Presentation by Gianni Pavan
Transcript
Presentation by Gianni Pavan
CIBRA - Centro Interdisciplinare di Bioacustica e Ricerche Ambientali Università di Pavia, Italy Go digital Gianni Pavan [email protected] www.unipv.it/cibra Short history • • • • • • • • • • Bioacoustic research started in 1980 at the Entomology Lab Initial focus on bird songs (individual and species recognition) Research required new analysis tools 1980-1988 First experiments in digital sound analysis, storage and retrieval (recording still on analog tape) 1986 First PC based sound analysis system 1988 First stand-alone full digital spectrograph KAY 5500 1989-1997 Adoption of DAT, digital transfer to PC 1990 First PC based real-time sound analysis required DSP 1991 Real-time analysis on simple PC, 1994 real-time on laptop 1998- Direct digital recording to PC Recording media: • 1980-1990 analog tapes • 1991-1997 DAT tapes (now entirely copied to HD and DVD • 1998-now HD recording on PCs 1980: 64K RAM, 640K floppies, 40 minutes for 1 second bw spectrogram 1985: colour spectrograms in 5-10 minutes 1987: spectrograms printed by a normal PC on normal paper 1990: real-time on a standard i486 PC 1994: real-time on a cheap laptop! Now: multiple channels at 192K sampling Now 1 second spectrogram computed in less than 50ms …just recording here… Tomorrow ? Advantages of PC recording •No intermediate passages •Duration limited only by inline storage •Sampling rates up to 1MHz (with suitable AD) •Multiple channels (easy to manage up to 8 ch at 192kHz) •Automatic recording, continuous, on timer, on events •Remotely (wired or wireless) controllable •Automatic filenaming •Logging of recordings, date/time, position, settings, failures, etc •Logging of metadata & user information •Recording from distributed network of PCs •Real-time visualization •Join audio and video (work in progress) Problems… •Bulky and more complex to operate than just pressing •Maybe less reliable than a stand-alone recorder •Powering for continuous operation (batteries, solar panels) SIRENA_20020713_170000_440453_0084334_2CH96K2400H44_2V_TAP_[….].wav Cuts have the same name+”cut_hhmmss”+ filter/editing info [….] may include additional info, checksum, archival code, etc …long term environmental monitoring with statistical analysis noise levels, acoustic biodiversity, unexpected events Regardless of the “recorder” you’re using… You must be aware of features rarely documented on spec sheets of consumer/prosumer products The quality of analog front-end (microphones and preamplifiers) in relation to your specific task Microphones’ self-noise (other than freq. response, linearity and directivity) Preamplifier’s noise The quality of A/D converters and related electronics Sampling rate and aliasing and …. AD OVERLOAD 0 Analog overload “brickwalling” dB aliasing 16bit -96 Mic noise Pre noise AD noise 24bit -144 0 Fs/2 (Nyquist) Fs=48,96,192kHz Soundscape recording Telinga EM23 Edirol UA25 LowPower Laptop Additional LiIon battery Optional solar panel MOTU Traveler 8channels 192K battery powered Rode NT1A 6dBA self-noise CoreSound Mic2496 preampli&AD PocketPC with 4GB CF card CoreSound PDAudio CF card Live2496 software Pocket can be replaced by MT2496 M-AUDIO MicroTrack 2496 less than 400$ Records to CF, up to 96 kHz, mono or stereo Good frequency response and antialiasing Bad phantom powering Hissy preamplifier, requires high-output mics or external preamplifiers or external AD Other compact choices: Edirol R01, R09 Marantz PMD 660 Fostex FR2-LE coming soon Larger choices: Sound Devices 702 CF only 722-744 CF+HD Fostex FR2 – excellent for 192K recording Marantz PMD 671 TASCAM HD-P2 Rode NT1A SoundDevices 722 the quietest microphones and the best recorder I ever used The weakest point of SD 722 is when running at 192kHz Most researchers don’t care enough about the performances and features of the equipment they use… Recordists are more concerned… Some $$$ amateurs have top quality equipment We can provide hints and some tests, but we can’t test all the equipment choices now available… We need to develop a common methodology for testing the equipment we use
Documenti analoghi
Bioacoustics
The DAT (Digital Audio Tape) standard is based on 16 bits of resolution and a
sampling frequency of 48000 samples/second to allow, respectively, about 90 dB
of dynamic range and a frequency respons...