ ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ ×ÙæØð ÁæÌð ãñ´ honestly and sincerely we discharge this responsibility of duly interpreting history and mythology. We should interpret historical and mythological texts from the perspective of the deprived classes and thus play a meaningful role in the revival of our civilization and culture. Prem Kumar Mani, by baring the real meaning of the story of Mahishasur and Durga, struck hard at the prevailing beliefs and perceptions. His article became a harbinger of change and today, in many different parts of the country, people are joining hands to launch a revolutionary movement in support of Mahishasur. Mahishasur Martyrdom Day is being observed at many places. Today in India, whatever we are taught has its beginnings in the Vedic age. However, the roots of the history, civilization and culture of the Bahujans lie in the pre-Vedic era. The biggest curse of this nation is that we did not write our history. The Aryans wrapped history in mythology and presented us a cocktail of few facts and much fiction. In this cocktail, Bahujan heroes are demonized. In fact, a cultural battle was fought parallel to the physical one. Following their physical defeat, the Bahujans have lost the cultural battle too. And this translated into them allowing themselves to be absorbed by their enemies. We started thinking and believing exactly what our enemies dd. In his article, Mani had quoted Communist leader Dange to describe Durga as the murderer of the Dalit and backward classes. The same applies to Ram, who is worshipped as an incarnation of God and as a symbol of truth. Dusseshra is the annual renewal of the licence of Ram to commit grossly improper and unjust acts. Just think, if severing the ears and nose of a woman is a criminal offence then why is the incident of severing of Surpanakha’s nose staged on Dussehra? Why is nothing done to ban it? Here, it is important to note that besides being a woman, Surpanakha was a daughter of the Bahujan community. Then, what is the reason that women of every class and Bahujans do not protest or revolt against it? Similarly, the depiction of Ram’s interaction with Kewat in Tulsi’s Ramcharitmanas is altogether different from that in other texts. Washing someone’s feet and drinking that water is Âýæ# ¥õÚU ß´ç¿Ì ÌÕ·Ô¤ ·¤è °·¤ ãè ÃØæØæ Ùãè´ ãôÌèÐÓ §â °·¤ ßæ€UØ Ùð ã׿ÚUð ·¤´Ïô ÂÚU ©žæÚUÎæçØˆØô´ ·¤æ ÕãéÌ ÕǸæ ÕôÛæ ÇæÜ çÎØæ ãñÐ §â×ð´ ·¤ô§ü â´àæØ Ùãè´ ãôÙæ ¿æçã° ç·¤ çÙ׿ü‡ææÏèÙ §çÌãæâ ×ð´ ã׿ÚUè Âã¿æÙ §âè âð ãô»è ç·¤ ã×Ùð ç·¤ÌÙè §ü׿ÙÎæÚUè ¥õÚU çÙDæ âð âØ·¤ ÃØæØæ ·¤ÚUÙð ·Ô¤ §â ©žæÚUÎæçØˆß ·¤æ çÙßüãÙ ç·¤Øæ ãñÐ ã× °ðçÌãæçâ·¤ ¥õÚU ÂõÚUæç‡æ·¤ ¥æØæÙô´ ·¤è ÃØæØæ, ß´ç¿Ì ÌÕ·Ô¤ ·¤è ÎëçC âð ·¤ÚUð´ ¥õÚU ¥ÂÙð §çÌãæâ, ¥ÂÙè âØÌæ ÌÍæ ¥ÂÙè â´S·¤ëçÌ ·Ô¤ ÂéÙL¤hæÚU ×ð´ âæÍü·¤ Öêç×·¤æ ¥Îæ ·¤ÚUð´Ð Âýð×·¤é׿ÚU ×ç‡æ Ùð ×çãáæâéÚU ¥õÚU Î黿ü ·Ô¤ ¥æØæÙ ·Ô¤ ×êÜ ×´ÌÃØ ·¤è ÃØæØæ ·¤ÚU·Ô¤ Âý¿çÜÌ ×æ‹ØÌæ¥ô´ ¥õÚU ÏæÚU‡ææ¥ô´ ÂÚU ·¤Çæ ÂýãæÚU ç·¤ØæÐ ©Ù·¤æ Øã Üð¹ §ÌÙæ ÂçÚUßÌüÙ·¤æ×è çâh ã饿 ç·¤ ¥æÁ Îðàæ ·Ô¤ çßçÖóæ çãSâô´U ×ð´ ¥Ùð·¤ Üô» ×çãáæâéÚU ·Ô¤ Âÿæ ×ð´ R¤æ´çÌ·¤æÚUè ¥æ‹ÎôÜÙ ¿Üæ ÚUãð ãñ´Ð Á»ã-Á»ã ×çãáæâéÚU àæãæÎÌ çÎßâ ×ÙæØæ Áæ ÚUãæ ãñÐ ¥æÁ ÖæÚUÌ ×ð´ ã×ð´ Áô ·¤éÀ Öè ÂÉ¸æØæ ¥õÚU ÕÌæØæ ÁæÌæ ãñ ©â·¤è àæéL¤¥æÌ ßñçη¤ ·¤æÜ âð ãôÌè ãñ ÁÕç·¤ ã× ÕãéÁÙô´ ·Ô¤ §çÌãæâ, âØÌæ ¥õÚU â´S·¤ëçÌ ·¤è ÁǸð´ Âêßü ßñçη¤ ¥õÚU Âýæ·¤÷ ßñçη¤ ·¤æÜ ×ð´ ãñ´Ð §â Îðàæ ·¤æ âÕâð ÕÇ¸æ ¥çÖàææÂ Øã ãñ ç·¤ §âÙð §çÌãæâ çÜ¹Ùæ Ùãè´ âè¹æÐ ¥æØô´ü Ùð §çÌãæâ ·¤ô ÂõÚUæç‡æ·¤ ¥æØæÙô´ ×ð´ ÜÂðÅU ·¤ÚU ã׿ÚUð âæ×Ùð ßæSÌçß·¤Ìæ ¥õÚU ·¤ËÂÙæ ·¤æ ·¤æ·¤ÅUðÜ ÂÚUôâ çÎØæ ¥õÚU §â ·¤æ·¤ÅUðÜ ×ð´ Ì‰Ø ·¤× ãñ´ ¥õÚU Ȥ´Ìæâè ¥çÏ·¤Ð §Ù ¥æØæÙô´ ×ð´ ÕãéÁÙ ÙæØ·¤ô´ ·¤ô ¹ÜÙæØ·¤ô´ ·¤è ÌÚUã »ê´Í çÎØæ »ØæÐ ßSÌéÌÑ, Øã ÖõçÌ·¤ Øéh ·Ô¤ â×æÙæ´ÌÚU ÜÇ¸æ »Øæ °·¤ âæ´S·¤ëçÌ·¤ Øéh ÍæÐ ÖõçÌ·¤ Øéh ·Ô¤ ¥Üæßæ, ÕãéÁÙ §â âæ´S·¤ëçÌ·¤ Øéh ×ð´ Öè ÂÚUæSÌ ãé°Ð âæ´S·¤ëçÌ·¤ Øéh ×ð´ ÂÚUæÁØ ·¤æ ¥Íü Íæ ¥ÂÙè Âã¿æÙ àæ˜æé¥ô´ ×ð´ çßÜèÙ ·¤ÚU, ©‹ãè´ ·¤è ÌÚUã âô¿Ùð-â×ÛæÙð ·¤è ׿Ùçâ·¤Ìæ ·¤æ »éÜæ× ãô ÁæÙæÐ Âýð×·¤é׿ÚU ×ç‡æ Ùð ¥ÂÙð ©Q¤ Üð¹ ×ð´ ·¤ØéçÙSÅU ÙðÌæ Çæ¡»ð ·Ô¤ ãßæÜð âð Î黿ü ·¤ô ÎçÜÌ ¥õÚU çÂÀǸð ÌÕ·Ô¤ ·¤è ãˆØæçÚU‡æè ÕÌæØæ ÍæÐ Øãè ÕæÌ §üEÚU ·¤æ ¥ßÌæÚU ×æÙ·¤ÚU ÂêÁð ÁæÙð ßæÜð ÚUæ× ÂÚU Öè ÂêÚUè ÌÚUã Üæ»ê ãôÌè ãñÐ ÎàæãÚUæ ÚUæ× ·Ô¤ °ðâð ãè ·¤ëˆØô´ ·Ô¤ Üæ§âð´â ·¤æ ßæçáü·¤ ÙßèÙè·¤ÚU‡æ ãñÐ ÁÚUæ âô¿ð´, ØçÎ ç·¤âè S˜æè ·¤æ Ùæ·¤-·¤æÙ ·¤æÅUÙæ ·¤æÙêÙÙ ¥ÂÚUæÏ ãñ Ìô ÎàæãÚUæ ×ð´ àæêÂüÙ¹æ ·Ô¤ Ùæ·¤ ·¤æÅUÙð ·Ô¤ Âýâ´» ·¤æ ×´¿Ù €UØô´ ßñÏ ãñ? §â ÂÚU ÂýçÌÕ´Ï Ü»æÙð ȤæòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ | ¥€ÅêUÕÚU 2014 ÕãéÁÙ çßàÜðá‡æ ·¤è ·¤æÚUüßæ§ü €UØô´ Ùãè´ ·¤è ÁæÌè? Øãæ¡ çß¿æÚU‡æèØ Ì‰Ø Øã ãñ ç·¤ àæêÂüÙ¹æ S˜æè ãôÙð ·Ô¤ âæÍ ãè ÕãéÁÙ â׿Á ·¤è ÕðÅUè Öè ÍèÐ çȤÚU €UØæ ·¤æÚU‡æ ãñ ç·¤ ÂýˆØð·¤ ß»ü ·¤è S˜æè ¥õÚU ÕãéÁÙ ß»ü §â·¤æ çßÚUôÏ Øæ §â·Ô¤ çßL¤h çßÎýôã Ùãè´ ·¤ÚU ÚUãæ ãñ? §âè Âý·¤æÚU, ·Ô¤ßÅU Âýâ´» çÁâ M¤Â ×ð´ Âý¿æçÚUÌ ãñ, ßã ÌéÜâè ·¤è ÚUæ×¿çÚUÌ׿Ùâ ·Ô¤ ¥Üæßæ ¥õÚU ·¤ãè´ Ùãè´ ãñÐ ç·¤âè ·Ô¤ ÂñÚU ·¤æ ÏôßÙ ÂèÙæ ƒæôÚU ¥Â׿ÙÁÙ·¤ ãñÐ ·Ô¤ßÅU Öè ÕãéÁÙ â׿Á ·¤æ ãè ÂýçÌçÙçÏˆß ·¤ÚUÌæ ãñÐ ÚUæ× ·¤è ÂêÚUè ·¤Íæ ÕãéÁÙ çßÚUôÏ ·¤è ãñ, §âçܰ ©Ù·Ô¤ Ùæ× ÂÚU ×ÙæØð ÁæÙæ ߿ܿ ÎàæãÚUæ ¥õÚU ¥‹Ø âÖè ˆØôãæÚU, ÕãéÁÙ ¥çS×Ìæ ·Ô¤ ×ÎüÙ ·Ô¤ surely most humiliating. Kewat also belonged to the Bahujan community. The fact is that Ram’s entire narrative is opposed to the Bahujans. And by implication, Dussehra and all other festivals celebrated in his name symbolize the crushing of the Bahujan identity. Celebrating the burning alive of a woman is the height of cruelty. Doing so even symbolically is immoral. Holi is celebrated by burning Holika. In this country, which boasts of having a rule of law, no one has the courage to ban the festival of Holi and take action against those celebrating it. What is ironical is that even women celebrate this festival with great enthusiasm. Why is this so? The only answer to this question is that Holika was the princess of an Asur royal family. Thus, trampling upon the identity of the Bahujan community is the basic objective behind the celebration of this festival. But Bahujans are no less to be blamed for all this because despite being aware of the truth, they prefer to cheer with their enemies. Bali Raja was a powerful king of the Bahujan community whose sway extended over all the three worlds. Vishnu vanquished him by deceit. But the story of the valiant and great king has been buried deep and the Bahujan community is largely not even aware of it. In his book Gulamgiri, Mahatma Jotiba Phule has written about Bali Raja in great detail. It is high time that Bahujans recognise their distinct identity and tradition. They should resolve to oppose and boycott all such traditions that symbolize the murder by deceit or the defeat of their heroes. For this, it is necessary that they should read their literature, explore their culture and forge a new path. There is no other alternative for our community facing cultural extinction. Editor of the Hindi edition of OBC Voice magazine, Ashok Anand has been active in the struggle for social justice. He has also written many novels ÂýÌè·¤ ãñ´Ð ç·¤âè S˜æè ·¤ô ÁÜæ·¤ÚU ˆØôãæÚU ×ÙæÙæ Ìô ·ýê¤ÚUÌæ ·¤è âè׿ ·¤æð Öè ÂæÚU ·¤ÚUÙæ ãñÐ ÂýÌè·¤æˆæ·¤ M¤Â âð Öè °ðâæ ·¤ÚUÙæ ƒæôÚU ¥ÙñçÌ·¤ ãñÐ ãôÜè ·¤æ Âßü ãôçÜ·¤æ ·¤ô ÁÜæ·¤ÚU ×ÙæØæ ÁæÌæ ãñÐ ·¸¤æÙêÙ ·Ô¤ ÚUæÁ ·¤æ 뫅 ÖÚUÙð ßæÜð §â Îðàæ ×ð´ §ÌÙæ Öè âæãâ Ùãè´ ãñ ç·¤ §âð ÂýçÌÕ´çÏÌ ·¤ÚUð ¥õÚU §âð ×ÙæÙð ßæÜô´ ÂÚU ·¸¤æÙêÙè ·¤æØüßæãè ·¤ÚUð? çßÇÕÙæ Øã ãñ ç·¤ çS˜æØæ¡ Öè §â ˆØôãæÚU ·¤ô ©âè ©×´» ¥õÚU ©ˆâæã ·Ô¤ âæÍ ×ÙæÌè ãñ´Ð ¥æç¹ÚU °ðâæ €UØô´ ãñ? §â âᑚ ·¤æ ÁßæÕ ·Ô¤ßÜ Øãè ãñ ç·¤ ãôçÜ·¤æ, ¥âéÚU ƒæÚUæÙð ·¤è ÚUæÁÂé˜æè Íè ¥ÍæüÌ ÕãéÁÙ â׿Á ·¤è ¥çS×Ìæ ·¤æ ×ÎüÙ ×êÜ M¤Â âð §â ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ ·¤æ ©gðàØ¤ãñÐ Üðç·¤Ù §â·Ô¤ çܰ ÎçÜÌ ÕãéÁÙ â׿Á Öè ·¤× Îôáè Ùãè´ ãñ, Áô â‘¿æ§ü âð çÖ™æ ãôÙð ·¤è ÕÁæØ Sߨ´ §âè ÚU´» ×ð´ ÚU´» ·¤ÚU àæ˜æé Âÿæ ·¤æ ©ˆâæãßÏüÙ ·¤ÚUÌæ ãñÐ ÕÜè ÚUæÁæ, ÕãéÁÙ â׿Á ·¤æ àæçQ¤àææÜè ÚUæÁæ ¥õÚU ÌèÙô´ Üô·¤ô´ ·¤æ ¥çÏÂçÌ ÍæÐ çßc‡æé Ùð ©âð ÀÜ âð ÂÚUæSÌ ç·¤ØæÐ ¥æÁ ÂýÌæÂè ÕÜè ÚUæÁæ ·Ô¤ ¥æØæÙ ·¤ô çßS×ÚU‡æ ·Ô¤ SÍæ§ü »Ìü ×ð´ Îȸ¤Ù ·¤ÚU çÎØæ »Øæ ãñ ¥õÚU ÕãéÁÙ â׿Á ·¤ô ·¤éÀ ¹ÕÚU ãè Ùãè´ ãñÐ ×ãæˆ×æ ÁôçÌÕæ ȤéÜð Ùð ¥ÂÙè Âýçâh ÂéSÌ·¤ Ò»éÜæ×ç»ÚUèÓ ×ð´ ÕÜè ÚUæÁæ ÂÚU çßSÌæÚU âð ¿¿æü ·¤è ãñÐ ¥Õ âר ¥æ »Øæ ãñ ç·¤ ÕãéÁÙ ¥ÂÙè ¥çS×Ìæ¥ô´ ¥õÚU ÂÚU´ÂÚUæ¥ô´ ·¤ô Âã¿æÙð´ ÌÍæ ©Ù âÖè ÂÚUÂÚUæ¥ô´ ·¤æ çßÚUôÏ ¥õÚU Õçãc·¤æÚU ·¤ÚUÙð ·¤æ â´·¤Ë Üð´, Áô ©Ù·Ô¤ ÙæØ·¤ô´ ·¤è ÀÜÂêßü·¤ ãˆØæ ¥Íßæ ¥‹Ø Âý·¤æÚU âð ÂÚUæÁØ ·Ô¤ ÂýÌè·¤ ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ ×ÙæØð ÁæÌð ãñ´Ð §â·Ô¤ çܰ ¥æßàØ·¤ ãñ ç·¤ ÕãéÁÙ ¥ÂÙæ âæçãˆØ Âɸð´, ¥ÂÙè â´S·¤ëçÌ ·¤è ¹ôÁ ·¤ÚUð´ ¥õÚU ©âè ÚUæSÌð ·¤ô ¥ÂÙæ·¤ÚU ÖçßcØô‹×é¹è ÕÙð´Ð âæ´S·¤ëçÌ·¤ ß´¿Ùæ ÛæðÜ ÚUãè §â ·¤õ× ·¤è ÕðãÌÚUè ·¤æ §â·Ô¤ ¥Üæßæ ÎêâÚUæ çß·¤Ë Ùãè´ ãñÐ ¥ôÕèâè ßæòØâ Âç˜æ·¤æ ·Ô¤ çã´Îè â´S·¤ÚU‡æ ·Ô¤ â´ÂæÎ·¤ ¥àæô·¤ ¥æÙ´Î â׿çÁ·¤ ‹ØæØ ·¤è ÜÇæ§ü ×ð´ âçR¤Ø ÚUãð ãñ´Ð ©Ù·Ô¤ ·¤§ü ©Â‹Øæâ Öè Âý·¤æçàæÌ ãñ´ 55 BAHUJAN 56 MEMORIAL OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press Mangarh Dham Centre of Tribal culture ¥æçÎßæâè â´S·¤ëçÌ ·¤è SÍÜè ×æÙ»É¸ Ïæ× KALULAL KULMI T he original inhabitants of this country have been inextricably associated with nature. The Mangarh hillock located on the Gujarat-Rajasthan border and the life of the local hero Govind Guru only proves this. Govind Guru was born on 20 December 1858 at Bedsa village in Doongarpur district into a non-tribal Banjara family. In 1903, he founded an organization called Samp Sabha. The word Samp means interaction and giving up evil practices. Under the leadership of Govind Guru, this mission moved ahead and Mangarh became its centre. The centre worked for making the tribals aware of their culture. The disciples of Govind Guru do not believe in idol worship. They do not believe in any god either. They are nature-worshippers. Govind Guru also tried to organize the tribals. He succeeded in his endeavour to such an extent that the then ruler of Doongarpur sought the assistance of British army. With the aid of the British army, around 1500 unarmed tribals were massacred on the Mangarh hillock and Govind Guru was taken prisoner. He was released in 1923 on the condition that he would not enter the Mangarh area. He passed away on 30 October 1931. His memorial stands at the place where he was cremated. Recently, the Rajasthan government has decided to build a column in memory of the martyrs of Mangarh. Kalulal Kulmi is the Udaipur correspondent of FORWARD Press §U ·¤æÜêÜæÜ ·¤éÜ×è â Îðàæ ·Ô¤ ×êÜ çÙßæçâØô´ ·¤è ÂÚUÂÚUæ Âý·¤ëçÌ âð ƒæçÙD M¤Â âð ÁéÇè ÚUãè ãñÐ ÚUæÁSÍæÙ- »éÁÚUæÌ âè׿ ÂÚU çSÍÌ ×æÙ»É¸ ·¤è ÂãæÇ¸è ¥õÚU SÍæÙèØ ÙæØ·¤ »ôçß´Î »éM¤ ·¤æ §çÌãæâ §â·¤è ÂéçC ·¤ÚUÌæ ãñÐ »ôçß´Î »éL¤ ·¤æ Á‹× w® çÎâ´ÕÚU v}z} §ü. ·¤ô Çê´»ÚUÂéÚU çÁÜð ·Ô¤ ÕðÇ¸âæ »æ´ß ×ð´ °·¤ »ñÚU-¥æçÎßæâè Õ´ÁæÚUæ ÂçÚUßæÚU ×ð´ ã饿 ÍæÐ v~®x ×ð´ ©‹ãô´Ùð Òâ´Â âÖæÓ Ùæ×·¤ â´»ÆÙ ÕÙæØæ Ð Òâ´ÂÓ ·¤æ ¥Íü ãñ ×ðÜ-ç×ÜæÂ ¥õÚU ÕéÚUæ§üØô´ ·¤æ ˆØæ» ·¤ÚUÙæÐ »ôçß´Î »éL¤ ·Ô¤ ÙðÌëˆß ×ð´ Ò×ðÜ-ç×ÜæÂÓ ·¤æ Øã ·¤æØü ¥æ»ð ÕÉ¸æ ¥õÚU ×æÙ»É¸ §â·¤æ ·Ô¤‹Îý ÕÙ »ØæÐ §â ·Ô¤´Îý Ùð ¥æçÎßæçâØô´ ·¤ô ¥ÂÙè â´S·¤ëçÌ ·Ô¤ ÕæÚUð ×ð´ Áæ»ëÌ ç·¤Øæ ÍæÐ »ôçß´Î »éM¤ ·¤ô ׿ÙÙð ßæÜð Üô» ×êçÌü ÂêÁæ ·¤æ çÙáðÏ ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´ ÌÍæ ç·¤âè §üEÚU ·¤è ÂêÁæ Ùãè´ ·¤ÚUÌðÐ ßð Âý·¤ëçÌ-ÂêÁ·¤ ãñ´Ð »ôçß´Î »éL¤ Ùð ¥æçÎßæçâØô´ ·¤ô â´»çÆÌ ·¤ÚUÙð ·¤æ ·¤æØü Öè ç·¤ØæÐ §â·¤æ ÙÌèÁæ Øã ã饿 ·¤è Çê´»ÚUÂéÚU ·¤æ ̈·¤æÜèÙ ÚUæÁæ §ÌÙæ ÇÚU »Øæ ç·¤ ©âÙð ¥´»ýðÁ âðÙæ âð âãæØÌæ ׿´»èÐ v~vx ×ð´ ¥´»ýðÁ âðÙæ ·¤è âãæØÌæ âð ֻܻ vz®® çÙãˆÍð ¥æçÎßæçâØô´ ·¤è ×æÙ»É¸ ·¤è ÂãæÇ¸è ÂÚU ãˆØæ ·¤ÚU Îè »Øè ¥õÚU »ôçß´Î »éL¤ ·¤ô ¥´»ýðÁô´ Ùð Õ´Îè ÕÙæ çÜØæÐ ©‹ãð´ v~wx ×ð´ §â àæÌü ÂÚU ÀôÇ¸æ »Øæ ç·¤ ßð §â ÿæð˜æ ×ð´ Âýßðàæ Ùãè´ ·¤ÚUð´»ðÐ x® ¥€UÅUêÕÚU v~xv ·¤ô »ôçß´Î »éL¤ ·¤è ×ëˆØé ãô »§ü, Áãæ´ ©Ù·¤æ ¿ÕêÌÚUæ ÕÙæ ã饿 ãñÐ §Ù çÎÙô´ ÚUæÁSÍæÙ âÚU·¤æÚU, ×æÙ»É ·Ô¤ àæãèÎô´ ·¤è ØæÎ ×ð´ °·¤ S×ëçÌ SÌ´Ö ÕÙßæ ÚUãè ãñÐ ·¤æÜêÜæÜ ·¤éÜ×è È æÚUßÇü Âýðâ ·Ô¤ ©ÎØÂéÚU â´ßæÎÎæÌæ ãñ´ ȤæòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ | ¥€ÅêUÕÚU ÕãéÁÙ 2014 ˆØæðãUæÚU XX 57 Bihar’s Dawoodnagar Showcase of vaudeville çÕãæÚU ·¤æ Îæª¤ÎÙ»ÚU Sßæ´» ·¤æ ¥Ùô¹æ â´âæÚU D çÕ SANJEEV CHANDAN AND ASHISH KUMAR ANSHU awoodnagar is a block headquarters town in Bihar’s Aurangabad district. It is home to mainly the OBC Kasare and Patwa communities. There was a time when the making of brass vessels was a cottage industry here, but now it is primarily known for its distinct cultural identity. An OBC cultural revival is taking place here. Dawoodnagar is a town of Bahujan artistes. On the second day of Ashwin in the Hindu calendar – which generally falls in the month of October – almost all residents of the city wear the disguise of different mythological and historical figures, and there are all-night concerts of Lavni and Jhumar. The artistes of this small town have perfected many an art. Some can lie still on the surface of water for hours; others get themselves stung by dozens of scorpions. Some can trick you into believing that their head has been slashed into two; others can ‘sever’ their limbs from their body. During these festivities, some residents dress up as various gods and goddesses, others as politicians to caricature them. In some places, you can see a person standing perfectly still, without even blinking his eyes, while in other places you can see artistes decked up as Buddha, Krishna or Kali. â´Áèß ¿‹ÎÙ ·ð¤ âæÍ ¥æàæèá ·é¤×æÚU ¥´àæé ãæÚU ·Ô¤ ¥õÚÚ»æÕæÎ ·Ô¤ °·¤ ¥Ùé×Ç´ Ü, Îæ©ÎÙ»ÚU, ×ð´ ×éØÌÑ çÂÀǸè ÁæçÌ Ò·¤âæÚUÓð ¥õÚU ÒÂÅUßæÓ ·¤è ¥æÕæÎè ãñÐ Øãæ¡ ·¤Öè ƒæÚU-ƒæÚU ×ð´ ·¤æ´âð ·Ô¤ ÕÌüÙ ÕÙæÙð ·Ô¤ ܃æé ©lô» ÍðÐ ¥æÁ §â àæãÚU ·¤è ¥ÂÙè °·¤ âæ´S·¤ëçÌ·¤ Âã¿æÙ ãñÐ §âð çÂÀǸè ÁæçÌØô´ ·Ô¤ âæ´S·¤ëçÌ·¤ ©‹×ðá ·¤æ àæãÚU ·¤ãæ Áæ â·¤Ìæ ãñÐ Îæ©ÎÙ»ÚU ÕãéÁÙ ·¤Üæ·¤æÚUô´ ·¤æ àæãÚU ãñÐ ÎÚU¥âÜ, Øã ÂêÚUæ àæãÚU ¥æçEÙ ×æâ ·¤è çmÌèØæ ·¤ô (ÂýæØÑ ¥€ÅUÕê ÚU ×ð)´ Öæ´çÌ-Öæ´çÌ ·Ô¤ Sßæ´» ÚU¿Ìæ ãñ, ܿ߇æè ¥õÚU Ûæê×ÚU »èÌ »æÌð ãé° ÚUæÌ-ÚUæÌ ÖÚU Ûæê×Ìæ ãñÐ §â ÀôÅUð âð àæãÚU ×ð´ ·¤Üæ·¤æÚUô´ Ùð Öæ´çÌ-Öæ´çÌ ·¤è ·¤Üæ°´ âæÏè ãñд ÂæÙè ÂÚU ƒæ´ÅUô´ âôØð ÚUãÙð ·¤è ·¤Üæ Øæ ÁãÚUèÜð çÕ‘Àé¥ô´ âð Ç´·¤ ×ÚUßæÙð ·¤æ ·¤ÚUÌÕÐ Sßæ´» ÚU¿æÌð ãé° ·¤ô§ü çÀóæ ×SÌ·¤ ãô â·¤Ìæ ãñ Ìô ·¤ô§ü ¥ÂÙð ãæÍ Âæ¡ß ·¤ô ¥Ü» ·¤ÚUÌæ ãé° çι â·¤Ìæ ãñÐ ¥æçEÙ ×æâ ·ð¤ ¥æØôÁÙ ·¤è ÚUæÌô´ ×ð´ ÂêÚUð àæãÚU ×ð´ ·¤§ü Üô» ¥Ü»-¥Ü» Îðßè-ÎðßÌæ¥ô´ ·ð¤ Sßæ´» ×ð´ ãôÌð ãñ´ Ìô ·¤§ü Üô» ÚUæÁÙèçÌ·¤ ÃØ´‚Ø ·¤ÚUÌð ãé° ¥Ü»-¥Ü» Ù·¸¤Ü-¥ßÌæÚUô´ ×ðд ·¤§ü Üô» ƒæ´ÅUô´ çSÍÚU ×éÎæý ×ð´ ¹Ç¸ð Øæ ÕñÆð ãôÌð ãñ,´ ÂÜ·¤ ÛæÂ·¤æ° çÕÙæ, ·¤ãè´ Õéh ÕÙð Ìô ·¤ãè´ ·¤ëc‡æ Øæ ·¤æÜèÐ BAHUJAN 58 FESTIVAL OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press THE ARTISTES OF THIS SMALL TOWN HAVE PERFECTED MANY AN ART. SOME CAN LIE STILL ON THE SURFACE OF WATER FOR HOURS; OTHERS GET THEMSELVES STUNG BY DOZENS OF SCORPIONS. SOME CAN TRICK YOU INTO BELIEVING THAT THEIR HEAD HAS BEEN SLASHED INTO TWO; OTHERS CAN ‘SEVER’ THEIR LIMBS FROM THEIR BODY §â ÀôÅUð âð àæãÚU ×ð´ ·¤Üæ·¤æÚUô´ Ùð Öæ´çÌ-Öæ´çÌ ·¤è ·¤Üæ°´ âæÏè ãñд ÂæÙè ÂÚU ƒæ´ÅUô´ âôØð ÚUãÙð ·¤è ·¤Üæ Øæ ÁãÚUèÜð çÕ‘Àé¥ô´ âð Ç´·¤ ×ÚUßæÙð ·¤æ ·¤ÚUÌÕÐ Sßæ´» ÚU¿æÌð ãé° ·¤ô§ü çÀóæ ×SÌ·¤ ãô â·¤Ìæ ãñ Ìô ·¤ô§ü ¥ÂÙð ãæÍ Âæ¡ß ·¤ô ¥Ü» ·¤ÚUÌæ ãé° çι â·¤Ìæ ãñ Chaudhary is one of the three artistes of Dawoodnagar who know the art of sleeping on the surface of water. He says that once, when he jumped into a canal to save a drowning child, it was as if the water was caressing him. In our presence, he lay still on water for over half-an-hour. The folksongs of the region suggest that this festival of disguises has a long tradition. These Jhumar songs are in Magahi (a dialect of Hindi) and are based on the Lavni folksongs of Maharashtra. According to these songs, when an epidemic broke out in the area in Vikram Samvat 1917, ie 1860 AD, some mendicants from Maharashtra installed and consecrated idols of Bamma Devi in the four corners of the town, and the residents spent entire nights worshipping the goddess for a month. From that time, this festival is celebrated as Jeevit Putrika Vrat (a fast undertaken by mothers for long life of their sons) or Jiutia. Incidentally, Jivit Putrika Vrat Liye Huye (On Jivit Putrika fast), the title of a famous poem by the Sahitya Academy award winner Gyanendrapati, was inspired by this festival. The poem is a satire on poets prepared to do anything to get their indifferent poetry published. It speaks of how they sell copies of literary magazines to wriggle into the good books of the editors. ã× Üô»ô´ ·¤ô Öè °·¤ ·¤Üæ·¤æÚU, Ù´Îç·¤àæôÚU ¿õÏÚUè Ùð ÂæÙè ÂÚU ¥æÏð ƒæ´ÅUð çÕÙæ ÌñÚUð çSÍÚU âô·¤ÚU çÎ¹æØæÐ ¿õÏÚUè Îæ©ÎÙ»ÚU ·Ô¤ ©Ù ÌèÙ ·¤Üæ·¤æÚUô´ ×ð´ âð ãñ,´ çÁ‹ãô´Ùð ÂæÙè ÂÚU çSÍÚU ÜðÅUÙð ·¤è §â ·¤Üæ ·¤ô âæÏæ ãñÐ ßð ·¤ãÌð ãñ´ ç·¤ °·¤ ÕæÚU ©‹ãô´Ùð °·¤ ÇêÕÌð Õ‘¿ð ·¤ô Õ¿æÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ ÙãÚU ×ð´ ÀÜæ´» Ü»æ§ü Ìô °ðâæ Ü»æ ç·¤ ÂæÙè ©‹ãð´ ÎéÜæÚU ÚUãæ ãñÐ Sßæ´» ÚU¿Ùð ·Ô¤ ©ˆâß ·¤è àæéL¤¥æÌ ·¤æ §çÌãæâ ßãæ´ ·Ô¤ »æØ·¤ô´ ·Ô¤ »èÌô´ ×ð´ ÎÁü ãñ, Áô ×ãæÚUæcÅþU ·Ô¤ Üô·¤»èÌ Üæß‡æè ·¤ô ×»ãè ×ð´ »æÌð ãé° ¥ÂÙð Ûæê×ÚU »èÌô´ ×ð´ ÃØQ¤ ·¤ÚUÌð ãñд ©Ù·Ô¤ »èÌô´ ·Ô¤ ¥ÙéâæÚU â´ßÌ v~v| ØæÙè v}{® §üâßè ×ð´ §â §Üæ·Ô¤ ×ð´ ×ãæ×æÚUè Èñ¤Üè ÍèÐ ÌÕ ×ãæÚUæCþ âð ¥æØð ·¤éÀ â´Ìô´ Ùð Îæ©ÎÙ»ÚU ·¤è âè׿ ÂÚU ÒÕ׿ ÎðßèÓ ·¤è SÍæÂÙæ ·¤è ¥õÚU ÚUæÌ-ÚUæÌ ÖÚU Áæ»Ìð ãé° ×ãèÙð ÖÚU ©ÂæâÙæ ·¤ÚUßæ§üÐ ÌÕ âð Øã ©ˆâß ÒÁèçßÌ Âéç˜æ·¤æ ßýÌÓ (ÁèçÌØæ ¥Íßæ çÁ©çÌØæ) ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ ×ÙæØæ ÁæÙð Ü»æÐ ØæÙè Âé˜æ ·¤è ¥æØé ·Ô¤ çܰ ×æÌæ¥ô´ ·¤æ ßýÌÐ Âýâ»´ ßàæ Øãæ¡ Øã Öè ÁæÙ ÜðÙæ ÚUô¿·¤ ãô»æ ç·¤ âæçãˆØ ¥·¤æÎ×è âð ÂéÚUS·¤ëÌ çã´Îè ·¤çß ™ææÙðδ Âý çÌ ·¤è °·¤ ¿ç¿üÌ ·¤çßÌæ ÒÁèçßÌ Âç˜æ·¤æ ßýÌ çܰ ãé°Ó ·¤æ àæèáü·¤ §âè ˆØôãæÚU ·Ô¤ Ùæ× âð Âýçð ÚUÌ ãñÐ §â ·¤çßÌæ ×ð´ ·¤çß Ùð ©Ù ÀÂæâ ÂèçÇÌ ·¤çߨô´ ÂÚU ÃØ´‚Ø ç·¤Øæ ãñ, Áô âæçãçˆØ·¤ Âç˜æ·¤æ¥ô´ ·¤ô Õð¿·¤ÚU â´ÂæÎ·¤ô´ âð ¥ÂÙæ Ùðã-â´ÕÏ´ ÕÙæÌð ãñд ÕãÚUãæÜ, ÒÕ׿ ÎðßèÓ ×ãæÚUæcÅþU ·¤è Ò×éÕæ ÎðßèÓ ·¤æ SÍæÙèØ M¤Â ãô â·¤Ìè ãñд Âðàæð âð çàæÿæ·¤ ¥õÚU Sßæ´» ·¤Üæ ×ð´ çÙÂ釿 âˆØð‹Îý ·¤ãÌð ãñ,´ Òâ´Ìô´ Ùð ©ÂæâÙæ ·Ô¤ ÕãæÙð SÍæÙèØ Ùæ»çÚU·¤ô´ ·¤ô ×ãæ×æÚUè âð ÜǸÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ âæÈ¸¤-âȤæ§ü ¥õÚU ¥‹Ø SßæS‰Ø çßçÏØô´ ·¤ô ¥ÂÙæÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ Âýçð ÚUÌ ç·¤Øæ ãô»æ ÌÍæ ÚUæÌ-ÚUæÌ ÖÚU Áæ»Ùð ·Ô¤ çܰ ×ÙôÚÚÁÙ SßL¤Â Ù·¸¤Ü, Sßæ´» ·¤è ÂÚÚÂÚUæ ÇæÜè ãô»è, ܿ߇æè »ßæØæ ãô»æ, çÁâð ÂÚÚÂÚUæ ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ Îæ©ÎÙ»ÚU Ùð ÁèçßÌ ÚU¹æÐÓ çÕýçÅUàæ ·¤æÜèÙ »ÁðçÅUØÚU ·Ô¤ ¥ÙéâæÚU v}{® ·Ô¤ ¥æâÂæâ ·¤æ âר çßçÖóæ ×ãæ×æçÚUØô´ ·¤æ âר ãñ, çÁââð ÜǸÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ çÕýçÅUàæ âÚU·¤æÚU SßæS‰Ø âðßæ¥ô´ ·¤è ØôÁÙæØð´ Üæ»ê ·¤ÚU ÚUãè ÍèРȤæòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ | ÁÙßÚUè 2014 ÕãéÁÙ ˆØæðãUæÚU 59 EVERY YEAR, HINDUS AND MUSLIMS OF THIS BIHAR TOWN COME TOGETHER TO CELEBRATE A FESTIVAL OF MYTHICAL DISGUISES, FOLKSONGS AND MAGIC ãÚU âæÜ çÕãæÚU ·Ô¤ §â àæãÚU ·Ô¤ çã‹Îê ¥æñÚU ×éâÜ×æÙ ç×ÜÁéÜ ·¤ÚU Sßæ´», ÁæÎê ¥õÚU Üô·¤»èÌô´ ·¤æ °·¤ ¥Ùô¹æ â´âæÚU ÚU¿æÌð ãñ´ Be that as it may, Bamma Devi is most likely the local version of Maharashtra’s Mumba Devi. Satyendra, a teacher by profession and a past master in the art of disguise, says, “The mendicants might have used prayers and worship as a means to teach the villagers about the importance of hygienic living to fight the epidemic. Swang, Lavni, and such must have been used to entertain the people and keep them engaged during the all-night worship sessions. And that practice must have been preserved by Dawoodnagar as a tradition.” According to the gazetteer of the British era, epidemics broke out in many parts of the country around 1860 and the British government took many steps to control them. Besides mythological stories, Lavni songs also chronicle tales of cultural or historical importance. For instance, a Lavni song describes in detail the construction of a canal from the Son River, including why the British decided to dig the canal, how engineers prepared the related designs, and even the width and length of the canal! In this town devoted to art, instances of communal harmony abound. During the Jeevit Putrika Vrat, the Muslim residents also wear disguises and sing and dance. Similarly, Hindu artistes join in the celebrations of Muslim festivals. The day we reached Dawoodnagar, taziyas (miniature mausoleums carried in processions) for Moharram were being prepared under the supervision of Hindu artist Shiv Kumar. The Khalifas of the 8-9 taziyas of the town were all praise for Shiv Kumar, describing him as a symbol of communal harmony. The Dawoodnagar residents also describe their town as the town of Banabhatta, the writer of Kadambari. Acharya Hazari Prasad Dwivedi, in his book Banabhatta Kee Atmakatha(Autobiography of Banabhatta), says Banabhatta was adept in theatrical skills. Dwivedi gives credit for his book to one Catherine, who, even at the age of 75, ܿ߇æè ×ð´ âæ×æçÁ·¤ âæ´S·¤ëçÌ·¤ ¥õÚU °ðçÌãæçâ·¤ ×ãˆß ·¤è »æÍæ°´ »æ§ü ÁæÌè ãñ,´ Ïæç×ü·¤ ç×Íô´ ·Ô¤ ¥ÜæßæÐ âôÙ ÙÎè ÂÚU ÕÙè ÙãÚU ·¤æ ߇æüÙ °·¤ ܿ߇æè ×ð´ ÎÁü ãñ ç·¤ ·ñ¤âð ¥´»Á ðý ô´ Ùð ÁÙÌæ ·Ô¤ ÂæÜÙ ·Ô¤ çܰ ÙãÚU ¹éÎßæ§ü, ÙãÚU ·¤è ç·¤ÌÙè »ãÚUæ§ü, ¿õǸæ§ü ãñ ¥õÚU ·ñ¤âð ÙãÚU ·Ô¤ çܰ ¥çÖØ´Ìæ¥ô´ Ùð Ù€àæð ¥æçÎ ÕÙßæØðÐ ·¤Üæ ·¤ô â×çÂüÌ §â àæãÚU ×ð´ âæ×éÎæçØ·¤ âõãæÎü ·Ô¤ ·¤§ü ©ÎãæÚU‡æ ãñд ÁèçßÌ Âéç˜æ·¤æ ßýÌ ©È¤ü ÁèçÌØæ ·Ô¤ ÎõÚUæÙ Áãæ¡ àæãÚU ·Ô¤ ×éâÜ×æÙ Öè Sßæ´» ÚU¿Ìð ãñ,´ Ûæê×Ìð »æÌð ãñ,´ ßãè´ ×éâÜ׿Ùô´ ·Ô¤ ˆØôãæÚUô´ ×ð´ Öè çã‹Îê ·¤Üæ·¤æÚUô´ ·¤ô Öæ»èÎæÚUè Õɸ-¿É¸ ·¤ÚU ãôÌè ãñÐ çÁÙ çÎÙô´ ã× Üô» Îæ©ÎÙ»ÚU Âãé¿ ´ ð ©Ù çÎÙô´ ×éãÚU×ü ·Ô¤ ÌæçÁØð ·¤æ çÙ׿ü‡æ çã‹Îê ·¤Üæ·¤æÚU çàæß ·¤é׿ÚU ·Ô¤ çÙÎðàü æÙ ×ð´ ãô ÚUãæ ÍæÐ àæãÚU ·Ô¤ } âð ~ ÌæçÁØô´ ·Ô¤ ¹Üèȸ¤æ çàæß ·¤é׿ÚU ·¤è Âýàæ´âæ ·¤ÚUÌð ãé° ©‹ãð´ âæ´ÂÎý æçØ·¤ âõãæÎü ·¤è ç×âæÜ ÕÌæÌð ãñд Îæ©ÎÙ»ÚU ·Ô¤ ßæâè §âð ßæ‡æÖ^ ·¤æ Öè àæãÚU ÕÌæÌð ãñд Ò·¤æÎÕÚUèÓ ·Ô¤ ÚU¿Ùæ·¤æÚU ßæ‡æÖ^ ·¤ô ¥æ¿æØü ãÁæÚUè ÂýâæÎ çmßðÎè Ùð Òßæ‡æÖ^ ·¤è ¥æˆ×·¤ÍæÓ ×ð´ ÙæÅUØ÷ çßÏæ ×ð´ çÙÂ釿 ÕÌæØæ ãñÐ çmßðÎè Áè Ùð ¥ÂÙè ÚU¿Ùæ ·¤æ ŸæðØ ç×â ·ñ¤ÍÚUæ§Ù ·¤ô çÎØæ ãñ, Áô |z ßáü ·¤è ¥ßSÍæ ×ð´ Öè âôÙ ÿæð˜æ ×ð´ ƒæê× ·¤ÚU ßæ‡æÖ^ ·Ô¤ â‹ÎÖü ×ð´ âæ×»ýè ÁéÅUæÌè ÚUãè Íè´Ð ©â âæ×»ýè ·¤ô ©‹ãô´Ùð çmßðÎè Áè ·¤ô BAHUJAN 60 FESTIVAL OCTOBER 2014 | FORWARD Press W hen and who initiated a particular practice that was absorbed into the folk culture, are questions that cannot be answered with any degree of certainty. This is true of Jiutia, too. But there is a folksong which clearly indicates the beginning of the tradition.Ashwin Andharia Dooj Rahe, Samvat 1917 Ke Saal Re Jiuitia. Jiuitia Re Rope Le Haricharan, Tulsi, Damdi, Jugul, Ranglal Re Jiutia. Are Dhan Bhaag Re Jiuitia…’ (It was the second day of the dark fortnight of Ashwin month of Samvat 1917. Haricharan, Tulsi, Damdi, Jugul and Ranglal sowed the seeds of Jiuitia. It was great luck …) According to this song, five persons launched the tradition that was a societal attempt to deal with the plague epidemic. People believe that the intensity of the epidemic waned due to fasting. Who was Jimutvahan? Jimutvahan, who is invoked by the Bahujans during this festival, was the famous ruler of the coastal province of Odisha. His father was Sahlivahan and mother Shaibya. The king, who belonged to the Survanshi clan, is credited with having started the Saka Samvat. It is still used by astrologers. He ascended the throne in 78AD. Two castes have kept Jiuitia alive The credit for preserving Jiuitia folk tradition in Dawoodnagar goes to two castes: Patwa or Tanti and Kansyakar or Kasera. Besides, the Rambabu family, which is of the Halwai caste, also deserves some of the credit. The five people who are said to have begun the tradition all belonged to the Kasera caste. But even the members of this caste accept that they have learnt it from the Patwa samaj. Jiutia is 154 years old vzy âæÜ ÂéÚUæÙæ ãñ çÁ©çÌØæ ç·¤ âè Öè Üô·¤ â´S·¤ëçÌ ·¤æ ÂýæÚÚÖ ç·¤Ù Üô»ô´ Ùð ·¤Õ ç·¤Øæ, §â ÕæÚUð ×ð´ Ì‰Øæˆ×·¤ M¤Â âð ÕÌæ ÂæÙæ àææØÎ ãè â´Öß ãôÌæ ãñÐ çÁ©çÌØæ ·Ô¤ ׿×Üð ×ð´ Öè °ðâæ ãè ãñÐ Üðç·¤Ù °·¤ Üô·¤»èÌ §â·Ô¤ ¥æÚÚÖ ·Ô¤ ÕæÚUð ×ð´ SÂCU â´·¤Ô Ì ·¤ÚUÌæ ãñ - Ò¥æçEÙ ¥‹ÏçÚUØæ ÎêÁ ÚUã,ð â´ÕÌ v~v| ·Ô¤ âæÜ ÚUð çÁ©çÌØæÐ çÁ©çÌØæ Áð ÚUôÂð Üð ãçÚU¿ÚU‡æ, ÌéÜâè, Î×Çè, Áé»Ü é , ÚÚ»ÜæÜ ÚUð çÁ©çÌØæÐ ¥ÚUð ÏÙ Öæ» ÚUð çÁ©çÌØæ..ÐÓ §â »èÌ ·Ô¤ ¥ÙéâæÚU, Âæ´¿ Üô»ô´ Ùð §âð ÂýæÚÚÖ ç·¤Øæ ÍæÐ §â àæéM¤¥æÌ ·¤æ ·¤æÚU‡æ ŒÜð» ·¤è ×ãæ×æÚUè ·¤ô àææ´Ì ·¤ÚUÙð ·¤è ̈·¤æÜèÙ â׿Á ·¤è ¿ðCæ ÍèÐ âæ×æçÁ·¤ ׿‹ØÌæ ãñ ç·¤ §âè ·¤æÚU‡æ ©â âר §Üæ·Ô¤ ×ð´ ŒÜð» ·¤æ Âý·¤ô Í× »Øæ ÍæÐ ·¤õÙ Íð Áè×éÌßæãÙ? Îæ©ÎÙ»ÚU ×ð´ §â ˆØôãæÚU ·Ô¤ ÎõÚUæÙ çÁâ Áè×éÌßæãÙ ·¤è ¥æuæÙ ÕãéÁÙ ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ´ ßð â×éÎý ÌÅUèØ â´ØQé ¤ ÂýæÌ´ (©Çèâæ) ·Ô¤ ÂýÌæÂè ÚUæÁæ ÍðÐ ©Ù·Ô¤ çÂÌæ ·¤æ Ùæ× àææÜèßæãÙ ¥õÚU ×æÌæ ·¤æ Ùæ× àæñÃØæ ÍæÐ âêØßü à´ æèØ ÚUæÁæ àææÜèßæãÙ Ùð ãè àæ·¤ â´ßÌ ¿ÜæØæ ÍæÐ §â·¤æ ÂýØô» ¥æÁ Öè ’ØôçÌá àææS˜æè ·¤ÚUÌð ãñд §üSßè âÙ ·Ô¤ ÂýÍ× àæÌæŽÎè ×ð´ |}ßð´ ßáü ×ð´ ßð ÚUæÁçâ´ãæâÙ ÂÚU ÕñÆð Ð Îô ÁæçÌØô´ Ùð Îð ÚU¹æ ãñ Òâ´ÁèßÙèÓ Îæ©ÎÙ»ÚU ×ð´ çÁ©çÌØæ Üô·¤ â´S·¤ëçÌ ·¤ô Áèß´Ì ÕÙæØð ÚU¹Ùð ·¤æ ŸæðØ ×éØ M¤Â âð Îô ÁæçÌØô´ ·¤ô ÁæÌæ ãñÐ ÂÅUßæ Øæ Ìæ´Ìè ¥õÚU ·¤æ´SØ·¤æÚU Øæ ·¤âðÚUæÐ §â·Ô¤ ¥çÌçÚUQ¤, ãÜßæ§ü ÁæçÌ ·Ô¤ ÚUæ×ÕæÕê ÂçÚUßæÚU ·¤ô Öè §â·¤æ ŸæðØ ÎðÙæ ãô»æÐ Âýæ¿èÙ âæçãˆØ ×ð´ ×ð´ çÁÙ Âæ´¿ Ùæ×ô´ ·¤ô §â â´S·¤ëçÌ ·¤è SÍæÂÙæ ·¤æ ŸæðØ çÎØæ ÁæÌæ ãñ ßð âÖè ·¤æ´SØ·¤æÚU ÁæçÌ ·Ô¤ ãñд Üðç·¤Ù Øã â׿Á Öè Øã ׿ÙÌæ ãñ ç·¤ ©Ù·Ô¤ ÂêßÁ ü ô´ Ùð Øã â´S·¤æÚU ÂÅUßæ â׿Á âð ãè âè¹æ ÍæÐ Upendra Kashyap is a journalist who has brought to light many socio-cultural specialties of the Shaahbad area of Bihar. He was the first to write on Jiuitia from a Bahujan perspective ˜淤æÚU ©Âð´Îý ·¤àØÂ Ùð ¥ÂÙè çÚUÂôÅUô´ü ·Ô¤ ×æŠØ× âð çÕãæÚU ·Ô¤ àææãæÕæÎ ÿæð˜æ ·¤è ¥Ùð·¤ âæ´S·¤ëçÌ·¤-â׿çÁ·¤ çßçàæCÌæ¥ô´ ·¤ô ©Áæ·¤ÚU ç·¤Øæ ãñÐ çÁ©çÌØæ ·Ô¤ ÕãéÁÙ-·¤Üæ Âÿæ ·¤ô âßüÂýÍ× âæ×Ùð ÜæÙð ·¤æ ŸæðØ Öè ·¤àØÂ ·¤ô ãè Âýæ# ãñUÐ travelled in the Son region to collect information about Banabhatta. She handed over all the material she had collected to Dwivedi. The Brahmanical system is not known for patronising theatre but was forced to accept Bharat Muni’s Natyashastraas the fifth Veda due to its popularity. Dawoodnagar – the city of disguises – has many Banabhattas. Art is not a means for earning money for the people of this town. They are associated with different professions while at the same time, serving the cause of art. Doctors, engineers, professors – all enthusiastically join the festival of Swang. Vijay Kumar, an expert in mimicry and a doctor, says, “The central and state governments should support the art and artistes of Dawoodnagar.” He adds, “Dawoodnagar can be an interesting subject for TV programmes centred on art.” One can only hope that the government and the ‘mainstream’ media pays heed to what he is saying. Sanjeev Chandan is a journalist who writes short stories and edits Streekaal magazine. Ashish Kumar Anshu is a correspondent of the monthly Sopan and is known for his investigative articles çÎØæ ÍæÐ Õýæ±×‡æßæÎè ÃØßSÍæ, ÙæÅUØ÷ ·¤×ü ·¤ô ÂýçÌDæ Ùãè´ ÎðÌè ÚUãè ãñ Üðç·¤Ù ÁÙÌæ ·Ô¤ Õè¿ Üô·¤çÂýØÌæ ·Ô¤ ·¤æÚU‡æ ©‹ãð´ ÒÖÚUÌ ×éçÙÓ ·Ô¤ ÙæÅUØ÷ àææS˜æ ·¤ô ´¿× ßðÎ ×æÙÙæ Öè ÂÇæ ÍæÐ Sßæ´» ÚU¿æÌæ Îæª¤ÎÙ»ÚU Ìô ·¤§ü-·¤§ü ßæ‡æÖ^ô´ ·¤æ àæãÚU ÂýÌèÌ ãôÌæ ãñÐ ·¤Üæ Øãæ´ ·Ô¤ Üô»ô´ ·Ô¤ çܰ ¥æØ ·¤æ âæÏÙ Ùãè´ ãñ, ¥Ü»-¥Ü» Âðàæô´ âð ÁéÇð¸ Îæ©ÎÙ»ÚU ßæâè ·¤Üæ ·Ô¤ â´ÏæÙ ×ð´ Ü»ð ãñ,´ €UØæ Çæ€UÅUÚU, €UØæ §´ÁèçÙØÚU Øæ ÂýæŠØæÂ·¤, âÕ ·Ô¤ âÕ Sßæ´» ÚU¿æÙð ·Ô¤ Âßü ×ð´ ©U„æâÂêß·ü ¤ àææç×Ü ãôÌð ãñд Ù·¸¤Ü çßÏæ ×ð´ çÙÂ釿 ¥õÚU Âðàæð âð Çæ€UÅUÚU çßÁØ ·¤é׿ÚU ·¤ãÌð ãñ,´ ҷԤδ ý ¥õÚU ÚUæ’Ø âÚU·¤æÚU ·¤ô Øãæ¡ ·¤è ·¤Üæ ¥õÚU ·¤Üæ·¤æÚUô´ ·¤ô â´ÚUÿæ‡æ ÎðÙæ ¿æçã°ÐÓ ßð âæÍ ãè ÁôǸÌð ãñ´ ç·¤ Ò·¤Üæ¥ô´ ·¤ô â×çÂüÌ ÅUè ßè ·¤æØüR¤×ô´ ·Ô¤ çܰ Îæ©ÎÙ»ÚU °·¤ ¥Ü» âð çßáØ ãô â·¤Ìæ ãñÐÓ ·¤æàæ, ©Ù·¤è §â ׿´» ÂÚU âÚU·¤æÚU ¥õÚU ×éØ×ÏæÚUæ ·Ô¤ ×èçÇØæ·¤×èü ŠØæÙ ÎðÌÐð ·¤ãæÙè·¤æÚU ß Â˜æ·¤æÚU â´Áèß ¿´ÎÙ ÒS˜æè ·¤æÜÓ Âç˜æ·¤æ ·Ô¤ â´ÂæÎ·¤ ãñ´ ÁÕç·¤ ׿çâ·¤ Âç˜æ·¤æ ÒâôÂæÙÓ ·Ô¤ â´ßæÎÎæÌæ ¥æàæèá ·¤é׿ÚU ¥´àæé ¹ôÁè ˜淤æçÚUÌæ ·Ô¤ çܰ ÁæÙð ÁæÌð ãñ´Ð ȤæòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ | ¥€ÅêUÕÚU ÎëàØ 2014 ×æŠØ× From Mangte Chungneijang to Mary Kom ×ñ»Ìð ¿´‚Ùð§Áñ» âð ×ðÚUè ·¤æò× GET A RARE GLIMPSE INTO THE HEART AND MIND OF A POOR TRIBAL GIRL WHO TOOK UP BOXING AGAINST ALL ODDS AND BECAME WORLD CHAMPION °·¤ °ðâè »ÚUèÕ ¥æçÎßæâè ÜǸ·¤è ·Ô¤ çÎÜ ¥õÚU çÎ׿» ×ð´ Ûææ¡·¤Ùð ·¤æ ÕðãÌÚUèÙ ×õ·¤æ, çÁâÙð ¥Ùð·¤ ×éâèÕÌô´ ·¤æ âæ×Ùæ ·¤ÚUÌð ãé° Õæòç€â´» ×ð´ ×ãæÚUÌ ãæçâÜ ·¤è ¥õÚU çßE ¿ñçÂØÙ ÕÙè SANJEEV KHUDSHAH I f you want to inculcate in your children, the values of unlimited patience and persistent hard work, please do take them to see the film Mary Kom. This is the story of a girl who lives in a small village of Manipur amid grinding poverty. The eight-year-old loves boxing gloves more than her life. Her father used to be a wrestler and wants his daughter to be an athlete. He sends her to a club to train in athletics. However, unknown to him, she learns boxing and goes on to become national champion. When her father comes to know of it, he is upset. He is worried that if his daughter learns boxing, she may suffer injuries to her face and that would come in the way of her marriage. One day, the father asks her daughter to choose between him and boxing. Mary chooses boxing. Indian girls can learn a lot from the unwavering commitment and grit of Mary Kom. Indian girls can and do stand up to their in-laws but they still cannot imagine going against the wishes of their parents. ¥ â´Áèß ¹éÎàææã »ÚU ¥æÂ ¥ÂÙð Õ‘¿ô´ð ·¤ô ¥ÙßÚUÌ ÏñØü ¥õÚU ¥Í·¤ ÂçÚUŸæ× ·¤ô ÁèßÙ×êËØ ·Ô¤ M¤Â ×ð´ çâ¹æÙæ ¿æãÌð ãñ´ Ìô ©‹ãðÚ çȤË× Ò×ðÚUè ·¤æò×Ó ÁM¤ÚU çι水РØã ×ç‡æÂéÚU ÚUæ’Ø ·Ô¤ °·¤ »æ´ß ×´ð çÙßæâ ·¤ÚUÙð ßæÜè ÜǸ·¤è Ò×ðÚUè ·¤æò×Ó ·¤è ·¤ãæÙè ãñ, çÁâ·¤æ ÂçÚUßæÚU Ì´»ãæÜè ×ð´ ÁèßÙ ÃØÌèÌ ·¤ÚU ÚUãæ ãñÐ ßã ¥æÆ âæÜ ·¤è ÜǸ·¤è Õæòç€Uâ»´ ‚ÜÃâ ·¤ô âèÙð âð Ü»æØð ÚUãÌè ãñÐ ¿êç´ ·¤ ©â·Ô¤ çÂÌæ ÚUâð ÜÚU ÚUã ¿é·¤Ô ãñ´ §âçܰ ©âð °·¤ °ÍÜèÅU ÕÙÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ €UÜÕ ÖðÁÌð ãñд Üðç·¤Ù ßã ÜÇ·¤è »é¿éÂ Õæòç€Uâ»´ âè¹Ìè ãñ ¥õÚU ÚUæCþèØ ¿ñçÂØÙ ÕÙ ÁæÌè ãñÐ çÂÌæ ·¤ô ÁÕ Øã ÕæÌ ÂÌæ Ü»Ìè ãñ Ìô ßð ÙæÚUæÁ¸ ãôÌð ãñд ©Ù·¤æ ׿ÙÙæ ãñ ç·¤ ¥»ÚU ÜÇ·¤è Õæòç€Uâ»´ ·¤ÚU»ð è Ìô ¿ðãÚUð ÂÚU ¿ôÅU Ü»ð»è ¥õÚU àææÎè ×𴠥Ǹ¿Ù ¥æØð»èÐ °·¤ çÎÙ çÂÌæ ÕðÅUè âð ·¤ãÌð ãñ,´ ¥æÁ Ìéãð´ ×éÛæð Øæ Õæòç€Uâ»´ ×ð´ âð ç·¤âè °·¤ ·¤ô ¿éÙÙæ ãô»æÐÓ ×ðÚUè ¿éÙÌè ãñ - ÒÕæòç€Uâ»´ ÓÐ °ðâð ×ÁÕêÌ ÁÊÕð ·¤ô Üð·¤ÚU âæ×Ùð ¥æÌè ×ðÚUè ·¤æò×, ÖæÚUÌèØ ÜǸ緤Øô´ ·¤ô ÕãéÌ ·¤éÀ çâ¹æÌè ãñÐ Áãæ´ °·¤ ¥æ× ÜǸ·¤è ¥ÂÙð ÜÿØ ·¤è ¹æçÌÚU ÖÜð ãè ââéÚUæÜ ×ð´ çßÚUôÏ ·¤ÚUÙð ·¤è çã×Ì ÁéÅUæ ÜðÌè ãô Üðç·¤Ù ×æÌæ-çÂÌæ ·¤æ çßÚUôÏ ·¤ÚUÙð ·¤è ·¤ËÂÙæ Öè Ùãè´ ·¤ÚU â·¤ÌèÐ XX 61 VISUAL OCTOBER 2014 FORWARD Press MEDIA | 62 It hardly matters that Priyanka Chopra does not look like Mary Kom. She has tried really hard – and with considerable success – to behave and speak like the boxer. She has done justice to her character §ââð ·¤ô§ü Ȥ·¤ü Ùãè´ ÂÇ¸Ìæ ç·¤ çÂýØ·´ ¤æ ¿ôÂǸæ, ×ðÚUè Áñâè Ùãè´ çιÌè, Üðç·¤Ù ©â·Ô¤ ãæßÖæß, ÕôÜè-Öæáæ ×ðÚUè ·¤æ× ·¤æ ¥æÖæâ ·¤ÚUæÌð ãñд çÂýØ·´ ¤æ Ùð ¥ÂÙð ç·¤ÚUÎæÚU ·Ô¤ âæÍ ‹ØæØ ç·¤Øæ ãñÐ When Mary Kom approaches the boxing coach and asks him to train her, the elderly coach tells her, “Give me five reasons why you want to learn boxing. Only then will I train you.” Mary Kom replies, “I love boxing. I love boxing. I love boxing. I love boxing. Do I have to say it once more?” And the coach agrees to take her under his tutelage. What makes Mary Kom’s success more striking is that she hails from a tribal family of Manipur – a state reeling under terrorism and the infamous Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act for more than half a century. Mary Kom’s husband Onler Kom persuades her to take part in boxing championship after she has become the mother of twins. He helps her at every juncture. Her coach did not want her to marry because he believed that once a woman is married, she is confined within the four walls of her house. However, Mary Kom proves her coach wrong. After becoming a mother, she again approaches him. Impressed by her determination, the coach tells her, “A woman becomes stronger after becoming a mother. Now, you are twice as strong as you were.” Mary Kom was born Mangte Chungneijang in Churachandpur, Manipur, on 1 March 1983. Her coach gave her the name Mary Kom. She is a five-time world amateur boxing champion and also has a bronze medal from the London Olympics. She was born in a poor and conservative Christian tribal family, where, in the name of cultural norms, girls were scrupulously kept away from the sports arena. For Mangte Chungneijang, becoming Mary Kom meant she had to repeatedly face hurdles rooted in regionalism, religion, caste and gender. Since the film is a dramatic adaptation of the life of Mary Kom, one cannot expect it to portray what exactly happened but the film does expose the petty politics informing the Indian sports world and quite realistically tells the story of the bitter struggle of one woman. This is a film for everyone, but particularly for those who want a future in sports. It hardly matters that Priyanka Chopra does not look like Mary Kom. She has tried really hard – and with considerable success – to behave and speak like the boxer. She has done justice to her character. The set depicting a Manipuri village does not look artificial. Priyanka’s co-actors have also acquitted themselves well. The dialogues are apt and well written. The film gives the viewers a rare glimpse into the heart and mind of Mary Kom, as well as an opportunity to understand the world of sports. The music is hummable and the direction is tight, keeping the audience glued to their seats to the last scene and igniting patriotic fervour in them. Film: Mary Kom, Duration: 122 minutes, Director: Omung Kumar Sanjeev Khudshah is a well-known Dalit writer ×ðÚUè ·¤æò× ÁÕ ¥ÂÙð ·¤ô¿ ·Ô¤ Âæâ Áæ·¤ÚU ×éP¤ðÕæÁ¸è çâ¹æÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ ·¤ãÌè ãñ Ìô ßã ©×ýÎÚUæÁ ·¤ô¿ ©Ùâð ÂýàÙ ÂêÀÌæ ãñ ç·¤ Ìé× ×éP¤ðÕæÁ¸è €UØô´ âè¹Ùæ ¿æãÌè ãô, §â·Ô¤ Âæ¡¿ ·¤æÚU‡æ ÕÌæ¥ô, ÌÕ ãè ×ñ´ Ìéãð çâ¹æª¤´»æÐ ÁßæÕ ×ð´ ×ðÚUè ·¤æò× ·¤ãÌè ãñ - Ò¥æ§ü Üß Õæòç€Uâ»´ , ¥æ§ü Üß Õæòç€Uâ»´ , ¥æ§ü Üß Õæòç€Uâ»´ , ¥æ§ü Üß Õæòç€Uâ»´ ; ¥Õ €UØæ ¥õÚU °·¤ ÕæÚU ·¤ãÙæ ãô»æ?Ó ·¤ô¿ ×ðÚUè ·¤ô ·¤ôç¿´» ÎðÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ ÌñØæÚU ãô ÁæÌæ ãñÐ ×ðÚUè ·¤æò× ·¤è çÁ´Î»è §âçܰ Öè çÎÜ¿S ãñ €UØô´ç·¤ ßð ×ç‡æÂéÚU ·Ô¤ °·¤ ÁÙÁæÌèØ ÂçÚUßæÚU âð ¥æÌè ãñ´ - ßã ×ç‡æÂéÚU Áô ¥æÏè âÎè âð Öè ’ØæÎæ âר âð ¥æÌ´·¤ßæÎ ¥õÚU ÕÎÙæ×àæéÎæ âàæS˜æ ÕÜ (çßàæðáæçÏ·¤æÚU) ¥çÏçÙØ× âð ÁêÛæ ÚUãæ ãñÐ ×ðÚUè ·¤æò× ·ð¤ ÂçÌ ¥ô‹ÜÚU ·¤æò× Îô ÁéÇ߸ æ¡ Õ‘¿ð ãôÙð ·Ô¤ ÕæßÁêÎ ×ðÚUè ·¤ô çȤÚU âð Õæòç€Uâ»´ ¿ñç´ ÂØÙçàæÂ ×ð´ Öæ» ÜðÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ Âýçð ÚUÌ ·¤ÚUÌð ãñ ¥õÚU ·¤Î×·¤Î× ÂÚU ©â·¤è ×ÎÎ ·¤ÚUÌð ãñд ©â·Ô¤ ·¤ô¿ Ùãè´ ¿æãÌð Íð ç·¤ ×ðÚUè àææÎè ·¤ÚUð €UØô´ç·¤ ©Ù·¤æ ׿ÙÙæ Íæ ç·¤ àææÎè ·Ô¤ Õ´ÏÙ ×ð´ Õ´ÏÙð ·Ô¤ ÕæÎ ÜǸ·¤è ƒæÚU ·Ô¤ ÎæØÚUð ×ð´ çâ×ÅU ·¤ÚU ÚUã ÁæÌè ãñÐ Üðç·¤Ù Îô Õ‘¿ô´ ·¤è ׿¡ ÕÙÙð ·ð¤ ÕæÎ çȤÚU ×ðÚUè ©â ·¤ô¿ ·Ô¤ Âæâ ¥æÌè ãñ Ìô ·¤ô¿ ©â·¤è çã×Ì âð ÕðãÎ ÂýÖæçßÌ ãôÌæ ãñ ¥õÚU ·¤ãÌæ ãñ ç·¤ - Ò°·¤ ¥õÚUÌ ×æ´ ÕÙ·Ô¤ ¥õÚU SÅþæ»´ò ãô ÁæÌè ãñ ¥õÚU ¥Õ ÌéãæÚUè Ìæ·¤Ì Îô »éÙæ Õɸ »ØèÐÓ ×ðÚUè ·¤æò× ·¤æ ¥âÜè Ùæ× ×ñ»Ìð ¿´‚Ùð§Áñ» ãñ, çÁâ·¤æ Á‹× v ׿¿ü v~}x ·¤ô ×ç‡æÂéÚU ·Ô¤ ¿éÚUæ¿æ´ÎÂéÚU ×ð´ ã饿 ÍæÐ ×ðÚUè ·¤æò× ·¤ô Øã Ùæ× ©Ù·Ô¤ ·¤ô¿ Ùð çÎØæ ÍæÐ ×ðÚUè ·¤æò× Âæ´¿ ÕæÚU çßE ×éP¤ðÕæÁè ÂýçÌØôç»Ìæ ·¤è ¿ñçÂØÙ ÚUã ¿é·¤è ãñ´ ¥õÚU Ü´ÎÙ ¥ôÜ´ç€Uâ ×ð´ ·¤æ´SØ Âη¤ çßÁðÌæ ã´Ðñ ßãU ¥æçÎßæâè §üâæ§ü ÂëDÖêç× ×ð´ ÂÜè ÕÉè ¥õÚU °·¤ °ðâð »ÚUèÕ ÂçÚUßæÚU âð Ìæ„é·¤ ÚU¹Ìè ã´ñ Áãæ´ â´S·¤ëçÌ ·Ô¤ Ùæ× ÂÚU ÜǸ緤Øô´ ·¤ô ¹ðÜ ×ð´ Öæ» ÜðÙð ·¤è ×Ùæãè ÍèÐ ×ðÚUè ·¤æò× ·¤è çÁ´Î»è ·¤è ·¤ãæÙè ÕÌæÌè ãñ ç·¤ ßã ×ñ»Ìð ¿´‚Ùð§Áñ» âð ×ðÚUè ·¤æò× ÕÙÙð ·Ô¤ ÎõÚUæÙ ·¤§ü ÕæÚU ÿæð˜æßæÎ, ÁæçÌßæÎ ÌÍæ Ëæñç´ »·¤ ß Šææç×ü·¤ Âêß»ü ãý U ·¤æ çàæ·¤æÚU ãé§Ðü ¿´çê ·¤ Øã çȤË× ×ðÚUè ·¤æò× ·¤è ¥âÜ çÁ´Î»è ·¤æ ÙæÅUØ÷ L¤Âæ´ÌÚU‡æ ãñ §âçܰ ÁM¤ÚUè Ùãè´ ç·¤ âæÚUè ƒæÅUÙæ°´ ¥õÚU â´ßæÎ ãêÕãê ãô´, Üðç·¤Ù Øã çȤË× ÖæÚUÌèØ ¹ðÜ ·¤è ¥ôÀè ÚUæÁÙèçÌ ¥õÚU °·¤ ¥õÚUÌ ·Ô¤ â´ƒæáü ·¤è ·¤ãæÙè ÕØæ´ ·¤ÚUÌè ãñÐ ãÚU ÃØçQ¤ ·¤ô Øã çȤË× Îð¹Ùè ¿æçã°, ¹æâ·¤ÚU ©‹ãð´ Áô ç·¤âè Öè ¹ðÜ ×ð´ ¥ÂÙæ ÖçßcØ Îð¹Ìð ãñд §ââð ·¤ô§ü Ȥ·¤ü Ùãè ÂÇÌæ ç·¤ çÂýØ·´ ¤æ ¿ôÂǸæ ×ðÚUè Áñâè Ùãè çιÌè, Üðç·¤Ù ©â·Ô¤ ãæßÖæß, ÕôÜè-Öæáæ ×ðÚUè ·¤æ× ·¤æ ¥æÖæâ ·¤ÚUæÌð ãñд çÂýØ·´ ¤æ Ùð ¥ÂÙð ç·¤ÚUÎæÚU ·Ô¤ âæÍ ‹ØæØ ç·¤Øæ ãñÐ çȤË× ·Ô¤ âðÅU ×ç‡æÂéÚU ·Ô¤ »æ¡ß ·¤æ ßæSÌçß·¤ ¥ãâæâ ·¤ÚUæÌð ãñд âã-·¤Üæ·¤æÚUô´ Ùð ÕðãÌÚUèÙ ¥çÖÙØ ç·Øæ ãñÐ â´ßæÎ âÏð ãé° ãñд çȤË×, Îàæü·¤ô´ ·¤ô ×ðÚUè ·¤æ× ¥õÚU ¹ðÜ ·¤è ÎéçÙØæ ·Ô¤ ¥´ÎÚU Ûææ´·¤Ùð, â×ÛæÙð ·¤æ °·¤ ÕðãÌÚUèÙ ×õ·¤æ ×éãÄñ Øæ ·¤ÚUæÌè ãñÐ â´»èÌ ©Îæ ãñÐ çÙÎðàü æÙ ©‘¿ ·¤ôçÅU ·¤æ ãñ Áô Îàæü·¤ô´ ·¤ô ¥´Ì Ì·¤ Õæ´Ïð ÚU¹Ìæ ãñ ¥õÚU ÎðàæÂý×ð ·Ô¤ ÁÊÕð âð ¥ôÌ ÂýôÌ ·¤ÚU ÎðÌæ ãñÐ çȤË× ·¤æ Ùæ× Ñ ×ðÚUè ·¤æò×, ¥ßçÏ Ñ vww ç×ÙÅU, çÙÎðüàæ·¤ Ñ ¥ô×´» ·¤é׿ÚU â´Áèß ¹éÎàææã ¿ç¿üÌ ÎçÜÌ Üð¹·¤ ãñ´ ATTENTION SUBSCRIBERS FOR GENERAL SUBSCRIBERS TERM ¥ßçÏ SMS: 07827427311 For Subscribers: New - 111; Renew - 333; Complaints - 000 We will contact you Call: 07827427311 (11am - 1pm & 2pm - 5 pm, Mon-Sat) Or E-mail: âæ×æ‹Ø Üô»ô´ ·Ô¤ çܰ çßlæçÍüØô´ ·Ô¤ çܰ 1 Year (12 copies) ` 200 ` 100 2 Year ` 360 ` 200 (24 copies) email: [email protected] ` 500 3 Year (36 copies) GET YOUR FAVOURITE MAGAZINE AT YOUR NEIGHBOURHOOD MAGAZINE STORE. PERSUADE MAGAZINE STORES AND AGENCIES OF YOUR CITY TO ORDER COPIES OF FORWARD PRESS OR SEND US THEIR PHONE NUMBER AND ADDRESS. ATTRACTIVE COMMISSION FOR AGENCIES AND GUARANTEED RETURN OF UNSOLD COPIES. CALL: 07827427311 FOR STUDENTS + 'Phule apne shabdon mein' ` 300 ` 1,000 ` 500 + Vishal Mangalwadi's book 'Hum pichde kyon hain'. `250 5 Year (60 copies) 0 0 `1 R FO S T EN AR D U E ST NE Y R FO O ×´»ßæ°´, ¥ÂÙè çÂýØ Âç˜æ·¤æ çÙ·¤ÅUßÌèü ×ñ»ÁèÙ SÅUôÚU ÂÚUÐ ¥ÂÙð àæãÚU ·Ô¤ ×ñ»ÁèÙ SÅUôÚUô´ ß °Áð´çâØô´ ·¤ô ȤæÚUßÇü Âýðâ ×´»ßæÙð ·Ô¤ çܰ ÂýðçÚUÌ ·¤ÚUð´ Øæ ã×ð´ ©Ù·¤æ ȤæðÙ Ù´ÕÚU ß ÂÌæ Îð´Ð °ðÁð´çâØô´ ·¤ô ¥æ·¤áü·¤ ·¤×èàæÙ ÎðØ ß Õ¿è ãé§ü ÂýçÌØô´ ·¤è ßæÂâè ·¤è »æÚU´ÅUè ÖèÐ ·¤æòÜ ·¤ÚUð´ Ñ ®|}w|yw|xvv SUBSCRIPTION FORM (Please fill in BLOCK LETTERS) Subscriber’s Name: Mr/Mrs/Ms ________________________________ Age: _______ Family size: _______ â¼SØ ·¤æ Ùæ×Ñ Ÿæè/Ÿæè×Ìè/âéŸæè ©U×ý Ñ ÂæçÚUßæÚU ×ð´ â¼SØô¢ ·¤è â¢Øæ Full Postal Address: Home Office ____________________________________________________ ÂêÚUæ ÂÌæ ƒæÚ ·¤æØæüÜØ __________________________________________ State: _______________ PIN Code: ____________ ÚUæ’Ø çÂÙ ·¤ôÇU Mobile Phone: _______________________ Email: ____________________________________________ ×ôÕæ§Ü ȤôÙ I am enclosing Rs. __________ by M.O. / D.D. No. /Cash ×¢ñ â¢Ü‚Ù ÖðÁ ÚUãUæ ã¡êU L¤ ×Ùè¥æòÇUÚU/ çÇU׿¢ÇU ÇþUæÅU/ Ù·¤¼ Dated _____________ ç¼Ù梷¤ drawn on (Bank name) _______________________ favouring “Aspire Prakashan Pvt. Ltd.” for a subscription of ¼ðØ (Õñ´·¤ ·¤æ Ùæ×) 1 Year 1 ßáü 2 Years 2 ßáü 3 Years 5 Years 3 ßáü 5 ßáü “°SÂæØÚU Âý·¤æàæÙ Âýæ. çÜ.” ·ð¤ Ùæ× You may send me SMS regarding breaking news and special offers. ¥æÂ ×éÛæð Õýðç·¢ » ‹Øê•æ ß SÂðàæÜ ¥æòȤÚU ·ð¤ çܰ °â.°×.°â. Öè ÖðÁ â·¤Ìð ãñ´UÐ Subs Started: _______ Address all correspondence including the Subscription Form with payment to: Aspire Prakashan Pvt. Ltd. 803 Deepali, 92 Nehru Place, New Delhi 110019 Tel. (011) 46538687, email: [email protected] If Undelivered Return To: ASPIRE PRAKASHAN PVT. LTD. 803/92 NEHRU PLACE NEW DELHI -- 110019 RNI No. DELBIL/2009/28608 Registration No. DL (S)-01/3361/2012-14 No. U(SE)-40/2012-14 Publishing on 28th of Every Month Posting on 4-5th of Every Month LICENSED TO POST WITHOUT PREPAYMENT MRB CITY (PHASE-I) Reg No : U74999 DL2013 PTC 259451 âßü â׿Á ·ð¤ çܰ âæ´ÖÚU-Èé¤ÜðÚUæ (ÚUæÁSÍæÙ) »éÜæÕè Ù»ÚUè ÁØÂéÚU ×ð´ ¥æßæâèØ ØæðÁÙæ ÂýSÌéÌ ·¤è Áæ ÚUãUè ãñU ¥Ùð·¤ ÂýæðÈð¤âÚUæð´, ˜淤æÚUæð´ ß Üð¹·¤æð´ Ùð Õé·¤ ·¤ÚUßæ° ŒÜæòÅU ÕãéUÁÙ â׿Á ·¤è ¥æÕæÎè ·ð¤ Õè¿ ãñU MRB CITY ØæðÁÙæ ß âéçßŠææ°´ ÂýçÌ ¤ L * 7 119 ü »Á ß» ãUÚU ×ãUèÙð ·¤è ÕãéUÌ ÀUæðÅUè âè Õ¿Ì âð ÕÙæ°´ âéÙãUÚUæ ·¤Ü 60 ß»ü »Á ·¤è ·¤è×Ì ×ãUÁ 71,820 L¤Â°, Õéç·´¤» °×檴¤ÅU ×ãUÁ 21,546 L¤Â° àæðá ÚUæçàæ ÂýçÌ׿ãU 2095 L¤Â° ·¤è ŽØæÁ ×éQ¤ 0-24 ׿çâ·¤ ç·¤SÌæð´ ×ð´ Âýè ãUæðËÇU çÚUãUæØàæè ŒÜæòÅU, Âæ·¤ü ß ¹éÜð ×ñÎæÙ, ¿æÚUÎèßæÚUè âè׿ ß »ðÅU, çÕÁÜè °ß´ ÂðØÁÜ âéçßŠææ ÖæÚUÌ ·ð¤ âÖè ÚUæ’Øæð´ ·ð¤ çÙßæçâØæð´ ·ð¤ çܰ âéÙãUÚUæ ׿ñ·¤æ, çÎËÜè âð ×éÌ âæ§UÅU çßçÁÅU ·¤è âéçßŠææ ÂèÇUèâè ¿ð·¤ âð ·¤ÚU â·¤Ìð ãñ´U Öé»ÌæÙ, çâÈü¤ ÚUçÁSÅþUè ·ð¤ âר ¥æÙð ·¤è ÁL¤ÚUÌ MRB °·¤ ÚUçÁSÅUÇüU ·¤æðÜæðÙæ§UÁÚU °´ÇU ÇðUßÜÂÚU ·´¤ÂÙè ãñUÐ Öé»ÌæÙ ·¤æð Üð·¤ÚU ÚUãð´U çÙçà¿´Ì MRB çâÅUè ·¤è çßSÌëÌ ÁæÙ·¤æÚUè ·ð¤ çܰ Îð¹ð´ ãU׿ÚUè ßðÕâæ§UÅU Ñ www.mrbtechnobuild.com ¥»Üð 6 ßáæðZ ×ð´ ·¤è×Ì ×ð´ ‹ØêÙÌ× 10 »é‡ææ ÕɸUæðžæÚUè ·¤æ ¥Ùé׿ÙÐ ¥Öè ·¤æòÜ ·¤ÚÔ´U, ׿˜æ 30 ŒÜæòÅU àæðá Ñ 08826390338 (Áè.°â. ÁØÚUæÁ), 08826390340 (·é´¤ßÚUÂæÜ), 08826390339, ŒÜæòÅUæð ·¤æ çßßÚU‡æ âæ§UÁ (Èé¤ÅU ×ð´) ÿæð˜æÈ¤Ü (»Áæð´ ×ð´) 18X30 60 100 20X45 30X45 150 40X45 200 ÂýSÌæçßÌ Ù° ©UžæÚU¥æŠæéçÙ·¤ àæãUÚUæð´ ×ð´ âð °·¤ ãñU Èé¤ÜðÚUæ Layout Approved by Govt. Èé¤ÜðÚUæ ×ð´ çÙßðàæ €Øæð´ çÎËÜè-×é´Õ§üU ¥æñlæðç»·¤ »çÜØæÚÔU ·¤æ ×éØ Á´€àæÙ (DMIC) çßàß ·¤æ âÕâð ÕǸæ âæñÚU ª¤Áæü ŒÜæ´ÅU (âæ´ÖÚU-Èé¤ÜðÚUæ) ÖæÚUÌ âÚU·¤æÚU mUæÚUæ çß·¤æâ ·ð¤ çܰ ÂýSÌæçßÌ ÙØæ ©UžæÚU ¥æŠæéçÙ·¤ àæãUÚU âæ´ÖÚU ÛæèÜ (Èé¤ÜðÚUæ) çßàß ÂØüÅUÙ SÍÜ RIICO ¥æñlæðç»·¤ ÿæð˜æ ·ð¤ ÙÁÎè·¤ New Project Launching very soon ȤæòÚUßÇüU Âýðâ ·ð¤ ÂæÆU·¤æð´ ·ð¤ çܰ çßàæðá ÀêUÅU MRB TECHNO BUILD PVT. LTD. Regd Office: 323, Plot No. 12, MLU, Vardman sunder Plaza, Sector -12, Dwarka, New Delhi, Phone : 9212275004, 9212285004, 011-45514729 ÁØ ßæË×èç·¤ ÁØ ÚUçßÎæâ ÁØ Öè× âÖè ÎðàæßæçâØæð ·¤æð âëçCU·¤Ìæü Ö»ßæÙ ßæË×èç·¤ ×ãUæÚUæÁ Áè ·ð¤ Âý»ÅU çÎßâ ×ð´ ãUæçÎü·¤ ÕŠææ§üU ¥æÁ ãU׿ÚÔU â׿Á ·¤æð ¥æßàØ·¤Ìæ ãñU - Õ“ææð´ ·¤æð çàæçÿæÌ ·¤ÚUÙð ·¤è, ãU×Ùð ÕãéUÌ âר ÃØÍü ×ð´ »´ßæ çÎØæ ãñU ¥æñÚU ¥Õ ¥æñÚU âר ·¤æð ÙãUè´ »´ßæÙæ ¿æçãU°, ¥Õ ¥ÂÙð ÂñÚUæð´ ÂÚU ©UÆU ¹Ç¸ð ãUæð¥æð ¥æñÚU çàæçÿæÌ ÕÙæðÐ ßèÚU ŸæðDU ¿æñŠæÚUè ØàæÂæÜ ßçÚUDU ÙðÌæ, ¥·¤æÜè ÎÜ ÚUæCþUèØ â´¿æÜ·¤, ֿ߿пâ Ìÿæ·¤ Õ‚»Ù °ÇUßæð·ð¤ÅU ÁæÚUè·¤Ìæü Ñ ßèÚU ŸæðDU ¿æñŠæÚUè ØàæÂæÜ, ßçÚUDU ÙðÌæ, ¥·¤æÜè ÎÜ, ÚUæCþUèØ â´¿æÜ·¤, ÖæÚUÌèØ ßæË×èç·¤ Šæ×ü â׿Á (ÚUçÁ.) ÜéçŠæØæÙæ ×éØ ÎÌÚU Ñ âæ×Ùð Ù»ÚU çÙ»× ·¤æØæüÜØ, ×æÌæ ÚUæÙè ¿æñ·¤, ÜéçŠæØæÙæ, â´Â·ü¤ Ñ 9814514323,
Documenti analoghi
ÇUæò€ÅUÚU ÕÙæÙð ·ð¤ Ùæ× ÂÚU ÆU»æ
âãØô» ·ð¤ çܰ Ìô ÂýçÌÕh ãñ,
Üðç·¤Ù ÒÒÿô˜æ ×ð´ ¥æÌ¢·¤ßæÎ ×ð´ ¥æ°
ãæçÜØæ ©UÀUæÜ ÂÚ ç¿¢çÌÌ ãñ, ¥õÚ
§âÙð ÙߢÕÚ w®v{ ×ð´ §Sܿ׿տÎ
×ð´ ãôÙð ßæÜð v~ßð´ Îÿôâ çàæ¹Ú
â×ðÜÙ ·ð¤ âÈ¤Ü ¥æØôÁÙ ·ð¤
׿ãõÜ ·¤ô »¢Ö...
10th 1080702_A1 Social Science QP.p65
Øã ÂýàÙ-Âæ Îæð Öæ»æð´ ×ð´ çßÖæçÁÌ ãñ´ Ñ Öæ»-I ¥æñÚU Öæ»-IIÐ Öæ»-I ×ð´ ÂýàÙ â´Øæ 1 âð 16 Ì·¤ ãñÐ §Ù
Õãé-çß·¤ËÂèØ ÂýàÙæð´ ·ð¤ ©æÚU ¥Ü» âð Îè »§ü ©æÚU ÂéçSÌ·¤æ ×ð´ çܹðÐ §â·ð¤ çÜØð âר ¥ßçÏ ¥æÏæ ...
ÚUæCUþU»æÙ çßßæÎ ¥æñÚU ÁæÁü Â
in December last year, followed by interviews in April-May
this year. The UPSC has released a list of 1236 successful candidates. Among them, at least 646 are Bahujans, five of whom
are OBCs ranked...
CBSE Class 9 Social Science Sample Paper 2013
(c) âæðçßØÌæð´ ·ð¤ ·¤æØü·¤Ìæü¥æð´ ¥æñÚU Ùæçß·¤æð´ Ùð
(d) §Ù×ð´ âð ·¤æð§ü Ùãè´
087_X_SA2_05_A1 QP Social Science.p65
Øæ ¥æñÚU ¥çÏ·¤ ÖæÚUÌèØ ·¤ÂçÙØæð´ ·¤æð Õãé ÚUæcÅþUèØ ·¤ÂçÙØæð´ ·ð¤ L¤Â ×ð´ ©ÖÚUÙæ ¿æçã°? Øã ç·¤â Âý·¤æÚU Îðàæ