Phantom heads and Matroshka
Transcript
Phantom heads and Matroshka
Space science Spaceflight Vol 53 December 2011 Gathering data on long term radiation exposure Phantom heads and Matroshka by Joel Powell A team of scientists from Russia, Europe, enclosed in a white Nomex bag and was America and Japan have tackled the velcroed to the starboard bulkhead on the middeck during the mission. problem of radiation exposure and protection head-on, utilising instrumented The basic instrumented head was anthropomorphic dummies called ‘phantoms’ provided by the Phantom Laboratory of that incorporate human body parts. Salem, New York (after they acquired the The first of these unique experiments was flown in August 1989 aboard Space Shuttle Columbia, and current versions — codenamed Matroshka — have been design from Alderson Research Laboratories). It was loaned to NASA by the Air Force for the duration of the three NASA One of the most vexing problems facing future interplanetary voyagers is long-term exposure to radiation. Researchers have already determined that space crews face potentially debilitating doses of radiation during the long journey to Mars, as well as down on the surface of the red planet. had dubbed ‘Satan’. A series of inflight photographs of the Shuttle flights. Some 120 holes were Phantom, released by the Johnson Space Center after the STS-28 flight, were among a deployed since 2004 aboard the drilled into the plastic interior of the head very limited number of photos provided to International Space Station (ISS). to accommodate over 400 the public from each classified Defense Department mission. Phantom Head thermoluminescent detector (TLD) chips to record the radiation dose. Nuclear track The Phantom Head is probably one of the detectors were imbedded in the layers of The eleven pound head was returned to Phantom Laboratory after each flight for most unusual experiments ever conducted the ‘brain’ to register primary radiation disassembly and readout of the radiation during a manned spaceflight. Constructed (heavy ions) and secondaries (particle dosimeters. The derived data was compared around a real human skull, the ‘phantom’ was instrumented to measure radiation fragments created during collisions within to separate radiation measurements made on the Shuttle middeck with passive doses in various depths of simulated human the particle detectors). Astronaut Mike Mullane tells a funny brain tissue. story about the Phantom in his book Riding dosimeters. This experiment validated the use of a Rockets (Scribner, 2006, p331). At one ‘phantom’ for human tissue equivalent experiment, formally designated Detailed point during the STS-36 mission, he radiation dose measurements. The readings Supplementary Objective 469, was a joint NASA and US Department of Defense slipped into a sleep restraint and two of his from the instrumented head corresponded well to the passive dosimeter data from project that flew on three Space Shuttle crewmates taped the phantom to the top of the sleeping bag. The orbital jokesters missions in 1989-90. floated up to the flight deck and managed inside the cabin. Plans were made by NASA to continue the investigation with a more Two of the missions, STS-28 and STS- to scare the wits out of their unsuspecting elaborate anthropomorphic dummy in the 36, were dedicated DoD flights that flew at pilot, John Casper, with the phantom they late 1990s. [1] The Inflight Radiation Dose Distribution high inclination and low altitude orbits. STS-31, the mission that deployed the Phantom Torso Hubble Space Telescope, flew in a high The second space phantom was stowed altitude, low inclination orbit with DSO 469. inside the SpaceHab logistics module The primary source of radiation on the low- aboard Space Shuttle Discovery in June altitude flights was galactic cosmic rays 1998. Nicknamed ‘Fred’, the phantom (GCR), while protons from the inner Van Allen radiation belt provided the primary represented the head and torso of a human being in order to measure the radiation ‘dose radiation exposure during high altitude equivalent’ in the internal organs. The flights. Phantom remained in space for 9.8 days Measuring six-by-eight-by-ten inches, the during the STS-91 mission, including four Phantom Head was stored in a middeck days while Discovery was docked to the locker during ascent and landing. It was Russian Mir station. 464 Phantom Head photographed during the STS-28 mission in 1989. NASA Space science Phantom Torso ‘Fred’ inside the Human Research Facility in the Destiny Laboratory in May 2001. The Matroshka number — effective radiation dose as determined by Matroshka is represented by: Fred was later deployed on the measure radiation doses is not new. The US International Space Station in 2001. The Air Force designed a plastic replica of a crew of STS-100 brought the phantom to the human torso for an orbital space mission in ISS where it was placed inside one of the still-empty experiment rack locations in the May 1965, but the ‘plastinaut’ was lost when the Atlas launch vehicle exploded shortly positions inside the torso with new Destiny laboratory. The torso was after liftoff. thermoluminescent and nuclear track detectors. The instruments yielded good designed to help estimate the effects of radiation exposure on the internal organs of Phantom on Mir data, revealing that the equivalent doses in the simulated ‘lungs’, ‘stomach’ and the body. The phantom was sliced into 34 separate segments, each supplied with Austrian and Russian researchers devised a water-filled phantom chamber to record ‘gonads’ was about 90 percent of the dose passive and active radiation sensors that radiation dosages on Mir from May 1997 to on the outside (‘skin’) of the torso. The gathered data for four months on the station, February 1999. anthropomorphic phantom on STS-91 was sponsored by the National Space until the phantom was returned to Earth on 0.59 plus-or-minus 0.04 mSv/d Measurements were made at 59 Development Agency of Japan. [2] Diagram of the Phantom Head detailing slices of the simulated brain tissue. NASA Shuttle mission STS-105. The idea of using a phantom torso to Preflight view of the Phantom Head provided by JSC. NASA The Institute of Biomedical Problems in Moscow built a 35 cm sphere to house thermoluminescent radiation detectors immersed in water. The spherical device was deployed in the cosmonaut’s personal cabins (katuyas) in Mir and the Kvant 2 module for a total of 555 days. At the altitude of Mir, approximately 380 km, the primary component of the radiation dose came from galactic cosmic rays, with a minor component of protons trapped in the South Atlantic Anomaly region of the radiation belts. The Spherical Phantom was intended to measure the depth distribution (ie, the penetrating power of the charged particles) in simulated human tissue. Matroshka Faced with the imminent demise of the Mir station in 2001, ‘Phantom’ researchers in Russia secured funding to continue their research on the new Space Station that was 465 Space science Spaceflight Vol 53 December 2011 The Matroshka phantom inside ISS with Expedition 11 crew members Sergei Krikalev (left) and John Phillips. scheduled to begin assembly flights in 1998. Russian scientists built another special carbon-fiber container represents the astronaut’s spacesuit. The phantom is NASA York. The MTR phantom was installed on the Spherical Phantom chamber and the known by the nickname Mr Rando, after the exterior of the Russian Zvezda module European Space Agency sponsored a new trademark name of the torso by its during an EVA by Expedition 8 astronauts Phantom Torso from the German DLR space agency. The experiment was named manufacturer, Phantom Laboratory of New Alexander Kaleri and Michael Foale on 26 February 2004. Matroshka because the sliced layers of the torso suggested the famous Russian The encapsulated Matroshka phantom was mounted on the Zvezda segment to record EVA-equivalent radiation doses. ESA The 1.1 m phantom remained in place as a sort of figurehead for the ISS for nearly 18 nesting dolls known as matryoshka. The months until it was brought back inside the project’s logo features a matryoshka doll Russian segment during another EVA on 18 with a fiery rocket tail. The Spherical Phantom (MTR-R) was August 2005. The sophisticated MTR phantom was divided into 33 ‘slices’ or deployed inside the Russian Pirs docking layers, where 354 TLD detectors were module beginning in 2004 to gather more emplaced, along with five nuclear radiation data on the dose distribution of radiation in tracking detectors. The Russian Dostel a ’tissue-equivalent’ apparatus. The devise measured radiation exposure in the Russians used a charged particle telescope (Liulin-5) to measure radiation in ‘brain’. [3] Using the Matroshka data, scientists MTR-R, and later installed bubble calculated the absorbed doses for organs of detectors to measure doses of neutrons the body (measured in SI unit micro-Grays) with the spherical phantom. and an effective dose measured in the SI The Matroshka (MTR) phantom torso was unit micro-Sieverts. These values were designed for a more ambitious radiation sampling job — to measure the dose compared to the data from personal dosimeters worn by extravehicular absorbed outside of the Station by astronauts. The surprising result for spacewalking astronauts. The torso and Matroshka researchers was that the EVA head contains natural bone material, and a dosimeters over estimated the dose by 2.1 low-density polyurethane material is used to times, which is good news for spacewalking simulate the lungs and other organs. A astronauts. 466 Space science The phantom remained operational aboard the ISS until March 2011, when the radiation sensors were removed for return to Earth on a departing Soyuz ferry. Mr Rando had been deployed aboard the Japanese Kibo laboratory since May 2010 as part of Italian astronaut Paulo Nespoli’s MagISStra mission. As a measure of its scientific significance, Matroshka has been the longest running radiation investigation on the Station, gathering data for seven straight years. The spherical phantom was re-activated on the ISS in May 2011. It was operated with new Canadian-built bubble detectors (dosimeters) for the study of neutron exposure in humans. The Russian designation for this new application is MTRRO 3. Measuring Mars The average radiation dose at Mars, as measured by the MARIE radiation instrument on the Mars Odyssey orbiter (before the Preparations to take Matroshka phantom outside the ISS during EVA in February 2004. NASA instrument failed prematurely in 2003) is twice that measured on the ISS in Earth orbit. [4] Daunted by the MARIE findings, NASA’s mission directorate in Washington authorised the Radiation Assessment Detector (RAD) to fly on the new Mars Science Laboratory (the Curiosity rover) in November 2011. The instrument will measure charged particle fluxes on the voyage to Mars, and will perform the first radiation survey on the surface of Mars. The ultimate goal of RAD is to determine how much radiation shielding will be necessary on a human mission to the red planet. The RAD experiment is a joint undertaking of the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado, and their partners at Christian Albrechts University in Kiel, Germany. [5] Future exploration Inside the head of Mr Rando. Analysis of Matroshka data continues in as early as the 2020s. The data from Matroshka will be used to also be used to validate estimates of how much shielding will be required on the laboratories around the world. The radiation calculate the maximum permissible spacecraft. studies have been motivated by the stated goal of several national space agencies to radiation doses for the human crews in What is up next for the Matroshka order to determine a reliable cancer risk phantom? According to DLR, the facility explore the Moon, asteroids and planet Mars forecast for the astronauts. The data will will be deployed once again outside the ISS in the near future. The research group References 1. A. Konradi, W. Atwell et al., “Low Earth Orbit Radiation Dose Distribution in a Phantom Head”, Nuclear Tracks Radiation Applied Instrumentation Part D, 20, pp. 49-54, 1992. 2. Hiroshi Yasuda, Guantam D. Badher et al., “Effective Dose Equivalent on the Ninth Shuttle-Mir Mission (STS-91)”, Radiation Research, 154, p.705, 2000. 3. Gunther Reitz, Thomas Berger et al., wishes to obtain another data set for EVA “Reducing Radiation Risk in Space: The Matroshka Project”, ESA Bulletin 141, February 2010. 4. Kerry T. Lee, “Martian Radiation Environment Experiment (MARIE)”, dissertation for University of Houston, 2006. 5. Greg Webster, “Sensor on Mars Rover to Measure Radiation Environment”, www.jpl.nasa.gov/news, 9 November 2010. exposure during the new solar cycle, to compare with the first deployment in 20042005. With its emphasis on protecting future exploration crews, perhaps the Matroshka experiment will one day share responsibility for the success of the first human deep space expeditions. 467
Documenti analoghi
utaprad-dim laboratory - Agenzia nazionale per le nuove tecnologie
UTAPRAD was started mostly from former Applied Physics Laboratories and a few
environmental groups at ENEA Frascati on April 20, 2010, within the process of
reorganization of ENEA Agency.
UTAPRAD m...
The NEAR Mission: Guest Editor`s Introduction
smaller. The mission operations and data analysis would eventually be limited to $35M in
FY ’92 dollars, thereby establishing limits on the complete project cycle.
Robert Farquhar derived a unique ...
life science - Texas Space Grant Consortium
have here on Earth. It is essential for the healthy crewmember to eat and drink correctly -according to space nutrition requirements -- to sleep, to exercise, and to relax. And, due to the
size lim...